This new product was provided by the retailer, but the naming feels a bit off. Kawasaki’s previous rackets typically followed a format of an object plus a number, where the object represented the style of the racket. However, the T160 is named after the “Mao Xiong” strategic bomber… After some inquiry, I discovered they intended to nickname it “White Swan.”
Regardless, this is my first time trying a Kawasaki racket in this segment, so let’s see how it performs.
Parameters: 4U G5, with shrink wrap, total weight 92.9g, balance point 282mm, shaft length 215mm, made from 30T material, moderate to soft stiffness, fluid box frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 string grooves, warranty up to 28 lbs, strung at 24-26 lbs with XB63.
The racket comes in two colorways, and I tested the white version. My earlier critique may seem puzzling, so let me clarify: it neither achieves the elegance of a swan nor the imposing presence of a bomber—so why this name? The blue and white paint job gives off a somewhat generic vibe, and the design elements feel sparse. The paint lacks depth and appears rather plain, fitting for a product below the mid-range. I expected more from Kawasaki, as they usually excel in aesthetic design; this racket seems mediocre. I personally think the gray-gold version looks better, but if they spent the time saved on paint to improve performance, I’d wholeheartedly approve.
The weight distribution is pleasant. With a 4U specification, it has some head weight, which feels comfortable. Although adding grip tape alters the balance significantly, I could still feel a bit of head heaviness that provides a good leverage sensation without making it difficult for beginners to swing.
The frame design lacks special technologies, and the box frame itself is a very mature choice, providing a large sweet spot and decent torsional stability. I didn’t experience any discomfort while adapting to it. The T160 is a racket that anyone can handle. When hitting high clears, the shaft deforms easily, and its elasticity is good, making it effortless to send the shuttle to the back line. It’s clear who this racket is aimed at; beginners can use it easily, and even more advanced players can enjoy it during casual play.
Recently, among lower-end rackets, the Bo Li Nebula provided a surprisingly high-level offensive experience, and this one does too. Judging a racket’s offensive capabilities solely by its shaft stiffness can be misleading. With the T160, it’s easy to feel its softer nature helps generate power, yet it still showcases decent explosiveness during smashes—shots are quick and fast. Although its weight is lighter due to being 4U, this entry-level racket combines continuity and initial speed to deliver high output in fast-paced exchanges. With strategic shot placement, it can certainly lead to victory.
Remarkably, the shaft’s recovery speed is better than many products in the same category, making it less prone to mishits during flat exchanges. Even without demonstrating exceptional cross-category performance, it can easily handle most situations faced by amateur players.
This racket is my first true experience with Kawasaki’s technical capabilities, largely due to its overall tuning, which surprised me. It doesn’t feel like a racket made with just 24T for the frame and 30T for the shaft. In my view, it reaches the level of mid-range “sugar water” rackets like the TK15, which features a 6.8mm flash shaft constructed from M40J. This gives a sense of overcoming expectations. Throughout my testing, the T160 didn’t display any of the typical weaknesses associated with low-end rackets, which is why I repeatedly sought confirmation from the retailer about its pricing and positioning—it was truly unexpected.
This year, Kawasaki introduced a complete spatial coordinate system with the Razer lineup, and having previously used the Razer Z, I can honestly say it has the best materials among the three, ranking half a notch above the X and Y models. However, I felt that the stiffness of the Z could be improved, so I decided to acquire the remaining two models. Let’s start with the Y, which has been getting some attention.
Parameters: 4U G5, with a base, total weight 93.0g, balance point 295mm, shaft made from 40T material, shaft length 215mm, moderate stiffness, wind-breaking frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 string grooves, warranty up to 30 lbs, strung at 25-27 lbs with KT66F.
Kawasaki chose to stand out visually by stacking materials. The overall deep blue color features extensive water transfer decals, with snake scales at the 4 and 8 o’clock positions and a design on the cone cap that resembles last year’s Razer model. Compared to the more luxurious Razer Z, the color choice makes the Y appear more three-dimensional and less flat.
Additionally, Kawasaki’s square racket cover is always a classic.
The balance point of this racket is not high, and the grip feels standard. There’s nothing particularly noteworthy about the feel. The new Razer certainly feels quick; the 4U wind-breaking frame combined with a moderate head-heavy design gives a sharp sensation while swinging. If it didn’t have other specifications, it would obviously be better suited for doubles play, but the light feel raises concerns about its stability and solidity.
The large frame offers a high margin for error, but it lacks a strong sense of cohesion; while the shaft has decent elasticity, it seems to have a bit of its own character. It responds better when you apply some power; if your swing is too casual, the feedback from the Razer Y feels rather insubstantial. The shaft deforms easily, and it allows for quick swings, making it user-friendly.
However, as I continued playing, I started to feel something was off. The Razer Y has good materials and can generate considerable speed when hitting high clears. Yet, the lack of head weight exacerbates its torsional stability issues, leading to dispersed shot placements. With the same power, my shots often seemed to fluctuate between being short and going out. Was it my touch or lack of skill? Maybe, but unfortunately, it reminded me of the Blue Factory’s SNP in terms of consistency.
So, I tried to shorten my shots and focus on downward trajectories, but the downward pressure of the Razer was somewhat lacking. I attempted an outrageous smash from the forehand, but I misjudged the contact point, resulting in a high shot that barely cleared the net and ended up at the neighboring court’s sideline. Still, the Razer does deliver power; smashes produce a satisfying sound and impressive speed, reminiscent of a certain model from Brand B. However, at my current level, achieving a shot that combines power and precision with the Razer Y is not easy.
Despite feeling off at times, its performance in defense against smashes and handling passive shots is solid, showcasing a user-friendly aspect. Moreover, its performance in flat exchanges is quite good, offering quick, seamless strokes. If I didn’t glance at the balance point on the cone cap, I wouldn’t expect this to be a head-heavy racket.
Ultimately, I still couldn’t pinpoint what felt wrong. The interaction between me and the Razer Y felt lacking. From a price perspective, it’s worth considering, but it definitely won’t be a top recommendation for Kawasaki products from me this year.
This is a lightweight offensive racket that Kawasaki recently promoted with a fair amount of marketing resources. Packaged in a gift box and featuring design elements from “Investiture of the Gods,” this racket combines high-quality materials with a friendly feel. Before this, I hadn’t encountered a Kawasaki product in this specification that exhibited such a clear offensive tendency. After using the last two rackets, I think Kawasaki has a good grasp on creating mid-range ultra-light rackets.
