Tag: Badminton Shoes

  • Badminton Shoes Lining SONIC BOOM 4.0 Reviews

    Badminton Shoes Lining SONIC BOOM 4.0 Reviews

    Since the launch of the “Sonic Boom” 2nd generation, followed by the 3rd, these two shoe models have been my go-to shoes for badminton matches. I’ve worn the Sonic Boom 2 for 86 matches, including amateur tournaments, traveling with my gear, and squeezing in games whenever possible. The Sonic Boom 3 has also logged 38 matches. (To ensure the accuracy and authenticity of my feedback, I meticulously keep records of each use and the details of my badminton sessions.)

    I particularly favor shoes that offer excellent wrapping and stability, even though there are often minor issues that need to be adapted to and resolved during the initial stages of use.

    When a shoe leaves a positive impression, it naturally catches my attention for further exploration. As soon as the Sonic Boom 2020, or the 4th generation, was released, I made sure to get my hands on it. With the reopening of badminton halls recently, I’ve been overjoyed to have matches again and the opportunity to test out my new shoes.

    In recent years, Li-Ning’s shoe designs have undergone significant changes, embracing innovation, avant-garde styles, and high aesthetics. New designs and technologies such as knitted uppers, sock-like fit, translucent outsoles, and Li-Ning Cloud technology have been adopted in badminton shoes, garnering both praise and some criticism. However, upon closer inspection, this trend is evident across all brands, as they all strive for evolution rather than stagnation.

    It’s undeniable that today’s badminton shoes are increasingly visually appealing, offering a wide range of color options for picky players. The Sonic Boom 2020 comes in four colorways for men and three for women, with one color (white) being a unisex option, aptly called the “couple’s colorway.”

    Regarding the shoe’s appearance, the Sonic Boom 2020 features a large, nearly full-surface PU material, front and rear cushioning, a prominent carbon plate, unique tongue structure, and lace-eyelet design. While it may resemble traditional Li-Ning badminton shoes at first glance, there are numerous changes upon closer inspection. Compared to the 3rd generation, the 2020 (4th gen) incorporates Li-Ning Cloud midsole technology, a dual-density rubber outsole (translucent + solid-colored), and an extended PROBAR LOC stability structure in the forefoot and heel, with the outer side being even longer. The accompanying carbon plate has also been lengthened, and its edge is reinforced with TPU support that bridges across. The heel area boasts substantial TPU reinforcement and an elevated ankle cuff, along with a longer tongue, all contributing to enhanced stability and protection.

    A crucial aspect worth mentioning is the alteration to the forefoot shape. Although it retains the 3-shoe last, the forefoot’s outer side is slightly tapered inwards, resulting in significantly improved wrapping, eliminating the need for narrow-footed players to wear thicker socks for a snug fit. The insole has also undergone changes, with a more pronounced curvature in the forefoot, a narrowing of approximately 1mm+ in width compared to the 3rd generation, and the addition of soft sponge ridges for enhanced grip. The solid EVA material in the forefoot insole has been thinned out.

  • Badminton Shoes Lining Blade Max On-Court Reviews

    Badminton Shoes Lining Blade Max On-Court Reviews

    Last September, Li-Ning unveiled the Blade Pro, a brand-new comprehensive badminton shoe series that garnered favorable reviews upon its release. I frequently spot fellow players wearing the Blade Pro on the court. A year later, Li-Ning has introduced the all-new Blade Max, an upgraded version of the Blade Pro. So, what kind of on-court performance does the Blade Max deliver?

    Firstly, the Blade Pro is a shoe I’m particularly fond of, and I’ve even acquired quite a few pairs – a total of 12, to be exact. What draws me to the Blade Pro? Primarily, it’s the incredibly comfortable upper and the redesigned shoe last, which naturally targets the competition from the green brand’s 65Z. However, in terms of materials, the Blade Pro is ahead of its time, boasting Li-Ning’s flagship cushioning technology, the Bèng (Four Thunder), while the 65Z still relies on outdated EVA cushioning. My friends who’ve worn the Blade Pro also attest to its superior cushioning performance over the 65Z. As the Blade Max, an upgraded version of the Blade Pro after a year, has incorporated feedback from players, it boasts numerous improvements.

    Let’s start with the outsole. The Blade Max’s outsole pattern is similar to the Blade Pro’s, featuring hexagonal shapes composed of bar-shaped grooves. However, the Blade Max boasts a denser groove pattern, and the outsole no longer has the fine creases present in new Blade Pro shoes. Additionally, the rubber material has been modified, resulting in better grip performance. This upgrade is a direct response to player feedback. In practical tests, under the same court conditions, the Blade Max indeed offers superior grip compared to the Blade Pro. Nevertheless, both Blade models have slightly higher requirements for the court surface. On dusty or aged courts, their grip performance falls short of the Thunder Pro. In terms of outsole durability, the Blade Max also sees improvements over the Blade Pro.

