Tag: Badminton Racket

羽毛球球拍

Badminton Racket Bonny STAR SHADOW Reviews
Playing badminton has become a luxury beyond my reach. Even during work events, my physical condition no longer allows me to accelerate and exert power like before; I struggle more often now. Although it’s not the first time I’ve faced this situation, a friend still recommended to me the Star Shadow, Star Illusion, and Star Cloud.
Specs:
4U G5, with base grip. Total weight: 92.4g in playing condition. Balance point: 283mm. Shaft length: 220mm, flexible shaft. Fluid box-shaped frame, 76-hole string bed, grommets at 9–3 o’clock, tension limit of 26 lbs, strung with 24-26lbs VBS66N.
I know that Babolat’s recent “Sky Series” includes three models, with slight differences in their paint jobs but a consistent overall style. The Star Illusion features a rose gold and cream white color scheme, giving it a warm and cozy feel. There are orange and light green stars and stripes on the frame for decoration. Although simple, the design is harmonious and not overly flashy, emphasizing a refreshing look. Unfortunately, the painting technique isn’t top-notch, as the surface has a rough texture. There’s an old saying: “The pinker the racket, the stronger the smash,” but the “Sky Series” rackets are quite rare in that their appearance lacks any aggressive vibe, making them likely more appealing to players who focus on the joy of badminton itself.
I already knew this was an entry-level racket, but when I first held the Star Shadow, I was still charmed by its lightness. Although it has a box-shaped frame, the thickness of the frame is relatively thin, and the beveled edge design aids airflow, giving this 4U racket impressive swing speed. Unlike those ultra-light rackets with extremely high balance points and very low weight, it still feels like a normal racket. There’s no “flail” feeling while swinging, and although the shaft is soft, it still feels responsive. The lower balance point provides agility without sacrificing a solid, reliable grip. Even female beginners with less power can feel that this is a racket they “can handle.”
After testing many high-end rackets designed for victory on the court, using extreme head-heaviness or swing speed, and employing a lot of calculation and resources to create unique feels, the Star Shadow is simpler, offering a natural feeling with a high level of usability.
Of course, any racket should be tested on the court to see how it performs. The Star Shadow‘s long, flexible shaft makes it easy to generate shaft flex during swings, and in all shots like clears and smashes, you can feel the shaft’s elasticity at work. While the elastic quality doesn’t exceed its price range, the ease of accessing that flex gives players confidence in their tactical moves. The Star Shadow feels like a beginner tutorial in a game, making it easy for both me and beginners to hit clears effortlessly to the backcourt. Only after completing this “beginner village” task and gaining a sense of achievement can you start optimizing your clear strokes. With its easy power, fast swing, and reliable feel, the Star Shadow naturally becomes a great first racket for a beginner.
This performance naturally reminds me of the lower-spec NF600 (aka Bluebird), but the Star Shadow feels a bit more refined, both in appearance and in subjective feel.
However, I can’t avoid discussing its competitive performance. The racket’s elasticity and moderate head heaviness are not outstanding, but the overall tuning of the Star Shadow gives it two key strengths: speed and stability.
The Star Shadow has fast swing speed and perhaps the best shuttle-holding ability I’ve seen in recent entry-level rackets, allowing it to handle slightly faster-paced exchanges.
Speed is easy to understand, but its stability comes from its high forgiveness. I used to attribute increased forgiveness to the string bed and sweet spot size, and while these are indeed strengths of the Star Shadow, its ease of use is also key. With this racket, you don’t need to be overly tense; even if you can’t always find the optimal hitting point, its easy-to-drive nature helps you recover better. In other words, its performance on defensive shots, such as lifting smashes, feels particularly comfortable. This is something I haven’t experienced in the past three to four months of trialing entry-level rackets.
As for the downsides, they are quite obvious: a lack of absolute offensive power and slower response in fast exchanges, especially the former. Its confidence in downward strokes can’t match some classic entry-level choices, but for beginners or players looking to take it easy, this isn’t critical. What’s important is the feeling of power and shuttle feedback on each return, experiencing the pure joy of swinging the racket and hitting the shuttle, or refining your technique and ball control without relying on technological enhancements. It can be both a toy and a tool. For a racket in this category, and for someone like me who can’t currently face the game with a competitive mindset, it’s more than adequate and excellent.
Currently, the racket is priced at 299 RMB. Even if you’re drawn to it for the aesthetics, paying the full price may not feel entirely justified. However, Babolat rackets are typically offered with discounts by certain retailers, and I think it would be a reasonable purchase if you can get it at a price on par with or slightly lower than the HMR.
September 20, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny Tao Yao Zhuo Hua Reviews
What makes lower-end products sell like hotcakes?
Is it the unmatched brand appeal of Green? The vast product line accumulated over time by Blue? The stunning design of Red? Or the unparalleled return-and-exchange service of Yellow?
Without these advantages, second-tier and independent brands are too conservative in their approach, usually relying on lower prices and better materials to compete. In recent years, some manufacturers have started focusing on packaging and presentation, offering thoughtful gifts that make people feel they’re getting good value. This has made their products much more competitive. But soon, these practices were copied, leading to a cycle of competition at the same price range, preventing anyone from truly standing out.
Specifications:
4UG5, no grip tape, 87.0g in use, balance point 292mm, shaft length 218mm, low stiffness, box-type frame, 72-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock grooves, rated for 26 lbs, strung at 24-26 lbs with Gaosen Steel Armor 5.
Tao Yao and Zhuo Hua from the same series are essentially the same racket, differentiated only by their paint jobs. Both come with a gift box. Zhuo Hua is blue, with a deep blue gift box featuring minimal design elements. The box itself is of good quality, offering decent protection when mailed and also looking nice if given as a gift. However, once opened, the contents are quite minimal, with only a racket cover inside. Although the racket is priced at just under 300 yuan, I’d actually be willing to pay a bit of a premium to get more surprises—grip tape, strings, socks, towels, wristbands—those extra touches would give it a more sincere feel.
