Badminton Racket Kawasaki NEZER X Reviews

Jayce October 9, 2024 0

A prolonged front line isn’t necessarily a good thing. Last year, Kawasaki’s Razer 1916 came in two versions with distinct performance orientations, catering to different preferences. This year, inspired by that, they released three new models, but none of them have quite met my expectations, indicating that the fast-moving product strategy may be a bit too aggressive.

Until yesterday, when I tested the Razer X, I finally found a racket that felt more harmonious to use.

Specifications: 4U G5, unstrung weight 95.3g, balance point 293mm, 6.8mm shaft, 46T material, handle length 215mm, medium stiffness, aerodynamic frame, 76-hole string bed, 3-9 o’clock grommets, warranty for 30lbs, strung with 25-27lbs KT66F.

The design language of this year’s three Razer models is the same, with only the color tones differing. The X model shares the same level as the Y, and the deep base color combined with the bright purple-red seems to hint at its aggressive nature. Due to the color difference, the snake scale stickers at the 4 and 8 o’clock positions on the frame are more noticeable.

Among speed rackets, the Razer X feels quite neutral, with a slight head-heavy feel combined with the 4U specification. The shaft stiffness isn’t high, and initially, it feels a bit like a “sugar-water” racket due to the shaft deformation and the large sweet spot. The initial feel is easy and elastic, but one needs to adjust the power to avoid hitting long. The current specifications could use a bit more stiffness; it has a bit of a “power loss” feel initially and lacks some explosiveness.

Nevertheless, the elasticity ensures a good speed of shot, providing effective pressure in flat clears, though the power still needs to be controlled. The overall torsional resistance is not outstanding but acceptable, and control over long shots requires further refinement.

Compared to the Razer Y and Z, the X allows me to experience speed and agility more easily, though it is the one with the highest balance point among the three. In flat drives and receiving smashes, this racket can push my reaction limits, creating an adrenaline rush during intense exchanges. However, the shaft’s lack of stiffness leads to slower recovery after bending, causing occasional instability during play.

My biggest dissatisfaction with it is its performance during decisive attacks. The slightly higher balance point provides good downward pressure but cannot compensate for the soft shaft, which limits the racket’s ability to support more explosive power. Although this type of racket still has advantages in speed and continuity, the lack of a winning shot capability impacts confidence during powerful smashes.

Overall, this racket is a fairly standard speed-oriented “sugar-water” racket with a modest upper limit. Its strengths lie in its accessibility, paint quality, and the thoughtful design of the racket cover. While I know it may not accompany me in more rigorous competitions, its ease of use provides a comforting experience. Out of the three models, the X has left a steady and controllable impression throughout my usage.