Tag: HYPERNANO X

  • Badminton Racket VICTPOR HYPERNANO X 100 Reviews

    Badminton Racket VICTPOR HYPERNANO X 100 Reviews

    Every time there’s a clearance sale, some lesser-known rackets often get a lot of attention. With the significantly reduced trial-and-error cost of these obscure rackets, they reach a broader user base, allowing their features to be more thoroughly explored and understood, which can lead to a reversal in reputation.

    The HypernanoX 100 is an example. I’ve seen this racket go for a terrifyingly low price during clearances. As a high-end entry model from one of the big three brands, it once reached a price of 249 for the bare frame at some retailers. With the advertised 80% full-spec technology, it made even second-tier and independent flagship models look inferior.

    However, once people have picked it up at a bargain, few would delve into why it was discounted.

    Parameters: 3UG5, full-spec 96g, balance point 291mm, 210mm length 6.8mm shaft, hard tuning (marked as soft), diamond aerodynamic frame, string tension 27 lbs BG65TI.

    The racket is visually appealing, with a cherry red that could make a strong man weep. The various patterns and color blocks create a very pronounced sense of layering. While the big reds of the 990 and 900, the navy blue of the 600 and SUN, and the black of the 800 are eye-catching, none look as “good” as the 100. Besides the color scheme, the asymmetrical frame design has many fine details, which theoretically should attract many players.

    In terms of hand-feel alone, the HX100 is a better choice for both beginner female players and advanced male players, unless power is extremely lacking. The 3U version is preferable due to its low balance point and light swing load, providing a certain lightness and solid feel. If using the 4U version, it might feel too floaty. The swing speed and weight suggest the HX100 is more suited for doubles play.

    During warm-up, it can be felt that the HX100 requires some effort, not particularly effortless. Aside from the higher string tension and light head causing less leverage, the shaft is a notable issue. Initially, the hitting feel was very wooden and jarring, with the shaft feeling much harder than the moderately soft rating suggests. Feedback from other users supports this view. According to my experience, the racket needs some break-in time. After about a month of use, the shaft’s operability is gradually improving, but the actual feel still remains stiff. As a high-end model, the 6.8mm shaft neither uses Flash Shaft nor Pyrofil but only improves material formulation with added nanotech. This might be a result of insufficient testing; the actual feel does not align with the promotional claims, possibly due to poor adaptability.

    The HX100 is not good at relaying each shot’s feedback, affecting the player-racket communication. For example, during powerful smashes, the racket shows good offensive potential and power direction. However, compared to other high-end rackets, the HX100 lacks distinct feedback in terms of resilience and rebound after powerful shots. The feedback feels almost uniform regardless of shot angle or power, similar to an undesired clapping sound.

    The HX100’s performance can meet many active and powerful shots, with a crisp feel, but this feedback characteristic makes rear court smashes and net play less favorable. Frequent netting issues in the rear court suggest a need for more power, while net play with the 65TI string tends to bounce high, losing an advantage in net battles. Passive defense often results in bizarre misses, either from the racket’s torsion issues or my own performance. The difficulty of lifting smashes increases, which doesn’t align with the racket’s string bed area and frame size.

    Overall, the HX100 offers good performance when in good form and able to handle each return, especially in favorable conditions. However, it becomes inexplicably difficult when in poor form or during frequent passive defense in challenging conditions. This shift in performance can happen within a few minutes during a match.

    Not recommended for beginners. While its appearance and product strength are commendable, at its current regular price, other mid-range Victory models might offer a more controllable experience for most players. At around 300, the HX100 is quite appealing, but it requires more time to adjust, and this period might not be very enjoyable.Every time there’s a clearance sale, some lesser-known rackets often get a lot of attention. With the significantly reduced trial-and-error cost of these obscure rackets, they reach a broader user base, allowing their features to be more thoroughly explored and understood, which can lead to a reversal in reputation.

    The HypernanoX 100 is an example. I’ve seen this racket go for a terrifyingly low price during clearances. As a high-end entry model from one of the big three brands, it once reached a price of 249 for the bare frame at some retailers. With the advertised 80% full-spec technology, it made even second-tier and independent flagship models look inferior.

    However, once people have picked it up at a bargain, few would delve into why it was discounted.

    Parameters: 3UG5, full-spec 96g, balance point 291mm, 210mm length 6.8mm shaft, hard tuning (marked as soft), diamond aerodynamic frame, string tension 27 lbs BG65TI.