Bolly has suffered from poor racket designs in the past but has finally wised up in recent years, paying more attention to the appearance of products across its low, mid, and high-end ranges. Tao Yao and Zhuo Hua feature a blend of traditional Chinese fonts with a fresh design, with white, gray, and blue as the main colors. There’s a gradient transition between gray and white on the shaft and frame, with a few blue lines wrapped around as accents, and subtle patterns on the racket head. Overall, it looks pleasing. At the 2 and 10 o’clock positions, there’s a floral motif that ties into the racket’s theme.
I did my homework—Tao Yao and Zhuo Hua are based on a racket I’ve reviewed before, so I didn’t experience anything particularly new during testing. It fits its positioning as a soft, flexible, lightweight, and easy-to-use racket. That said, I still roped in my team captain at work and forced him to use it in a match.
He was adjusting to the new racket that day, and his performance was quite shaky—which is exactly when a beginner-friendly racket shines. One thing to note: I only handed him the racket right before the match, that’s how confident I was in its ease of use.
True to form, our captain finished the entire match without a single complaint or a frame hit, which speaks volumes about the low entry barrier and high forgiveness of this racket. Playing doubles with him was pretty hassle-free: if he was in the backcourt, I’d just focus on intercepting shots in the middle while he smashed, and if he was in the front, I’d mix smashes and drops, leaving him to finish off the play. Though we’d occasionally bicker over return quality, we both ended up having a pretty relaxed experience by the end of the match.
The string bed isn’t particularly large, but the sweet spot is ample, allowing for a solid shuttle response without feeling too loose. The shaft’s softness is well-suited for beginners, offering easy flex without feeling weak, and the elastic feedback is easy to control.
However, as a captain, his demands go beyond ease of use—he’s particularly fixated on net play and powerful backcourt smashes.
He has an obsession with aggressive net shots when serving and receiving. Initially, I thought he was showing off, but when I saw his low success rate, I realized he was just practicing. Regardless, when using Zhuo Hua, likely frustrated after struggling with the new racket all night, he suddenly burst into form. He didn’t miss a single net shot all match, not even the cross-court flicks or forced low returns. I had my doubts about the feel of this 84g racket, but its sweet spot is indeed impressive.
When it was his turn to deliver power shots, I was surprised he didn’t have a single complaint about the racket. In my opinion, this isn’t a racket that can easily dominate in evenly matched backcourt exchanges, but he wielded it with ease. Two reasons, I think: first, the last match with Zhuo Hua came when everyone’s stamina was flagging, making a racket with a low driving threshold even more crucial to handle the game; second, despite its low balance point and weight, Zhuo Hua offers a surprisingly effective downward pressure, with solid directional control even if the shuttle doesn’t come off explosively. Plus, in the rare case that the backcourt player’s attacks don’t break through, the rotation will naturally bring me to the frontcourt, where I could block potential passes and stabilize the situation until we either scored or lost the point.
One more thing: our captain maintained great consistency throughout the match. The fast, easy handling of Zhuo Hua not only aided his flat drives and backcourt pressure but also reduced fatigue, ensuring longer endurance. Even after long rallies where neither side could break through, we found it easier to recover. In the hot and humid summer of southern China, this endurance is a huge advantage.
After the match, the captain gave Zhuo Hua a thumbs-up. As a reward, I got to borrow his 88S Tour for a while—win-win.
Back to the gift box: while the racket itself doesn’t lack product quality, once you position it as a gift box, it should go beyond just a formality. I’d like to see more accessories inside, at least enough to give when gifting it to a beginner female player—it’s all about saving face.
After B Company and its retailers have made efforts to improve the appearance of their products, they will likely still need to do some work in understanding consumer psychology.

September 20, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny Classic Carbon AtheneⅡ Reviews
The author would like to talk about another series from the Wuqie family—Athena.
The first generation of Athena was truly one of my favorite rackets, even though it wasn’t a popular one. The only thing that didn’t quite sit right with me was that despite being designed as a female-oriented racket, the look still followed the same old exposed carbon fiber under clear lacquer—come on, woven isn’t some sacred ground, what’s so nice about it? The first time it looked fresh, but after seeing it a few more times, it’s just the same old thing.
This time, I got a chance to try out Athena 2, and after using it, I once again felt that refreshing coolness I had during that one summer—a light and fresh product, very fitting for the season.
Specifications: 4UG5, with grip tape and heat shrink, total weight 92.1g in use, balance point 290mm, 6.8mm shaft made of Mitsubishi M40 carbon fiber, 217mm long, medium-soft stiffness, aerodynamic frame, 80-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock grooves, rated for 30 lbs, strung at 24-26 lbs with VBS66N.
It seems the design team has figured it out—after switching to a white glossy finish, the overall texture of the racket has greatly improved. While the first-generation used a purple-red accent, Athena 2 opted for a mint green, shedding the previous somewhat flamboyant look in favor of something more refreshing. This change might even encourage some male players to give it a try. In fact, looking at the overall design pattern, the two generations share a common design language. The designer seems to have grasped the essence, as the large color patches on both sides of the frame and the scaly texture at 4 and 8 o’clock remain intact.
This is a rare 80-hole racket with a string bed that doesn’t feel dull or shock the hand, and it’s still formed using hot air blow molding. It seems Bolly’s fiber film technology has had a noticeable impact. Softness, high elasticity, and friendliness are the hallmarks of Athena, and I was initially concerned that the second generation might sacrifice some of the first generation’s selling points for better competitive performance, but it turns out I needn’t have worried.
The first impression of Athena 2 felt somewhat similar to Invisible Hand from not long ago—both have a rounded aerodynamic structure, both use white as the base color, and from afar, you might think they’re part of the same series with different color schemes. Even when holding them and weighing their balance and swing weight, it’s hard to tell them apart. Although Athena 2 has an optimized swing weight to appeal to a broader audience, Bolly hasn’t done enough to differentiate the products while maintaining a suitable feel. The real difference only becomes apparent on the court.
After several clears during warm-up, I let out a sigh of relief—it’s still that familiar feel. While warming up with an unfamiliar opponent, rallying back and forth near the baseline, I’m always worried that a mishit or misplacement might expose my lack of basic skills. But Athena is very reliable. As long as you properly execute the full action of raising the racket, rotating your body, and swinging, you don’t even need to apply much force to send the shuttle high and far. The shaft’s elasticity is excellent, its driveability superb, and the frame’s sweet spot is large, with fast head speed—there’s no adaptation required at all.