Parameters: 5U G6, with a base, total weight 88.19g, balance point 301mm, shaft length 220mm, moderate stiffness, box frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 string grooves, warranty up to 35 lbs, strung at 26-28 lbs with BS900.
The matte finish features a bold red and blue color scheme, with decorations incorporating lotus flowers and wheels of fire, all aligning with traditional mythological themes. While Kawasaki excels in racket paint quality and artistic design, the visual impact of the Nezha 35 feels somewhat overwhelming; it’s like using a blue background with red text in a PowerPoint presentation.
The gift box is attractive, but inside there’s only a standard racket cover and grip.
The balance point of this racket is relatively restrained compared to many other 5U rackets. Despite not being bottom-weighted, it exceeds 300mm, and in hand, the primary characteristic remains its “lightness.” However, the swing weight is noticeably higher; the long shaft provides a strong driving sensation. You can leverage the shaft’s deformation to produce powerful shots, and this deformation’s rebound is quite impressive. Combined with the stability of the box frame, it can maintain good directionality even for long shots, allowing for excellent control on high clears targeting the baseline.
The shaft stiffness is moderate, and the Nezha provides good feedback during play without being burdensome. The ultra-light racket’s design requires precise short bursts of power, and I enjoy the concentrated feedback it delivers after hitting.
Since the popularity of ultra-light rackets like the Blue Factory’s “Hammer,” this category has become trendy. However, standing out among numerous competitors hinges on elasticity. The Nezha 35 benefits from its 40T material, allowing it to generate a significant downward force without excessive swing weight. Honestly, it struggles to pose a serious threat in the mid to backcourt; even with ample power opportunities, it can’t deliver strong offensive plays. However, its quick release, good elasticity, short preparation, and lack of rigidity offer advantages in dealing with proactive shots. Its capability for sudden downward interceptions or smooth pressure at the net increases the game’s tempo, aiming to see which team cracks first, which is precisely the Nezha’s desired scenario.
At the same time, the racket’s face performance is not overly aggressive, retaining a degree of ball feel. This is beneficial for controlling quick returns and net play, allowing for higher confidence and a positive feedback loop for users. While the Nezha may not match the stability of 3U or 4U offensive rackets, its advantages in agility provide valuable touch and finesse.
I would describe its defensive performance as “decisive.” It handles returns well, whether it’s reacting to smashes, exploiting gaps, or angled shots at the net. However, it lacks a bit of proper unload feel; when trying to manage a high shot during a return, it can go a bit too high.
The Nezha also excels in handling passive shots, with adequate shaft elasticity and a forgiving face. It offers manageable drive difficulty and swing weight, enabling players to generate power even from lower positions and place shots more accurately.
Moreover, the often-discussed issue of homogenization in Kawasaki products seems to have significantly eased in this ultra-light category, which can easily stumble. For instance, despite the Nezha 35 and the recently released Aurora 50S having different shaft qualities, both demonstrate distinct differences in swing speed, shot feedback, and tuning focus, all while being easy to use, showcasing a solid understanding of the product.
Having a long battle line is not necessarily a good thing. Last year, the Kawasaki Razer 1916 had clear performance differences between its two versions, catering to different preferences. This year, inspired by that, they released three new models, but I haven’t yet found one that I’m fully satisfied with, indicating that their fast-moving product strategy is still a bit too aggressive.
Until yesterday, when I tried the Razer X, I finally encountered a racket that felt relatively harmonious to use.
Parameters: 4U G5, with a base, total weight 95.3g, balance point 293mm, 6.8mm shaft with 46T material, shaft length 215mm, moderate stiffness, aerodynamic frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 string grooves, warranty up to 30 lbs, strung at 25-27 lbs with KT66F.
This year’s three Razer models share the same design language, differing only in color tones. The X, similar in level to the Y, uses a dark base coat with a vibrant purple-red color that seems to indicate its aggressiveness. Due to the color differences, the snake scale stickers at the 4 and 8 o’clock positions on the frame are more pronounced.
Among speed rackets, the Razer X feels relatively neutral, still with a slight head-heavy feel and the 4U specification. The shaft stiffness isn’t very high, and upon first using it, the shaft’s deformation and sweet spot area give a soft feel; the shots come out easily with good elasticity, but you need to control the power to avoid hitting long. However, for my specs, I would prefer a stiffer shaft; the initial feel is a bit too soft, lacking explosiveness.
That said, the elasticity still ensures good speed on shots, providing good pressure in high clears, although control over the force is essential. The overall torsional resistance isn’t outstanding but is adequate; controlling landing points on long shots requires more practice.
Compared to the Razer Y and Z, this racket allows me to feel the speed and agility more distinctly, though it has the highest balance point among the three. During flat exchanges and receiving smashes, it pushes my reaction abilities to the limit, with adrenaline surging during close encounters. However, the shaft isn’t stiff enough, and the recovery speed after a bend in the swing isn’t quick, making it prone to floating shots.
My biggest dissatisfaction arises from its performance when a decisive attack is needed. The slightly higher balance point doesn’t hinder the downward pressure feel much, but it cannot compensate for the soft shaft, which limits the user’s explosive potential. While this type of racket still has advantages in maintaining continuous speed, the subjective experience of lacking a powerful finishing shot diminishes confidence during heavy smashes.
This is a fairly standard speed racket with a soft feel; its upper limit isn’t high, but it’s approachable enough, enhanced by its good paint quality and the thoughtfully designed racket cover. While I know it won’t accompany me in more rigorous competitions, the ease of use gives me a sense of comfort. Interestingly, after using all three models, it’s the X that provided a steady and manageable experience throughout.
The White Swan TU160 had already left a strong impression on me, and this similarly priced Little Cannon GT-I also performed quite well.
Appearance: The mech-style flamingo color scheme with a white and red base, accented by gold patterns, features a symmetrical design. The top and T-joint grommets are also red, which I personally think looks fantastic. For a price under 200, I always worry about paint quality, but after long-term use, I realized my concerns were unfounded. Aside from a small paint bubble near the T-joint, the rest is nearly perfect. The overall texture is comfortable and robust—truly both attractive and durable, plus it’s affordable enough not to feel bad about using it.