    The racket is visually appealing, with a cherry red that could make a strong man weep. The various patterns and color blocks create a very pronounced sense of layering. While the big reds of the 990 and 900, the navy blue of the 600 and SUN, and the black of the 800 are eye-catching, none look as “good” as the 100. Besides the color scheme, the asymmetrical frame design has many fine details, which theoretically should attract many players.

    In terms of hand-feel alone, the HX100 is a better choice for both beginner female players and advanced male players, unless power is extremely lacking. The 3U version is preferable due to its low balance point and light swing load, providing a certain lightness and solid feel. If using the 4U version, it might feel too floaty. The swing speed and weight suggest the HX100 is more suited for doubles play.

    During warm-up, it can be felt that the HX100 requires some effort, not particularly effortless. Aside from the higher string tension and light head causing less leverage, the shaft is a notable issue. Initially, the hitting feel was very wooden and jarring, with the shaft feeling much harder than the moderately soft rating suggests. Feedback from other users supports this view. According to my experience, the racket needs some break-in time. After about a month of use, the shaft’s operability is gradually improving, but the actual feel still remains stiff. As a high-end model, the 6.8mm shaft neither uses Flash Shaft nor Pyrofil but only improves material formulation with added nanotech. This might be a result of insufficient testing; the actual feel does not align with the promotional claims, possibly due to poor adaptability.

    The HX100 is not good at relaying each shot’s feedback, affecting the player-racket communication. For example, during powerful smashes, the racket shows good offensive potential and power direction. However, compared to other high-end rackets, the HX100 lacks distinct feedback in terms of resilience and rebound after powerful shots. The feedback feels almost uniform regardless of shot angle or power, similar to an undesired clapping sound.

    The HX100’s performance can meet many active and powerful shots, with a crisp feel, but this feedback characteristic makes rear court smashes and net play less favorable. Frequent netting issues in the rear court suggest a need for more power, while net play with the 65TI string tends to bounce high, losing an advantage in net battles. Passive defense often results in bizarre misses, either from the racket’s torsion issues or my own performance. The difficulty of lifting smashes increases, which doesn’t align with the racket’s string bed area and frame size.

    Overall, the HX100 offers good performance when in good form and able to handle each return, especially in favorable conditions. However, it becomes inexplicably difficult when in poor form or during frequent passive defense in challenging conditions. This shift in performance can happen within a few minutes during a match.

    Not recommended for beginners. While its appearance and product strength are commendable, at its current regular price, other mid-range Victory models might offer a more controllable experience for most players. At around 300, the HX100 is quite appealing, but it requires more time to adjust, and this period might not be very enjoyable.

  • Badminton Racket HYPERNANO X 800 Reviews

    Badminton Racket HYPERNANO X 800 Reviews

    This is probably the face of the HypernanoX series. The HX800 once stood out in reputation and popularity. As the former racket of Tai Tzu-ying, the HX800 has won many fans with its unique feel and excellent performance. However, like many of Victory’s popular models, it shares the same fate of collapse and cracking, which has deterred many from choosing it.

    Parameters: 3UG5, with a base, total weight 92.9g, balance point 305mm, 6.8mm Boro Carbon shaft, length 215mm, hard tuning, diamond aerodynamic frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock grommets, 28 lbs warranty, string tension 25-27 lbs KT65.

    This is a racket with a black base, but the black primer is very deep, like ink, with no grayish tint. The racket features a lot of technology, some of which is exclusive to the HX series. In its time, the diamond aerodynamic frame combined swing speed with stability. The appearance isn’t outstanding, but the additional stickers and purer black give it a quality look. However, both the stickers and paint are quite fragile and prone to defects.

    The HX800 is clearly a high-end racket for advanced players, with a high driving threshold. In terms of head heaviness, it is definitely a balanced racket, which matches my impression of the HX series. The feel of the shaft and frame can be discouraging for beginners. The shaft’s hardness might be similar to the HX900X, but the latter’s stronger head heaviness excels in power driving, while the HX800 relies more on the player’s own power. Even with a 3U version, the racket still feels quite stiff, even for warm-up clears.

    The HX800 also has two twin versions, LTD-C and LTD-P. Based on previous trials, and considering factors like ball response, swing weight, and feedback, the HX800 falls between the two. Although the shot is extremely crisp, it doesn’t provide the same swing speed surprise as the LTD-C.