Interestingly, I recall the first generation having a slight head-heavy feel, but this sensation is reduced in the second generation without affecting the power-absorbing feedback; it’s actually more agile.
Speaking of agility, I have to praise Athena 2‘s improvements in flat drives. The first generation was tuned in a way that avoided the issue of the shaft not recovering properly after continuous swings. In Athena 2, the racket’s tendency to wobble after multiple swings is suppressed, and subjectively it feels like the recovery speed after deformation is faster. While the shuttle response still isn’t particularly crisp, the improved continuity gives more maneuverability in rallies. From what I understand, the second generation has roughly the same specs as the first, but with a slightly stiffer shaft, which does make the racket feel more controllable during high-frequency shots, likely improving its performance in fast-paced exchanges. Unfortunately, the cone cap from the previous generation that I liked didn’t carry over, so when adjusting my grip to generate power, my thumb doesn’t feel as stable as it used to.
Additionally, I don’t expect too much from Athena in terms of offensive performance, but in the latest generation, the racket has improved its attack efficiency using the same level of carbon fiber, balance point, and stiffness by upgrading the production process.
The application of new nanomolecule clusters reduces energy loss when hitting and increases energy transfer efficiency, ensuring that each attack transfers the force more completely to the shuttle. Combined with Athena‘s highly maneuverable characteristics, I can continuously apply power from the backcourt without worrying much about stamina, which effectively allows me to increase the pace of the game at any time. The initial speed of smashes is also quite impressive, focusing on sudden attacks. However, if you face a skilled opponent, whether a powerful smash can score is another story—but let’s just treat it as a racket that can be casually used for attack. Still, don’t underestimate it—this makes Athena 2 a piece of equipment that can be used for serious competition.
What reassures me the most is that in passive or defensive situations, it outperforms the first generation. Especially in situations where you have to scramble to retrieve a deep corner shot after a heavy smash, Athena 2 helps you handle it with more grace.
Unlike other Bolly products that emphasize directness, crispness, and stability with the Wuqie core technology, Athena sacrifices some of its competitive potential to significantly improve its ease of use, resulting in a unique experience. The upgrade direction of Athena is therefore quite clear.
Overall, Athena 2 performs excellently in its positioning, and in terms of user experience, it even outshines other lightweight, flexible, and elastic rackets like the NF600 from the big three manufacturers. Given its actual price, I believe Athena 2 will be an attractive option for players at various skill levels.
September 20, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny STAR CLOUD Reviews
The days still begin with caffeine and end with zolpidem.
Sometimes, even when holding a racket I’ve never used before, I’ve lost the excitement and curiosity I used to have during tests. Instead, there’s just a faint sense of dread about completing the task.
I still haven’t returned to the joyful state I was in before. But since the Sky Realm series has more than just the Star Shadow, I might as well continue with the simple goal of distinguishing each of them bit by bit.
Specifications: 4UG5, with grip tape, total weight 91.7g in use, balance point 278mm, shaft length 220mm, soft flex, fluid box-shaped frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock groove, warranty up to 26 lbs, strung at 24–26 lbs with VBS66N.
Since it’s from the same series, there are naturally no major changes in terms of style. The Star Cloud‘s frame pattern has transformed into a design resembling swirling clouds, making it visually richer. The color scheme has shifted to blue-gray, which still looks very refreshing. The grommets have turned yellow, but aside from that, there’s no difference. However, neither in design nor specifications do the three models of the Sky Realm series show much variation—so are they essentially the same racket?
As the testing progressed, the differences between the Star Cloud and Star Shadow started to emerge. After adding the grip tape, the Star Shadow‘s weight became higher but its balance point lower. This is likely due to quality control issues, adding an element of unpredictability. The Star Cloud’s balance point is an astonishingly low 278mm, which I’ve never seen before. Perhaps it’s due to the product’s large tolerance, which makes my Star Shadow something of a lucky gem.
When held, the feel of the Star Cloud is just as solid as the Star Shadow, and at this stage, it’s hard to tell the difference between the two. But when swung, you can feel that the Star Cloud is more agile in raising the racket and less prone to deformation during swings. This helps explain its performance in match situations.
A lower balance point means improved agility for the racket. During the warm-up, when practicing high clears, compared to the Star Shadow, the Star Cloud offers more direct feedback upon hitting the shuttle. The sluggish feel of the shot is reduced, and while the Star Cloud is just as easy to use, its power-absorbing to power-releasing ratio is slightly lower. Given that the Star Cloud’s strings are two weeks newer than the Star Shadow’s, I believe it at least indicates one thing: the Star Cloud‘s shaft stiffness is slightly higher. This was also confirmed during defensive play—when receiving smashes or when using power to lift the shuttle diagonally, the feedback felt more crisp and precise, with clearer and easier-to-execute lifts.
The increase in stiffness significantly enhances the competitive experience.
Let’s start with high clears and smashes. Due to the Star Cloud’s firmer shot output, the power threshold is slightly higher, but the shaft can store more energy, resulting in more direct feedback and crisper shots. By focusing energy more precisely, the Star Cloud can deliver fast flat clears, demonstrating a certain level of explosiveness. However, with backcourt drops or sliced shots, the shuttle tends to snag in the frame and string bed, often resulting in drop shots falling short, which will need some adjustment over time.
The feel of flat drives has significantly improved, with the racket capable of handling consecutive exchanges and providing faster shot responses, giving me more confidence to engage my opponent in rallies near the net. However, due to the shaft’s longer recovery time after deformation during continuous swings, there’s a risk of mistimed shots when the pace picks up.
The Star Cloud might be the best racket in the Sky Realm series for smashes. The improved shaft texture gives the smashes more power—it no longer feels weak. When practicing smashes, especially when someone feeds high shots, the Star Cloud exhibits a strong “syrupy” feel, reminiscent of the TK15. Despite its low balance point, its light weight makes it easier to judge the optimal timing to hit the shuttle at the highest point for an attack, without the shuttle floating out of control. Whether it’s steep or powerful smashes, the shots clearly have more power, while still maintaining decent follow-through capabilities. You can think of it as a softer version of the 9001, which should make it easier to understand.
I’m still taking it easy, but the Star Cloud has improved my competitive performance, and that’s my impression of it. I’m glad that through this racket, I’ve been able to regain a bit of my old form.
