Author: Karry

Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 5H Reviews
Many players may have noticed that the brand Victory has many classic mid-range rackets in the 8xx price range. Apart from the high-end material-distributed Columbia, models like Little Falcon, Little Devil Slayer, and Speed 50 have become outstanding representatives of mid-range rackets. When in doubt, choosing among these three can provide a good experience.
However, have you ever heard of a “Mid-Range Four Legends” version that includes a Yu series racket?
Specifications: 3UG5, unstrung weight 88.1g, balance point 305mm, 7.0mm Pyrofil carbon shaft, length 210mm, moderate to stiff stiffness, 76-hole aerodynamic hexagonal frame, 8—4 o’clock string grooves, warranty 34 pounds, strung with 26-28lbs NBG95.
The actual visual effect of the Yu 5H is not fully captured in pictures. The paint used is mixed with a large amount of glitter, giving the racket a very blingbling effect, and the actual color of the paint is somewhat darker than what is shown in promotional images. I find this paint job somewhat controversial; its distinctive appearance is both a benefit and a drawback as it may not align with everyone’s aesthetic preferences. As for paint durability, the previous user reported minor blemishes at the 2 o’clock position on the racket head after about a month of use, which may still be unsatisfactory. Moreover, if significant paint chipping occurs, the exposed carbon fiber color may become quite glaring. Also, the black color in the images is not pure black but a brownish shade similar to traditional Chinese medicine decoctions.
The 3U weight is quite imposing, and the reason the previous owner sold the racket aligns with some reviews on platforms like Xianyu and Zhongyu: it’s heavy and hard to handle. After testing various 3U rackets, I found that the weight distribution of the Yu 5H is quite balanced, and the overall weight is not high, making the swing load feel minimal. This initial impression conflicts with the reviews. The hexagonal frame, used in the previous Yu 1L/3F models, still maintains a balance between low wind resistance and high stability. During shuttle juggling practice, apart from a somewhat muted hitting sound compared to other rackets, there were no other unusual sensations. The difficulty reported by many players may stem from the shaft. I haven’t seen any non-collision damage cases on rackets with the Strong Stack System.
From the moment I picked it up, I was impressed by its firm and crisp feel, unlike Victory’s 76-hole string bed paired with NBG95. Initially, the stiffness of the shaft doesn’t match the actual settings, somewhat similar to the HX800LTD. However, after some use, as the initial tension of the NBG95 settles, the racket becomes more flexible, resulting in a more neutral overall stiffness for both the shaft and frame.
The elasticity of the racket is quite impressive. During warm-up, clearing shots felt smooth, with a good balance of ball feel, speed, and angle. For advanced players, the Yu 5H is quite easy to handle. However, its neutral feel means that the feedback can be somewhat ambiguous. For players with strong power who can deform the shaft, the racket feels like playing on a sponge, while for those without sufficient upper body strength, it might feel overly jarring. Although it is a mid-range model, its current settings are somewhat high, similar to the Columbia series, which targets typical head-heavy attacking players. The Yu 5H, marketed as a balanced racket, might lead some buyers to feel disappointed.
Whether it will become easier to use after breaking in, like the Speed 10, remains to be seen with long-term use by others. Currently, its firm state provides a good experience in offense. The Yu 5H is not a heavy-hitting racket; its performance relies on elasticity, requiring focused power from the user. When this requirement is met, the ball speed is impressive, with explosive performance exceeding my expectations for its swing weight, and the sound is quite sharp. As a mid-range racket, the Yu 5H’s smashing performance might be on par with its elder brother, the Yu 7K, and its lower balance point also enhances its continuity. The strong core and hexagonal frame provide excellent torsional resistance, ensuring stable shot control under various power levels, resulting in excellent performance in quick kills.
Although it performs well offensively, the 305mm balance point seems somewhat lacking in terms of sharp and shallow drop shots, with less downward pressure compared to the Yu 7K.
For players who have already purchased the Yu 5H but find it too heavy for doubles, adjusting the grip point slightly to have the thumb rest against the cone cap can reveal its strength in flat drives. With quick response and agile swings, if the finger joints can effectively generate power, it proves to be highly useful in fast-paced mid-court exchanges, with strong shots even with the 95 string. Although the balanced nature of the Yu series is often associated with creating opportunities through precise net play, I personally prefer its direct and straightforward approach. Techniques like net drops are not difficult with the Yu 5H, but its straightforward shot style makes me often forgo these options.
Of course, when repositioned to the mid-to-back court due to lifts or drives, the large sweet spot and high tolerance of the Yu 5H make actions like intercepting and slicing easier to perform.
In fact, I didn’t do enough research before acquiring this racket, and was surprised to see the Pyrofil on the shaft after receiving it, even checking the equipment library for confirmation. Overall, I really like the Yu 5H; it uses quality materials and performs well. However, its moderate stiffness means it has the characteristic drawbacks of Victory’s balanced rackets, which may not meet the expectations of the mid-range market, resulting in a rather low profile in the market.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X DF 09 Reviews
Do you remember the Yu 09 that I wrote about before? It’s understandable if you don’t, as such a basic entry-level racket rarely interests anyone and hardly sells, with its circulation being close to zero. The reason I mention it is that the Yu series is a successor to the HX series, but the HX series models were generally quite obscure.
