Tag: Badminton Racket

羽毛球球拍

Badminton Racket Victor JETSPEED S 12 Reviews
Specifications: 3UG5, double grip, total weight and balance point unknown, medium shaft stiffness, speed frame, 8–4 o’clock grommet holes, strung at 28lbs with xb63 strings.
The color is bright and youthful, alternating between green and black, which many people have seen, so I won’t go into too much detail. The new cloisonné blue color was previously experienced on the JS12TD, but given the choice, I prefer the current version. The paint quality is well-known, living up to Victor’s reputation. However, it’s worth noting that a friend’s racket developed several dents in non-grommet areas, which aligns with forum complaints about some Taiwan-made rackets. Although he took various measures to prevent further damage and maintain the JS12’s hitting feel, it’s something to watch out for. To avoid similar issues, consider using lower tension, adding grommet strips, or replacing the grommets.
Although it’s a 3U racket, it is nearly balanced with a head-heavy setup. Combined with the speed series’ aerodynamic frame, the racket swings very smoothly and quickly, living up to its series name. During the swing, you can feel the shaft flexing. The overall feel is solid but not overly stiff. Despite being a flagship speed racket in the series, compared to the JS10, the JS12 is not a difficult racket to handle. The current setup features relatively high-tension strings, which highlight the shaft’s elasticity. From this perspective, I’d even call the JS12 a “sweet racket.” Its excellent swing speed, impressive elasticity, and low stiffness threshold made my high clears during the warm-up feel very enjoyable. Small head, fast swing, good repulsion—it’s hard to imagine a quicker feeling. For most players, the 3U version is likely the better choice.
Victor has made the JS12 a versatile racket, excelling in all areas of doubles play. In the frontcourt, the feel is solid with a large hitting area, giving confidence in net control. Shots like net dribbles, slices, and drop shots are very forgiving. The quick swing speed allows for easy interceptions at the net, excelling in smashes, blocks, and pushes. Although the feel may not be as crisp or solid as traditional head-heavy offensive rackets, the JS12 is excellent for doubles players who prioritize speed and fluidity over sheer attacking power.
The lightweight build may result in less smash power from the backcourt, but the JS12 compensates for this with its flexibility. Before the advent of WES technology, adjusting to a higher hitting point enabled the JS12 to generate sharp attack angles. Its frame stability also contributes to the racket’s precision, making it one of the best-performing speed rackets I’ve used. Smash speed was satisfying, offering enough pressure to challenge the opponent’s defense. Moreover, the sound produced by the current string setup was quite pleasing.
Compared to the JS10, the JS12’s power ceiling is noticeably lower. There is a slight loss of power during heavy smashes. To enhance backcourt attack quality, using stiffer strings at higher tension is a simple solution, though this increases the risk of frame collapse. However, the JS12’s better overall fluidity compensates for this. With fast swing speed, moderate swing weight, and a shaft that isn’t too stiff, it has a sweet, enjoyable feel that allows for continuous downward pressure. The larger sweet spot helps maintain control when energy levels dip, allowing for effective drop shots and maintaining the initiative.
However, in flat drives, the shaft’s recovery speed was not as fast as I expected, occasionally impacting defensive continuity. That said, when properly prepared, the quality of counter-attacks and defensive lifts was excellent, with manageable effort and good control.
Conclusion: The JS12 lives up to its reputation. Offensive enthusiasts may find it lacking in sheer power, but for doubles players looking for a racket that balances casual play and high performance, it’s a classic choice.
September 18, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor JETSPEED S 2SP Reviews
The JetSpeed series, with models like 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 9, spans from mid-high to high-end speed-oriented rackets. After using one of these models, I believe they all possess strong product performance that is inconsistent with their current market reception. Despite this, even a review of the JetSpeed 3, equipped with Babolat carbon, has not yet reached 9,000 reads, which reminds me of the fate of the HypernanoX series.
Among these models, the JetSpeed 2SP has recently gained attention. Seeing that some vendors are offering it at a good price, I decided to try out this lesser-known JetSpeed racket, which boasts a rating of 9.6.
Specifications: 3UG5, with grip and heat-shrink film, total weight 93.0g, balance point 295mm, 6.8mm shaft, length 210mm, Babolat carbon material, medium stiffness, 76-hole string bed, 9–3 o’clock string grooves, fully wind-breaking frame, warranty at 28 lbs, strung at 26–28lbs with VBS66N.
Now, I must start by commenting on the aesthetics. In terms of color, it reminds me of the fluorescent yellow version of the JetSpeed 12, and judging by the name, specs, and technology, this should also be an entry-level version of the latter. However, compared to the similarly positioned JetSpeed 3, its paint feels a level cheaper. The matte finish, aside from several fluorescent yellow-green decals, lacks any particularly striking features. On the other hand, the stardust-like glitter finish on the JetSpeed 3 left a lasting impression. In terms of appearance, the JS2SP looks youthful and eye-catching, but upon closer inspection, it lacks quality.
Another pattern I’ve noticed is that I’ve always used 3U versions in the JetSpeed series, whereas in the ShenSpeed series, I mostly use 4U (except for the 70K). Since I get most of these rackets from the second-hand market, does this mean the 3U versions, though well-regarded, are less popular among players? Much like the JetSpeed 3, I believe the 3U JetSpeed 2SP is a better option for male players. The balance point is slightly higher than the JS3, and the shaft is stiffer, providing a more solid feel on contact. This difference is noticeable when playing clears, where the JS2SP’s power shines. Though the JetSpeed 3 offers good elasticity, it feels a bit too relaxed in comparison. However, at my current condition, I find the JS2SP stands out more when strung within the 25–27lbs range.
On the day I tested it, I arrived late and didn’t have time for warm-up. I was hoping the JS2SP’s user-friendliness would help me get into form quickly, and indeed, it was very easy to handle. The large string bed and well-designed shaft allowed for a high minimum return quality, eliminating any mishits. It’s worth noting that the wind-breaking frame of the JetSpeed series remains as fast as ever. In my impatience, I swung at a non-threatening incoming shuttle and completely missed it.
