Jayce
Anyone who has used the Nano 6/7 is probably more than four years old by now, well I’ve at least shot myself in the foot. The fact that the originals of these two rackets are still available and that there are imitations of these rackets is off the charts. While it’s true that I have never used the Nano 6, it’s not necessary to find an old mid-range with the right roots to beat down for this purpose, after all, Victor knew enough to at least give it a new holster with the HpernanoX name to sell.
However, there are better upgrades available.
Parameters: 3UG5, de-bottomed, total weight of 91.6g in use condition, balance point 299mm, 6.6mm mid-rod, 210mm long, moderate hardness, power hexagonal frame, 8-4 point line slot, 76-hole line bed, 28lbs warranty, pull line 26-28lbs vbs66n.
Hands down, the IP is not used for nothing. One of the most classic elements of the nano 6, the ip, is the rose gold color scheme, and the Harness Nano 6 now has the tuning to have the ability to make it look even better. Nano 6 came out at that time iphone4 are not yet shadow na, Victor this wave is not leading the trend? Compared to the silly old model, this time the Harness does look and feel a lot more advanced texture.
By the way, although it is one of the notable features, this trial share does not explore the degree of solidity, there is no such opportunity, but also hope that all of you have the experience of crashing the racket of the ball do not really take it on the court to take revenge.
Other than that, 3U’s dxn6 is still the same balanced tuning strategy as the old Nano, but it still has some weight to swing, and you can’t expect it to be a speed racket with a rounded frame without a high balance point, and it’s not a racket that can be speeded up at any time. Other than that, the frame stability, sweet spot tolerance, the feeling of borrowing power are online, not too difficult to get started.
Everyone says that the old Nano is wooden, and the main reason for the wood is still the elasticity defect of the center stick. In order to correct this shortcoming, Victor seems to have made a great deal of money to give it a 6.6mm center stick, and then used a large bold font to write this information on the cone cover is very rough and lack of ambition, a “who still say that I am wood” feeling of complacency, as for the actual experience well… …
As for the actual experience, well … … more than the anti-emitting carbon tube this charming technology, dxn6 or hair wood, and almost hx100 the same model. The old nano heart comfort, the spirit has been inherited …… joke ends here, the new shoot up the initial period of time in the middle of the club performance is indeed still not in the state, play a little more there is a half an hour or so after the process of opening the ball hit the feedback feeling becomes natural. There is a slightly more pronounced hold on the ball, a bit meaty, which is a classic feature of the old Nano, but the solidity is still there, and it is a pleasure to use.
When you open up the shot, you will experience a NAMD-like feeling in heavy kills, and the whole racket will be a little bit stiffer at the moment of hitting the ball. When the front cable is pulled to the 26-28 level, the feedback from the racket face is quite clear, so the feeling of killing the ball is not ambiguous.The significance of upgrading the 6.6mm center stick is revealed at the moment, and the upper limit of the Harness 6 is not too low for players with good explosive power, and it can be ranked as a mid-range racket, which is not worse than some of those who have used the Bellow Carbon.
But then, the Harness 6 demands a lot more from the player in the downswing, and it’s not as sugary. It can stand up to the shorter bursts of power that come with hitting the ball, but it’s certainly a lot less fun to leisurely hit a downward-pressing drive with racket weight alone. Especially at the end of the set, using this racket is physically demanding.
But with the power hex frame, and a much thinner frame, especially at 12 o’clock, Victor must have found a way to make the Nano 6 more flexible. And just as I was confidently speeding through doubles, I regretted it – the flat draw block performance was still rather mediocre and off. Maybe the 4U has improved, but the old Nano isn’t a speed winning racket per se, so let’s forget about it.
You can’t pump the forecourt, but you can still control it to death. The frame shape of the Harness series is really for stability, and the Nano 6 with this frame shape has good stability supported by a solid feel. The feel of the net for small balls is quite stable, and the quality of the net release, roll, push and pick, and unloaded net blocking can reach a high level very quickly. Although I don’t really like to use it for hooking or faking due to the swingweight, for players who are looking for more purposeful shots, the Harness 6 has the upper limit of executing the shot commands as well as the high-end rackets. Play slower, play slower and everything is better.
The old Nano was on the verge of becoming a big ip for Victor, and while its performance has certainly improved a lot with the material upgrades that have been made to it in the new era, the ability and patience required to treat it has increased. You can buy it, but you still need to buy it and play it a bit more to get used to it and appreciate how good it is slowly.