September 20, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny Classic Carbon J20-010 Reviews
I received the 009 sample racket, and I immediately fell in love with it. The speed experience of the 009 is, to this day, the pinnacle of Pollen’s works in terms of swing speed. It’s light, bouncy, and despite its shortcomings, it has been the best consolation for me since losing the 90S. At that time, despite its instability and lack of solidity, I chose the 009 as my main racket for quite a long period.
However, after trying the 46w, which shares the same lineage but with a different tuning, I was struck by its aggressive performance. I had to consider a longer-term question: How far can the 009 take me?
Specifications: 4UG5, empty weight 84g, balance point 295mm, total weight 84.6g without grip tape, full aerodynamic frame, 8-4 o’clock groove, 76-hole string bed, warranty up to 30 pounds, string tension 24—26 lbs with VBS66N.
In terms of appearance, there are a few differences between the 010 and the 009. One is the color of the cone cap, which is white on the 009 and black on the 010. Another difference is the color of the drip-like design near the T-joint, which is yellow on the 009 and white on the 010. Finally, the frame patterns have some minor color variations. Despite these subtle differences, the 010 still looks great and maintains its youthful appearance. Compared to the more striking 46w and F35a, the 010 exudes a more rebellious aura.
There’s a small detail: both the F35a and 010 are 4U, but the former weighs more by over 1 gram when strung without grip tape. Considering that the 010 is made according to the 84g specification, there might be some deviation in both rackets’ weights.
Last year, I wasn’t aware of the existence of the 010 version of the J20. Based on my limited understanding of Pollen, I tended to believe that different models from the same period usually only differed in appearance and specifications, while their essence remained similar. So when I learned about the 010, I didn’t pay much attention to it and didn’t develop any interest.
However, when I took the 010 to the court for a warm-up, I felt something was different—it has changed. There’s no doubt that the 009 is lighter and faster, but the 010 provides better adaptability. Although the slight increase in weight doesn’t visibly affect fast-paced continuous swings, the 010 performs noticeably better in high clears, giving me more confidence. The merchant informed me that the 009 was made according to an 82g specification, while the 010 is 84g. This 2-gram difference is like adding a bit of salt when making red bean paste—though it slightly reduces the sweetness, it enhances the overall flavor and adds depth.
I didn’t realize this until I tested them side by side on the court. Despite the 009 being more agile in flat drives and blocks, the 010 is more stable and less reckless in fast-paced situations. The 010’s feel and directional control are improved, reducing impulsiveness. In the front court, the 009’s quick response and control are excellent, but in defensive situations in the back court, the 009’s lack of a decisive back court winning ability can be exploited by a skilled opponent. The 010, however, offers greater stability and torsional resistance, allowing me to maintain control over more rallies and open up my opponent’s defense through more accurate and strategic shots.
Overall, the additional carbon in the 010 provides better support for higher string tensions and improves the racket’s stability and torsional resistance. While it may not directly score points, it allows the player to take the initiative in more rallies and exploit its good directional control to break through the opponent’s defense. Considering its overall performance, the 010 is actually more suitable for a broader range of players.
Among the four versions of the J20 series, my ranking is as follows: for agility and swing speed under the same specifications: 009 > 010 > F35 ≥ 46w; for sweetness: 010 ≥ 009 > F35 ≥ 46w; for offensive quality and physical exertion: 46w ≥ F35 >> 010 ≥ 009; for subjective feel and control quality: F35 ≥ 010 ≥ 46w > 009. For singles players, a racket with a higher balance point is better, particularly for back court offensive needs. For those seeking a comfortable experience, front court play, or those with less power or amateur female players, the 009/010 might be more suitable.
September 19, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny Classic Carbon 1982 B153 & BlackMamba5 Reviews
I’m always eager to try out new Pollen products. On one hand, the brand’s pricing system is stable; flagship products on online channels are often launched at more than 50% off compared to the major brands. On the other hand, Pollen’s rackets consistently perform well in terms of feel and competitive performance, catering to players at all levels, and almost always providing a “safe bet” recommendation.
However, this also means that some of Pollen’s excellent models are more prone to being out of stock due to production limitations, especially the “boron fiber” upgrade products, which have been notoriously difficult to find over the past year. This even led to rare instances where specific models saw a price inversion in the second-hand market.
As they say, “Early birds get the worm.”
Specifications:
- B212: 4U G5, with paint, total weight 93.68g, balance point 295mm, 6.5mm middle rod, length 218mm, medium hardness, box-shaped frame, 78-hole string bed, 9-3 point string groove, warranty up to 30 pounds, string tension 25-27lbs VBS69N.
- Black Mamba Pro: 4U G5, without paint, total weight 90.11g, balance point 303mm, 6.3mm middle rod, length 220mm, high hardness, wind-breaking frame, 72-hole string bed, 9-3 point string groove, warranty up to 30 pounds, string tension 25-27lbs Li Ning N68.
Design and Appearance: The two new models are hot off the press, and their designs reflect their different series. The B212 and B213 are part of the latest 1982 series, maintaining the InterstellaX theme with a space-age feel. The frame has a touch of black lining at the 2 and 10 o’clock positions, and a glossy finish, creating a clear distinction from the 213. The paint quality remains at Pollen’s flagship level.
The Black Mamba Pro, on the other hand, stands out with its unique design elements. The racket is entirely black, with the Pollen cloud mark replaced by a cobra emblem, reminiscent of the Ford Mustang Shelby GT500. The two venomous fangs at the top of the frame add to its aggressive look, and the use of high-reflective stickers in purple, bronze, and silver creates a visually striking effect. The ultra-thin middle rod adds a touch of sophistication, though some elements appear inspired by the Thunder series.
Performance: The main upgrade for the B212 is the addition of boron fiber, and the racket’s hardness has been adjusted to accommodate the new material. While the racket’s face remains similar to previous models, the increased middle rod hardness moves it away from being a “sugar-water” racket, introducing a slightly higher usage threshold. From the feel of rallying in the backcourt, the B212 provides a more “solid” hit, allowing for high ball speeds. This version retains the advantages of easy power generation and leverage, making the B212 more aggressive in handling long shots, while maintaining precision and accuracy, integrating some of the hard-core 1982 genes.