Despite having other rackets to test that day, I ended up using the JS2SP all night without switching. It felt great and was highly enjoyable.
The JS2SP excels in drives and defense, offering a highly satisfying experience. Its large frame, fast swing speed, and elastic response provide all the advantages needed for rapid exchanges. Even though it’s a heavier 3U version, its flexibility isn’t compromised. As long as you set up the racket and adjust your grip, you’ll never feel overpowered, even against opponents skilled in fast, tight exchanges. This effectiveness extends to defensive plays, where its quick reaction and ability to absorb power let you defend and counter swiftly. The JS2SP also allows for aggressive shots that put the opponent on the defensive.
As a downgraded version of a high-end racket, the JS2SP offers much better offensive capabilities compared to the JS12TD. The shaft is medium-stiff but not too soft, allowing for impressive power when given a bit of extra time. The Babolat carbon shaft feels more explosive than that of the Falcon, erasing the powerless backcourt struggles experienced with the JS12TD. Though it can catch opponents off guard with sudden smashes, the JS2SP also excels in continuous play, smoothly transitioning from backcourt smashes to frontcourt follow-ups.
For newer or less experienced players, I’d recommend the 3U version with strings tensioned around 24lbs. As long as you avoid collisions, this racket can last you a long time. With some channels offering it for around 400 RMB, its value is hard to beat, making it one of the best speed rackets for all ages, combining excellent brand quality and performance.
September 18, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor JETSPEED S 11 Reviews
The JetSpeed series has evolved from well-regarded mid-range models to more niche, syrup-like offerings, and then to the consistently popular JetSpeed 10 and 12. This represents a broad range of styles, yet I’ve only scratched the surface of this family so far. JetSpeed 11, also a high-end model, is said by some friends to be slightly lower in positioning compared to the 9/10/12 models. In the racket market, the performance of the JS11 has been relatively lukewarm. Paradoxically, this has made it a high-value, lesser-known racket for many players.
Specifications: 3UG5, with grip, total weight 92.0g, balance point 288mm, 6.8mm Flash Shaft with a length of 210mm, medium to stiff hardness, wind-breaking frame typical of the JetSpeed series, energy bow structure, 8–4 o’clock string grooves, and strung with 28lbs XB63.
In terms of appearance, the JetSpeed 11’s reddish-purple color is quite mesmerizing. Overall, the racket looks appealing, similar to the fresh and neutral aesthetic of the green JetSpeed 12. Based on the shaft’s hardness information, the JS11’s offensive capability should be slightly stronger than the JS12, although its appearance doesn’t scream aggressive. However, this racket does offer better resistance to collapse compared to the JS12.
The overall weight of the racket is slightly on the higher side, with a relatively thick handle. The balance point is modest at 288mm, providing a balanced 3U feel. As expected, the wind frame delivers excellent aerodynamic performance, and the current weight distribution still offers good swing speed. Upon initial contact with the shuttle, the racket’s overall stiffness is noticeably higher than the JS12, but not excessively so, making it relatively easy to handle. Especially during warm-up clears, the low power threshold makes it easy for intermediate players to generate high arcs and deep shots.
Although Babolat carbon is now Victor’s flagship shaft material, the 6.8mm Flash Shaft on the JS11 still offers good elasticity. During powerful smashes, the racket feels like a tightened slingshot, where part of the swing speed is converted into elastic potential energy through the shaft and frame deformation, releasing that energy upon shuttle impact. Simply put, it hits hard and hits well.
The JS11’s shots aren’t overly crisp, and as a speed racket, it noticeably increases ball-holding time, giving it more of a syrupy feel. Currently, it is strung with 28lbs of XB63, a relatively high-tension, stiff string. During powerful strokes, the prolonged contact between the shuttle and string bed adds extra downward pressure on backcourt attacks, which sometimes results in shallower shots. Additionally, due to the large sweet spot and increased ball-holding time, it provides more confidence in net play, making it an excellent tool for players who enjoy controlling the front court.
However, during testing, I discovered that the JS11 has a somewhat peculiar personality. As your performance level rises, the shaft seems to soften, and the spring-like effect can sometimes hinder continuous downward pressure. Despite the reinforced core, its torsion resistance is still slightly inferior to that of the JS10.
If I had to nitpick, I’d mention the thick handle, which can make it somewhat challenging to adjust grip during consecutive defense or drives. Also, the unusual downward pressure may cause some amateur players to either smash into the net or over-hit beyond the baseline while getting used to it.
While the 3U JS11 performs well in terms of continuity and offense, I believe that the 4U version might be more appealing to a wider audience, including myself. During my first trial of the JS11, it didn’t leave a particularly strong impression compared to the JS12. It wasn’t until recently, after playing a few serious matches, that I found its true feel. It’s genuinely a well-rounded speed racket, though no single aspect stands out remarkably, so it took some time for me to warm up to it.
I’m not sure how much the price has risen by now.
September 18, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor JETSPEED S 10 Reviews
Since the 2016 Rio Olympics, the price and popularity of the “Watermelon Knife” (JS12) have remained high. Initially, some players complained that it felt wooden, stiff, and difficult to handle, but now, over time, its reputation has significantly improved. It has become a beloved racket for many, and despite multiple reissues, it’s still hard to find.
The third racket in the Jetspeed series, JS10, is a legend in its own right.
Specifications:
- 3U G5
- Total weight (with grip and no bottom cap): 90.7g
- Balance point: 292mm
- Boron-carbon shaft, extremely stiff
- 9–3 o’clock groove
- Aero-sword wind-cutting frame
- String tension warranty: 28lbs
- Strung with XB63 at 25-27lbs
This racket’s appearance is widely recognized, so there’s no need to dwell much on its design and technology. The red, green, and black layered decals resemble the inside of a watermelon, and the black base coat with glitter gives it a distinctive look. Both the new and old colors are attractive, though the older version holds sentimental value for many. However, the paint is fragile and easily chips, especially in the wind-cutting sections. Even with careful maintenance, cracks may appear around the cone and T-joint.