Parameters: 4U G5 spec, 76-hole box frame, 3-9 string grooves, unstrung weight with grip and tape at 94.0g, grip length 205mm, shaft length 215mm, balance point around 300mm, strung with VBS66N at 26 lbs.
Feel: The flamingo color scheme of the GT-I certainly matches its bold attributes. Unlike the highly recommended White Swan TU160, the GT-I emphasizes offensive capabilities and is less balanced. You can immediately feel that the GT-I has more weight, and in practice, it has a noticeable head-heavy feel, which brings a solid offensive experience. The shaft’s stiffness is moderate, but I personally feel it leans slightly softer; the response speed isn’t very quick, and the feel is softer and more elastic—somewhat like a weakened, user-friendly version of the Fire Call.
I previously described the TU160 as being well-rounded, adaptable, and exceptionally user-friendly, making it perfect for casual play. In contrast, the GT-I excels in shot direction and stability; whether it’s high clears, kills, or delicate net shots, it feels more solid, with consistent landing points and excellent torsional resistance. This is likely due to the brand’s commitment to quality materials, using a mature 30T setup and an internal T-joint. As for net play and flat shots, they perform adequately, reflecting the normal standards for this price range—not particularly impressive but definitely usable.
The GT-I is easy to pick up. For me, the only drawback is that I feel the shaft could be stiffer to emphasize its offensive attributes, especially for those who prefer fast-paced attacks; it may feel a bit slow for them. I understand that most brands in this price range tend to play it safe, but there’s also a need for unique offerings, and many beginner players are confident and willing to try rackets that aren’t just for novices.
Summary: Although this post is about the Kawasaki GT-I, I still find myself strongly recommending the TU160! Both rackets are excellent choices for beginners and intermediate players, offering great value. For under 200, with strings included, who could ask for more? Both make great backups, but if you ask me about the king in this price range, I’d still side with the TU160.
Everything can be copied or borrowed. However, for brands with their own production lines, even if they are targeted by others, they can only have their appearance or fonts copied at most, since the craftsmanship, materials, and channels are still in their hands.
However, among brands with their own production lines, copying each other is a pretty mean act. As an onlooker, I naturally enjoy the drama. Kawasaki’s new Thunder F10 is something else.
Parameters: 4UG5, with a base, total weight 95.1g, balance point 299mm, shaft length 213mm, medium-high stiffness, box frame, 76-hole string bed, 8-4 string groove, warranty up to 30 lbs, strung at 26-28 lbs BS710.
This appearance—with a matte black carbon base, ultra-thin shaft, and gold lettering at 4 and 8 o’clock—what more can I say? Just look at it; the paint quality is still pretty good. Aside from potential controversies over the appearance, I want to share a hearsay story. It seems that Kawasaki was the first to propose the “Thunder” series name, with the F8 as the series’ first installment, but the English name was “thunderbolt,” which is actually not the same. However, as everyone knows, Kawasaki’s brand appeal can’t compete with the big names, and the Chinese name for this series was taken by the red factory, which became quite popular. Isn’t there a bit of an NTR vibe here? The “you do the first of the month, I’ll do the fifteenth” storyline resembles a yellow-haired character invading someone else’s territory, doesn’t it?
Wow, the moment I got my hands on the F10, it ignited my desire to attack; I hadn’t even taken it out for a proper match yet. Kawasaki also has a new offensive model, the Spider-Man 8100 Pro, this season, but the F10’s head-heavy feel is certainly not inferior to the former. I believe its air swing weight is among the top in the 4U category, which is still within my adaptable range. On the day I tried it, I didn’t have time to adjust to the F10; I just went straight into a match with it.
To be honest, this isn’t a peculiar or unfriendly racket. Aside from a slightly high swing weight, its good power transfer, large sweet spot distribution, and above-average elasticity for its specs allow players with decent strength to effectively utilize it. The direct feedback during hits gives the F10 a satisfying feeling, making it a piece of equipment that motivates players to keep using it. Let’s not say things like “this racket looks unresponsive and unsuitable for flat shots”—it’s clearly not made for that, but that doesn’t mean it’s not excellent.
I still remember the feel of the Thunder 80, and the F10 is definitely not its follower; they feel different in play. The former is very balanced among offensive rackets, while the latter delivers the classic feel of a true offensive racket. The box frame’s inherent resistance to twisting gives the F10 excellent shot direction. Not only for downward strikes but also for pushes and high clears that require some control, the F10 can deliver the trajectory I envision, landing precisely where I want. With the head weight and shaft elasticity, the F10’s feedback feels quite “explosive”—powerful, speedy, and satisfying. This racket is clearly more aggressive than the Thunder 80.
The racket’s control during net play is also outstanding. I personally enjoy using slightly head-heavy rackets for net shots or lifts, as it stabilizes the feel. When I reach a high point in the backcourt, a normal swing can bring the shuttle to the opponent’s net with precision. Sometimes, during a hasty response to an opponent’s heavy smash, the proper unloading feel can turn the tide from defense to offense.
Regarding the F10’s offensive performance, I believe it’s the most “explosive” Kawasaki racket I’ve used this year—very intense. The ultra-thin shaft’s energy release is somewhat beyond my expectations. When I focus my energy, the F10 performs very solidly, with efficient power transmission. Even with its obvious head-heavy nature, which allows users with less strength to strike solid downward shots, reckless power can make the offensive effect truly intimidating. This intimidation stems from the combination of sound, speed, and feedback—an exceptional experience. It’s not one of those clunky rackets that sacrifices continuity for a powerful smash; the shaft’s quick recovery ensures that I can maintain consistent backcourt output during testing. Notably, despite its slightly higher stiffness, it still retains a certain resilience during heavy smashes.
On the other hand, the passive performance of this new racket really tests the player’s skills.
I initially speculated that it wouldn’t be suitable for fast-paced flat shots, and my actual experience confirmed this. During doubles rotation in the front court, I often had to step back half a step more than usual to avoid being caught by the opponent’s flat shots. Simply put, the Thunder F10 might show a sluggish side in switching grip positions and maintaining a fluid stroke. However, if we really had to rank it, the F10’s decisive shot delivery and quicker shaft recovery prevent it from being the bottom performer in fast exchanges, at least with the Spider-Man to back it up. Moreover, its segmented fish-mouth cone cap allows for some flexibility in thumb positioning during backhand grips.