The Black Mamba Pro, being even harder, offers a more direct feedback with its ultra-thin middle rod. This results in a higher difficulty level for the sweet spot, making it more suitable for advanced players. While it may seem easier to use for aggressive shots, it becomes more demanding in slightly passive scenarios, requiring greater effort from the user. Compared to the B212, it exhibits a more extreme side that fits its product profile.
The B212 is considered an offensive racket but has a slightly lower hardness compared to the 213. The boron fiber upgrade makes it more elastic in attack compared to other 1982 models. With the increased hardness in the middle rod, it can handle explosive power better, with reduced shock and a more substantial feel on impact. Unlike the B155/152, which relies on frame weight for power, the B212’s strength comes more from the middle rod’s rebound. This new material finally provides a racket that feels confident for attacking from the backcourt in mixed doubles, although it took some time to adjust.
In contrast, the Black Mamba Pro excels as a professional offensive racket. It might feel slightly lighter in hand, but its pronounced head weight enhances its downward shot tendencies. Even with less concentrated force, it can deliver downward shots. When attacking, the new 6.3mm middle rod shows impressive explosive power, with a noticeable whip-like feel and sharp sound, encouraging players to extract more energy from it. It can deliver both sharp and heavy shots, with each strike being potentially lethal.
Comparison: Both rackets were able to keep up with my doubles play, though they differed in swing speed and flexibility. Overall, the Black Mamba Pro’s wind-breaking frame provides superior swing speed, proven in the backcourt with sustained aggressive pressure. This consistent attack is a comprehensive trait, with quick middle rod recovery also playing a crucial role. However, the B212, with its slightly lower head weight, is quicker in the initial swing and offers better flexibility, which is advantageous for intercepting and front-court play, providing more stable and forgiving performance.
Regarding net play and backcourt control, the two rackets have clear distinctions. The Black Mamba Pro offers a stiffer feel with a smaller sweet spot, making precise angle and power adjustments more challenging, which might result in a slightly higher error rate for delicate shots. The B212, with a longer contact time and more adjustment space, offers more confidence in delicate backcourt shots and net play, making it more effective for handling small balls and disrupting the opponent’s strategy.
Conclusion: The boron fiber and 6.5mm middle rod of the B212 provide a predictable upgrade in performance, while the 6.3mm middle rod of the Black Mamba Pro offers stronger impact. Having previously expressed concerns about the pace of updates in certain series, the recent releases with Pollen’s latest middle rod technology have shown significant improvements compared to their predecessors. The Black Mamba Pro inherits traits from the Pro 2.2/Princess frame, which remains unmatched until further updates. However, the feel of this frame is more rigid and shock-inducing, explaining why it hasn’t been as popular as other models. In contrast, the 1982 series remains evergreen, though the positioning of the B212 and B213 seems inconsistent with official promotional materials. Is there any need for clarification on this?
September 19, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny Classic Carbon Infinity IF215 Reviews
When I was improving my game, the Infiniti series felt fantastic, but recently, I’ve hit a plateau and find it less effective. It’s fair to say that this series, among Babolat’s self-developed frame series, has seen the least progress. From Infiniti 2 and 003 to 016 and Glory 002, the series has primarily focused on adjustments and optimizations rather than major breakthroughs. Since the introduction of 46T in 014, subsequent models have largely focused on balance point and stiffness. Now that the series has adopted a new numbering method and reached 215, Babolat likely hopes to achieve some breakthroughs.
Specifications:
- 4UG5
- With cap
- Total weight: 95.90g (in used condition)
- Balance point: 300mm
- Shaft thickness: 6.5mm
- Length: 220mm
- Stiffness: High
- Thin-wing small frame
- 76-hole string bed
- Full string grooves
- Warranty: 30 lbs
- Strung with VBS66N at 25-27 lbs
The Infiniti series traditionally uses a no-filler construction and applies varnish and water decals for decoration. While earlier models like 008-010 had their unique themes, this approach seemed to have reached its limit by 016, with some models even falling short compared to the early Infiniti 2’s pearlescent finish. The 215 has significantly improved in this regard, featuring more colored paint. The head transitions from white to teal at 4 and 8 o’clock, then to black at the T-head, creating a natural gradient. Although the official promotion describes it as a racing-themed paint style, the aesthetics are what matter most.
The current version has adjusted the balance point to 300mm. While not as aggressive as the Glory series I used, it still provides a noticeable head-heavy feel. Originally positioned as an offensive racket, the Infiniti series’s excellent frame wind resistance made me prefer it for doubles as a speed racket. The 215 maintains a high swing speed, similar to previous versions, with the full string grooves being a longstanding feature from Babolat.
However, the 215’s harder shaft and smaller head make it less user-friendly. Despite a relatively large sweet spot, increased string tension further raises the driving difficulty of the racket. The high balance point allows for effective power shots, but it becomes more challenging to generate power for defensive shots and net plays, which may limit its usability.
On the flip side, the 215 demonstrates a high ceiling for offensive play. Its small frame naturally provides a higher power threshold and more focused rebound feedback. When a player uses their power effectively, the racket delivers explosive shots. The lower wind resistance and fast swing speed contribute to rapid reactions. Although its 300mm balance point is not as high as Glory’s, it still outperforms the 295mm Lamberti in terms of placement and power.
The current weight allows for relatively agile handling, making quick transitions between forehand and backhand shots easier and maintaining stability during fast exchanges. The racket’s stability and directional control provide confidence in angled shots and precise placements. However, it still demands a high level of arm strength, and fatigue can lead to decreased shot quality and slower returns, giving opponents opportunities to pressure.
Previously, small-frame rackets weren’t ideal for my touch shots, but the 215’s improved feel has enhanced its performance. Although the racket’s small head can still cause some erratic shots during fine control, its overall stability has improved. Especially for backcourt drop shots, the increased frame inertia helps guide the shuttle closer to the net without the worry of being intercepted.
In defense, the 215 offers clear feedback for shots like lifting and blocking, but it faces challenges in two areas. Firstly, its small head offers less tolerance, making it difficult to react to fast shots and locate the shuttle accurately. Secondly, handling drop shots and soft touches becomes harder, particularly when fatigued, leading to less effective shots and potential form issues.