Upon holding it, the racket feels solid, and despite its balance point measuring just 292mm, it still feels slightly head-heavy. The swing speed is fast, and as a 3U racket, it has the characteristics of a speed-oriented racket, although the swing weight is not light. While I generally prefer 4U rackets, the 3U Watermelon Knife is one I can manage.
A key characteristic of the Watermelon Knife is its smaller racket head. Compared to other Victor Jetspeed series rackets, it indeed has a smaller frame, but it’s not as extreme as the smaller head frames of Yonex models. The racket is about 1-2mm wider in every direction compared to the ZF2, so the hitting feel doesn’t scream “small frame.”
During warm-up clears, it’s evident that the power comes mainly from the frame and string bed’s elasticity. With a shaft length of 220mm, the racket is responsive and easily transfers power. Initially, it took some time to adjust to its liveliness, often resulting in shots going long. As labeled on the shaft, the racket is extremely stiff, but since the racket I borrowed was already broken in, it displayed excellent elasticity and precision during testing. Shots were crisp and responsive, and the sweet spot was quite forgiving, with a higher tolerance than typical small-frame rackets. My first impression was that it wasn’t as unforgiving as expected.
The Watermelon Knife’s swing speed is indeed fast. While it doesn’t feel as effortlessly light as the HX800LTD-C, its swing speed shines when defending, returning smashes, backhand clears, or engaging in flat exchanges. The racket’s speed helps the user avoid compressing their power output during fast-paced exchanges. Compared to Yonex’s small-head frames, the Watermelon Knife stands out in this aspect.
However, I struggled with the racket when trying to attack from the backcourt. During six or seven test matches, none of my smashes were satisfactory. There are several reasons: First, the XB63 string is stiff, and the Watermelon Knife itself is extremely stiff, creating a high activation threshold. On that day, my smashes were powered more by the string’s elasticity than the shaft’s. Second, the swing speed is very fast. Compared to the 88S, the racket face reaches the hitting point quicker after setting up for a smash, causing timing issues in fast-paced exchanges before I fully adapted to it. In short, I haven’t yet found the upper limit of this racket’s power. However, its stable shots, precise control, and powerful shaft make the Watermelon Knife a racket with immense attacking potential, pushing me to find an opportunity to maximize its performance. Though the feel of smashing is excellent, I wasn’t fully equipped to handle it at the time.
In net play, my touch was average, and my shots tended to pop up, inviting interceptions. However, compared to other small-frame rackets, the Watermelon Knife’s friendly frame size made overhead slices and tight net shots easier to control.
In short, this is an excellent racket, combining fierce, fast strokes with outstanding swing speed and maneuverability. Some might compare it to the ZSP, but from my experience, aside from raw smash power, the Watermelon Knife is better suited for various situations in doubles play. That said, as a flagship-level stiff racket, it’s energy-consuming to use, and after four continuous games, I had to take a break, feeling the strain on my wrist and arm. Despite the high usage threshold, its feel, attacking prowess, and swing speed make it a standout among speed and attacking rackets.
Currently, due to production issues at the Taiwan factory, the racket is hard to find, and prices are steep. Even if you manage to find a dealer, there’s still the risk of frame collapse. As a 3U flagship racket with a 28lbs string tension warranty, more advanced amateur or professional players might find this limiting. For less experienced players, I’d recommend stringing 1-2lbs below your usual tension to make the Watermelon Knife more manageable.
September 18, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor JETSPEED S 12TD Reviews
Based on the principle of preferring new over old models, I haven’t explored Victor’s Speed series yet, especially the Brave Sword and JetSpeed series, as I already own rackets from the God Speed series. However, the continued production of the JetSpeed 10 and 12, and the development of subsequent models, indicates their success and maturity, and shows that these models still have room for development (commercial potential).
The JetSpeed 12 and the Sword series have been widely recognized. High-end rackets with such long-lasting popularity are rare for me, so this time I decided to test the mid-range JetSpeed 12 Youth Edition, the JetSpeed 12 TD, which was strongly recommended by Coach Fat Tiger. I estimate that many players might have bought this racket during the Double 11 sales.
Specifications: 4UG6, with a grip weight of 95.0g, balance point of 293mm, full wind frame, 10 o’clock to 4 o’clock string grooves, 210mm length of Babolat carbon shaft, moderate hardness, and string tension of 24lbs with VBS66N.
The new color of this racket feels quite refreshing to me. The design includes some small patterns inside the 12 o’clock frame and a milk-white accent, making it look very youthful and appealing to players who value aesthetics.
The racket feels slightly head-heavy when held. For some players who prefer lighter rackets, this head heaviness might be more pronounced. Thanks to the wind frame design, the swing speed is indeed excellent. However, Coach Fat Tiger mentioned that the wind frame at 12 o’clock is not as sharp as the JS12, but I couldn’t experience this due to the lack of comparison. In terms of the empty racket feel, it’s suitable, and the load is manageable, making it also appropriate for beginners.
As a mid-range racket, it needs to meet the requirement of not having too high a barrier to entry. I recall that Victor’s Babolat carbon has always been tuned to be relatively stiff, offering great power but with a higher barrier to entry. For the price range of the JetSpeed 12 TD, Victor has still used good quality materials for the shaft, which is commendable. The elasticity of the shaft is evident in high clears, providing good leverage and satisfactory speed after the shaft deforms, producing a “syrup-like” effect. However, personally, I found the shot speed a bit sluggish and felt that the string bed was too sticky. This might reflect the trade-off between shaft hardness and performance.
