Tag: HYPERNANO X 100

  • Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 100 Reviews

    Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 100 Reviews

    Whenever there’s a clearance sale, it always heats up some lesser-known, niche rackets. At lower prices, the trial and error cost of these rackets decreases significantly, which broadens their user base. This allows the characteristics of these rackets to be more thoroughly explored and understood, often reversing their reputation.

    HypernanoX 100 — I’ve witnessed this racket being sold at terrifying clearance prices, going for as low as 249 RMB for a bare frame in some stores, despite it being an entry-level high-end racket from one of the big three brands. With 80% of the full tech package advertised, even second-tier or independent brand flagships couldn’t compete.

    However, after snatching up a bargain, few people would care to explore why it ended up in clearance in the first place.

    Specifications:
    3UG5, fully strung weight of 96g, balance point 291mm, 6.8mm shaft (210mm long), stiff tuning (although marked as medium), diamond aero frame, strung at 27 lbs with BG65ti.

    The racket looks great, with a cherry red color scheme that even tough guys might tear up over. The various layers of patterns and color blocks create a very distinct visual depth. Although other models in the same series—like the 990 and 900 in red, or the 600 and Sun in navy blue, or even the 800 in black—may stand out visually, none of them appeal to me as much as the 100. In addition to the color, the asymmetrical design of the frame’s pattern is quite detailed, which should be enough to attract many players.

    When held in hand, the HX100 should be suitable for both beginner female players and intermediate male players. Unless you severely lack strength, the 3U version is likely the better choice. The balance point isn’t high, so the racket feels light to swing with little burden. The feel is solid enough, and opting for a 4U version might lead to the racket feeling too floaty. With its swing speed and weight, the HX100 seems more suited for doubles play.

    During warm-up rallies, you can feel that the HX100 requires some effort to generate power; it’s not an effortless racket. Besides the high string tension and light head making it harder to utilize, the shaft is a major point of criticism. At first, the racket feels stiff and jarring on impact, with noticeable shaft stiffness that contradicts its advertised medium-flex label. Other feedback from players in my gear library echo this opinion. Based on my experience, this racket needs a break-in period. After owning it for about a month now, I can feel the shaft gradually becoming more manageable, but the overall playing experience still leans stiff. As a high-end model, this 6.8mm shaft doesn’t feature technologies like Flash Shaft or Pyrofil; instead, it just has a modified material formula with nanotubes. Perhaps the experimentation wasn’t enough, as the playing experience doesn’t match the promotional claims, suggesting a mismatch between the technology and performance, leading to a disjointed playing feel.

    The HX100 doesn’t communicate feedback consistently with each shot, and this disconnect affects the interaction between player and racket. For instance, during a powerful smash, the racket’s offensive potential is evident, with enough strength to deliver a floor-smashing shot. The balanced weight also makes it easy to generate power, with decent precision. However, compared to other high-end rackets that give a distinct sense of elasticity and rebound after a strong hit, the HX100 lacks a recognizable feel. Regardless of angle or power, the feedback feels the same, which can be likened to clapping hands with someone who doesn’t want to participate.

    The HX100 performs well for active, power-based shots with crisp shuttle release, but its feedback characteristics make backcourt slice shots and net play unfriendly. Frequent errors in backcourt shots remind you to put in extra effort, and when paired with the BG65ti strings, it’s all too easy to lift the shuttle too high in net play, losing any advantage in net battles. In defense, I frequently encountered puzzling mishits—swinging early before the shuttle arrived or missing shots even when the direction was correct. This is rare and could either point to a torsion issue with the racket or just me being off my game. It’s also harder to lift smashes, which doesn’t correlate with the size of the racket’s string bed or frame.

    In summary, after multiple tests, I found that when I’m in good form and able to respond to each shot, especially in favorable conditions, the HX100 can offer a satisfying experience with its solid shuttle release. However, when my form is off and I need more support from the racket, particularly in defense-heavy situations, the HX100 becomes inexplicably uncooperative. The switch between these states can happen within just a few minutes during a game.

    For beginners, I wouldn’t recommend this racket. While it has the looks and decent product quality, now that it’s returned to its normal price range, I think other mid-tier rackets from Victory would offer a more controllable experience for most players. At around 300 RMB, the HX100 is still a good deal, but you’ll need to invest some time in breaking it in—and it may not be the most enjoyable process.

  • Badminton Racket VICTPOR HYPERNANO X 100 Reviews

    Badminton Racket VICTPOR HYPERNANO X 100 Reviews

    Every time there’s a clearance sale, some lesser-known rackets often get a lot of attention. With the significantly reduced trial-and-error cost of these obscure rackets, they reach a broader user base, allowing their features to be more thoroughly explored and understood, which can lead to a reversal in reputation.

    The HypernanoX 100 is an example. I’ve seen this racket go for a terrifyingly low price during clearances. As a high-end entry model from one of the big three brands, it once reached a price of 249 for the bare frame at some retailers. With the advertised 80% full-spec technology, it made even second-tier and independent flagship models look inferior.

    However, once people have picked it up at a bargain, few would delve into why it was discounted.

    Parameters: 3UG5, full-spec 96g, balance point 291mm, 210mm length 6.8mm shaft, hard tuning (marked as soft), diamond aerodynamic frame, string tension 27 lbs BG65TI.

    The racket is visually appealing, with a cherry red that could make a strong man weep. The various patterns and color blocks create a very pronounced sense of layering. While the big reds of the 990 and 900, the navy blue of the 600 and SUN, and the black of the 800 are eye-catching, none look as “good” as the 100. Besides the color scheme, the asymmetrical frame design has many fine details, which theoretically should attract many players.