    Moving on to the midsole, the Blade Pro and Max share identical configurations. Both feature Bounse+ in the forefoot, Bèng (Four Thunder) technology in the heel, and a full-length Li-Ning Cloud framework. This technology lineup underscores the excellent cushioning capabilities of the Blade Pro/Max within the comprehensive shoe category. Furthermore, a wraparound TPU framework in the heel ensures stability. A large, irregularly shaped TPU plate and a rigid carbon plate in the midfoot provide exceptional torsion resistance and support. During gameplay, I can clearly feel the ample cushioning of the Blade Pro, supporting all necessary shock absorption for my weight. Its torsion resistance is significantly superior to the 65Z, preventing foot arch strain or soreness. The Blade Pro/Max delivers a powerful push-off feedback, akin to stepping on a shock-absorbing medium. It’s neither sluggish nor overly harsh.

    Turning to the upper, the Blade Max’s upper material is stiffer than the Blade Pro’s, enhancing support. The Blade Pro’s upper is very flexible, and players with stronger ankles might accidentally push their feet out. However, the Blade Max addresses this issue with improved upper support, securely locking the foot in the shoe’s chamber without feeling rigid. Personally, I adore the Blade Pro’s sock-like wrapping sensation, which is why I’ve accumulated so many pairs. The Blade Max also upgrades the shoe’s collar, incorporating a woven technology fabric for better support. The flashy TPU at the heel is quite novel, displaying “MAX” and the Li-Ning logo from different angles, adding a stylish touch.

    Regarding the insole, the Blade Max’s insole is stiffer than the Blade Pro’s. Some players have reported slipping issues with the Blade Pro’s insole, though I haven’t encountered this. Li-Ning has addressed these concerns with corresponding upgrades to the Blade Max’s insole, which remains firmly in place during practical tests.

    In terms of court feel, the Blade Max’s excellent foot-shoe integration allows me to perceive the ground clearly during gameplay. It feels like an extension of my feet, providing a comfortable experience.

    In conclusion, Li-Ning has made thoughtful upgrades to the Blade Max based on consumer feedback, which is commendable. Listening to customers and improving products accordingly is always inspiring. For me, aside from the Blade Pro and Max’s limited grip adaptability, I can’t fault them in other aspects. Plus, they’re relatively affordable. For players who aren’t excessively heavy and play on decent courts, the Blade Max is a highly recommended shoe.

  • Badminton Shoes Lining Blast JF01 SE Reviews

    Badminton Shoes Lining Blast JF01 SE Reviews

    Back in March this year, the Fastwind SE made its debut at Li-Ning’s 2022 Autumn/Winter Order Conference in Hangzhou. As a new addition to the Fast Start Series, it captured the curiosity of many badminton enthusiasts with its ambitious goal of being the lightest badminton shoe ever created by Li-Ning. Following the April release and subsequent buzz surrounding the flagship Fastwind PRO, today, we bring you an exclusive first look at the Fastwind SE, another star in the series.

    Official Tech Highlights:

    Simplicity Meets Uncompromising Technology

    The overall design embodies the essence of simplicity, crafting the lightest iteration within Li-Ning’s Fast Start Series. Taking a size 42 as an example, each shoe weighs an impressive 280 grams. Featuring a multi-layered midsole configuration, the heel is equipped with Bèng (Four Thunder) technology for cushioning, while the forefoot incorporates BOUNSE+ for enhanced push-off feedback. The carbon plate in the midfoot, combined with dual TPU, provides stability and anti-torsion support. The segmented upper design ensures a snug fit while maintaining breathability, with a low-stretch, soft, and supple microfiber at the toe for comfortable wrapping.

    Design Aesthetics:

    Inspired by the Time-Lapse Photography of Nighttime Car Light Trails

    The sleek lines of the Fastwind PRO left a lasting impression, exuding speed and technology. The Fastwind SE continues this design language, drawing inspiration from the light trails created by cars moving at high speeds in nighttime time-lapse photography. The designer captured the fleeting sensation of speed and the passage of time as the vehicle’s lights blur and shift, translating it into the streamlined silhouette of the Fastwind Series.

    With a similar “family face” to the Fastwind PRO, the side profile boasts a feathered Li-Ning logo that appears lightweight and agile. The tongue and heel wrap adopt a traditional design, differentiating it from the sock-like fit of the PRO model to cater to a wider range of users. The segmented upper design not only reinforces the fit but also ensures breathability.

    The Fastwind SE is available in three color options: red-white-blue, black, and white. The color palette of the shoe body and sole complements each other seamlessly. The red-white-blue variant showcased in this unboxing stands out for its vibrant color play, particularly the striking blue-white-red accents on the sole, a detail visible only when lifting your feet on the badminton court.

    Priced more affordably than the Fastwind PRO, the Fastwind SE, according to official data, does not compromise on core technologies. Already available since July, are you ready to make a splurge?

  • Badminton Shoes Lining Invincible Ace Reviews

    Badminton Shoes Lining Invincible Ace Reviews

    After his devastating defeat to Kunlavut Vitidsarn at the Tokyo Olympics, Shi Yuqi once again suffered a setback in the semifinals of the Japan Open, losing to Lanier. The once-promising young talent has finally fallen victim to the passage of time.