Indeed, the JetSpeed 12 TD has some shortcomings in smash performance. To simplify and accommodate my physical condition, I used strings with slightly lower tension, and I clearly felt that the string bed lacked the energy return and explosive feel on smashes. Although it has good downward pressure, it lacks a decisive offensive capability. Ideally, using higher tension strings could address this shortcoming, but unfortunately, the 12 TD only comes with a 26lb warranty. Coupled with the slightly less elastic shaft, the 12 TD has limitations in smash power. Nevertheless, it has excellent continuity and can maintain downward pressure without significant physical strain.
Moreover, the racket’s defense and passive play are quite commendable. Returning smashes and high clears to the opponent’s backcourt feels smooth, especially with the high frame tolerance. It’s also less challenging when dealing with low net shots, allowing for more struggle space. Similarly, the JetSpeed 12 TD lowers the barrier for backhand shots. For controlling high drops from the backcourt, it’s above average, with a higher feeling of ball contact on the string bed, though the suddenness of the shot could be improved, causing limited pressure on the opponent.
In this price range, it’s a highly cost-effective option. Players who favor smashes might not prioritize it, but for those learning continuous skills and on a budget, it’s a great choice among the top three brands at this price. Moreover, its shaft material is better than the God Speed 50. Overall, the JetSpeed 12 TD offers a “syrup-like” feel and can be a good companion for players looking to advance until they need to switch to a higher-end model. I haven’t fully recovered and also caught a cold, so my testing was limited; please take this into consideration.
September 18, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor JETSPEED S 12FTD Reviews
Specifications: 4UG5, no base grip, total weight in use 87.9g, balance point 312mm, 6.8mm Babolat carbon shaft, 210mm length, medium stiffness, fully aerodynamic frame, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, 76-hole string bed, tension guarantee of 29 lbs, strung with BG80 at 25 lbs.
Sakura Blade! Beautiful! Saying this feels a bit like “AMD, yes!” The racket’s main color is light blue, decorated with a lot of stickers and decals, making it look quite extravagant. The pink base paint at the 4 and 8 o’clock positions of the frame, combined with small flowers, gives off a very girly vibe. It’s truly a “Sakura girl!” I thought I wouldn’t be into this kind of design based on the promo pictures, but once I had it in my hands, I couldn’t put it down. However, the paint is prone to damage, especially the decals or base paint on the aerodynamic sections, which can chip off after hitting the frame. Also, it’s a must to pair this with white grip tape.
But, after using it, I felt like it had a bit of aggressiveness. The head heaviness is quite noticeable, likely above the average for the speed-focused series, and heavier than the JS12 in my memory, though the swing speed is still high. Before using this racket, I had been using the VTFL-CW, which has a pretty poor feel, and when I applied the same power rhythm to the Sakura Blade with its noticeable head heaviness, the awkwardness came — I kept hitting the frame! And this happened right in front of the owner! The combination of head heaviness and high swing speed created a significant mismatch, unlike the JS12F, which is more responsive and quick. Although it’s not hard to drive, the hitting rhythm requires adaptation. This might also explain why it’s rare to see second-hand Sakura Blades, and they are often marked by chips and dents.
Honestly, aside from this, there’s no other entry barrier. The sweet spot is large and forgiving, and the Babolat carbon shaft is elastic enough, so hitting the sweet spot is not a problem, giving a speed boost similar to the Falcon. Moreover, it’s great for borrowing power, and the shaft is not stiff, making swings and strikes comfortable and reliable.
Regarding the aerodynamic treatment of the racket head, it’s not as thin or aggressive as it could be. The thickness is about the same as the JS12TD, which likely contributes to improved stability, making it a choice for many professional players who have used it in international competitions. By the way, even Liu Yang, the player known for his straightforwardness, has used it.
In terms of offensive performance, I prefer the JS12F over the JS12. If we’re only considering power smashes, then the entire JS series has the JS10/Ahmad as the benchmark, with the rest being at least one tier below. But compared to the JS12, the F’s head heaviness gives a more solid feeling during downward shots, and the reduced driving difficulty allows me to apply more pressure in the backcourt of doubles matches without being too cautious about conserving energy.
Similarly, the head heaviness makes the shuttle more likely to be pulled downward during smashes, reducing the chance of a floaty shot. I was surprised by how sharp the placement could be with this speed racket. Also, the lower driving threshold improves the user’s continuity in offensive play, and thanks to the use of TERS resin in the shaft, the recovery speed after deformation is quite good. During continuous downward shots, I didn’t experience any noticeable drag.
However, I found the JS12F a bit less comfortable in flat drives and blocks. The swing speed is fast, but the initial acceleration is slightly delayed, and the response in low-power shots isn’t as crisp and sharp. Due to the overall softer tuning, the string bed has a certain ball-holding feel, which works but isn’t as quick as the JS12 in fast-paced front-court exchanges. Upon closer inspection, its more tempered ball response also shows in downward shots, which might not appeal to players seeking a crisp feel. However, its defense and ability to handle passive situations are much better, thanks to its easy power transfer and drivability.
Additionally, I don’t know if it’s because the previous owner used it less or if it’s just a feature of the racket, but compared to the JS11/12 borrowed from a friend, I personally feel that the JS12F’s shaft doesn’t degrade as quickly during play, and its elasticity lasts longer, giving me more confidence during rallies.
The popularity of the JS12F isn’t just due to its looks. I’ve seen many strong players happily bring it to the court. It’s a great racket with both external and internal qualities, and beneath its approachable exterior, it’s no slouch in doubles play.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket VICTOR JS12II Reviews
Since the release of the first Brave Sword 12, VICTOR has introduced the seventh racket in the speed series with the number 12 in its name. Unlike the more attack-oriented Brave Sword 10 and JetSpeed 10, and the control-focused Brave Sword 11 and JetSpeed 11, the 12-series rackets have always been about balanced speed. The original JetSpeed 12 featured crisp shots, sharp aerodynamic sounds during swings, a well-distributed sweet spot, and a subtle but noticeable head weight, making it nearly perfect for doubles and fast-paced play.