It’s clear that this 4.5-star offering is more suited for intermediate players; the F10 fits well in situations where an 88D can be used, highlighting a thoroughly enjoyable offensive experience. However, I do wonder about the timing of this high-quality new release, coming in direct competition with the Spider-Man, which seems a bit unwise.
Many badminton friends believe that among the many second-tier brands, Kawasaki is truly the king. In terms of material sourcing and technical capabilities, it has historically been a strong competitor to the major three brands. One can see that low-end models may sell well, but they struggle to gain significant recognition among more advanced players. During the process of collecting and experiencing various equipment, it’s easy to notice many beginners using the Ninja or Blue Porcelain rackets for casual play, while experienced players sometimes opt for older Kawasaki models like the bottom cap or Master series to teach newcomers.
After Kawasaki’s revival trend, it’s indeed time for them to showcase high-quality new products.
Specifications:
Red model: 84±1g, balance point 290±3mm, medium-hard shaft
Blue model: 82g, balance point 293±3mm, medium shaft
Red used: 88.9g, balance point 304mm
White (towel grip): 90.1g, balance point 300mm
6.5mm shaft material: 46T+30T, dual slot box frame material: 30T+40T, 76-hole string bed, small frame, warranty for 30 pounds, some components outsourced to CBN, string tension 26-28lbs vbs66n.
Believe me, this is a product that delivers an endless visual delight right after unboxing.
The manufacturer provides matching colored square covers for the Razer, making them uniquely stylish. After experiencing the K-18, I’ve noticed that some manufacturers are more willing to focus on product details. For example, Kawasaki does a great job with the quality of the cover; the inner lining and design of the bag are aspects many manufacturers tend to overlook. While most players who prefer practical bags for games might find this upgrade somewhat unnecessary, the fact that the product is well-prepared for transportation enhances overall appreciation.
Upon unboxing, a second wave of visual excitement follows. Both rackets look great. Although they share a similar design language, the color differences and the snake scale patterns make each racket visually appealing. The matte finish and the themed decorations on the wings and head of the frame reflect their names well; the blue model features a black, white, gold, and blue spiral pattern, while the red model combines black, red, and gold. Subjectively, the blue model appears more elegant, while the red model exudes a sense of aggression, aligning with their performance characteristics.
With both the blue and red rackets, the difference is felt immediately when holding them and swinging them without strings. Both are lightweight within the 4U category, but the red model has a slightly noticeable head-heavy feel. Considering that the Razer 1916 uses the second-generation frame, combined with a slender shaft, I initially thought these would be great for singles play. However, the official parameters and actual feel surprised me. While the frame’s design to reduce wind resistance isn’t extreme, the smaller frame’s reduced wind area and rounded edge allow for surprisingly high swing speeds. Undoubtedly, both rackets are well-suited for the fast-paced nature of doubles play.
Based on experience, Kawasaki’s past rating system indicates that rackets rated 3.5 stars and above have a significant learning curve. The previous Razer 19 was already a 5-star racket, and this 1916 model also uses 5-star materials. Will this premium model become out of reach? Fortunately, during warm-up, both rackets quickly dispelled my concerns about my physical condition. Despite the small frame, the high swing speed and moderately adjusted shaft hardness significantly ease handling, making it easier to find good leverage during active shots. For intermediate players, the only adjustment needed is adapting their timing to the faster swing speed. For beginner players, the Razer doesn’t have a high power threshold and low tolerance, making it a great choice beyond the Pollen Infiniti 003/004/007 for experiencing small frame feel, with a lower learning curve compared to the Radiation 6 and significantly lower than the Breaker BZ. Using it feels oddly familiar—“Why am I so skilled with this small frame? How many times have I paired with it?”
As previously mentioned, agility is the answer that the Razer twins provide. Whether red or blue, their performance in the front court during doubles is impressive, offering sufficient flexibility. The responsiveness during flat exchanges may not be evident, but when mixed doubles players handle awkward shots from their opponents, the Razer truly shines. It’s not only agile; the moderately firm grip allows for fine-tuning and spontaneous power delivery. If one prepares well with the racket, players who master short bursts of power can deliver more threatening shots. Between the two, the blue model, being slightly heavier but with a lighter head, excels in swing speed and stability.
To establish an advantage, controlling the net is crucial, especially during serve and return. The Razer performs admirably, providing a sense of control during aggressive plays. The ability to apply pressure without resulting in high or far blocks is notable, especially in close-level matches where high placement can dominate. If one practices soft shots beforehand, it becomes even more effective. However, trying to use flick shots or to sidestep opponents at the net may feel a bit light; it still requires the user’s solid fundamentals to compensate for the loss of heft.
This character often leaves opponents perplexed: “Wait, I was the one who initiated the attack…”
When it comes to offense, the red Razer performs exceptionally well despite its weight disadvantage. Instead of relying on sheer force, it focuses on making every shot threatening. The small frame allows for explosive, powerful feedback during concentrated hits, while the ultra-slim shaft, made of high-modulus carbon fiber, provides sufficient elasticity. The energy transfer is impressive, resulting in strong initial and final speeds and an appealing sound on impact. While the frame and T-head offer decent torsional stability, I still hope for a more robust feel during dynamic, varied attacks that can slice through defenses. The blue Razer’s lighter head and softer shaft haven’t yet unlocked its potential for heavy smashes, which is somewhat regrettable.
However, the adaptability of both models in defense is satisfactory. Even with a string tension close to my limit (26-28 pounds), handling continuous defensive positions and shots to the backhand and overhead areas is manageable. The power feels good, and the overall effort is low, highlighting the Razer’s thoughtful design. The enjoyment in both offense and defense creates a blissful experience.
In ensuring the string tension and physical readiness are consistent, I was fortunate to parallel test both new models. The Razer twins delivered commendable performance, particularly with their excellent finish and craftsmanship. They have a friendly learning curve and a unique feel, reflecting their high-end pricing. However, the lack of weight can sometimes lead to a less solid feel in feedback. After differentiating their performances, the blue and red models should have distinct places in the equipment lineup.
Of course, many players are concerned about pricing. I was recommended to purchase from a vendor currently offering impressive discounts, so it’s worth checking out. The official prices don’t really matter anymore.
If you’re looking for a badminton shoe recommendation under 400 yuan, the recently popular Kawasaki Crossover 2.0 certainly deserves a spot on the list. This shoe stands out with its high aesthetics, excellent cushioning and torsion resistance, and its affordable price.