Despite the “buy new, not old” mindset, the Infiniti 215 remains one of the best small-frame rackets for those wanting to experience Babolat’s small-frame capabilities. It represents the highest quality within the series. However, it’s disappointing that the Infiniti series still lacks substantial progress, with the latest model mainly adjusting existing parameters. The boron fiber technology that significantly improved Babolat’s newer models has not yet been applied to the new Infiniti, which might be due to compatibility or production constraints. Nonetheless, incremental improvements in aesthetics alone might not satisfy long-time fans of the series.
September 19, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny Classic Carbon J20 Steel-Wings gold Reviews
Mid-cycle updates and iterations in vehicle models have different implications. During a model’s lifecycle, the more exceptional and promising a model is, the more attractive its mid-cycle update becomes, often approaching high completion. On the other hand, iterations become more meaningful when a model reaches the end of its life cycle. One represents the pinnacle, while the other signifies a new beginning.
Babolat’s Steel Wing recently underwent a mid-cycle update. I’ve been using this racket for some time, and the change in its appearance compared to the original color was significant enough that I needed some time to adjust. However, it hasn’t reached its peak.
Specifications:
- 4UG5
- With cap
- Total weight: 93.18g (in used condition)
- Balance point: 294mm
- Shaft length: 218mm
- Medium stiffness
- Wind-breaking frame
- 76-hole string bed
- 9-3 o’clock string grooves
- Warranty: 30 lbs
- Strung with VBS69N at 25-27 lbs
The previous Steel Wing J20, which benefited from the use of boron fiber, achieved good market performance last year. The new color and adjustments for the current model have transitioned from the original silver-white to gold, so I’ve started referring to it as “Gold Wing.” In terms of appearance, the only difference between the new and old versions is the color; the design and stickers remain the same, so refer to the previous Steel Wing for appearance details. I forgot to take photos after using it, so please make do with the available images.
The Gold Wing features some changes, notably the fish-mouth cone cap, reminiscent of the Thunder series from the Red Factory. I still miss Babolat’s previous flat cone cap. This new cone cap addresses the issue of stabilizing the thumb during reverse shots and enhances the racket’s rebound performance due to the increased deformability of the shaft. This change is commendable. The adaptation of boron fiber to new elements also shows promising results.
The Gold Wing has become much more user-friendly, with improved elasticity. After the shaft stiffness was adjusted, the racket’s feel became lighter and smoother, making the swing process more effortless. This adjustment alleviates the stiffness that was a challenge with the original version, making it easier for players who struggled with the original Steel Wing.
The most notable improvement is in handling passive shots. Previously, the combination of a short, stiff shaft and high rigidity made it difficult to return shots effectively, often leading to an exposed net. Now, even under pressure, a well-placed shot can quickly balance the game.
The enhanced feel of the Gold Wing significantly improves its performance in play. As one friend noted, this change in “tolerance and ball control” allows for a more refined small ball control, making net play more manageable and creating opportunities for offensive plays. Its lightweight and speed attributes maintain its agility in deceptive shots and soft net play.
However, the Gold Wing’s response in fast-paced drives is slower compared to its predecessor, making it harder to adapt. The defensive rhythm also feels slightly sluggish when transitioning from defense to offense.
For advanced users, the Gold Wing’s performance in the backcourt is somewhat lacking. While the reduced power requirements improve the racket’s consistency and endurance, each shot feels softer, making it challenging to produce high-speed shots with enough threat. In long-distance shots requiring heavy smashes and precise placement, confidence might be slightly undermined.
Overall, the Gold Wing is the most user-friendly boron fiber racket from Babolat to date. For entry-level players, this racket is a solid choice for the season, providing a well-rounded option for those looking for a versatile and effective racket.
September 19, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny PL176 Reviews
Continuing to review some mid-range and low-end rackets from non-top brands, this time it’s Babolat. The last Babolat racket I tested, the Wind Storm 057, was quite disappointing. I’m curious whether this similarly priced racket will restore my confidence in Babolat’s lower-end models.
Specifications:
- 4UG5
- No cap
- Total weight: 92.7g (in used condition)
- Balance point: 305mm
- Shaft length: 218mm
- Medium stiffness
- Wind-breaking frame
- 76-hole string bed
- 8-4 o’clock string grooves
- Warranty: 26 lbs
- Strung with XB63 at 24-26 lbs
Appearance: This might be the best Babolat racket in terms of paint quality and finish in this price range that I have seen. It looks even better than some flagship models. The paint is deep blue with a slight metallic sheen. The frame is decorated with red, black, and white stickers, with patterns at the 2, 10, 12, 4, and 8 o’clock positions, creating a visual layer without being flashy or excessive. According to retailers, one of the selling points of this racket is its superior paint quality compared to other products in the same category.
Feel and Performance: The head weight of the Aurora 9001 is quite noticeable. Despite being a 4U racket, the feel isn’t particularly pleasing. It might be better if the handle wasn’t so thin, as it feels somewhat uncomfortable in hand.
However, despite the discomfort, the Aurora 9001 performs decently in terms of feedback. It’s less harsh compared to the Wind Storm 057 and doesn’t feel as stiff. The sweet spot is more consistent, and you won’t experience the dead or inconsistent hits you might with the 057. Adjusting to the Aurora 9001 isn’t overly difficult; a few clears or a warm-up game should suffice.
Comparing to the Wind Storm 057, the Aurora 9001 does have its advantages. However, it still falls short compared to the Bluebird series. The overall elasticity isn’t as good, and the frame’s stiffness affects the linearity of power delivery. In simpler terms, it lacks “feel.”
The head-heavy balance makes it suitable for net play, allowing for effective control of small shots. The frame’s torsion resistance and the stability of the string bed contribute to good performance at the net. However, for shots above the net, the head-heavy design might cause the actual hitting point to fall short of expectations, possibly resulting in out-of-bounds shots. The feel is quite stiff and unyielding.
Regarding its offensive capabilities, the frame’s rigidity ensures that even with a wind-breaking design, the directional control remains adequate. The head-heavy balance helps in directing the shuttle downwards, but the speed and power of smashes are not impressive. It lacks the elasticity found in higher-end models, and smashes might sometimes land short, possibly due to the shaft being softer than expected or the string bed’s unexpected ball retention. Adjusting your hitting point is necessary.