This review focuses on the upgraded and reforged JS12II in 4U, which includes new tech such as the floating handle, a thinner 6.6mm shaft (down from 6.8mm), and an improved molding process. The floating handle enhances feel and reduces vibrations, while the thinner shaft represents an advancement in craftsmanship and addresses durability issues seen in earlier models.
Paintwork & Aesthetics
The JS12II retains a similar design to the first-generation JetSpeed 12, with a white/blue/silver color scheme accented by red/orange decals. Thanks to a matte finish, the racket looks even better in person. Unlike the first-generation JS12, which featured a color-shifting paint, the JS12II only has a reflective decal on the inside of the frame, so players should ensure that stringers use high-tension protection to avoid damaging it.
Specs & Weight Distribution
The original JS12 was slightly heavy, which made the 3U version less ideal for the reviewer. Therefore, the 4U version of both the JS12M and JS12II were chosen. Interestingly, the JS12II feels slightly lighter in the 4U version, in contrast to the first-generation’s heft. For players who prefer balanced attack and defense, the 3U version is recommended. However, for those who opt for the 4U version, wrapping two layers of overgrip and removing the factory grip can add more head weight.
Floating Handle Advantage
Made from fatigue-resistant nano nylon, the floating handle is superior to traditional wooden handles in terms of durability and protection from sweat. For players in humid environments, this is a great feature. Previously, the reviewer had to use heat-shrink sleeves and wax candles to protect wooden handles from sweat, but the floating handle eliminates these concerns.
Additionally, the floating handle offers better control, reducing stress at the shaft-handle joint. Players will notice the increased flexibility of the shaft, which provides better leverage and control during play.
String and Grip Recommendations
The reviewer suggests using hard or crisp strings, such as VBS66nano or VBS68. For 4U versions, tensions should be kept ≤29lbs, but no lower than 24lbs to maintain the racket’s speed performance. GR233 and GR262 grips are personal favorites, and towel grip users may find the ultra-thin GR334 ideal.
Comparing JS12II with Brave Sword 12
While it may be unfair to compare the JS12II with the Brave Sword 12, as they were released a decade apart, the JS12II clearly benefits from modern advancements. The Brave Sword 12 had some issues, such as poor paint adhesion and quality control. With the JS12II, paint chips from shuttle impacts are now avoided, and quality has improved significantly.
Comparing JS12II with JetSpeed 12M
The JS12M, with its color-shifting blue paint and vibrant decals, is visually more striking than the JS12II. However, in terms of material and build quality, the JS12II is superior, featuring a thinner 6.6mm shaft, which is more advanced than the 6.8mm shaft in the JS12M.
Performance and Conclusion
Compared to the first-generation JetSpeed 12, the JS12II offers a more balanced and flexible feel, particularly with the 4U version excelling in defense and quick exchanges. The shaft’s elasticity, along with the floating handle, makes the JS12II easier to control, allowing players to break free from passive situations more effectively. However, for players who prioritize smashing in doubles, the JS12M or the 3U JS12II may be better options, as the 4U JS12II leans more towards speed and agility.
In conclusion, the JS12II is a versatile and user-friendly racket. Its floating handle provides benefits in both singles and doubles, and it caters to players who prefer a speedier game.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 09 Reviews
Find a few unusual basic-level rackets to try. Pay attention to the wording—basic-level means there’s no other racket in the series with an official price lower than this full carbon fiber model. This distinguishes it from entry-level rackets. I’ve always trusted Victory’s basic models, whether new or old, because I often find interesting elements in them.
Speaking of which, I wonder if any readers remember when I wrote about the TK330. It’s an entry-level racket with a 6.6mm shaft, which plays softly but still feels decent. The Yu 09 attracted me for a similar reason: I just wanted to see how the most basic 6.8mm shaft from the Blue Factory feels.
Specifications: 3UG5, without grip tape, total weight in use 91.05g, balance point 290mm, shaft length 215mm, low stiffness, fluid box frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, string tension warranty of 26lbs, strung at 24lbs with VBS70.
Of course, offering multiple color choices is a way for low-end rackets to boost their product power. When they can’t provide much performance, they should at least meet aesthetic needs. The version I have is red and black, with vibrant red used on the 4-8 o’clock positions of the racket head and the cone. Visually, it provides a basic sense of layering. The model on the shaft uses a bold font typical of the Yu series, and “09” is a more basic code compared to the 0 and 1L. A similar naming pattern is used in the Speed series. I wonder how this racket looks to others. To me, aside from the head, the current color scheme reminds me a lot of the Duora 8XP.
This racket is aimed at amateur beginners, so it naturally can’t have too much head-heaviness. Besides, given the positioning of the Yu series, this should be a balanced racket. The materials used in this 6.8mm shaft are identical to the slightly pricier Yu 0 and Yu 1L models. Or you could say the 1L at least has the advantage of being lighter, but the Yu 0… is it just because of its looks that it differs from the positioning of the Yu 09? I can accept that.
Originally, I thought this level of racket would feel rather dull, but after using it, I found that the increased stiffness of the 09 improved the overall feel of hitting the shuttle. It feels quite different from the soft and dull sensation of the Yu 0 and 1L. The 09 is a bit stiffer than those two, and its reduced diameter gives it a slight improvement in elasticity. When handling close shots, the power release feels much better, and the dampening effect is reduced. The shaft doesn’t feel too soft when hitting, and although its increased stiffness makes it harder to flex, the benefit is a much clearer feel.
As you can see in the image, the strings are a bit off, which might not sit well with perfectionists. However, there’s no need to worry about these small details, as the stringing condition was pretty average during the test. But here’s the question: why wasn’t this better shaft used in the Yu 0 and 1? Could it be a cost issue?
When I first tested the Yu 0 and 1L, I struggled to adapt to the low elasticity when hitting powerful smashes. Not only did it produce a dampening effect, but the feedback wasn’t very clear, and I wasn’t confident in the power of my shots. But the Yu 09 doesn’t have this problem. As a “basic model,” it reminds me of the unattractive 3U-spec ProKennex Bluebird. Although their feel is in two different directions, the performance ceiling is similar. Whether for casual play or low-intensity matches, it’s really sufficient for me.