Just recently, the upgraded version of the Crossover 2.0 was also released, and I was quick to get my hands on the Cosmic Silver (Collector’s Edition) colorway. Today, let’s dive into the differences between these two badminton shoes and how to choose between them!
Crossover 2.0 Wearing Experience:
The Kawasaki Crossover 2.0 has been a hot seller lately, boasting not only impressive aesthetics but also top-notch features. Equipped with a buckle lacing system, it allows for easy one-pull opening and tightening, making putting on and taking off a breeze. Compared to its predecessor, the 2.0 version offers better control over the tightness.
In terms of cushioning, torsion resistance, breathability, and durability, this shoe excels in all aspects. The upper features a lightweight and breathable flyknit fabric reinforced with microfiber leather, providing both ventilation and support. The midsole incorporates Kawasaki’s NON Shock Absorption Technology, with a K-POWER high-rebound pad in the forefoot for faster starts and a NON shock-absorbing pad in the heel for significant impact absorption upon landing, effectively protecting the knees. Additionally, a genuine large carbon plate in the midfoot enhances torsion resistance, while TPU reinforcements on the sides offer extra support. Overall, this shoe provides comprehensive protection with few drawbacks.
When selecting a size, note that those with standard or narrow feet should consider going down a size, while those with wider feet may find the shoe’s roomy toe box fitting perfectly.
Crossover 2.0 MID Overview:
Midsole Configuration:
Combining a rear Kawasaki shock-absorbing pad, a forefoot K-POWER power pad, a carbon fiber plate for arch support, TPU torsion control bridges, and high-elastic EVA, this shoe delivers both shock absorption and rebound.
Outsole Configuration:
Breathable metal mesh pattern with a durable rubber outsole.
Upper Configuration:
A one-piece Flyknit 3D upper with optimized microfiber material, complemented by starry breathable mesh and a mid-cut sock-like design for added flexibility. The shoe also features lace wraparound and leather reinforcement at the heel.
Rotary Buckle System:
Upgraded with high-tensile threads for precise fitting and effortless putting on and taking off.
Cushioning Technology:
Full-length ultra-elastic EVA midsole with a K-POWER high-rebound pad upfront for powerful feedback during footwork and Kawasaki shock-absorbing technology in the heel, adaptively absorbing impacts based on your movements.
Differences Between Kawasaki Crossover 2.0 and Crossover 2.0 MID:
While both versions are highly praised for their performance, the Crossover 2.0 MID offers some notable upgrades:
Lasting Shape: The Crossover 2.0 MID has a regular last shape, while the Crossover 2.0 is wider.
Cuff Design: The MID version features a mid-cut sock-like design, while the 2.0 opts for a high-cut sock-like design with reinforced leather at the heel.
Rotary Buckle System: The MID version has an upgraded high-tensile thread system for better adjustability and convenience.
Durability Reinforcement: The MID has TPU reinforcement on the inner side of the toe box for added durability.
Breathability: The MID version incorporates more breathability features.
Overall, the performance gap between the Crossover 2.0 and Crossover 2.0 MID is minimal. The upgraded MID version excels in its rotary buckle system, durability reinforcements, and breathability. For those with wider feet, the Crossover 2.0 might be a better fit, while those with standard foot shapes may prefer the upgraded Crossover 2.0 MID.
Journeying, an embodiment of adventure sports, and in physics, a metaphor for time travel. Kawasaki, a seasoned player in badminton footwear, after a cordial greeting, now invites you to raise a toast and paint the cosmos as we embark on a journey through the realms of space and time. This time, the veteran brand, having grown familiar, brings friends and companions to explore the vast expanse of the universe, past and present. Reaching the Kuiper Belt, amidst the dazzling stars, in the silence and vastness, an epiphany arises, and the Kawasaki Traverse 2.0 MID is born.
Technology Features
Midsole
Function: Cutting-edge shock absorption technology for maximum knee and ankle protection, stable support, and a dynamic foot feel.
Technology: Kawasaki Shock Absorption Technology
Configuration: Rear Kawasaki Shock Absorption Pad + Front K-POWER Power Pad + Carbon Fiber Plate Support at the Arch, combined with TPU Torsion Control Bridge and High-Rebound EVA for shock absorption and rebound.
Outsole
Function: Builds grip, multiple torsion control for optimal performance, breathable, and durable.
Technology: Utilizes ergonomic biomimetic technology, mimicking the foot’s natural motion curve for segmented torsion control.
Configuration: Breathable Metal Mesh, Durable Rubber Outsole.
Upper
Function: Continuously enhances breathability and containment for all-around protection.
Technology: One-Piece Flyknit 3D Upper, optimized with microfiber material, complemented by Starlight Breathable Mesh Overlay, Mid-cut Sock-Fit Design for flexibility, lace wrap, and leather reinforcement at the heel.
Quick-Lace System
Function: One-touch activation, upgraded high-tension yarn for effortless tightening and loosening, precise fit, and convenient on/off.
Core Technology: Kawasaki Shock Absorption Pad
Function: Meets varying shock absorption needs during different sports activities, adapting to athletes’ footwork changes, steps, and smashes, providing tailored shock absorption to effectively dissipate foot vibrations, protecting knees, and ensuring maximum safety.
Composition: dclan Material (New Smart Cushioning Material), based on the core principle of “Liquid Body Armor,” can withstand up to 90% of impact force. dclan is a non-Newtonian fluid that remains relaxed and soft under normal conditions but instantly locks molecules upon impact, hardening to absorb and dissipate external forces, forming a protective layer. Upon impact cessation, it returns to its original soft and flexible state.
High-End Handcrafted Distressed Finish: The collector’s edition undergoes a meticulous process of wiping, sanding, and polishing to achieve a natural, interstellar gradient effect.
Double Lasting Process: Uses a standard last, undergoes initial shaping, then undergoes the distressed finish followed by a second shaping and curing process, resulting in a more structured and stable shoe shape for enhanced performance.
Design Concept & Inspiration: Reforging Interstellar Power, Self-Awakening Traversing the Kuiper Belt, a realm of rubble, charged particles, and stardust, the Traverse 2.0 MID deconstructs, fuses, and rebirths, reforging interstellar power. Amidst the stars, silence, and vastness, it awakens.
