Badminton Racket Lining HC1800 Reviews
Li-Ning’s series is aimed at beginner players. In fact, I’ve heard of HC’s entry-level models priced below 200 yuan, specifically the HC1900. I remember seeing a few kids from my partner’s family playing with an HC1900, and to this day, I still regret not taking that racket away from them.
“Why didn’t I just take the kid’s racket?”
Recently, I managed to get an HC1800 at a low price, so I can finally explore the true nature of this series.
Specifications: 3UG5, without grip tape, total weight in use 89.8g, balance point 305mm, shaft length 220mm, medium stiffness, box frame, 9–3 point grommet positioning, 72-hole stringing pattern, tension warranty of 26 lbs, strung at 25 lbs with VBS70 strings.
One significant advantage that the “Red Factory” has over other first- and second-tier brands is the effort they put into improving the paint quality of mid- and low-end products. The version I have is black and gold. Despite some scuffs left by the previous owner, the racket still looks quite appealing when in good condition. The subtle gradient of gold on the racket head, though simple, adds a layered feel to the design, while the dark color gives it a more premium appearance. With a few more decorative touches, I believe I could easily claim this as a mid-range racket before using it.
Additionally, Li-Ning rackets are indeed quite sturdy, as is the case with the HC1900 that was mishandled but still durable. This HC1800 has withstood many bumps and remains solid.
I used this racket around the same time as the previous two models, and during the racket-switching process, I quickly noticed that the HC1800 has the strongest head-heavy feel. The overall weight is not much different, but this indicates its more attack-oriented positioning.
The slight increase in weight ensures a solid feel without adding too much burden. In terms of clears, its hitting feel is better compared to the previous two models. This can be attributed not only to the ideal state of the VBS70 strings but also to the head-heavy feel providing easy follow-through, the moderately tuned long shaft, and the large sweet spot on the string bed. Even with the added weight, it remains an easy-to-handle product.
The shaft feels slightly stiff but not too soft, giving it a decent sense of quality.
I can say the HC1800 behaves well in all aspects, making it a balanced product. Stability is my first impression. Especially during wide, high clears or soft, controlled smashes, it offers better direction and shot feel compared to the previous two models, providing a sense of reliability. When the shuttle doesn’t land as expected, the HC1800 responds with subtle adjustments.
Also, due to its more pronounced head heaviness, the HC1800 doesn’t disappoint in attack. Though it doesn’t offer high elasticity, during fast swings against incoming shots, the high balance point ensures a strong downward feel when hitting. You can feel the shuttle being driven down during a swing, and in the same class, it doesn’t have a noticeable loss of power. With better strings, I believe more advanced players could land two or three powerful, hammer-like shots.
However, the usual caveat applies: this racket’s setup isn’t suited for fast-paced exchanges. In doubles, it lacks agility, whether it’s intercepting at the net, flat drives in the mid-court, or handling fast-paced defense and smashes from both sides. The longer shaft and greater wind resistance reduce the racket’s maneuverability. Moreover, since it’s inherently head-heavy, the higher the intensity, the more likely the arm and wrist joints will tire.
Still, it’s a pretty decent racket, one that can be used for a long time and isn’t just for fun. While there’s a brand premium, the HC1800’s price is still reasonable.