As for other aspects, such as drives, net play, defense, and handling passive shots, I’m at a loss for words—the racket embodies the balanced style of the Yu series. The performance and experience of this type of racket are likely more influenced by the strings. If I had a fresh 26lb 66N setup, everything would improve. But with the VBS70, which is losing tension, well…
I think it’s worth recommending. For players who are serious about the game, there’s no need to consider other entry-level Yu series rackets—this one can carry you to an intermediate level. Not to mention, I picked up the second-hand unstrung racket for under 100 yuan. Players tired of the 9500 might want to consider this one, which offers a more balanced feel and a slightly better shaft.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 3H Reviews
Recently, the Blue Factory has released many new low-end, mid-range, and sub-high-end models. Unlike the previous wave of rackets that seemed to simply swap in a floating handle on existing models, many of the new models this time don’t seem to have prototypes in the current lineup.
Except for the 10M, the Yu series has continued to remain low-profile. However, the new quarter’s Yu F/M series has finally garnered some attention, at least in the promotions. Meanwhile, the Yu 5H has reappeared in the spotlight due to player reviews and retailers clearing their stock. But in an unassuming corner, there’s also a new Yu 3H…
Specifications: 4UG5, with a bottom cap, total weight in use is 90.33g, balance point 295mm, shaft length 210mm, stiffness is medium-high, hexagonal aerodynamic frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, 30 lbs string warranty, strung at 27-29 lbs with VS100.
The Yu 3H has an elegant light gold exterior, and the blue and yellow lines on the wings of the frame transition to a beige design, giving the racket a fresh look. Aside from these painted details, the racket has no other decals, making it appear even cleaner. The original 3F was a very aesthetically pleasing racket targeted at women, while the 3H is much more neutral in comparison. Both 3F and 3H use the same level of carbon fiber, but upon investigation, it was found that the 3H has had changes in the shaft and handle.
I have never been fond of rackets with FRS, as they tend to give poor feedback from the racket face. However, the low string tension of the 3F was also a downside. The 3H is no exception. With moderate swing weight and relatively high swing speed, the power feels good, but the overall hitting sensation is average. When hitting actively, the floating handle does provide decent shock absorption with high-tension strings, but the filtered feedback makes it harder to generate the desire to hit harder.
Additionally, the racket itself is slightly stiff, but the driving sensation is still fairly easy to control. For the entry-level players this racket is aimed at, while it’s not overly forgiving, it also doesn’t pose much of a problem.
In terms of offense, this is a racket that gives me half a sense of relief. Compared to the 3F, the more solid hitting sensation and greater rebound ability elevate the feel during powerful or sharp smashes to a higher level. The shuttle comes off the racket faster, and generating power is equally enjoyable. However, compared to the 5H, the reduced swing weight and downgraded materials create a significant performance gap when driving the shuttle downward. Therefore, the 3H is more of a racket that emphasizes generating downward power through your own effort. As a result, when my stamina declines or I don’t want to play too aggressively, I actually prefer the slightly heavier and bulkier 5H to maintain control and dominance on the court. This is definitely a racket I would use with high-tension strings, and if it weren’t for the VS100 strings, the situation would be even better. But there is still a considerable difference in offensive efficiency and overall feel between the 3H and 5H.
The aspect of the 3H I’m most satisfied with is its excellent continuity. Its flexibility is similar to the 3F, but it has the fastest shuttle response of the three, which gives the 3H an advantage in fast exchanges in the front and mid-court. Additionally, its higher string warranty supports players with mature short power techniques and awareness, allowing for fast drives and blocks that are tight and seamless.
However, the racket’s feel for controlling small shots is relatively weaker compared to the other two. The Yu 5, with its more stable and solid feel, is at a higher level, and the slight ball-holding sensation of the 3F provides a unique advantage in handling deceptive shots and increasing fault tolerance. In comparison, the 3H appears rather average.
When it comes to handling defensive shots, the 3F remains the best. Its lightweight and slightly softer frame allow for easy returns to the backcourt with just the natural elasticity, without needing to exert much power. It also excels at lifting smashes with ease. While the 5H is slightly heavier, it provides stability and adequate shock absorption, instilling confidence when transitioning from defense to offense. The 3H, at this point, sits somewhere in between the two, lacking distinct characteristics.
From the overall performance of the 3H, it stands out with clear differentiation.
What initially attracted me to this racket was its appearance and the significance of the “H” suffix. After using this product, I was quickly reminded of the old HX60H, and the two indeed have some comparability. However, mid-range balance rackets from the Blue Factory often end up relatively unnoticed, with only the Nano 6/7 series becoming a hit in the past 30 years.
Although I quite like this racket, the awkward part is that the 3H, as a core model in the Yu series, has the same low market presence as the overlooked 3F targeted at women. In terms of performance, the 5H, along with the slightly adjusted and reissued 6/7SP, as well as the higher-end Nano 6/7, are significantly better with just a bit more budget. From the channels I’ve checked, you can get a racket that’s a couple of levels higher in both frame and shaft performance, reaching high-end quality, if you just increase the budget slightly. Therefore, the purchasing advice is clear: “Go for the upgrade.”
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X NANO6 Reviews
Badminton players who have used the Nano 6/7 are likely around forty by now. Well, at least I hit the mark myself. The fact that the original versions of these two rackets are still being sold and even have counterfeit versions is quite unbelievable. Although I haven’t used the original Nano 6, there’s no need to go out of my way to find an old mid-range racket just to knock it down, especially since Victor knows to at least give it a new look and rebrand it as the HypernanoX series to sell.
But now, there’s an even better upgraded version.
Specifications: 3UG5, without the base grip, total weight 91.6g in use, balance point 299mm, 6.6mm shaft, length 210mm, medium stiffness, dynamic hexagonal frame, 8–4 o’clock string grooves, 76-hole string bed, warranty for 28 lbs, strung at 26–28 lbs with VBS66N.