    Shi Yuqi’s journey, fraught with obstacles, mirrors the ups and downs of the Invincible Ace shoes he wears. Since the Invincible Ace debuted in 2020, it has gone through four generations and five colorways, earning a reputation as a cost-effective masterpiece through hard work. From the first generation’s bulkiness and lack of breathability, to the second generation’s tendency for the camouflage-patterned sides to delaminate, and the third generation’s less-than-stellar durability on the white gold sides, Li-Ning has finally combined the best of its predecessors to create a “king of sneakers” – the Yuanyang Invincible Ace.

    Compared to the simplicity of the first and third generations and the flamboyance of the second, the fourth-generation Invincible Ace embodies the essence of being elegant yet understated. The TUFF TIP material on the toe cap, while appearing as a plain white from afar, reveals exquisite cloud patterns upon closer inspection (one can’t help but marvel at Li-Ning’s adeptness in striking a chord with fashion enthusiasts). It’s unclear whether these patterns genuinely enhance the durability of the toe cap or if it’s simply the superior material formulation. Nonetheless, the wear resistance of this Yuanyang pair is impressive, showing virtually no signs of wear even after a month of use, unlike other shoes.

    In an era where faster technology is all the rage, the first three generations of Invincible Ace often left users feeling a noticeable sluggishness during initial movements before breaking in. Likewise, the Yuanyang’s weight hinted at its premium status as a successor to the Invincible Ace line. However, upon putting them on, I was surprised by how lightweight they felt. This alone earns the Yuanyang the title of the ultimate Invincible Ace, as who wouldn’t want a steed that’s ready to gallop without any warm-up?

    Interestingly, the Yuanyang’s sole has reduced TPU support pads, which, considering the thickness of previous Invincible Ace soles, might explain why it achieves faster start-up speeds. This makes it a versatile shoe suitable for all ages.

    One gripe, however, is the inconsistency in sizing between Li-Ning’s and another domestic brand’s (let’s call them V-Brand for anonymity) shoe size charts. It would be convenient if domestic brands could standardize their sizing. Therefore, potential buyers should measure their foot length carefully before making a purchase.

    When faced with the vast sea of shoes and the dilemma of balancing budget with aesthetics, the Yuanyang Invincible Ace offers a compelling option. Priced just slightly above 400 yuan, it combines eye-catching design with a lightweight feel and a comfortable sole.

    In conclusion, why look any further? This is the complete package.

  • Badminton Shoes Kawasaki CROSS 2.0 Reviews

    Badminton Shoes Kawasaki CROSS 2.0 Reviews

    If you’re looking for a badminton shoe recommendation under 400 yuan, the recently popular Kawasaki Crossover 2.0 certainly deserves a spot on the list. This shoe stands out with its high aesthetics, excellent cushioning and torsion resistance, and its affordable price.

    Just recently, the upgraded version of the Crossover 2.0 was also released, and I was quick to get my hands on the Cosmic Silver (Collector’s Edition) colorway. Today, let’s dive into the differences between these two badminton shoes and how to choose between them!

    Crossover 2.0 Wearing Experience:

    The Kawasaki Crossover 2.0 has been a hot seller lately, boasting not only impressive aesthetics but also top-notch features. Equipped with a buckle lacing system, it allows for easy one-pull opening and tightening, making putting on and taking off a breeze. Compared to its predecessor, the 2.0 version offers better control over the tightness.

    In terms of cushioning, torsion resistance, breathability, and durability, this shoe excels in all aspects. The upper features a lightweight and breathable flyknit fabric reinforced with microfiber leather, providing both ventilation and support. The midsole incorporates Kawasaki’s NON Shock Absorption Technology, with a K-POWER high-rebound pad in the forefoot for faster starts and a NON shock-absorbing pad in the heel for significant impact absorption upon landing, effectively protecting the knees. Additionally, a genuine large carbon plate in the midfoot enhances torsion resistance, while TPU reinforcements on the sides offer extra support. Overall, this shoe provides comprehensive protection with few drawbacks.

    When selecting a size, note that those with standard or narrow feet should consider going down a size, while those with wider feet may find the shoe’s roomy toe box fitting perfectly.

    Crossover 2.0 MID Overview:

    Midsole Configuration:

    Combining a rear Kawasaki shock-absorbing pad, a forefoot K-POWER power pad, a carbon fiber plate for arch support, TPU torsion control bridges, and high-elastic EVA, this shoe delivers both shock absorption and rebound.

    Outsole Configuration:

    Breathable metal mesh pattern with a durable rubber outsole.

    Upper Configuration:

    A one-piece Flyknit 3D upper with optimized microfiber material, complemented by starry breathable mesh and a mid-cut sock-like design for added flexibility. The shoe also features lace wraparound and leather reinforcement at the heel.

    Rotary Buckle System:

    Upgraded with high-tensile threads for precise fitting and effortless putting on and taking off.