I’ve already reviewed the more advanced HX series models, so it’s time to try out this “featureless” entry-level model. Its “fast food” simplicity fits my needs at the time.
Specifications: 4UG5, with a base, total weight 89.90g in use, balance point 292mm, 7.0mm shaft, length 215mm, medium-low hardness, diamond-cut wind frame, 72-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, warranty 23 pounds, strung with 24lbs BG6.
Surprisingly, this basic entry-level racket comes in only one color. Nevertheless, for a low-priced product, its appearance is quite good. The lake blue paint with an asymmetric frame design, and the dark-colored split at the 2 and 8 o’clock positions, give the 09 a distinctive look and a clean, fresh appearance. The racket has no advanced technology, and the use of water decals is minimal, providing a simple visual experience, cleaner and more straightforward than the summer models.
When the HX09 came out, it didn’t have the advantages of the Yu 09, and could only use a 7.0mm shaft, so its elasticity is limited. This allows for a clearer experience of its smooth swing and power feel through the low swing weight and high swing speed. It encourages users to focus on short, powerful strokes and offers a comfortable hitting feel. Although officially marked as the lowest hardness, it still has a bit of “resistance” subjectively.
The swing speed of this racket is genuinely high. Combined with its low power difficulty, it offers excellent continuity, with great feel for mid-court and net play, almost effortless. It seems lighter than the Yu 09 and better aligns with my aesthetic preferences.
Although the frame doesn’t withstand high tension well, it’s better than using FRS, which makes an already uncomfortable low-end racket even more sluggish. I quite like the feedback from the HX09. While it can’t finish off opponents with a single hit, enjoying its power and compression is quite nice, somewhat like the Wave Power 9001. Moreover, the shaft isn’t as lacking as expected. When I decide to powerfully smash, it provides decent ball speed without losing balance, allowing for some sudden shots. It somewhat resembles the overlooked HX30.
Additionally, the racket excels in one area that’s guaranteed for products in its class: its low power requirement for passive shots makes it very suitable for transitional shots. Speaking of which, why has the classic diamond-cut wind frame become so rarely used?
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 90 Reviews
It’s evident that there is a difference between outstanding items and those that are more subtle. In badminton gear, good products often compete not only across different brands but also within the same brand due to variations in cost-effectiveness and marketing. Even if a product is excellent, it may still face stiff competition. This is what I’m referring to with the HypernanoX90, the final piece in the somewhat obscure Super Nano series.
Parameters: 3UG5, stripped base, current weight 89.8g, balance point 320mm, 7.0mm shaft, 205mm length, stiff, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock grommet slots, diamond-cut wind frame, warranty 27lbs, string tension 25-27lbs, XB65.
The most striking color on the HX90 is fluorescent green. The frame features a mix of black, purple, and green with a layered, asymmetric design. The frame’s thickness isn’t exceptional, but the large frame area stands out. The paintwork is well done, with a commendable matte finish.
The HX series is known for its balanced rackets, but like the HX80, the HX90’s high stiffness and balance point make it feel stable and solid. A 3U version with a balance point of 320mm feels quite hefty during initial handling and even more so during early play. Previously, the HX80 was available in 4U, but the HX90’s remaining stock is all 3U, which presents a challenge.
The racket excels in power when leveraging the shot, but with highly elastic strings, it’s easy to overshoot. It also has a “long forehand” feel, requiring some adaptation to the swing rhythm.
The shaft uses reverse carbon technology, and thankfully, the HX90’s performance leans more towards the direct feel of the HX80 rather than a dull response. Additionally, whether due to the EM fibers or the strings, the HX90’s string bed offers a good amount of elasticity. It provides excellent initial speed in short, powerful shots and doesn’t cause erratic shots during delicate play. This balance of qualities reminds me of the HX900X.
Thus, with a strong core filling, the control is very good. The large head and sweet spot ensure a high margin for error, while the high stiffness and anti-twist capability provide precision. The heavier spec ensures stable feel, making it easy to perform quality shots like lifts, cuts, hooks, spins, and drops. The racket also demonstrates impressive power among those with reverse carbon shafts. Although the Nano 6 was also a balanced offensive racket, the HX90’s harder feel enhances the joy of attacking from the backcourt. It performs well in competitive play, providing powerful smashes.
However, the drawbacks are also apparent—slow and heavy. The diamond-cut wind frame only slightly reduces wind resistance, and even with advanced designs like the Speed Frame, the head-heavy feel of the HX90 leads to a primarily heavy handling experience, affecting quick defensive moves. The racket’s inflexibility can make fast-paced actions and net play more difficult.
The HX90 can indeed be classified as a traditional offensive racket. The 4U version would be a better choice, though even this requires a high level of skill and technique. Despite its advantages, the HX90’s performance might not stand out compared to other models, which could explain its lack of popularity in the market. Overall, it justifies its price and positioning but has a higher usage threshold. Its good elasticity requires substantial personal strength to drive it effectively, making it a near-high-end racket. With many competing models and no particularly striking features, its market performance is understandable.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 990 Reviews
It must be admitted that it is, first and foremost, a “collapsed king.” When I received it, it was still strung, and upon inspection, I found that the condition of the racket head was not ideal. However, after removing the strings, the situation wasn’t too severe, so I reluctantly accepted it. Upon further inspection, it turned out that all six holes in the racket head were problematic. If you decide to use this racket, make sure to find a responsible stringer with good skills, ideally someone who will adjust the angle of the protective tube for each stringing. For this review, the racket head was fitted with the lightest six-grommet system possible, which may have affected its performance. After replacing the grommets, it was found that the stringer didn’t rotate the protective tubes for the 2 o’clock and 10 o’clock directions, so I had to rely on their judgment.