For flat drives and defensive play, the racket doesn’t leverage the wind-breaking frame’s potential to enhance swing speed. The lack of speed and elasticity makes it challenging to handle passive returns effectively.
Overall, as an entry-level racket, the Aurora 9001 isn’t particularly user-friendly, lacking the pleasure of play found in better models. Before the Sky series was released, it was one of the best in Babolat’s lower-end range in terms of paint quality. Choosing between external aesthetics and internal performance depends on individual preferences, and neither choice is inherently better or worse.
However, after using the Aurora 9001 in a few matches, it becomes more comfortable to handle, with the initial stiffness gradually diminishing. It ultimately depends on whether players have the patience to adapt to its unique feel.
September 19, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny Classic Carbon 9001 Reviews
The legendary “slacker’s weapon.” In my opinion, Bonny’s most well-known product isn’t the Zhan Gui Dao, the J20 series, or the 1982 series; it’s this Light Blade 9001. It’s on almost every beginner and intermediate racket recommendation list, proving its reliability. Recently, a new color version of the 9001 was released, but my old color version was a gift from a friend, and it allowed me to experience the classic feel of Bonny.
Appearance: The old color version is simple—silver-gray base paint with gold accents. Many people criticize its appearance, but I find it understated and restrained, matching the racket’s character well. It’s not flashy, and you can’t expect a “slacker’s racket” to have the vibrant colors like yellow or red seen on Lin Dan’s models, right? Upon closer inspection, the paint quality is quite good, and the combination of gold and blue on the frame is well-balanced. A refined racket paired with my dashing self—it makes me the most stylish player on the court.
Specifications:
- 76 holes
- 3-9 o’clock string grooves
- Box-shaped frame
- Fully equipped weight: 89.2g
- Balance point: 293±2mm
- Handle length: 210mm
- Shaft length: 210mm
- Strung with VBS70
- 1.5K WOVEN woven carbon fiber technology
Playing experience: I already have several Bonny rackets, including the 2013, White Tiger, and Qilin, as well as rackets from other brands. Since my playing style leans toward offense, my rackets tend to be on the aggressive side, so I had both high expectations and some concerns about the 9001. The first time I tried it, I hit a few clears, and wow, it was effortless! You don’t even need to worry about your hitting posture—it’s truly effortless. Thanks to the moderately soft shaft (I find it softer than expected), the shuttle flies high and far, offering a completely different experience from stiffer rackets. This feature also helps in easily escaping the opponent’s smashes, making it strong in passive defense, especially boosting the effectiveness of my backhand shots.
However, on offense, you need a good level of power to get the best out of it. The racket’s smash power is lacking—when I use it, my heavy smashes from the backcourt rarely succeed, and the shuttle placement can be a bit unstable, often floating slightly. It’s best to rely on speed and play with continuity, especially aiming to win points from mid-court to the frontcourt. Otherwise, if the shuttle lands in the backcourt without a great opportunity, I suggest resetting the rally with a high clear. The racket also performs well at the net, with effortless control when slicing. Overall, it’s a racket with weak offense but strong defense. Also, it’s really not tiring to use—there’s hardly any strain on my hands or wrists, and the only fatigue I felt was in my legs from footwork, which can become addictive.
Conclusion: The Light Blade 9001 is a very user-friendly racket. I’ve used it in several singles and doubles matches, and from my personal experience, it’s definitely more suited for doubles, particularly for players positioned in the mid to frontcourt. For singles, I’d recommend a playstyle that focuses on placement and four-corner control, rather than an aggressive, smash-heavy style. If you’re a player who thrives on relentless attacking, the 9001 may not give you the satisfaction of fluid, fast-paced shots. But as a backup racket with specific functional uses, the 9001 performs well. At a price point below 300 RMB, its performance is undoubtedly great value for money. I’m confident many other players would agree with me—this is definitely a racket that deserves a permanent place in your bag.
September 19, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny ARROW 10 PRO Reviews
The Arrow series from Boli hasn’t gained much attention, but last year, I had the chance to use a model labeled 780, and it left a deep impression on me, making me remember this underrated series.
Now, the Arrow series has been officially renamed as “Jifeng” (Swift Wind), abandoning the previous three-digit numbering system and using “pro” as a suffix for a fresh start. Its potential impact on the mid- to high-end racket market could be as powerful as the recent gusty weather in Guangdong.
Specifications: 4UG5, with a bottom cap, total weight in use of 93.77g, balance point of 297mm, shaft length of 222mm, medium stiffness, box frame, 78-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, 30lbs warranty, strung with 26-28lbs VBS66N.
The Jifeng 10 Pro’s color scheme alone shows an upgrade in Boli’s design department. The matte black base coat contrasts beautifully with a purple head and gold decals, creating a sense of elegance. Additionally, the clear white grommets give the frame a more vibrant look, breaking away from the typical all-black appearance. Considering the cost of semi-glossy finishes is higher, this already demonstrates the sincerity behind this product.
This racket offers a classic long-shaft feel. The slightly extended shaft and the conical cap allow for noticeable flexibility during swings, giving it a “sweet” sensation. It’s easy to unleash the shaft’s elasticity when raising the elbow and swinging the racket, making it simple to generate high shuttle speeds with moderate swing weight, making it very user-friendly.
Although the racket has a compact head, I didn’t experience any significant issues adapting to its sweet spot. The string bed density has been optimized, so it performs well in terms of tolerance. Even during intense defense against smashes, the Jifeng 10 Pro can effectively absorb the opponent’s force and return the shots steadily. The new frame achieves a well-balanced performance in swing speed and torsion resistance, maintaining good directional control on long-distance shots.
Despite the long shaft, the Jifeng 10 Pro recovers quickly in fast-paced exchanges, maintaining strong continuity. While the racket’s response time may be slightly longer during flat drives, the resulting shot speed is forceful, allowing for time to adjust and strategize. The racket’s flexibility enables quick reactions at the net, making it suitable for competitive men’s doubles.
Moreover, the racket excels in handling defensive shots, providing a reassuring feel when retrieving low or overhead shots from challenging positions. Even difficult shots from awkward positions like under the armpit or right shoulder can be executed with enough power to escape tight situations.