    However, one advantage is its low energy loss, providing a raw, powerful feel. In situations like receiving smashes, the rebound feeling is very easy, especially against opponents who like to hit hard. It almost doesn’t require much physical effort to counter their shots.

    Additionally, this direct feel provides very low response delay during flat drives, making shots high-bouncing and stable. But the current 3U specification doesn’t offer a more continuous frame swing experience; otherwise, it would excel in flat drives. For players who favor control, the non-holding racket face may reduce tolerance in net play, with a very narrow adjustment window between high bounce and netting.

    Since the racket is designed for quick shots, its heavy smash performance completely depends on the user’s ability to pinpoint power. The more concentrated the power, the more lethal the shot. This can be quite unfriendly, similar to the DZS model, where although the racket seems to deliver quick and sudden shots during flat kills, a more focused effort is needed for satisfactory smashes. I’ve recently felt a similar experience with the original Boli 2013P, and I think this is where the HX800 falls short compared to the MX80N. I tend to prefer lighter rackets that are easier to power up, and the 4U version seems more suitable for driving.

    This racket was borrowed from a local friend. I had previously tried this racket once before. Although I really wanted to write about it after that first encounter, I knew I couldn’t fully grasp its nuances at the time, so I didn’t push myself to write it. Recently, after borrowing it again, I got another opportunity to experience it. However, this reunion after two years has somewhat diluted my impressions.

  • Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 20H Reviews

    Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 20H Reviews

    Since high-end models are no longer available, the entry-level models can still be great for lifting spirits. I got the HX20H at a “what do you need a bicycle for” price and wonder if it has any surprises.

    Parameters: 4UG5, stripped and fully equipped with a total weight of 86g, balance point 295mm, 6.8mm shaft length 210mm, soft tuning, 10-4 o’clock grommets, diamond aerodynamic frame, string tension 25 lbs with BG80P/VBS68.

    Technology-wise, it’s all familiar stuff. For those who remember the Nano 7 era, this racket uses the FRS technology from the company’s Hammer series, making it a high-tension model with a 35-pound warranty. The design is quite youthful, with a white base and blue-black stripes. As an entry-level racket, it’s quite attractive, showing that design effort went into it, more so than the Yu 1L. However, the paint quality might be lacking; it chips easily and the traditional cone cap tends to get black marks.

    The feel during empty swings is nimble. Although the diamond aerodynamic frame only slightly reduces wind resistance, the 4U balanced racket doesn’t require much power, so it gives a good feeling of maneuverability with low swing weight. This friendly setup should not make beginners feel it’s too heavy to swing. The shaft is soft and can easily deform, but it’s not as uncontrolled as some of the Hammer series. Given the 7.0mm shaft is a standard for entry-level Victory rackets, there’s not much to complain about.

    During warm-up, I was initially a bit uncomfortable. Recently, I’ve been using balanced rackets less, so I had trouble adjusting the force for high clears. The shaft is indeed easy to drive, but with a light head, you need to put more effort into the shot; otherwise, the trajectory might be shallow or the landing not deep enough. Considering the string bed is an older BG80P, switching to a more elastic string like VBS68 improved the situation.

    For doubles, the racket is really easy to handle. For example, in mid-court flat drives, the nimble feel persists, allowing for a slightly aggressive rally despite the lack of very crisp shots. For net opportunities, as long as small movements are well executed, it performs well. Despite being an entry-level racket, it offers a performance similar to ultra-light rackets in fast-paced games.

    The backcourt smash performance isn’t as impressive. The racket is quite soft, making it easy to hit smashes with minimal effort, but the speed and power are average, and there’s a noticeable energy loss. For a balanced racket, the lack of head inertia means power transfer relies more on the shaft’s elasticity. For this entry-level shaft, there’s significant room for improvement, which explains why I sometimes find entry-level head-heavy rackets like the Hammer series have better elasticity and heavier smashes. While the smashing threshold is low and the downward feel is good, the shot quality isn’t very satisfying, but this isn’t the key competitive edge for an entry-level racket. Also, increasing the string tension on the HX20H doesn’t add much value.

    The classic frame design still offers relatively stable handling and adapts well. The feel for net shots is reassuring due to the holding sensation, though it still has the “mushy” feel criticized in the Nano 7. Defense and receiving smashes are quite competent.

    Another entry-level racket that’s obedient and easy to handle. Overall, it feels like a younger and more high-tension version of the Nano 7. Compared to the HX7SP, it offers good value for money and is worth recommending.