With Wang Shixian as the spokesperson, the HX series flagship racket, designed and crafted by Victory in Taiwan, has a commendable reputation. However, it has received a score of 7.9 and mostly 4-star reviews. Strangely, the reviews include contradictory comments such as “head-heavy, stiff and hard shaft, slow swing speed” and “light head, soft middle shaft, easy to handle, faster swing speed,” which seem to describe the same racket.
A friend who has played with the entire HX series gave a negative evaluation of this racket, leading me to wonder what the HX990 is like.
Parameters: 3UG5, with bottom coating and shrink film, total weight 99.2g, balance point 300mm, 6.8mm Flash Shaft (M30J + M46J), 210mm shaft length, stiff, racket length 675mm, diamond-cut wind frame, 9-3 o’clock grommet slots, warranty 31lbs, string tension 25-27lbs, VBS66N.
The striking red base with white and black stripes and gold accents makes it hard not to notice this racket. The aggressive color scheme has a “hatred-provoking” effect, making one eager to pick it up.
After stringing, there is a noticeable head-heavy feel, which doesn’t quite align with the expected balanced design. After trying the HX900, I felt that a 3U would be better, but it seems I made a miscalculation with the HX990, especially for continuous doubles play.
Before changing the strings, I tried it with the original Li Ning No. 5 strings. The high-clearance shots were fine, and the head-heavy feel was just right for me, offering good power and a feeling of elasticity in the shaft. The diamond-cut wind frame provided a smooth swing experience, and the overall feel was on par with Victory’s flagship rackets. The response was clear with good directional accuracy and appropriate shot speed. However, there was a noticeable “sticky” feel on the string bed, making the feedback less crisp. This might be due to the large frame or shaft adjustments, showing a difference in understanding or handling of the Hypernano series between the Nanjing and Taiwan factories. The HX990 and HX900 are two distinct types of rackets.
Many of the national women’s singles players seem to prefer rackets with a “blurry” hitting feel, such as the Thruster 77. While the HX990 has a high upper limit, its feel is somewhat reserved and unremarkable. It excels in stability, control, and precision but lacks excitement. Its easily damaged nature also explains its lesser popularity.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 600 Reviews
The more I experience the HX series, the more I regret its experimental nature.
Parameters: 3UG5, with base and heat shrink wrap, total weight 98g, balance point 292mm, 6.8mm Flash Shaft middle shaft, length 210mm, hard tuning, diamond windbreak frame, 10-4 point string groove, warranty 30 pounds, strung at 25-26lbs with BG80P.
The high-end HX series paint jobs are very attractive. I haven’t encountered any mediocre ones so far. With its white base coat, silver high-gloss stickers, and overall glossy finish, the color scheme is quite orthodox, without obvious feminine or masculine aesthetic traits. However, the paint’s durability on the sharp edges of the windbreak frame still shows weakness. When I received the racket from the seller, it was in excellent condition after just a few clears. However, small blemishes appeared due to the rubbing of the rackets stacked together.
From the specifications, there is no difference between the HX600 and my HX-Sun. Both have good swing speeds when unstrung but with a slightly head-heavy feel, making the HX600 feel quite well-balanced. Except for the weight, it’s almost identical to the Sun, making me consider how to transition the review naturally to the HX-Sun before the match.
However, a fellow player pointed out that there is a difference in the middle shaft tuning between the two. After playing, I indeed noticed the difference — the HX600 has a stiffer feel. The material hardness and weight are different, making the 600’s middle shaft harder to drive compared to the Sun. While the Sun can be used as a more forgiving racket in less optimal conditions, the 600 has less forgiveness.
The HX600 excels in high clears with excellent power transfer and a solid feel. Its performance in terms of frame tolerance, handling of passive shots, defense, and small ball control is similar to the Sun, making it a good reference.
In terms of offense, the HX600 provides more explosive power. Its stiffer feel allows advanced players to get better feedback when smashing, resulting in more forceful and precise shots. On this 3U racket, the diamond windbreak frame’s torsional resistance and M46J’s excellent elasticity are well showcased. Coupled with BG80P strings, it provides a gratifying impact during smashes. However, this level of feedback has a threshold. On the day of testing, my partner’s opponent gave up after a few rallies and switched back to the Xunfeng 10U.
Notably, I also used the HX900X that day. When driving, the Pyrofil and Flash Shaft felt similar in difficulty, but the former had a more brittle feel while the latter was slightly more resilient.
Other experiences will not be detailed here. Compared to the mainstream series like Li-Ning’s Sword, Speed, and TK series, Victory has indeed made many experimental combinations in the HX series. The frame shapes used in HX are quite complex and varied. Although positioned as an all-around racket, some models clearly cater more to speed or attack. The overall characteristics of the HX series are not very clear, with significant differences between models. This might be why the series performed poorly in the market and was eventually replaced by the Yu series.