With this IP in hand, it’s a waste not to use it. One of the most classic elements of the Nano 6 IP is the rose gold color scheme, and now the Yu Nano 6 has been fine-tuned to make it look even better. When the Nano 6 was released, the iPhone 4 hadn’t even come out yet! Isn’t Victor leading the trend with this move? Compared to the clunky old version, the new Yu series indeed looks and feels much more premium.
By the way, even though durability is a significant feature, this review won’t cover its sturdiness, as I didn’t get the chance to test it, and I hope players who have had racket clashes won’t actually use it for revenge matches.
That said, although the 3U DXN6 still follows the Yu series’ balanced tuning strategy inherited from the old Nano, it feels a bit weighty when swung. You can’t expect it to be a speed racket just because it has a low balance point and a rounded frame. It’s not a racket that can accelerate at any moment. Besides that, the frame stability, sweet spot forgiveness, and power absorption are all in line, making it relatively easy to handle.
People often say the old Nano felt wooden, and the main reason for that was the shaft’s lack of elasticity. To address this flaw, Victor seems to have made a significant move by fitting it with a 6.6mm shaft, boldly writing this information on the cone in large black font, as if to say, “Who’s still calling me wooden?” But as for the actual experience…
Thanks to the quirky anti-rebound carbon tube technology, the DXN6 still feels wooden, almost like the HX100. The old Nano is comforted, its spirit lives on… Jokes aside, during the initial use of the new racket, the shaft’s performance was not fully activated. After about half an hour of play, the feedback felt more natural. The racket offers a slightly noticeable ball-holding sensation, feeling a bit soft, which is also a classic feature of the old Nano, but it still retains a solid feeling, making it somewhat enjoyable to use.
After breaking it in, during powerful smashes, you’ll experience a sensation similar to NAMD, where the racket’s hardness slightly increases upon impact. With the string tension at 26–28 lbs, the feedback from the string bed is quite clear, so the smash feeling isn’t vague. The significance of the 6.6mm shaft upgrade becomes evident at this moment. For players with good explosive power, the upper limit of the Yu Nano 6 is quite high, ranking in the upper-mid range of mid-tier rackets, not inferior to those featuring Pyrofil carbon.
However, this also raises the bar for players when using the Yu Nano 6 for downward attacks. It’s not as easy as it looks. While it accommodates the more abrupt burst of power during impact, relying solely on the racket’s weight to leisurely execute a downward offensive shot is much less satisfying. Especially towards the end of a match, using this racket demands a certain level of fitness.
But since it’s equipped with a dynamic hexagonal frame, and the overall thickness of the frame has been significantly reduced—especially with the thickness at the 12 o’clock position close to the speed series—it seems Victor has found a way to improve the flexibility of the Nano 6. Just when I was confidently speeding up in doubles, I regretted it—the performance in fast exchanges is still quite ordinary, not quite what I expected. Perhaps the 4U version might improve this, but the old Nano was never a speed-oriented racket, so I’ll pass.
You may not excel at fast exchanges, but you can control the game effectively. The Yu series’ frame design is indeed geared towards stability, and the Nano 6, with its solid feel, offers excellent stability. The feel at the net is very solid, and the quality of net drops, slices, lifts, and blocks can quickly reach a high level. Although due to the swing weight, I don’t particularly enjoy using it for cross-court shots or deceptive moves, for players with a higher demand for shot precision, the Yu Nano 6’s ability to execute shot commands is on par with high-end rackets. Slow things down a bit, and everything will be great.
The old Nano has almost become a major IP for Victor. After upgrading its materials in the new era, its performance has indeed improved significantly, but so have the skills and patience required to handle it. It’s worth buying, but after purchasing, you’ll need to spend more time playing with it, adapting to it, and gradually appreciating its merits.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 8K Reviews
My first flagship racket was the 3U ZSP in the new color. It was definitely a racket that felt great for young players, offering impressive swing speed and powerful performance.
Recently, I bought a brand-new racket, the 3U Yu 8K, which for some reason reminded me of the ZSP I once owned. Although the feel of these two rackets is not the same, it indicates that the Yu 8K is also a racket that can offer me a new experience.
Of course, it could simply be due to changing tastes after gaining more experience.
Specifications: 3UG5, stripped-down, total weight 95.4g, balance point 304mm, handle length 195mm, 7.0mm Babolat carbon shaft, hard setup, 76-hole string bed, dynamic fluid hexagon frame, 8-4 o’clock string grooves, warranty 29 lbs, string tension 26-28 lbs BN69.
The main color of the racket is a deep Prussian blue, which is quite understated and not particularly striking but looks very stable. The circuit-like lines on the shaft and frame are a major feature of the Yu series. However, for a high-end racket like the Yu 8K, the lack of any flashy elements in its appearance is somewhat disappointing. The neighboring Yu 8S, with its metallic red hue, seems more eye-catching in comparison. This might be why the Yu 8K hasn’t received much attention.
Strictly speaking, the Yu series includes three types of frames: the Yu 7K and below use a guiding hexagonal frame, the high-end series uses a three-in-one dynamic fluid hexagonal frame, and the Yu 9X features a unique twisted frame. The Yu 8K’s frame has a rounded transition in the midsection, and the guiding hexagonal frame has already achieved a good balance of stability and swing speed, while the three-in-one frame further enhances swing speed while maintaining stability. The thickness at the head is almost like that of speed rackets.
Therefore, as a 3U racket with a slightly higher balance point, the Yu 8K initially felt very much like the ZSP: solid feel, slightly head-heavy, good swing speed, hard shaft, and well-matched to my style. In fact, with its thinner frame, the Yu 8K might even offer slightly higher swing speed. Even before trying it, it gave me the feeling of “I want it all.”