Although it has a compact head, the Jifeng 10 Pro still excels at net play, offering precise control over delicate shots like net rolls and lifts. For players who excel in deceptive play, its flexibility supports smooth execution of disguised shots, delivering excellent results.
From an offensive perspective, the Jifeng 10 Pro performs well. While it doesn’t match the power of dedicated attack rackets in smashing, its solid downward pressure and control make it reliable. Though it isn’t designed for raw power, its “sweet” feel allows for continuous and unpredictable attacks, creating scoring opportunities through placement and variety. During smashes, the shaft’s significant deformation and high head speed produce a strong whiplash effect, making it both enjoyable and confidence-boosting.
The Jifeng 10 Pro shares qualities with many well-regarded, balanced high-end rackets. Its feel is crisp and continuous without conforming to the current trend of “shorter, stiffer” shafts. The racket’s standout features impressed me. The frame’s boxy lower section and wind-breaking wings are intriguing, as is the compact 78-hole head. Additionally, the 6.6mm shaft fills the gap between the more common 7.0, 6.8, 6.5, and 6.3mm shafts. These elements suggest that the Jifeng 10 Pro is a new answer to “continuous attack” play, balancing stability and speed effectively.
September 19, 2024
Badminton Racket Bonny Classic Carbon Black Tortoise Reviews
After completing the entire Divine Beast series, I’ve finally pieced together the last part of the puzzle—Xuanwu, over a span of 9 months. What’s comforting is that the Divine Beast series seems to have consistently been updated in terms of craftsmanship. In addition to differentiating by frame shape, stiffness, and swing weight, it also keeps up with the times by using new materials. This version of Xuanwu is the only racket in the Divine Beast series to incorporate boron fiber in the shaft.
Though I privately mock the racket’s English name, “Big Turtle,” which I find amusingly simple, I can confidently say that this is yet another fantastic racket.
Specifications: 4UG5, with grip tape. Total weight in use is 97.92g, balance point at 298mm, shaft length of 220mm, with a slightly above-average stiffness. It features a box frame, 76-hole string bed, string grooves at 9-3 o’clock, rated for 30 pounds, strung at 25-27lbs with KT66F strings.
Yes, Boray has returned to its familiar dark base paint, and just when I was about to criticize the design department again, I held back—this time, the color scheme, though not eye-catching, suits the theme well, and the paint quality is impressive. The metallic gray-blue, combined with the semi-matte finish, creates a restrained look that matches the “Xuanwu” theme, especially with the blue accents at the 4 and 8 o’clock positions on the frame. Chinese elements still decorate the frame, and the gold lettering on the shaft stands out more. This visual coherence gives the racket a low-key but professional appearance, avoiding any misleading impressions.
In terms of swing weight, it’s comparable to the 1982 B149 series in the same specification. The balance point is slightly higher compared to Boray’s other products, but it feels moderate during actual play. The frame is a familiar design, enhancing stability and torsional resistance while reducing wind resistance through a streamlined and rounded structure.
Thus, while some claimed that Xuanwu would be a racket aimed at professionals, in actual play, it’s quite user-friendly for players with decent skills. The moderate head weight and relatively long shaft allow players to leverage the shaft’s deformation easily. The excellent elasticity of the shaft and larger sweet spot also provide great support for ball speed and forgiveness.
Although I’ve mentioned the boron fiber shaft six times now, it plays a unique role in Xuanwu. Other rackets with similar shafts may match or even exceed its stiffness, with only the J20 Steel Wing rivaling it, but the latter’s feedback comes mainly from the short shaft design. Xuanwu, however, stands out for its balance of stiffness and elasticity, which leads me to a broad comparison—it feels like a stiffer version of the Ghost Slayer 3.
So, is Xuanwu incredibly satisfying? Absolutely! It offers faster ball response, more direct feedback, and clearer communication between racket and player, constantly tempting me to unleash more power. In its harmonious blend of directionality and elasticity, it not only hits where you aim but also does so with remarkable speed. This is particularly evident in flat clears, where even in doubles, a well-timed clear can solve many problems, leaving opponents hoping the shuttle would land out, only to see it land perfectly in the court.
Given this, why not fully exploit its potential for smashes and see who comes out on top? I certainly did, and Xuanwu handles concentrated bursts of power beautifully. Hitting the sweet spot results in an explosive sound, similar to the Ghost Slayer, with the shuttle flying swiftly into the opponent’s court. Furthermore, adjustments in swing weight and stiffness prevent Xuanwu from having the same issues as the Ziyan 3, where it sometimes fails to control the shuttle. This lets me fully enjoy the racket’s raw power.
However, these changes in swing weight and stiffness also slightly increase the racket’s “bloodsucking” effect, which is a trade-off I find worthwhile. Yet, I still don’t quite understand why, despite official claims that boron fiber only strengthens the shaft, it significantly boosts elasticity.
Despite its streamlined and narrow frame, Xuanwu doesn’t emphasize speed much. When caught in fast-paced exchanges, using Xuanwu in defensive situations feels fairly average. While its stiffer configuration is great for offensive play, in scenarios like flat drives and blocks where you can’t fully utilize your strength, the racket demands more from the player.
Handling defensive play doesn’t just refer to backhand returns or smash defense. In fact, during defensive positioning and receiving smashes, Xuanwu excels in countering with quick returns, often catching opponents off guard. As long as there’s enough time and the shuttle comes in high enough, the backhand clears can capitalize on the racket’s extraordinary elasticity to regain control. However, in situations like drive exchanges or when the opponent is aggressively attacking the net, my own level often leaves me struggling to keep up.
If you don’t play too aggressively, Xuanwu can even be considered for casual games. The larger sweet spot allows for soft blocks or taps at the front court, often giving your partner opportunities to counterattack. Additionally, the racket’s elasticity gives confidence in returning deep clears for defense. Just be mindful of its bounciness at the net, as it can cause shots to float unless you add some slicing.
In conclusion, Xuanwu, the only Divine Beast racket benefiting from boron fiber, delivers a “game-changing” experience to the series. It’s harder and more stable than its predecessors, making it a solid choice. While it’s not a guaranteed win, you definitely won’t lose out with it.
September 19, 2024