It is said that this Nanjing long racket was once available at a bargain price? The racket is quite good, but after browsing Taobao and considering its popularity and performance alternatives, the current price is just about competitive. The resale value on Xianyu is also acceptable. Finding a good deal on a second-hand one is still a good idea.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 500 power Reviews
I really dislike the “mushy” feeling of durable strings. Whether it’s for smashes or flat drives, it always makes me feel like the shuttlecock isn’t coming off the string properly, and the feedback is also less clear. It feels like a waste, especially on high-end rackets. Although I’ve played with a few rackets strung with 65 strings that felt good, they inevitably ended up being unpopular and discontinued.
Recently, I encountered a high-end racket that still performs well with 65 strings as the HypernanoX series reaches its final exploration stage. It’s truly a pity for this series.
Parameters: 3UG5, with base, total weight in use 94.9g, balance point 300mm, high-modulus carbon middle shaft, length 205mm, stiff tuning, 76-hole diamond windbreak frame, 8-4 point string groove, warranty 28 pounds, strung at 27 pounds with BG65.
The aesthetic of the HX500P in good condition is quite appealing to me, with a very layered appearance. The deep gray part of the paint uses a glossy finish with glitter, which looks quite nice up close. Besides the deep gray on the head and T-joint, the middle shaft and sides feature a non-symmetrical design with fluorescent yellow merging into white, providing a rich visual experience. The racket clearly showcases its technological features with the coefficients marked on it.
However, the paint quality is quite poor, which was a common issue with Victory products from that period. It chips easily, especially on the cone area. Even the tape from the grip can pull off the “Victor” logo on the cone after several wraps. Despite this, the frame feels quite robust, giving a powerful impression similar to the HX900X, possibly due to the wide windbreak surface on the diamond frame.
The racket feels noticeably heavy in hand, highlighting its “power” attribute as the name suggests, offering a solid experience. Although I’ve mentioned many times that the diamond windbreak frame’s performance is well-known, the HX500P’s swing is smooth but lacks the agility of faster rackets.
On the court, the power is evident. With its 3U weight, high balance point, and decent elasticity in the middle shaft, each high-clearance shot combines speed, depth, and trajectory effectively, providing a solid and reliable performance with good power. Although slightly heavier rackets may struggle in prolonged rallies, the HX500P remains effortless to use, making shots more natural in controlled exchanges.
The racket uses familiar strong core filling, enhancing stability in the diamond frame, providing excellent directional control. This is particularly noticeable in drills and defense, allowing for precise placement of shots. It has a large sweet spot, contributing to high tolerance and reducing mishits during the adjustment phase.
It’s worth noting that the HX500P isn’t a speed-oriented racket. Its moderate swing speed and noticeable string bed wrap affect its performance at the net. When opportunities are lacking, aggressive pushes are not recommended, as the heavy head may cause shots to miss the target. Instead, it’s better to use its steady advantage to create opportunities through varied net play.
Although the HX500P excels in men’s doubles and mixed doubles, its slower swing speed and string bed wrap mean it often maintains a defensive position rather than taking the initiative. However, once the initiative is gained, the racket performs excellently in aggressive play, reminiscent of the HX80 and HX900X. Its head-heavy inertia aids in driving the middle shaft and storing energy for powerful smashes, which remain effective even with 65 strings, delivering strong, fast, and well-placed shots. The feedback is clear, and smashes feel satisfying.
Unfortunately, the stiffer and heavier setup also affects performance when the user’s energy is low, making powerful smashes harder to execute, especially in mixed doubles where energy consumption is a concern. Despite the HX500P meeting my preferences, it is not a racket that can be used recklessly. I once lent it to a teammate, and its slower swing speed and heaviness made him frequently miss shots. However, he appreciated its excellent smash feel and used it for several matches. To me, the HX500P is somewhat similar to the HX900X.
Interestingly, while I’ve generally used 4U rackets for mid-range models, I’ve opted for the heaviest specifications for high-end series, possibly due to lower acceptance of 3U rackets. When matched with adequate power, 3U rackets often provide better performance in optimal conditions. For 3U balanced rackets, there’s no need to resist; adapting to them might be wiser than sticking to 4U out of comfort.
Nevertheless, the HX500 remains a competitive racket below 600, but it doesn’t change its relatively lukewarm status.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 500 Control Reviews
The most overlooked balance racket series from the Blue Factory has finally been filled in. After using the HX500P and finding that the database did not separate the two rackets, I initially thought of skipping the HX500C. Later, as updates were made and my interest grew, I decided to complete the review.
Specifications:
4UG5, with base layer, total weight 93.0g in used condition, balance point 283mm, 6.8mm Babolat carbon shaft, shaft length 208mm, medium to high stiffness, diamond-shaped frame, 9-3 o’clock grommet design, 76-hole string bed, warranty of 27 lbs, strung with 25-27 lbs KT65.
As the twin of the relatively unknown HX500P, the HX500C and P are distinctly different. This isn’t due to a difference in style but rather the color schemes: the Power version uses a black base coat, while the Control version uses a white base coat. The fluorescent yellow stickers add a touch of freshness, making the racket look more neutral and suitable for female players as well.
I haven’t used a diamond-shaped frame for a long time, and the frame shape popularized by the Nano 7 has no secrets left. While this construction was necessary back then to combine swing speed and stability, today’s material science allows for frames with better performance.
However, the racket still has a good temperament. With a larger frame area and a lower balance point, it requires less effort from the user and makes it easier to hit high clears. The face has a noticeable holding feel, familiar to those who have used the Nano 7. The short shaft gives a bit of a mismatch; with the setup for explosiveness and recovery speed, I would prefer a crisper response.