    Cushioning Technology:

    Full-length ultra-elastic EVA midsole with a K-POWER high-rebound pad upfront for powerful feedback during footwork and Kawasaki shock-absorbing technology in the heel, adaptively absorbing impacts based on your movements.

    Differences Between Kawasaki Crossover 2.0 and Crossover 2.0 MID:

    While both versions are highly praised for their performance, the Crossover 2.0 MID offers some notable upgrades:

    1. Lasting Shape: The Crossover 2.0 MID has a regular last shape, while the Crossover 2.0 is wider.
    2. Cuff Design: The MID version features a mid-cut sock-like design, while the 2.0 opts for a high-cut sock-like design with reinforced leather at the heel.
    3. Rotary Buckle System: The MID version has an upgraded high-tensile thread system for better adjustability and convenience.
    4. Durability Reinforcement: The MID has TPU reinforcement on the inner side of the toe box for added durability.
    5. Breathability: The MID version incorporates more breathability features.

    Overall, the performance gap between the Crossover 2.0 and Crossover 2.0 MID is minimal. The upgraded MID version excels in its rotary buckle system, durability reinforcements, and breathability. For those with wider feet, the Crossover 2.0 might be a better fit, while those with standard foot shapes may prefer the upgraded Crossover 2.0 MID.

  • Badminton Racket Kawasaki DROSS 2.0 MID Reviews

    Badminton Racket Kawasaki DROSS 2.0 MID Reviews

    Journeying, an embodiment of adventure sports, and in physics, a metaphor for time travel. Kawasaki, a seasoned player in badminton footwear, after a cordial greeting, now invites you to raise a toast and paint the cosmos as we embark on a journey through the realms of space and time. This time, the veteran brand, having grown familiar, brings friends and companions to explore the vast expanse of the universe, past and present. Reaching the Kuiper Belt, amidst the dazzling stars, in the silence and vastness, an epiphany arises, and the Kawasaki Traverse 2.0 MID is born.

    Technology Features

    1. Midsole
      • Function: Cutting-edge shock absorption technology for maximum knee and ankle protection, stable support, and a dynamic foot feel.
      • Technology: Kawasaki Shock Absorption Technology
      • Configuration: Rear Kawasaki Shock Absorption Pad + Front K-POWER Power Pad + Carbon Fiber Plate Support at the Arch, combined with TPU Torsion Control Bridge and High-Rebound EVA for shock absorption and rebound.
    2. Outsole
      • Function: Builds grip, multiple torsion control for optimal performance, breathable, and durable.
      • Technology: Utilizes ergonomic biomimetic technology, mimicking the foot’s natural motion curve for segmented torsion control.
      • Configuration: Breathable Metal Mesh, Durable Rubber Outsole.
    3. Upper
      • Function: Continuously enhances breathability and containment for all-around protection.
      • Technology: One-Piece Flyknit 3D Upper, optimized with microfiber material, complemented by Starlight Breathable Mesh Overlay, Mid-cut Sock-Fit Design for flexibility, lace wrap, and leather reinforcement at the heel.
    4. Quick-Lace System
      • Function: One-touch activation, upgraded high-tension yarn for effortless tightening and loosening, precise fit, and convenient on/off.

    Core Technology: Kawasaki Shock Absorption Pad

    • Function: Meets varying shock absorption needs during different sports activities, adapting to athletes’ footwork changes, steps, and smashes, providing tailored shock absorption to effectively dissipate foot vibrations, protecting knees, and ensuring maximum safety.
    • Composition: dclan Material (New Smart Cushioning Material), based on the core principle of “Liquid Body Armor,” can withstand up to 90% of impact force. dclan is a non-Newtonian fluid that remains relaxed and soft under normal conditions but instantly locks molecules upon impact, hardening to absorb and dissipate external forces, forming a protective layer. Upon impact cessation, it returns to its original soft and flexible state.

    Craftsmanship Techniques (Space Silver Collector’s Edition)

    • High-End Handcrafted Distressed Finish: The collector’s edition undergoes a meticulous process of wiping, sanding, and polishing to achieve a natural, interstellar gradient effect.
    • Double Lasting Process: Uses a standard last, undergoes initial shaping, then undergoes the distressed finish followed by a second shaping and curing process, resulting in a more structured and stable shoe shape for enhanced performance.

    Design Concept & Inspiration: Reforging Interstellar Power, Self-Awakening
    Traversing the Kuiper Belt, a realm of rubble, charged particles, and stardust, the Traverse 2.0 MID deconstructs, fuses, and rebirths, reforging interstellar power. Amidst the stars, silence, and vastness, it awakens.

    Aesthetic Analysis:

    The Traverse 2.0 MID is launched in four striking colorways: Space Silver (Collector’s Edition), White/Dolphin Blue, White, and Sky Blue, aiming to usher in a new era of sports fashion. The shoebox cover, too, is thoughtfully designed, featuring astronauts encircled by vibrant hues, with massive planets as a backdrop, towering above the starry expanse.

