Badminton Racket Lining Flame N50 I Reviews

Introduction Statement: Evaluations have a lot of subjective elements, and differing opinions can exist, but let’s avoid arguments!

Racket History: Starting with history, this classic old racket is the first-generation product released after Li-Ning sponsored the national team in 2009. The endorser was Fu Haifeng, known for his powerful shots. Those familiar with Bao Ge know that he preferred rackets with a relatively soft shaft and a certain weight in the head. Such rackets have a high swing weight and powerful shots. (This review discusses the retail version of the endorsed racket, not the CP version.)

Li-Ning’s first-generation rackets were generally comparable to those used by players before. The N501 clearly targeted the Yonex ArcSaber 10. The specific feel will be discussed later, so it won’t be elaborated on here.

Besides Bao Ge, national team players like Jin Boss, Huang Yaqiong, and Chen Qingchen also used the N501 for a period. If the national team hadn’t changed sponsors, the N501 might have accompanied Chen Qingchen at the Tokyo Olympics.

Even Lin Dan briefly put down his N90 I and used the N50 I (source screenshot from Bilibili). The racket’s suitability for aggressive play is self-evident.

It’s worth mentioning that Bao Ge won the World Championship in 2009 using this racket. You can search for the video if interested.

Appearance: The red, white, and gray color scheme immediately brings to mind the red ArcSaber 10. The overall look of the racket is quite aesthetically pleasing, with a subdued dark red base color that becomes increasingly attractive and refined with use. Li-Ning’s attention to paint details and quality was outstanding. Back then, racket colors were not as bright or bold as today, so while the N501 might not be stunning now, it remains elegant and understated, like a fine tea that still has flavor when it cools.

Feel: After removing the base and stringing, the overall weight is 92g, with a balance point at 305mm. It’s not an extreme power racket, but with the high balance point, it’s still quite powerful.

The swing weight is very heavy and solid, making it feel like a “meteor hammer.” Is it powerful? I think it’s sufficiently so, though Lin Dan and Lee Chong Wei might not agree. As always, preferences vary, and there’s no need to be overly critical!

The shaft of the N50 I is softer compared to the ArcSaber 10 but has similar resilience (referring to the flex feel when squeezed). It has a similar hitting feel to the ArcSaber 10 (not very elastic but suitable for powerful shots). Li-Ning’s first-generation rackets had distinct and user-friendly shafts. Today, they may not be considered stiff, but those who like them (like me) find them very satisfying. The feel is solid and reminiscent of archery with a curved bow. For those who don’t like it, the feedback might be wooden or soft. Overall, the first-generation shaft is relatively elastic.

Regarding overall weight, as a balanced racket, I believe the weight doesn’t significantly affect the feel; it’s more about the balance point. Therefore, I won’t stir up any debate about 3U vs. 4U. Ultimately, practice and strength are more important than worrying about weight.

The frame design is a large frame, almost identical to the ArcSaber 10, featuring a box frame with a fluid frame design in the middle. The main advantage is maintaining the box frame’s power while ensuring some degree of hand speed for defense and front-court play. Of course, the actual effect depends on individual ability, as the racket’s technology cannot compensate for 90% of players’ abilities.

Horizontal Comparison: The comparison with the ArcSaber 10 has been briefly covered. Here, the focus is on comparing Bao Ge’s other racket—the Kason F9.

Having used many rackets, I find Bao Ge’s rackets quite unique, especially since he endorses balanced rackets, which is a contrast that adds a touch of surprise!

The F9 has several similarities with the N50 I:

  1. Similar paint color, both featuring a dark red base.
  2. Both have a soft, resilient shaft.
  3. Both feature a large frame, suitable for all-around play.

Differences include:

  1. The F9 has a special wind-breaking frame design with “Energy Axe” technology, offering faster swing speed than the N50.
  2. Different price points and awards.
  3. Different brands (Kason is cheaper but has more counterfeit issues).

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

      Leave a reply

      Badminton Pro Guide: News, Players, Gear, and Expert Reviews
      Logo
      Register New Account
      Compare items
      • Total (0)
      Compare
      0