The elasticity of the racket is still excellent. As a high-end racket priced at 1280 yuan, the shaft material was top-notch at the time, though it lacks the special fibers found in other technologies like Nano Fortity/TR+/SR+/EM. The potential of the diamond-shaped frame is mostly exhausted, so the 500C falls short in torsional resistance, with deformation after stringing being average.
Compared to the 500P, the Control version has improved flexibility, making mid-court shots and counter-attacks easier and showing an advantage in swing speed. This makes the 4U HX500C more suitable for women’s singles or doubles. The short shaft’s advantage in fast-paced rallies is evident, with quick recovery and explosive power, but the holding feel on the face reduces the crispness of shots.
While the 500P also has a noticeable holding feel, it has a stiffer shaft and strong head-heavy balance, which suits aggressive play. The 500C, however, cannot avoid the issue of holding feel affecting its performance in flat drives.
The 500C excels in rear-court drop shots, providing a good feel for control and allowing for quick, precise net shots. The flexibility and hold make it good for sudden angled shots. Yet, for net play, I prefer the stable feel of the 3U HX500P.
Although labeled as Control, the 500C is not weak in attacking. Its short and powerful shaft provides excellent explosiveness, with a sharp, explosive sound. It is more akin to the 88S in the Axforce series, showing good offensive feel and consistency. However, it lacks some downward pressure, making it difficult to control the ball when physical strength wanes, a problem not present in the 500P.
The 500C is good for defense, with high tolerance and elasticity. It returns shots well in passive situations and feels good for backhand shots, though I’m not a fan of its less direct feel when using it for returns. This results in less abruptness in flat shots.
The HX series also includes the 800 series with P and C variants, with the 800C being distinctive and the 500 series focusing more on Power. While the 500C is a good racket, its diamond frame and face characteristics leave it somewhat average, creating a bit of regret and making it feel more neutral.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 60H Reviews
Regardless of how good the racket is, it often ends up being a less popular model that sells poorly, sometimes even hitting a dud, becoming a hot potato.
In this series, buyers who have been a bit of a pain are the most common…
Specifications:
4UG5, with grip tape removed and cushioning film, total weight 86.7g, balance point 298mm, 6.8mm shaft, shaft length 215mm, medium stiffness, handle length 205mm, diamond-shaped frame, 76-hole string bed, 8—4 o’clock grommet design, warranty of 34 lbs, strung with 26 lbs Li Ning No. 1 string.
The orange color is vibrant and energetic. Apart from the eye-catching color scheme, the racket still adheres to the straightforward design language of the mid-range HX series. The frame uses asymmetric coating, with bright silver stickers at the 11 and 5 o’clock positions on each side, but these are prone to fading, revealing the orange base coat. The transition from black to orange is marked by strong lines. The black-and-orange HX logo on the shaft is quite to my taste, giving a robust, industrial feel.
The frame uses FRS, which is one of Victor’s most widely used technologies and is suitable across high, mid, and low-end models. The warranty of 34 lbs suggests that the HX60H might inherit the durability of the Nano series. The diamond-shaped frame feels similar in swing, but in practice, the head-heavy feel of the HX60H seems heavier than indicated by the balance point.
Many players report that the No. 1 string is a high-elasticity string with a tendency to transmit vibrations and a wooden feel, but it pairs well with the 60H, providing better shock absorption than the previous HX30. However, the feel is relatively less clear, but this slight muddiness remains acceptable. Maintaining the characteristics of mid-to-low-end rackets, the string tension is not high, the shaft stiffness is moderate, and the diamond frame offers decent swing speed and a consistent sweet spot. The high-clear experience with the HX60H is above average and easy to handle.
When it comes to small shots, passive play, and defense, I am running out of words. After all, the entire series uses the same frame shape. Besides differences in player skill and slight variations in shaft/frame material affecting stiffness/elasticity, the large sweet spot lowers the operational threshold. Personally, I prefer rackets with clear feedback for net shots, but the 60H’s feedback for small actions is somewhat distorted, and the holding feel is not very pronounced. However, despite the limited descriptive ability, the HX60H’s relatively easy-to-drive shaft and moderate head-heavy support offer good performance in net play, backhand area, and receiving smashes.
In terms of backcourt attacking quality, the 60H ranks first among the HX mid-range models I’ve experienced. With the current string setup, it delivers threatening attacks while allowing for smooth follow-up shots. The head-heavy feel is not excessive, and the process from drawing the racket to hitting the ball is relatively smooth. The shaft’s driving force and elasticity are good, making it suitable for players between beginner and intermediate levels to perform effective smashes. Remarkably, the racket’s explosive power is fitting for its high tension capacity. Even at 26 lbs, there is still potential for releasing more power, and my full-force smashes did not experience significant shock absorption. While the HX30 provided unexpected attacking performance, the 60H’s durability for high tension and shaft tuning demonstrate deeper potential.
Additionally, although the diamond frame is said to reduce wind resistance, after numerous HX series experiences, its stability rather than speed is what leaves a lasting impression. This feeling is particularly noticeable in flat drives, contrasting with the sharpness of speed rackets. My personal experience may differ from some reviews, so please consider this with caution.