Aesthetic Analysis:
The Traverse 2.0 MID is launched in four striking colorways: Space Silver (Collector’s Edition), White/Dolphin Blue, White, and Sky Blue, aiming to usher in a new era of sports fashion. The shoebox cover, too, is thoughtfully designed, featuring astronauts encircled by vibrant hues, with massive planets as a backdrop, towering above the starry expanse.
Space Silver (Collector’s Edition): The primary showcase colorway, featuring a one-piece Flyknit 3D upper enhanced with a high-end handcrafted distressed finish, creates a mesmerizing interstellar gradient under changing light, reminiscent of a galactic river cascading from the heavens. The precision-fitted quick-lace system and futuristic design embody the courage to embark on the first steps into the vast universe, creating countless miracles.
White/Dolphin Blue: Transporting us from the cosmos to the azure seas, this refreshing colorway combines a white base with playful dolphin blue accents, exuding a youthful and romantic vibe perfect for summer.
White: In the journey, the breathtaking winter scenery of snow-capped mountains is also captured. The pure white hue, adorned with subtle yellow and green accents, adds vitality to the collection.
Sky Blue: Soaring through the clouds, this unadulterated shade of light blue embodies the boundless freedom and carefree spirit of floating amidst the heavens.
Last year, the Kawasaki Traverse 2.0 debuted, and today, the Traverse 2.0 MID is introduced to enrich the product line, offering a mid-cut version for more versatile choices. Perhaps, this journey is meant to reconnect with you. May the Traverse 2.0 MID empower your court conquests, awakening your full potential.
Budget-friendly Entry-level Shoes, Dare to Imagine the Features
Carbon fiber bridge? Or high-rebound cushioning?
Let me tell you, the sneakers we’re recommending today not only boast a large carbon fiber bridge and TPU encircling, but also a high-rebound EVA midsole and EVA cushion insole for superior cushioning, paired with a refreshing colorway. And the cherry on top? Its price is just two bills! Isn’t that amazing?
Today’s protagonist is this pair of Kawasaki Bingguo badminton shoes in my hand.
—Appearance & Colorway The Kawasaki Bingguo I’m holding boasts a pristine white base, with refreshing cotton candy pink and icy blue accents on the midsole. The shoe’s body incorporates a seamless blend of artificial leather and sandwich mesh, creating a clean, fresh, and elegant aesthetic.
—Detailed Specifications Taking a size 42 (265mm) as an example, the Kawasaki Bingguo weighs just 317g per shoe, fitting perfectly into the lightweight category. Technologically, the entry-to-intermediate Bingguo generously offers a substantial carbon fiber bridge at the midfoot connection, reinforced with TPU encircling for exceptional torsional resistance, rivaling high-end shoes. Furthermore, the midsole and insole generously utilize ample EVA material.
—Fit & Comfort Putting on the Bingguo, the first impression is of a soft, snug fit and smooth bending. The shoe’s slender silhouette lengthens the appearance of the foot, making it highly recognizable.
This is mainly due to the Bingguo’s U-shaped 2.5E standard last, providing high adaptability. The spacious forefoot chamber is comfortable and wide enough, making it ideal for players with wider feet. Coupled with a low-cut design that favors compatibility and a sturdy heel counter, the shoe offers a strong lockdown feel.
In gameplay, with its 317g weight, the Bingguo delivers a moderately fast start-up speed. The EVA cushioning in the forefoot is ample, though the speed sensation isn’t overwhelming. However, the heel’s rebound cushioning is noticeable and soft, ample for players of heavier builds.
Additionally, the shoe’s midsole and outsole feature widened lateral designs, offering excellent lateral grip and support during intense stops and starts.
—Recommendation Summary The Kawasaki Bingguo boasts a refreshing and pleasant appearance, combined with dual protection from its carbon fiber bridge and TPU encircling. At this entry-to-intermediate price point, it stands out as a top contender, surpassing many other models and brands. Highly recommended for intermediate players and those who prioritize protection and breathability, especially if you have a heavier build.
Choosing the right string tension is best determined through trial and error. For beginners, the general recommendations are:
For women: 22-24 lbs
For men: 23-24 lbs
Of course, string tension is subjective and can vary for each individual. It depends on your physical tolerance, skill level, and personal feel. Higher tension provides better control of the shuttlecock but less elasticity, while lower tension offers more elasticity and is less taxing but provides less control.
Consider adjusting the tension in the following situations:
Decrease Tension: If you find the racket face too stiff, and you feel you can’t generate enough power, especially when handling defensive shots, and you experience significant vibration, you may need to lower the tension. This will increase the racket’s elasticity and improve its forgiveness.
Increase Tension: If you feel the shuttlecock is sticking to the strings, the speed of your shots is slower than the effort you’re putting in, and you find control lacking, you may want to raise the tension.
2. About Racket Selection
Material of the Racket:
The best choice is a racket with both the shaft and frame made of carbon fiber, often referred to as a full carbon fiber racket. In 2024, avoid aluminum or aluminum-carbon alloy rackets. While they might seem inexpensive, they are often considered disposable; you might not even restring them because they can’t handle higher tensions. Nowadays, full carbon fiber rackets are very affordable and are the recommended choice.
Racket Weight:
For beginners, the material is less of a concern as long as it’s full carbon fiber. The weight of the racket is a more critical factor.U denotes the weight of the racket. Common classifications are 2U, 3U, 4U, 5U, 6U, etc.
The larger the number in front of U, the lighter the racket.
This weight value is easy to remember. For every U, the racket is lighter by 5 grams from 100 grams:
2U means it is 10 grams lighter than 100 grams. So, the weight of 2U is 100-10 = 90 grams, with an actual range of 90~94 grams.
3U = 100 – 3*5 = 85 grams, with an actual range of 85~89 grams.
4U = 100 – 4*5 = 80 grams, with an actual range of 80~84 grams.
If both 3U and 4U rackets can achieve the same swing speed, and 3U does not make you tired, then choose the 3U racket. If you find 3U too heavy and tiring, then opt for 4U or lighter rackets.
Most players use 3U and 4U rackets. The main difference between them is the weight. There is no absolute answer to which is better; the most important thing is finding a weight that suits you. For beginners, if unsure, choose 4U as it is more versatile for newcomers.