    Space Silver (Collector’s Edition):
    The primary showcase colorway, featuring a one-piece Flyknit 3D upper enhanced with a high-end handcrafted distressed finish, creates a mesmerizing interstellar gradient under changing light, reminiscent of a galactic river cascading from the heavens. The precision-fitted quick-lace system and futuristic design embody the courage to embark on the first steps into the vast universe, creating countless miracles.

    White/Dolphin Blue:
    Transporting us from the cosmos to the azure seas, this refreshing colorway combines a white base with playful dolphin blue accents, exuding a youthful and romantic vibe perfect for summer.

    White:
    In the journey, the breathtaking winter scenery of snow-capped mountains is also captured. The pure white hue, adorned with subtle yellow and green accents, adds vitality to the collection.

    Sky Blue:
    Soaring through the clouds, this unadulterated shade of light blue embodies the boundless freedom and carefree spirit of floating amidst the heavens.

    Last year, the Kawasaki Traverse 2.0 debuted, and today, the Traverse 2.0 MID is introduced to enrich the product line, offering a mid-cut version for more versatile choices. Perhaps, this journey is meant to reconnect with you. May the Traverse 2.0 MID empower your court conquests, awakening your full potential.

  • Badminton Shoes Kawasaki K3B53-A3318 Reviews

    Badminton Shoes Kawasaki K3B53-A3318 Reviews

    Budget-friendly Entry-level Shoes, Dare to Imagine the Features

    Carbon fiber bridge? Or high-rebound cushioning?

    Let me tell you, the sneakers we’re recommending today not only boast a large carbon fiber bridge and TPU encircling, but also a high-rebound EVA midsole and EVA cushion insole for superior cushioning, paired with a refreshing colorway. And the cherry on top? Its price is just two bills! Isn’t that amazing?

    Today’s protagonist is this pair of Kawasaki Bingguo badminton shoes in my hand.

    —Appearance & Colorway
    The Kawasaki Bingguo I’m holding boasts a pristine white base, with refreshing cotton candy pink and icy blue accents on the midsole. The shoe’s body incorporates a seamless blend of artificial leather and sandwich mesh, creating a clean, fresh, and elegant aesthetic.

    —Detailed Specifications
    Taking a size 42 (265mm) as an example, the Kawasaki Bingguo weighs just 317g per shoe, fitting perfectly into the lightweight category. Technologically, the entry-to-intermediate Bingguo generously offers a substantial carbon fiber bridge at the midfoot connection, reinforced with TPU encircling for exceptional torsional resistance, rivaling high-end shoes. Furthermore, the midsole and insole generously utilize ample EVA material.

    —Fit & Comfort
    Putting on the Bingguo, the first impression is of a soft, snug fit and smooth bending. The shoe’s slender silhouette lengthens the appearance of the foot, making it highly recognizable.

    This is mainly due to the Bingguo’s U-shaped 2.5E standard last, providing high adaptability. The spacious forefoot chamber is comfortable and wide enough, making it ideal for players with wider feet. Coupled with a low-cut design that favors compatibility and a sturdy heel counter, the shoe offers a strong lockdown feel.

    In gameplay, with its 317g weight, the Bingguo delivers a moderately fast start-up speed. The EVA cushioning in the forefoot is ample, though the speed sensation isn’t overwhelming. However, the heel’s rebound cushioning is noticeable and soft, ample for players of heavier builds.

    Additionally, the shoe’s midsole and outsole feature widened lateral designs, offering excellent lateral grip and support during intense stops and starts.

    —Recommendation Summary
    The Kawasaki Bingguo boasts a refreshing and pleasant appearance, combined with dual protection from its carbon fiber bridge and TPU encircling. At this entry-to-intermediate price point, it stands out as a top contender, surpassing many other models and brands. Highly recommended for intermediate players and those who prioritize protection and breathability, especially if you have a heavier build.

  • Badminton Shoes Victor 9200II vs Asics COURT FF NOVAK Reviews

    Badminton Shoes Victor 9200II vs Asics COURT FF NOVAK Reviews

    Firstly, please note that the Asics COURT FF NOVAK is a tennis shoe, so if you’re not interested in wearing tennis shoes for badminton, feel free to skip this.

    After recovering from my ankle injury to about 80%, I switched to the Victor 9200II and played two sessions. The main reason I chose the Victor was its good lateral support for protection. My actual experience: decent cushioning, average starting responsiveness, better lateral support than the Hawk 4, but the overall wear felt a bit bulky, and the appearance was just average. Sometimes, I’d still switch back to my trusty 65Z. Being a fan of higher-cut shoes, I looked for another pair with strong lateral support and decent looks. After much deliberation, I stumbled upon the Asics COURT FF NOVAK while browsing for the BLAST FF 2. Its appearance ticked all the boxes.

    Some people might argue that tennis shoes aren’t suitable for badminton courts, but I reasoned that tennis, with its demanding lateral movements, requires even higher lateral support (given my ankle injury, this was my top priority). Furthermore, tennis shoes cater to different surfaces like hard courts, clay, and indoor rubber, so for rubber badminton courts, they should suffice. I checked the specs and concluded it was fine.