The HX60H, aimed at advanced players, is a decent racket that doesn’t fetch a high price. I even saw new ones selling for around 300 yuan on certain platforms, quite a pity.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X Sun Reviews
The latest racket is indeed quite niche—the third trial racket, the HX-SUN, a signature model of the Vice President of the Badminton Association, Sun Jun.
I wasn’t familiar with this name, so I checked the information. Coach Sun Jun was a national men’s singles player in the 1990s, known for his defensive and control play, following in the footsteps of Coach Zhao Jianhua. He was a major tournament player but retired prematurely due to health issues.
Since recovery is ongoing, the test intensity will be slightly lower; this experience is for reference only. Overall, the racket feels different from what I expected based on Sun Jun’s image.
Specifications:
Produced by Victor’s Nanjing factory, 4UG5, with grip tape removed and balance point at 306mm. The shaft is 6.8mm (M46J + M30) and 210mm in length, with medium stiffness. It features a diamond-shaped frame, 10—4 o’clock grommet design, and 23-25lbs string tension with NBG95.
The colors—navy blue, silver-gray, bright red, and white—combine to create an energetic, positive design, reminiscent of the classic color scheme of Gundam’s main characters. The frame stickers and shaft lettering are quite flashy, making the racket visually striking. Apart from the special Sun Jun signature on the shaft, the racket has a “three good” traditional quality feel, similar to classic models from the past, which I find appealing.
Although the balance point is at 306mm, it is not heavy to swing compared to the Dragon Tooth, leading me to question the mystical relationship between balance point and feel. The T-head features wind-breaking design, and the 4-6 o’clock direction includes flow channels. The diamond frame, used by Victor since the Nano 7, provides a clear and smooth wind-breaking effect. Despite the head-heavy nature leading to a slightly cumbersome feel during continuous swings, the overall process remains smooth.
After a few shots, the positioning of the SUN becomes apparent. The head and shaft have medium stiffness, while the shaft offers excellent elasticity and feedback, making it easy to deliver high-clear shots with controlled placement. The 6.8mm Flash Shaft is a mature design used in high-end rackets, explaining why models like TK15/30 were considered luxurious.
The feel for small shots is solid and reliable. The large frame and sweet spot make technical shots like drops easier to execute and offer a good sense of the ball. This wrap-around feel and large sweet spot improve the ability to break away from defensive shots, allowing for effective transitions from defense to offense in doubles. For attacking with power and precision, this racket performs well.
The racket’s attacking performance is impressive, with noticeable ball retention on the string bed but without the sticky feel of the HX990 or the dryness of the HX900. It offers a power feedback similar to the Arc 11, delivering direct power without a wooden or mushy sensation. The racket’s design requires minimal explosive force to achieve mid-shaft deformation, allowing for fast smashes and effective ground-stamping shots. The frame’s resistance to torsion is good, providing a predictable shot placement. Although it doesn’t have the rotational generation system of the Throat series, it still transitions well between heavy smashes and subsequent shots, proving effective in competitive matches.
The performance in flat drives is slightly lacking. In fast exchanges, it feels a bit sluggish, and successful predictions for intercepting shots may suffer due to swing speed issues. It remains suitable for backcourt play in doubles or singles with less power.
Regarding the NBG95 string, although it is often categorized as an all-around string among durable lines, its moderate character is not particularly favored. However, the new string’s performance is commendable, with hardness and elasticity approaching 80P and a decent holding feeling. For amateur players, it’s not economical to frequently change strings due to performance issues, and the NBG95 string’s post-tension performance does degrade, contributing to its less favorable reputation.
In my view, the SUN is a high-quality, user-friendly racket designed primarily for amateur players, with excellent feel and downforce. After receiving it, I couldn’t find any retailers on Taobao. Later, I found that new or first-hand models were priced around 500-600 yuan, with in-store prices around 800 yuan. This price is reasonable for the racket’s performance, though availability is currently uncertain. With the HX flagship discontinued, the HX-SUN continues to shine in its obscure niche. It’s a shame that such a good racket is relatively unknown. Victor’s previous marketing strategy has indeed overlooked many great products. I hope that Victor, after restructuring, will focus on improving their equipment. Ultimately, player choices depend on product quality.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X Air Reviews
I waited for this racket for over six months, experiencing a moment of reluctance, a missed opportunity, and a fortuitous encounter before finally acquiring it from an unknown female player, albeit in less-than-perfect condition. Nevertheless, this racket is almost a concluding piece for the HypernanoX series from Victory, which has been full of regrets. Securing this rare model despite various obstacles and completing my series testing holds significant value.
Specifications:
5UG5, unstrung weight of 83.0g, balance point 315mm, 6.6mm shaft, 217mm long, stiffness rated medium-stiff, elliptical aero transition diamond frame, 9-3 point grommet system, 76-hole stringing pattern, tension warranty of 26 lbs, strung at 24 lbs with BGAS string.
First off, there were quality control issues; I discovered a rattling sound after receiving it. However, considering that during its release many high-end models from Victory were collapsing or cracking, a rare model like this having such a minor issue seems less concerning.
The deep blue base coat, combined with a lot of gold foil stickers on the aero frame, is very prone to damage! Despite this, the asymmetrical design and vibrant colors give it a universally appealing look suitable for both genders.