    In terms of hand-feel alone, the HX100 is a better choice for both beginner female players and advanced male players, unless power is extremely lacking. The 3U version is preferable due to its low balance point and light swing load, providing a certain lightness and solid feel. If using the 4U version, it might feel too floaty. The swing speed and weight suggest the HX100 is more suited for doubles play.

    During warm-up, it can be felt that the HX100 requires some effort, not particularly effortless. Aside from the higher string tension and light head causing less leverage, the shaft is a notable issue. Initially, the hitting feel was very wooden and jarring, with the shaft feeling much harder than the moderately soft rating suggests. Feedback from other users supports this view. According to my experience, the racket needs some break-in time. After about a month of use, the shaft’s operability is gradually improving, but the actual feel still remains stiff. As a high-end model, the 6.8mm shaft neither uses Flash Shaft nor Pyrofil but only improves material formulation with added nanotech. This might be a result of insufficient testing; the actual feel does not align with the promotional claims, possibly due to poor adaptability.

    The HX100 is not good at relaying each shot’s feedback, affecting the player-racket communication. For example, during powerful smashes, the racket shows good offensive potential and power direction. However, compared to other high-end rackets, the HX100 lacks distinct feedback in terms of resilience and rebound after powerful shots. The feedback feels almost uniform regardless of shot angle or power, similar to an undesired clapping sound.

    The HX100’s performance can meet many active and powerful shots, with a crisp feel, but this feedback characteristic makes rear court smashes and net play less favorable. Frequent netting issues in the rear court suggest a need for more power, while net play with the 65TI string tends to bounce high, losing an advantage in net battles. Passive defense often results in bizarre misses, either from the racket’s torsion issues or my own performance. The difficulty of lifting smashes increases, which doesn’t align with the racket’s string bed area and frame size.

    Overall, the HX100 offers good performance when in good form and able to handle each return, especially in favorable conditions. However, it becomes inexplicably difficult when in poor form or during frequent passive defense in challenging conditions. This shift in performance can happen within a few minutes during a match.

    Not recommended for beginners. While its appearance and product strength are commendable, at its current regular price, other mid-range Victory models might offer a more controllable experience for most players. At around 300, the HX100 is quite appealing, but it requires more time to adjust, and this period might not be very enjoyable.Every time there’s a clearance sale, some lesser-known rackets often get a lot of attention. With the significantly reduced trial-and-error cost of these obscure rackets, they reach a broader user base, allowing their features to be more thoroughly explored and understood, which can lead to a reversal in reputation.

    The HypernanoX 100 is an example. I’ve seen this racket go for a terrifyingly low price during clearances. As a high-end entry model from one of the big three brands, it once reached a price of 249 for the bare frame at some retailers. With the advertised 80% full-spec technology, it made even second-tier and independent flagship models look inferior.

    However, once people have picked it up at a bargain, few would delve into why it was discounted.

    Parameters: 3UG5, full-spec 96g, balance point 291mm, 210mm length 6.8mm shaft, hard tuning (marked as soft), diamond aerodynamic frame, string tension 27 lbs BG65TI.

    The racket is visually appealing, with a cherry red that could make a strong man weep. The various patterns and color blocks create a very pronounced sense of layering. While the big reds of the 990 and 900, the navy blue of the 600 and SUN, and the black of the 800 are eye-catching, none look as “good” as the 100. Besides the color scheme, the asymmetrical frame design has many fine details, which theoretically should attract many players.

    In terms of hand-feel alone, the HX100 is a better choice for both beginner female players and advanced male players, unless power is extremely lacking. The 3U version is preferable due to its low balance point and light swing load, providing a certain lightness and solid feel. If using the 4U version, it might feel too floaty. The swing speed and weight suggest the HX100 is more suited for doubles play.

    During warm-up, it can be felt that the HX100 requires some effort, not particularly effortless. Aside from the higher string tension and light head causing less leverage, the shaft is a notable issue. Initially, the hitting feel was very wooden and jarring, with the shaft feeling much harder than the moderately soft rating suggests. Feedback from other users supports this view. According to my experience, the racket needs some break-in time. After about a month of use, the shaft’s operability is gradually improving, but the actual feel still remains stiff. As a high-end model, the 6.8mm shaft neither uses Flash Shaft nor Pyrofil but only improves material formulation with added nanotech. This might be a result of insufficient testing; the actual feel does not align with the promotional claims, possibly due to poor adaptability.

    The HX100 is not good at relaying each shot’s feedback, affecting the player-racket communication. For example, during powerful smashes, the racket shows good offensive potential and power direction. However, compared to other high-end rackets, the HX100 lacks distinct feedback in terms of resilience and rebound after powerful shots. The feedback feels almost uniform regardless of shot angle or power, similar to an undesired clapping sound.

    The HX100’s performance can meet many active and powerful shots, with a crisp feel, but this feedback characteristic makes rear court smashes and net play less favorable. Frequent netting issues in the rear court suggest a need for more power, while net play with the 65TI string tends to bounce high, losing an advantage in net battles. Passive defense often results in bizarre misses, either from the racket’s torsion issues or my own performance. The difficulty of lifting smashes increases, which doesn’t align with the racket’s string bed area and frame size.

    Overall, the HX100 offers good performance when in good form and able to handle each return, especially in favorable conditions. However, it becomes inexplicably difficult when in poor form or during frequent passive defense in challenging conditions. This shift in performance can happen within a few minutes during a match.

    Not recommended for beginners. While its appearance and product strength are commendable, at its current regular price, other mid-range Victory models might offer a more controllable experience for most players. At around 300, the HX100 is quite appealing, but it requires more time to adjust, and this period might not be very enjoyable.