3.About Racket Brands:
For entry-level rackets, you don’t need to be overly concerned with the brand. As long as it’s from a reputable manufacturer of badminton rackets, it will be suitable. Brands like Yonex, Victor, Li-Ning, Kawasaki, Kason, Xwind, Babolat, and others are all good choices. You can consider brand reputation, reviews, and cost-performance ratio as references.
4.About Racket Appearance:
The design of rackets has become increasingly beautiful and trendy, incorporating various cultural elements. Preferences for appearance are subjective. Whether a racket looks good or not is up to you; if you like it, that’s what matters.
Of course, there are many other parameters not covered here, such as the racket’s balance point and shaft stiffness. However, the above simple and clear introduction should be sufficient to help you avoid common pitfalls. The key is how the racket feels in your hand, as the parameters are fixed but the playability is crucial. Next, I’ll recommend some high-value-for-money rackets suitable for beginners.
① Kawasaki Ice Cream
The two color options, Sea Salt Blue and Taro Purple, are visually appealing and attractive to many female players.
With a 5U weight and a box-shaped frame structure, the racket is lightweight and flexible, offering quick speed while also providing excellent torsional stability. This enhances the precision of control. The racket uses high-strength, high-modulus Mitsubishi carbon fiber, with good shaft elasticity and moderate hardness, making it easy to drive. Even beginners can easily achieve the desired shaft deformation. The ultra-light design also reduces wrist strain.
As an entry-level racket, the Kawasaki Ice Cream meets the criteria of good power, low price, and high appearance. It is very suitable for double matches and continuous attacking play.
② Victor Hammer
The Victor Hammer (TK-HMR) and the Mini Hammer (TK-HMRL) are also very popular entry-level offensive rackets.
The Hammer comes in 4U and 5U specifications, with the 4U model capable of handling up to 32 lbs and the 5U model up to 31 lbs.
The Mini Hammer comes in 5U and 6U specifications, with the 5U model capable of handling up to 28 lbs and the 6U model up to 27 lbs.
Both the Hammer and Mini Hammer use a shaft material consisting of carbon fiber + resin + 7.0 SHAFT. The shaft of both models is relatively soft, with the Mini Hammer having an even softer shaft. Therefore, players with less power or female players are recommended to choose the 6U Mini Hammer, while those with more power should consider the regular Hammer. As an entry-level offensive racket, whether for beginners or players with some experience, this racket is an excellent choice with a high cost-performance ratio.
③ Lining Little Cannon
The Thunder 80 is incredibly popular, with its availability being scarce. The Thunder 50 is a mid-range offensive champion and has been extremely popular. However, many students still have a strong preference for entry-level offensive rackets. Despite budget constraints, the pursuit of aesthetics, feel, and offensive capability remains important. Hence, the Thunder Little Cannon was created.
The Thunder Little Cannon is currently the only entry-level racket endorsed by world champion Chen Long.
In terms of appearance, it is more attractive than the Victor 9500 and Victor Hammer. This 4U Little Cannon can handle up to 32 lbs. It has a slight weight and a head-heavy feel, with a soft and elastic shaft, making it an entry-level racket primarily for back-court offense. It is comparable to the Victor Hammer.
The racket comes in 4U, 5U, and 6U specifications. If you need a single-player back-court offensive racket and are aiming for ultimate offense, the 4U model is suitable. For continuous smashing, the 5U is recommended, while the 6U is ideal for front-court play. As an entry-level racket endorsed by world champion Chen Long, it is highly recommended.
④ Kawasaki Galaxy
With a weight of 4U and a balance point of 287mm, the distribution of balance and weight is designed for whippy action. Made from high-modulus Taimo dense nano carbon and featuring a 6.8mm uniformly elastic slim shaft, the middle shaft offers excellent elasticity, making it easier to generate power. It excels in net play for short balls, drops, slices, and pushes, and maintains an advantage in fast-paced flat drives. The low balance point emphasizes agility and control, while the box-shaped frame with wind-breaking design ensures stability during shots and maintains a high swing speed. The racket is very easy to handle, making it a true gem for casual play.
It provides smooth and continuous net play, handles small balls effectively, and, while the 287mm balance point is not ideal for aggressive back-court attacks, it is well-suited for sharp smashes, point attacks, or net kills. It is recommended for players who enjoy doubles, quick attacks, and predominantly play at the front and middle courts.
This concludes the recommendations for entry-level rackets under 300 yuan, including information on string tension. When choosing an entry-level racket, focus on the weight, and consider aesthetics and brand preferences. These types of rackets are all very easy to handle.
In summary, do any of these entry-level rackets catch your eye?
Offensive Racket: Characterized by a heavier head, allowing for faster smashes.
Balanced Racket: Combines both defense and offense, with a balance between the weight of the handle and the head.
Defensive Racket: Focuses on defense, with a generally heavier handle compared to the head, which helps to speed up reaction and swinging.
Balance Point:
Generally around 285mm.
A balance point ≤ 285mm is considered a defensive racket.
A balance point ≥ 285mm is considered an offensive racket.
A balance point of = 285mm is considered a balanced racket. Beginners are usually recommended to choose balanced rackets.
On the handle or shaft of the racket, there are generally some letters and numbers.
G + Number: Indicates the thickness of the handle, usually ranging from G2 to G5. A higher number means a thinner handle. Beginners are advised to choose a thinner handle for better power in quick swings. A thicker handle may cause the racket to slip out of the hand.
Number + U: Indicates the weight of the racket. Common weights are 3U, 4U, with some being 2U, 5U, 6U. A higher number indicates a lighter racket. For example:
3U: 85-89 grams
4U: 80-84 grams
5U: Even lighter Players with good grip and strength can choose 3U to better utilize their advantages. For those with less strength, 4U or 5U is recommended for better swing feel.
Number + LBS (Pounds): Indicates the maximum tension the racket can withstand. High-quality rackets can handle up to 30 lbs or more, while most are around 28 lbs. Beginners should not focus on high tension, as medium to low tension (below 23 lbs) is sufficient. Higher tension provides better control but less bounce, making it harder for beginners. Professionals often use higher tension, but for beginners, 22/23/24 lbs is advisable. Higher tension results in tighter stringing and less elasticity, making control more difficult for beginners.
Top 10 Recommended Rackets for Beginners
1.Victor Challenger 9500D (Offensive Type)
The Victor Challenger 9500D, a top choice for beginners, is one of the most popular entry-level badminton rackets with a solid reputation. The latest upgrade, the CHA-9500 D/S, offers faster swing and hitting speed, a more attractive design, and a thinner frame with reduced wind resistance.