    I placed my order and after two games, I was surprised to find that the tennis shoes weren’t as heavy as I anticipated. In fact, they didn’t weigh much more than the Victor 9200II. However, the visual difference is striking – the COURT FF NOVAK is far more appealing. For reference, here are the weights (both Asics and YY are size 41.5, while Victor is 40.5, all with an insole length of 260MM):

    • COURT FF NOVAK: 368.9g
    • Victor 9200II: 345.3g
    • 65Z: 294.5g

    Wearing experience: Truly impressive. I’ve always associated Asics running shoes with their famous “walking on clouds” feel, but I experienced it in these tennis shoes too. The sole material is slightly firmer than the Victor 9200II but significantly better in terms of torsion control. I could twist the Victor’s sole, but the COURT FF NOVAK was rock-solid. Clearly, tennis places a premium on anti-rollover protection. The shock absorption is superior to the Victor 9200II, and I felt quicker starts, possibly due to the lack of a bulky feel (or maybe it’s just my mind playing tricks). Here’s a comparison of the soles, including the 65Z for reference.

    A few additional visuals comparing their appearances:

    In summary, tennis shoes can indeed perform well in badminton, provided you choose ones suitable for rubber courts. As for appearance, personal taste varies, but to me, tennis shoes outshine current badminton shoes hands down.

    As a side note, with the COURT FF NOVAK in my arsenal, the Victor 9200II is likely to be sold on the secondhand market (in near-mint condition, 98% new, with original insoles unused, replaced with XD’s). If interested, feel free to reach out.

  • Badminton Shoes ASICS GEL-BLADE 8 Reviews

    Badminton Shoes ASICS GEL-BLADE 8 Reviews

    As the sweltering summer draws to a close, we unbox a new companion. Renowned for its excellent reputation among basketball enthusiasts, ASICS shoes have carved out a unique niche amidst the fiercely competitive landscape of the three major shoe brands. The Aurora and Revelation series consistently score above 9.5 points on the Zhongyu Equipment Library, with Aurora 2 currently ranking among the top three most popular shoes. Today, we bring you the latest addition to ASICS’ popular Gel Blade series: the all-new Gel Blade 8.

    According to official sources, the Gel Blade 8 features a newly upgraded seamless mesh upper that offers superior breathability, lightweightness, and wraparound support. It keeps your feet cool while ensuring a snug fit for enhanced comfort. The innovative upper material also significantly reduces the overall weight compared to its predecessor.

    The Gel Blade 8 boasts an increased ankle collar height, providing better ankle protection during intense play. The midsole incorporates ASICS’ flagship cushioning technology, FLYTEFOAM PROPEL, a highly elastic foam that combines cushioning with rebound. This upgrade from the SPEVA foam used in the 7th generation delivers superior shock absorption and rebound, enhancing athletic performance.

    The TPU TRUSSTIC technology in the sole not only lightens the shoe but also improves stability and torsional rigidity. The new outsole tread design ensures excellent grip, while the X GUIDANCE grooves in the forefoot enhance multidirectional movement flexibility.

    The primary showcase of this unboxing is the gray-orange colorway, featuring an elegant interplay between a subtle gray and a vibrant orange, creating a sophisticated yet layered aesthetic. The official flagship black-red version is also one of the most classic color combinations in the sneaker world. Red, the first color in the visible spectrum, paired with black, a neutral hue often referred to as “achromatic,” creates a visually stunning effect. The black-red pairing is deeply favored by many leading brands, such as the iconic AJ1. As the cool autumn air sets in, equipping yourself with a pair of high-performance basketball shoes is the perfect way to enjoy a game of hoops.

  • Badminton Shoes ASICS Blast FF2 Reviews

    Badminton Shoes ASICS Blast FF2 Reviews

    Recently, ASICS’ popular Gel Blast FF2 badminton shoes in a brand-new colorway have arrived for an unboxing session on Zhongyu. Following the unboxing of the Gel Blade 8 last year, many badminton enthusiasts have been eagerly anticipating the arrival of the Gel Blast series. Today, let’s take a closer look at the stunning new colorway of the Gel Blast FF2.

    Key Technology Features:

    According to official information, the ASICS Gel Blast FF2 is designed for stability in badminton. The shoe features a large area of heat-fused material, providing ample wraparound support and reinforcement for the upper. The DYNAWRAP dynamic wrap technology at the instep ensures dynamic lockdown for the midfoot during movement, ensuring stability and safety for the wearer. The TRUSSTIC midfoot stability shank, a signature feature of ASICS, is equipped under the midsole, coupled with a “wing-shaped” stability plate that runs through the midfoot to the heel on the outer side of the shoe, offering robust torsional rigidity and lateral support. The midsole incorporates ASICS’ proprietary FLYTEFOAM cushioning material, which balances lightweight construction with ample cushioning and rebound.