If it weren’t for the prominent HX branding emphasizing its lineage, it might fit better within the Speed series. Nonetheless, regardless of series, the Air model stands out among the Blue Factory’s high-end rackets today. It lacks the Flash Shaft and Pyrofil labeling, instead using Toray’s prepreg fabric. The equipment library shows the Air’s shaft as 7.0mm, but visually it appears more slender. Its unconventional design was my first impression.
I previously held the view that a super-light racket used for serious play should have a firm shaft, and the Air excels in this.
The seller paired it excellently, and I instantly fell for the Air’s hitting feel. The hard yet elastic AS string complements the Air’s own firm and elastic setup. Despite only 24 lbs tension, the feedback is substantial. The 5U weight and 315mm balance point make it easy to handle the shaft’s deformation, providing a very comfortable experience for high clears, without the effort and dissatisfaction of many ultra-light rackets. Even without the top-tier Bolo carbon, the shaft quality is top-notch.
Remarkably, it has no obvious power loss; you can even execute powerful smashes to pressure your opponent.
Surprisingly, the racket’s forgiveness level is extraordinary for a Speed model—no surprise given its frame type. The 76-hole stringing pattern provides consistent sweet spot size and performance, with no awkwardness or issues like mis-hits from strange swing speeds or weights. This could be the best 5U flagship model from the Blue Factory. High swing speed, excellent leverage, and stable string bed make it incredibly user-friendly.
Additionally, the larger hitting area makes it easier to hit accurate shots at the net, allowing smooth execution of techniques like flicks, drops, and pushes, with consistent feel.
However, to label it simply as a “soft feel” racket would be a significant understatement. In my testing, it demonstrated considerable attacking capability. The 5U Air supports string tensions up to 26 lbs, and the 4U version goes up to 27 lbs, meeting the needs of advanced players for various scenarios. It is a firm racket with excellent elasticity; even at 5U, it performs well under explosive smashes, comparable to the NF800LT with decent smash power and excellent attacking continuity. The racket maintains high efficiency in energy transfer to the shuttle, and the threshold for effective smashes is relatively low. Well-placed smashes can directly score points.
Its performance in flat drives is noteworthy, with good shaft recovery speed and fast swing speed, retaining the Speed series feel. Defense and transitioning to attack are also comfortable, avoiding the net errors common in some ultra-light rackets.
Having previously worked with various electronic products, I’ve noticed a pattern: Creativity Air, iPad Air, MacBook Air—good products. Hence, the HypernanoX Air is also a good product, without any faults.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 80L Reviews
Here we are again with another mid-range model from the HX series. This series is vast and complex, so it would seem challenging to complete a comprehensive review. However, as I write, the progress is better than expected—probably because some rackets in this series are easier to acquire, which only underscores the somewhat sad state of the HX line.
HX80L, just looking at its specs, is almost a high-end model, and there’s also a sibling without the “L” suffix. HX20H and HX30 are great entry-level choices, while HX80L… well, it’s more for reference.
Specifications:
4UG5, unstrung weight of 86.4g, balance point 289mm, 6.8mm shaft (220mm long), stiffness rated medium-stiff, tested as medium, diamond aero frame, 8—4 point grommet system, 76-hole stringing pattern, tension warranty of 26 lbs, strung at 24–26 lbs with VBS70.
It’s clear that the HX80L has an attractive appearance. The predominantly white racket, with subtle patterns on the frame aside from its tech features, gives it a fresh look—standard practice to make a racket look more appealing. This aligns with the trend of “L” suffix models being generally aimed at female players. However, as with many brands, the paint job quality starts to show after some use. The prettier the racket, the worse it looks after it gets scratched.
When it comes to dry swings, there’s not much to say—the overall stiffness isn’t high, and the swing feels quite light and agile. It’s a balanced racket but doesn’t feel particularly responsive in hand. Many players may have used the Nanoray 7, so I’ll just say it feels like a slightly lighter Nanoray 7.
The shaft on the HX80L uses the same rebound nanotube technology as the HX100. While the latter felt much stiffer than advertised, the HX80L feels a notch softer than its rated stiffness. If it’s not a formula error, then it’s likely that this shaft’s stiffness degrades more significantly over time. The tech description mentions that this innovation should enhance the shaft’s elasticity, but during overhead clears, it felt like a standard entry-level racket—easy to use with decent swing speed and directional accuracy, but nothing more to note.
I brought both the HX80L and FX04 to my company’s game for testing, switching seamlessly between the two. Comparing them, the HX80L felt slightly stiffer and a bit crisper on shuttle contact. Paired with the relatively hard VBS70 strings, the racket’s control in the frontcourt and net play was quite solid, giving me confidence. Its lightweight nature made it easier to push and flick to the backcourt, creating some offensive opportunities. However, when transitioning to the backcourt for attack, the control-oriented clears weren’t particularly fast. While it’s forgiving, it lacks the element of surprise. Overall, the entire experience felt mild and uneventful throughout testing. It seems that Victory’s 76-hole stringing pattern indeed helps enhance shuttle hold.
As for flat drives and defense, there isn’t much new to say. Like many soft-shaft rackets, its performance was similar to the FX04—probably 90% comparable.