This racket is made of full carbon material, making it lightweight with excellent strength, durability, and elasticity. Despite its carbon fiber construction, it remains affordable. Carbon fiber comes in three grades: standard, high stiffness, and ultra-high stiffness. The Challenger 9500D provides great value for its price range, making it an ideal recommendation for beginners.
Summary: This racket is lightweight and easy to use. With a relatively soft shaft, it allows for easier play and more power from the racket’s rebound effect. A softer shaft offers greater deformation, aiding in a more effortless hit, whereas a harder shaft provides less deformation and faster shuttlecock speed, suited for players with more power and explosiveness.
2.Yonex NR7000I (Balanced Type)
The Yonex NR7000I is an excellent choice for beginners, known for its lightweight and good stability, along with fast speed. This racket offers high maneuverability and elasticity, despite its relatively stiff shaft. Beginners may initially find it challenging to control the shuttlecock’s direction, but the racket provides a good feel for net shots and quick reactions. Once accustomed, it enhances defensive play due to its structure and lightweight design, allowing for better anticipation of incoming shots and effective net play.
Summary: This racket has a good feel with excellent shaft elasticity. The 3U weight makes it very flexible, making smashes and clears effortless. Although the smash power might be slightly less due to the inability to fully leverage the racket head, the excellent shaft elasticity compensates for this, and it performs well at medium to high string tensions.
3.Victor Hammer TK-HMR-M (Attack Type)
The Victor Hammer TK-HMR-M is an offensive series racket with a length of 675mm, designed for high-tension attack play. It features a box-shaped structure that enhances stability and torsion resistance during hits, and it can handle higher string tensions. The power groove design stores force during the swing and amplifies it upon impact, creating greater destructive power, earning it the nickname “Assault Hammer.” The strengthened layered system improves the frame’s rigidity and supports higher tension, providing increased power.
Summary: This racket is very lightweight, making it an excellent choice for beginners, especially for women. It offers great value for its price, with excellent craftsmanship, a refined feel, and attractive appearance. In terms of performance, the racket’s stiffer shaft and heavier head are suited for offensive play, with minimal vibration upon impact and effective cushioning, making it very easy to use. It is a highly recommended entry-level racket.
4.Li-Ning HC1100 (Balanced Type)
The Li-Ning HC1100 is an excellent choice for beginners. It features rebound elasticity and torsion angles that ensure high elasticity of the racket. Even if the impact point is off-center, the rebound elasticity and torsion technology help produce high-quality returns. The frame is mechanically optimized to increase the sweet spot area and extend its position upward, creating a more efficient defensive system. The optimized frame improves the effective defensive area and enhances the rebound power as the string bed area expands, thus increasing ball speed.
Summary: This racket has balanced performance with a high aesthetic appeal. Its relatively soft shaft allows for easy leverage and effortless swings, making it user-friendly. It is suitable for beginners focusing on control and defense, particularly female players. However, it may not be ideal for those who prefer an aggressive playing style.
5.YONEX CAB8000N (Offensive Type)
The YONEX CARBONEX 8000N features high-elasticity carbon fiber and carbon nanotubes to reduce the racket’s weight. The square frame design creates a stable frame structure, effectively improving the racket’s stability, ensuring precise and powerful shots. The arched string groove system supports the racket on a curved surface, reducing reaction forces at contact points and minimizing string fatigue. Its one-piece construction ensures structural stability, resistance to deformation, and good shock absorption, resulting in accurate control.
Summary: This racket is lightweight and user-friendly, with good craftsmanship, making it a classic choice for beginners.
6.Li-Ning Speed 3000 (Balanced Type)
The Li-Ning Speed 3000 is a balanced offensive and defensive racket with a soft and elastic shaft, a large head, and a low balance point. Its thin shaft makes it extremely comfortable to play with. This racket offers comprehensive performance, suitable for both singles and doubles, and is durable and easy to handle, making it ideal for beginners. Due to its soft shaft, it provides a feeling of reduced force on smashes and is more suited for control rather than aggressive play.
Summary: This racket is great for beginners, with attractive colors that appeal to those who care about aesthetics. It has a large sweet spot and high tolerance, making it easy for newcomers to use.
7.Yonex AEROSMASH AXSM (Offensive Type)
The Yonex AEROSMASH AXSM is made with carbon fiber for a resilient handle, designed as an offensive racket with a heavier head and a soft shaft. It is suitable for players with less power who need help with smashes but may not be ideal for powerful players, as it may not deliver sufficient force for strong smashes. The racket is lightweight, allowing for fast swings and advantageous net play, making it suitable for front-court play in doubles. However, its performance in the back-court is weaker, requiring more effort for high clears.
Summary: The AEROSMASH AXSM is lightweight and easy to handle, making it ideal for beginners, particularly women and players with less power. Its soft shaft makes it user-friendly for newcomers, and it has an appealing design.
8.Kawasaki KD-1 (Balanced Type)
The Kawasaki KD-1 features mainstream carbon material with high strength, offering a balance of offense and defense. The racket uses high-rigidity carbon fiber for the frame and shaft, enhancing the power and explosiveness during shots.
With a frame length of approximately 675mm and a weight ranging from 95 to 200g, the KD-1 is lightweight and portable. It employs a grooved frame to reduce air resistance and protect the strings. The carbon shaft provides a comfortable grip, increasing shot power and smash speed, while the T-joint enhances stability during hits.
The Kawasaki KD-1 features a high-strength carbon material, offering a balanced performance suitable for both offense and defense. The KD-1’s frame and shaft use high-stiffness carbon fiber,
With a frame length of approximately 675mm and a weight ranging from 95-200g, it is lightweight and portable. The racket features a grooved frame to reduce air resistance and protect the strings. The carbon shaft provides a comfortable grip and improves hitting power and smash speed, while the T-joint design enhances stability.
Summary: The Kawasaki KD-1 is a best-selling racket in the market, known for its affordability and comfort. It is ideal for casual play in community or park settings, making it suitable for family entertainment and relaxation.
Here is the summary of the top recommended badminton rackets for beginners. Finally, for newcomers, it is advised to choose rackets made of carbon fiber or carbon composites. These rackets are lightweight, strong, and durable. It is important not to blindly pursue expensive options but to select a racket that meets your personal feel and preferences.