    Aesthetics: Orange—Warmth for Autumn, Passion for Summer

    From the gray-orange color scheme of the Gel Blade 8 unboxed last autumn to the white-orange-black combo of the new Gel Blast FF2, it seems that ASICS designers have a special fondness for orange, making it the highlight of the overall design. In the early autumn when the weather gradually cools, orange brings warmth, while in the upcoming sweltering summer, it represents boundless passion. The Gel Blast FF2 boasts a black-and-white upper with vibrant orange accents on the TURNTRUSS side panels. The color transition from black to orange, with large areas of white trim, appears more natural and adds a touch of liveliness and dynamism, creating a more eye-catching visual effect.

    The Gel Blast series has consistently maintained a high rating (9.3) in the Zhongyu equipment database, boasting a loyal fan base. This new colorway offers even more diverse options for fans of the Gel Blast series. Currently, the Gel Blast FF2 in this fresh colorway is available in stores.

    “Vibrant Orange Ignites Summer,” marking the beginning of this summer’s heatwave with a wave of passionate orange energy.

  • Badminton Shoes Asics Court Control FF3 Review

    Badminton Shoes Asics Court Control FF3 Review

    Asics’ running shoes are indeed formidable among Japanese counterparts, and its badminton shoes have always been, in my opinion, the most formidable brand outside the big three. Based on recommendations from fellow players, the current consensus among enthusiasts for high-end badminton shoes from Asics is the Gel Kayano EVO 3. The fact that the EVO series has reached its third generation speaks for itself – who would bother with a third iteration if it weren’t worth it?

    Recently, a major sale on a popular e-commerce platform offered incredible discounts, so I jumped at the opportunity to grab a pair.

    The Gel Kayano EVO 3 is priced at 1090, but I managed to get it at around half off during the sale. For those aiming to snag it below 500, you’ll need to dedicate some serious effort into coupon-hunting and patience for the right moment. Some colorways have been spotted for around 4xx after rigorous searching and validation from fellow players, but I wasn’t lucky enough to catch that deal. It’s also intriguing to note the significant price variations across different color options, with some attractive hues commanding prices closer to 600. I’m still unsure if there’s any performance difference tied to these different “skins.”

    The EVO 3 is made in Vietnam, and its craftsmanship surpasses that of the 65z3, also from Vietnam, which comes across as more simplistic and plastic-like. The EVO 3 exudes a more refined aesthetic. It’s undeniable that the quality control from a full-spectrum shoe giant, especially one rooted in Japan, is significantly better than that of lesser-known manufacturers.

    The EVO 3 adheres to a classic badminton shoe silhouette, featuring a moderate and stable design that’s not overly bulky. The upper utilizes a mesh KPU heat-pressed technology, ensuring exceptional wrap and stability. Asics’ iconic GEL cushioning technology is present and accounted for, complemented by the FLYTEFOAM dual-layer midsole, which balances responsiveness with lightweight properties. There’s no sign of a carbon plate in the midsole, instead relying on a specialized TPU at the arch for support. For those who swear by carbon plates, this might not be the shoe for you. But let it be known: carbon plates aren’t the sole determinant of a shoe’s premium status – just look at the EVO 3 and the 990!

    In US size 8.5, the shoe weighs 311g, making it relatively lightweight among stable-focused models. The low center of gravity, slightly narrow last, and lower ankle collar (which might be a consideration for wider feet – consider sizing up) contribute to a solid on-foot feel. Initial impressions highlight a strong wrap around the instep, with the outer side effectively locking the foot in place to minimize slippage. However, the lower ankle collar gives me a slight psychological feeling of less robust lateral support, though it’s purely subjective.

    Pros of Wearing:

    1. Excellent protection and lateral support without a carbon plate, suitable even for heavier players.
    2. Superior grip compared to the 65z3 and other similar shoes.
    3. Well-balanced, low-to-the-ground, lightweight, and quick in both initiation and feedback, with strong court feel.
    4. The GEL cushioning in the heel provides a comfortable landing experience, with a feedback that feels more refined than dynamic foams, hopefully with a slower performance degradation.
    5. The overall mesh TPU construction offers good lateral support and breathability, making it suitable even for warmer climates.

    Cons of Wearing:

    1. The insole feels uncomfortable, too thin for my liking.
    2. The shoe lacks a standout feature, offering a balanced but somewhat unremarkable performance that could be replicated by others.
    3. Despite its esteemed brand and solid performance, the EVO 3 lacks the social currency aspect that some might seek.

    In summary, the EVO 3 delivers a solid, unassuming performance, equipping you with everything you need without any particular aspect shining brighter than the rest. It proves that carbon plates and supercritical materials aren’t prerequisites for a shoe to rival the top dogs in the industry. Compared to the popular 65z3, the EVO 3 may not boast as many color options or a stronger social presence, but it stands its ground in terms of pure performance, making it a solid choice for those seeking a reliable, high-quality Japanese-inspired badminton shoe – akin to a beloved local restaurant introducing a new dish that’s both flavorful and of guaranteed quality, albeit not quite the city’s top pick yet.

