Jayce
Another entry in the HX series, the HX80L represents a mid-range model. Given the vast and diverse range within this category, completing it would be quite a challenge. Surprisingly, the coverage so far has been quite decent, possibly because some models in this series are easier to acquire, which highlights the overall lackluster nature of the HX series.
The HX80L, in terms of specs, is almost high-end, and it has a sibling without the “L” suffix. The HX20H and HX30 are quite good entry-level rackets, while the HX80L… well, it’s just worth mentioning for reference.
Parameters: 4UG5, full-spec 86.4g, balance point 289mm, 6.8mm shaft 220mm length, hardness marked as medium hard but actually medium, diamond aerodynamic frame, 8-4 o’clock grommets, 76-hole string bed, 26 lbs warranty, string tension 24-26 lbs VBS70.
Visually, the HX80L is appealing with its white base color and subtle, light-colored water-mark patterns on the frame. This design is a common technique to make the racket look fresher, which fits the trend of “L” suffix models generally being more suited for female players. However, after extensive use, the quality of the paint and finish of the racket reveals typical issues, with more attractive rackets showing more wear and tear over time.
The initial feel during dry swings doesn’t offer much to discuss. The racket’s overall hardness is not high, the swing speed is reasonably quick, and it is a balanced racket but not particularly responsive. For those familiar with the Nano 7, the HX80L feels like a slightly lighter version of that.
The HX80L uses the same repulsion carbon tube as the HX100. Previously, the HX100 felt much stiffer than its rating, while this one feels softer than its marked medium hard. This could be due to noticeable degradation in shaft hardness. Despite the promotional claims that this technology improves the resilience of a soft shaft, it doesn’t show up in high-clearance shots, making it feel like a typical entry-level racket—easy to use, with decent directional control and swing speed.
Testing alongside the FX04, the HX80L felt slightly stiffer and delivered a bit crisper shots. With the VBS70 strings, it had good control in the front court and could create opportunities for proactive plays due to its lightness. However, its rear court performance, especially for smashes, lacked the surprise factor. It had a somewhat dull and uninspired feel throughout the test. The 76-hole string bed does increase the ball feel.
For male players, the racket might seem quite unremarkable due to its average offensive quality. To rule out any impact from recent high-end rackets affecting my sensitivity, I compared it to a 4U TK15 from a colleague, which showed a noticeable difference in smash quality. The HX80L’s capability for continuous play was acceptable, but it fell short in terms of aggressiveness, especially with a 26 lbs warranty. For more aggressive shots, traditional offensive strings would be needed.
The HX80L doesn’t provide much excitement in terms of feedback. During poor performance periods, the only sensation I felt was a somewhat bland one.
In summary, the HX80L’s technology doesn’t need to be overly elaborate. The core filling does offer a more stable feel and better directional control, with good vibration dampening. However, it doesn’t provide the added elasticity that the higher-end models offer. The soft and balanced nature seems to be aimed at female players. The initial solid feel might be nice, but over time, the elasticity falls short compared to the HX20H and certainly doesn’t reach the level of the HX100. This could be due to the degradation in shaft performance, making it a decent but not exceptional choice within the HypernanoX mid-range. It reminds me of the Double Blade 6.