For male players, this racket might feel a bit dull, as there’s nothing exceptional about its offensive quality—quite average. To rule out the possibility that my high-end racket usage was making me overly picky, I swapped with a colleague’s 4U TK15 for smash practice. Both rackets are non-head-heavy, but the smash quality of the HX80L was noticeably inferior. Its continuity was acceptable given its weight and specs, but the smash power left little to be desired. The technology’s advertised benefits, like enhanced elasticity, were not fully realized, except for the slight softness. With a max tension of 26 lbs, if you want to make aggressive shots, switching to more traditional offensive strings is necessary.
I wanted to get some satisfaction from the soft, elastic feedback, but the HX80L struggled to deliver any excitement. When I wasn’t in good form, all I felt was a bland, watered-down sensation.
In summary, the HX80L doesn’t need to overdo it with fancy technology. Its core filling does provide a more stable feel and better control, with good shock absorption, but I didn’t experience any noticeable elasticity enhancement. The soft, balanced feel seems aimed at female players. It feels solid at first, but over time, you’ll notice that its elasticity is better than the HX20H but still falls short of the HX100. Perhaps the shaft’s performance deterioration affects its feel, and it lacks the impact of true high-end models. When considering a mid-range option from the HypernanoX series, the HX80L is an average, middle-of-the-road choice.
Writing this review, I can’t help but think of the Duora 6.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 100 Reviews
Whenever there’s a clearance sale, it always heats up some lesser-known, niche rackets. At lower prices, the trial and error cost of these rackets decreases significantly, which broadens their user base. This allows the characteristics of these rackets to be more thoroughly explored and understood, often reversing their reputation.
HypernanoX 100 — I’ve witnessed this racket being sold at terrifying clearance prices, going for as low as 249 RMB for a bare frame in some stores, despite it being an entry-level high-end racket from one of the big three brands. With 80% of the full tech package advertised, even second-tier or independent brand flagships couldn’t compete.
However, after snatching up a bargain, few people would care to explore why it ended up in clearance in the first place.
Specifications:
3UG5, fully strung weight of 96g, balance point 291mm, 6.8mm shaft (210mm long), stiff tuning (although marked as medium), diamond aero frame, strung at 27 lbs with BG65ti.
The racket looks great, with a cherry red color scheme that even tough guys might tear up over. The various layers of patterns and color blocks create a very distinct visual depth. Although other models in the same series—like the 990 and 900 in red, or the 600 and Sun in navy blue, or even the 800 in black—may stand out visually, none of them appeal to me as much as the 100. In addition to the color, the asymmetrical design of the frame’s pattern is quite detailed, which should be enough to attract many players.
When held in hand, the HX100 should be suitable for both beginner female players and intermediate male players. Unless you severely lack strength, the 3U version is likely the better choice. The balance point isn’t high, so the racket feels light to swing with little burden. The feel is solid enough, and opting for a 4U version might lead to the racket feeling too floaty. With its swing speed and weight, the HX100 seems more suited for doubles play.
During warm-up rallies, you can feel that the HX100 requires some effort to generate power; it’s not an effortless racket. Besides the high string tension and light head making it harder to utilize, the shaft is a major point of criticism. At first, the racket feels stiff and jarring on impact, with noticeable shaft stiffness that contradicts its advertised medium-flex label. Other feedback from players in my gear library echo this opinion. Based on my experience, this racket needs a break-in period. After owning it for about a month now, I can feel the shaft gradually becoming more manageable, but the overall playing experience still leans stiff. As a high-end model, this 6.8mm shaft doesn’t feature technologies like Flash Shaft or Pyrofil; instead, it just has a modified material formula with nanotubes. Perhaps the experimentation wasn’t enough, as the playing experience doesn’t match the promotional claims, suggesting a mismatch between the technology and performance, leading to a disjointed playing feel.
The HX100 doesn’t communicate feedback consistently with each shot, and this disconnect affects the interaction between player and racket. For instance, during a powerful smash, the racket’s offensive potential is evident, with enough strength to deliver a floor-smashing shot. The balanced weight also makes it easy to generate power, with decent precision. However, compared to other high-end rackets that give a distinct sense of elasticity and rebound after a strong hit, the HX100 lacks a recognizable feel. Regardless of angle or power, the feedback feels the same, which can be likened to clapping hands with someone who doesn’t want to participate.
The HX100 performs well for active, power-based shots with crisp shuttle release, but its feedback characteristics make backcourt slice shots and net play unfriendly. Frequent errors in backcourt shots remind you to put in extra effort, and when paired with the BG65ti strings, it’s all too easy to lift the shuttle too high in net play, losing any advantage in net battles. In defense, I frequently encountered puzzling mishits—swinging early before the shuttle arrived or missing shots even when the direction was correct. This is rare and could either point to a torsion issue with the racket or just me being off my game. It’s also harder to lift smashes, which doesn’t correlate with the size of the racket’s string bed or frame.
In summary, after multiple tests, I found that when I’m in good form and able to respond to each shot, especially in favorable conditions, the HX100 can offer a satisfying experience with its solid shuttle release. However, when my form is off and I need more support from the racket, particularly in defense-heavy situations, the HX100 becomes inexplicably uncooperative. The switch between these states can happen within just a few minutes during a game.
For beginners, I wouldn’t recommend this racket. While it has the looks and decent product quality, now that it’s returned to its normal price range, I think other mid-tier rackets from Victory would offer a more controllable experience for most players. At around 300 RMB, the HX100 is still a good deal, but you’ll need to invest some time in breaking it in—and it may not be the most enjoyable process.
September 13, 2024