  • Badminton Shoes ASICS Blast FF3 Review

    Badminton Shoes ASICS Blast FF3 Review

    If I were to ask you right now: What are the essential features or technologies that a premium sneaker priced around a thousand yuan should possess?

    Your first answer, chances are, would be “carbon plate,” and so would mine.

    Yet, there exists a shoe, or even a brand, that never incorporates carbon plates in its high-end badminton shoes. Renowned in the running shoe scene but niche and intriguing in the badminton world, it’s none other than ASICS.

    Upon hearing the name “Aurora,” one might envision a dazzling icy blue, but the “Venom” colorway with its black and green hues is equally captivating, exuding a sci-fi vibe.

    The “exoskeleton”-like TPU reinforcement, resembling alien ecology, serves as the backbone of the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3), enhancing both its aesthetic appeal and overall performance.

    The Blast FF3 (Aurora 3) is a lightweight cushioned badminton shoe. Its sock-like design eliminates tongue slippage, enhancing comfort, while the upgraded upper improves wrap and stability. The midsole features lightweight FLYTEFOAM foam, balancing lightness with cushioning. The TPU stability plate on the lateral side provides lateral support.

    Static Wear Experience

    As a 179 cm, 68 kg individual with a Greek foot of 265 mm and a narrow yet wide foot shape, I chose a size 42.5 with an internal length of 270 mm for the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3). Upon wearing, I noticed that the forefoot space is moderately roomy, with a snug fit around the midfoot and a tight-fitting sensation across the instep.

    Due to the slight excess space in the forefoot, I suggest adjusting the lining material or wearing thicker socks, or even replacing the insole, as these can effectively address the issue. Thus, I conclude that the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3) would suit players with wide feet and a low instep.

    Fans of the predecessor, the Blast FF2, would attest to its secure fit and robust support, but some criticized the reduced heel lockdown due to the lowered ankle collar.

    The Blast FF3 (Aurora 3) addresses this by adopting a tongueless half-sock inner boot and adding more foam padding to the heel. Although the heel lockdown is slightly improved over its predecessor, it still falls short for those with narrow feet like me.

    The tongueless half-sock design lowers the ankle collar, sacrificing some protection but enhancing flexibility while providing moderate ankle support. This versatility even allows some players to use it for volleyball or basketball.

    On-Court Experience

    Weighing just 332.2g for a size 42.5 (270 mm), the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3) feels light and agile on the feet, with a low center of gravity, solidifying its position as a speed-oriented shoe.

    Its ground feel upon takeoff is solid and responsive, with no drag. Notably, the fused heat-sealed upper enhances support compared to its predecessor but may require some breaking in due to its stiffer flex.

    Outstanding Support and Anti-Rollover Performance

    Not only does the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3) physically widen its outsole to prevent rollover, but its low center of gravity also contributes to this.

    Moreover, the material hardness of the outsole’s lateral edge is noticeably increased, further enhancing anti-rollover performance.

    Coupled with the TRUSS TIC TPU midfoot stabilizer, which runs through the shoe, reinforcing the outer corners, the heel’s anti-rollover effect is remarkable, making it virtually impossible to roll over during intense play.

    Impressive Traction

    Especially on wooden floors in multi-purpose venues, the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3)’s unique tread pattern of irregular circles and triangles, combined with its solid rubber outsole, provides exceptional grip.

    Interestingly, while tying my shoelaces, I caught a whiff of the rubber’s aroma, reminiscent of childhood playdough. Could this unusual scent hint at the shoe’s exceptional grip due to a more adhesive rubber compound?

    Now, you might wonder, even with these impressive features, what truly sets the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3) apart. Here’s the real deal:

    ASICS enthusiasts are likely familiar with the brand’s renowned GEL cushioning and FLYTEFOAM foam technologies. GEL, introduced in the 1980s, remains a top fluid cushioning technology in running shoes despite its weighty density.

    In contrast, FLYTEFOAM foam, ASICS’s primary lightweight and responsive cushioning technology, was a natural choice for the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3).

    Contrary to the typical soft, plush feel of foam, the FLYTEFOAM in the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3) provides a more supportive and firm landing, with a concentrated rebound impact. While the cushioning is improved over its predecessor, heavier players may find the impact too direct.

    Conclusion

    The Blast FF3 (Aurora 3) demonstrates that a shoe from a brand with a rich heritage can achieve greatness through simple yet effective material technologies and refined application of existing technologies.

    It boasts robust torsional rigidity, anti-rollover performance, and improved breathability and wrap over its predecessor. However, there’s still room for improvement in heel lockdown, forefoot space, and cushioning for heavier players.

    As a speed-oriented shoe, it offers quick start-up response but sacrifices some protection and cushioning, making it less suitable for heavier players.

    Lastly, among premium sneakers priced below 600, there’s ample choice among flagship and celebrity-endorsed models. But if you seek uniqueness, avoiding the “same-shoe” syndrome, and drawing admiring glances from fellow players, the Blast FF3 (Aurora 3) from ASICS will surely put a smile on your face when they inquire about it.