Tag: HYPERNANO X 800

  • Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 800 Reviews

    Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 800 Reviews

    This might be the flagship of the HypernanoX series. The HX800 once stood out with its reputation and popularity. As one of Tai Tzu Ying’s former rackets, the HX800 won over many players with its unique feel and excellent performance. However, like many other Victory bestsellers, its destiny was the same—issues such as collapse and cracks ultimately became the main reason why many people hesitated to buy it.

    Specifications:
    3UG5, with base grip, total weight in playing condition is 92.9g, balance point 305mm, 6.8mm Pyrofil carbon shaft, length 215mm, stiff tuning, diamond aero frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 point string grooves, warranty up to 28 lbs, strung at 25–27 lbs with KT65.
    This is a racket with a black base, but its black paint is very pure, like ink, without any grayish tone. The racket features plenty of technology, some of which is exclusive to the HX series. Back in the day, the diamond aero frame offered both swing speed and stability. The appearance of the racket isn’t outstanding, but the additional stickers and purer black color give it a decent texture. However, the stickers and paint are quite fragile and easily show defects.

    The HX800 is clearly a high-end piece of equipment aimed at advanced players, and its power threshold is not low. In terms of head weight, it definitely qualifies as a balanced racket, which aligns with my overall impression of the HX series. However, both the shaft and frame feel might discourage beginners. From my perspective, the shaft’s stiffness is comparable to that of the HX900x, but the latter’s more pronounced head weight makes it excellent for leveraging power. In contrast, with the HX800, you’ll mostly have to rely on your own strength—even for warm-up clears, the 3U version in my hand still felt quite stiff.

    There are two twin versions of the HX800: the LTD-C and LTD-P. In my previous trials, I noted that in terms of shuttle hold, actual swing weight, and feedback, the HX800 sits between the two. Although the shuttle releases crisply, the 800 doesn’t give me the same surprising swing speed as the LTDC.

    One advantage, however, is that this racket has low shock absorption, giving it a raw, hand-to-hand combat feel. For instance, when defending against smashes, the sense of power return to the backcourt feels very effortless—especially when facing opponents who like to hit hard. It’s almost as if you don’t need to use much physical energy to drive them back effectively. This direct feeling also translates well during flat drives, where the response delay is very low, resulting in a high-elasticity and stable shuttle release. The current 3U specs, though, don’t quite offer the most seamless experience in continuous drive-play. Otherwise, this racket would excel at flat exchanges. However, for players who prefer control, the racket’s lack of shuttle hold could reduce forgiveness during delicate net battles, as the adjustment window between high lifts and net errors is very small.

    Since the shuttle releases immediately, the heavy smash performance of the HX800 depends entirely on the player’s timing. The more focused the hit, the more lethal it becomes. This aspect is quite unforgiving—similar to the DZS. When hitting sharp smashes, the shuttle releases quickly and unexpectedly, but during heavy smashes, it seems to require much more concentrated power to achieve somewhat satisfactory downward pressure. I recently experienced this same sensation with the first-generation Protech 2013P. I believe this is where the HX800 falls short compared to the MX80N. Personally, I prefer rackets that are more lightweight and easy to generate power with, so I suspect that the 4U version of this racket would be a better option for feeling that drive sensation.

    This racket was borrowed from a local friend.
    I had previously tested this racket once. Despite my desire to write about it after our first encounter, I knew at the time that I couldn’t fully explore its potential, so I didn’t rush into writing. After borrowing it again recently, I got another chance to experience it. However, this reunion, two years later, was a bit less enchanting than before.

  • Badminton Racket HYPERNANO X 800 Reviews

    Badminton Racket HYPERNANO X 800 Reviews

    This is probably the face of the HypernanoX series. The HX800 once stood out in reputation and popularity. As the former racket of Tai Tzu-ying, the HX800 has won many fans with its unique feel and excellent performance. However, like many of Victory’s popular models, it shares the same fate of collapse and cracking, which has deterred many from choosing it.

    Parameters: 3UG5, with a base, total weight 92.9g, balance point 305mm, 6.8mm Boro Carbon shaft, length 215mm, hard tuning, diamond aerodynamic frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock grommets, 28 lbs warranty, string tension 25-27 lbs KT65.

    This is a racket with a black base, but the black primer is very deep, like ink, with no grayish tint. The racket features a lot of technology, some of which is exclusive to the HX series. In its time, the diamond aerodynamic frame combined swing speed with stability. The appearance isn’t outstanding, but the additional stickers and purer black give it a quality look. However, both the stickers and paint are quite fragile and prone to defects.

    The HX800 is clearly a high-end racket for advanced players, with a high driving threshold. In terms of head heaviness, it is definitely a balanced racket, which matches my impression of the HX series. The feel of the shaft and frame can be discouraging for beginners. The shaft’s hardness might be similar to the HX900X, but the latter’s stronger head heaviness excels in power driving, while the HX800 relies more on the player’s own power. Even with a 3U version, the racket still feels quite stiff, even for warm-up clears.

    The HX800 also has two twin versions, LTD-C and LTD-P. Based on previous trials, and considering factors like ball response, swing weight, and feedback, the HX800 falls between the two. Although the shot is extremely crisp, it doesn’t provide the same swing speed surprise as the LTD-C.

    However, one advantage is its low energy loss, providing a raw, powerful feel. In situations like receiving smashes, the rebound feeling is very easy, especially against opponents who like to hit hard. It almost doesn’t require much physical effort to counter their shots.

    Additionally, this direct feel provides very low response delay during flat drives, making shots high-bouncing and stable. But the current 3U specification doesn’t offer a more continuous frame swing experience; otherwise, it would excel in flat drives. For players who favor control, the non-holding racket face may reduce tolerance in net play, with a very narrow adjustment window between high bounce and netting.

    Since the racket is designed for quick shots, its heavy smash performance completely depends on the user’s ability to pinpoint power. The more concentrated the power, the more lethal the shot. This can be quite unfriendly, similar to the DZS model, where although the racket seems to deliver quick and sudden shots during flat kills, a more focused effort is needed for satisfactory smashes. I’ve recently felt a similar experience with the original Boli 2013P, and I think this is where the HX800 falls short compared to the MX80N. I tend to prefer lighter rackets that are easier to power up, and the 4U version seems more suitable for driving.

    This racket was borrowed from a local friend. I had previously tried this racket once before. Although I really wanted to write about it after that first encounter, I knew I couldn’t fully grasp its nuances at the time, so I didn’t push myself to write it. Recently, after borrowing it again, I got another opportunity to experience it. However, this reunion after two years has somewhat diluted my impressions.