However, its impact feel is not related to the crisp or focused feeling. The BN69 is a 0.66mm diameter, high elasticity, medium-hard string. At 26-28 lbs, the Yu 8K surprisingly still provides a certain ball-holding sensation, with a bit of a bow-and-arrow feel. It doesn’t have the soft yet resilient feeling of the bow-and-arrow series but offers a turbo-like kick-in sensation. While I don’t mind this feeling, many other players might prefer the high-speed self-absorbing sensation.
The 7.0mm shaft not only represents the thickest diameter in its series but also has a notable official hardness. Therefore, while you can feel the ball-holding sensation, it doesn’t feel mushy; you can feel the hardness, but it’s not wooden. For small actions like net shots, flicks, and drops, the racket leans towards ball-holding, while for larger actions like smashes, clears, and drives, it leans towards explosiveness.
I’ve rarely written such a lengthy, subjective, sensory, and non-standard description. If I were to really describe the Yu 8K, it would be similar to many excellent rackets I’ve encountered: it offers a significant feel of borrowed power, whether for high clears, flat clears, or smashes; the T-head box structure ensures the racket’s stability, clear directional control, and excellent torsional resistance; it might be challenging for flat drives due to its heavier weight, and its slightly delayed response from the preparation to the swing can make it risky for net play; the sweet spot is easy to find, but hitting outside the sweet spot significantly affects the quality, with average tolerance; the shaft’s explosiveness is outstanding, and the frame can handle high tension, resulting in high-quality smashes with a sharp, pleasant sound; the heavy weight and hard setup are not recommended for beginners. The 4U version might be more generally liked, but I prefer the extremely stable 3U version for personal improvement.
Does that cover it?
Even though it was a regular purchase, the Yu 8K gives me a sense of an unexpected encounter. Its comprehensive nature makes me occasionally overlook its excellent performance. As a balanced, slightly attacking racket, its feedback doesn’t quite match some other mid-range rackets, and its response speed in doubles isn’t exceptionally quick. However, using it on the court gives a sense of stability, and its excellent shock absorption reduces the load. All-around, it may not always be appealing.
Even now, my description of the Yu 8K feels like the saying “The way that can be told is not the eternal way.” No matter how I describe it, I can’t fully capture its essence. Its strengths are not immediately obvious or captivating. Its solid and stable nature often makes me forget the racket’s presence until I’m reminded by a powerful smash that the equipment I’m using is not to be underestimated.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 7K Reviews
If we are to talk about the youngest family within the current lineup, it would undoubtedly be the Yu series. Rumor has it that it is the successor to the HypernanoX series, maintaining the same “all-around” characteristics while incorporating numerous new technologies and a more refined product positioning. Although I previously tested the DX1L, as an entry-level racket it only featured a power hexagonal frame and didn’t provide much insight into the series’ performance.
Today’s review is of the Yu series’ first true product: the Yu 7K. As mentioned earlier, the Yu series has a more mature product positioning, and the 7K is clearly focused on control and attack.
Specifications: 4UG5, full-weight 88.8g, balance point 302mm, 6.8mm Babolat carbon shaft, length 210mm, slightly stiff, power hexagonal frame, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, strung at 26lbs with VBS68.
Appearance: The racket is quite understated with a deep gray base and orange stripe stickers. While it is visually appealing, it also gives off a cheap impression, which is surprising for a high-end racket. Additionally, the paint quality is not satisfactory, especially at the top of the frame where the paint has chipped and become uneven after a year of use. The frame design is worth mentioning; it has a traditional box frame at the T-joint, transitioning to a sharp frame at the top, somewhat similar to the HX900’s all-in-one frame but with a more natural transition. The wings are not of the Speed series’ sword structure, which should provide the 7K with a more stable hitting experience.
Handling: The head-heavy feel is noticeable, but the 4U weight and the head’s aerodynamic design make for effective swing speed, making it suitable for doubles. The racket feels responsive and maintains a strong overall integrity with minimal deformation.
In terms of high-clear shots, the 76-hole string bed makes the sweet spot very easy to find, with clear feedback and good power feel. Despite the stiffer shaft, the racket’s head-heavy nature still allows for good leverage. The dynamic-hex frame type effectively reduces wind resistance, contributing to the racket’s stable shot performance and precise hitting.
Performance: If the user has good explosive power, they will likely appreciate the Yu 7K’s response during smashes and drives. The racket is overall quite stiff, with a certain learning curve, and may feel somewhat wooden for less powerful players. The Pyrofil in the shaft and the “K” suffix indicate that this is a serious contender. The combination of internal rotation power and the shaft’s explosiveness yields strong, fast shots. The pronounced head-heavy feel also aids in smashes and net play.
However, there are some downsides, particularly its flexibility. The high balance point results in some drawbacks in maneuverability, especially during fast drives and when retrieving shots from behind. The stiffness of the shaft can challenge shot execution and may cause issues with low arcs or interceptions on defensive shots.
Control: As an all-around racket, control is crucial. Although I am not particularly skilled at fine handling, I found that the clear and stable feel allowed for quick adjustment in net play and correction of errors. The large string bed and sweet spot also provide ample forgiveness for backcourt smashes and lifts. However, compared to rackets known for control and balance like the Bow or Dual Blade 7, the Yu 7K’s straightforward shot delivery doesn’t offer the same confidence in small ball control. For me, quick pushes and unexpected high clears are more effective with the Yu 7K in creating passive situations for opponents.
There was a time when the Yu 7K was available at a very low price, making it quite appealing. The subsequent price increase has led to a sales decline, which may be due to consumer expectations not aligning with the new price. The paint job is mediocre, but the performance is good, with a certain usage threshold. The 7K has similarities to the HX800, HX900, and HX900X. If the Yu series aims for an all-around performance, the 7K is indeed balanced, with slightly less emphasis on speed but stronger in attack. For players accustomed to softer rackets and looking to advance to a more versatile racket, especially those confident in their attacking abilities, the Yu 7K is worth trying. At its current price point, it offers some advantages over similarly positioned products from the major brands.
September 13, 2024