Tag: Kawasaki

川崎摩托

  • Badminton Racket Kawasaki Aurora 50S Reviews

    Badminton Racket Kawasaki Aurora 50S Reviews

    As I continued my trial experience, I finally got my hands on a Kawasaki racket with real distinctiveness.

    Do you suffer from “beginner’s racket face blindness”? I’ve been using a lot of mid-to-low-end rackets recently, and looking back at the non-high-end categories I’ve tried, they all seem to perform similarly—light and easy to drive. It doesn’t really matter which manufacturer they come from; the differences are minor. What they compete on are either looks, the amount of material packed into them, or the branding appeal that big names can effortlessly market.

    But for manufacturers that focus on reliability, it’s not a matter of choosing between stunning visuals or creating a performance monster.

    Specifications: 5U G6, with grip, total weight in use 90.14g, balance point 292mm, 6.8mm shaft, length 221mm, medium stiffness, aerodynamic frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 point string grooves, warranty up to 32lbs, strung at 25-27lbs using Viscounter V3 strings.
    A deep blue night sky, with sparkling stars, and most of the sky illuminated by the vibrant colors of the aurora—this is indeed the vision that the 50S appearance conveys. The main body of the racket is composed of deep blue pearlescent paint and gray matte paint, with the pearlescent effect being particularly eye-catching, bling bling with a dazzling brilliance. The decorations mainly consist of new holographic stickers, used sparingly but matching the contours and visual lines of the 50S just right. Observing the changes in reflections from different angles is quite fascinating, much like admiring the unpredictable changes of the aurora.

    Moreover, it retains the tradition of the Aurora series, which comes with a high-value racket cover, making the emotional value max out.

    This is a product that inherits from its predecessor, the Aurora 7, but besides the visual upgrade, the 50S also received performance enhancements. In terms of materials, it uses a shaft made of Toray 40T carbon fiber, making it more elastic. In terms of specifications, a 4U version was added to meet the diverse needs of players. Structurally, the power cone cap and the slightly adjusted aerodynamic frame aim for faster and stronger performance. In fact, the replacement of the carbon fiber butt cap with the latest one also shows that Kawasaki is taking this upgraded product seriously.

    I’m sure many of you are tired of hearing about racket “pro” features, but the 50S’s upgrades and naming seem much more subtle.

    Even with the same 5U specifications, the 50S, after shedding the compromises made in the predecessor to accommodate users with insufficient strength, now offers a much more appealing hitting feel. The combination of the fish-mouth cone cap and the extended shaft still provides considerable drive, but the improved stiffness and abundant elasticity remove most of the cheapness from this drive. When attempting to add power to the shots, the speed, trajectory, and depth of the shuttle all form a good linear relationship with the power output to the racket face, making the racket feel more resilient. Although the 50S hasn’t lost its “sweet” nature, its deeper inner strength is enough to accompany its owner to higher levels, rather than reaching its limits too early and bowing out prematurely.

    Mid- and front-court drives and net play are naturally the strengths of the 50S. There’s no extreme balance point, no soft power feedback, and the process from a quick backswing to hitting the shuttle is very smooth. It’s easier to take a more advanced grip point, and with quick wrist and forearm movements, you can easily execute net kills, flat drives, and other shots with precision, hitting your target every time.

    As the hitting feel improves, my confidence in the 50S’s downward shots becomes even stronger. In active power play opportunities in the mid- and backcourt, it makes me more eager to speed up and add power to my attacks. Since the racket is highly forgiving and easy to generate power with, there’s no fear of failing to hit solidly and producing weak shots that the opponent can easily counter. This still isn’t a racket for heavy hitters, but the 50S undoubtedly uses its agility and elasticity to turn continuous downward pressure into a more effective scoring method, providing a satisfying attacking feel.

    It’s not just the downward shots; the 50S’s directional control also surprised me. The stability of the racket face is outstanding for a 5U product, and it’s still an aerodynamic frame—how did they achieve that? It’s said that Kawasaki deliberately increased the thickness of the racket frame’s top, which undoubtedly involved a trade-off between swing speed and torsional resistance. For a 5U product, further increasing the swing speed is no longer a priority, and this adjustment’s rationale is unquestionable.

    So, even with a light and highly elastic setup, baseline control and net play remain within the 50S’s comfort zone. There’s rarely a concern about hitting clears out of bounds, and various slicing, net drops, and net kills all have a lively feel. Occasionally, you might even discover the secret to precise power control and show off a deceptive shot, like a fake drop followed by a real push—a display of unpredictability.

    Even in handling defensive shots, the 50S is so effortless. As long as you make solid contact with the shuttle, backhand lifts to the baseline or lifts after receiving a smash can be done with ease. It’s all about respecting the defensive game’s internal challenges. Such performance allows you to fully relax and let go on the court, without fear of dragging down your teammates or being outplayed by your opponents. If I ever get the chance to visit Northern Europe and witness the polar lights, I’m sure I could also take the opportunity to clear my mind of all worries.

    Kawasaki has used the right materials and a well-thought-out approach to fine-tune the Aurora 50S, making it a well-rounded racket. I can win, but I can also play without thinking about winning or losing—having fun is the confidence the 50S gives me in both its appearance and performance.

  • Badminton Racket Kawasaki 8900II Reviews

    Badminton Racket Kawasaki 8900II Reviews

    In the recent equipment market, based on my personal experience, it’s still the second-tier brands that are providing the most fun. The Lightning 8900, a model that sold pretty well last year, is sure to have follow-up products from Kawasaki’s associated merchants. But honestly, the first-generation 8900 was already a highly refined model, so if there’s a second generation, where could it improve?

    After using it, I was reminded of Zenitsu from Demon Slayer: “Thunder Breathing, First Form: Thunderclap and Flash, Sixfold!”

    Specifications: 3U G5, with grip, total weight in use 95.5g, balance point 295mm, 6.8mm shaft, 46T material, length 218mm, medium stiffness, aerodynamic frame, 76-hole string bed, 8-4 point string grooves, warranty up to 30lbs, string tension 24-26lbs vbs66n.
    I can’t even count how many products have gone into the “Deep Dark Fantasy” direction after their second generation came out. Although the second generation has two color options and different specifications, they both use black as the base paint, which feels quite natural. The cone cap, as always, features the racket’s specifications and a symbol corresponding to its name. The racket looks slim, and the aerodynamic frame doesn’t have such sharp edges, so it looks more like a diamond-shaped aerodynamic frame that’s been further narrowed. The stickers are not overwhelming, mainly serving as subtle decorations. This time, Kawasaki has shown restraint in areas they excel in, yet the racket remains sharp.

    The Lightning II’s frame is also very narrow, which gives it an impressive swing speed. There’s a “whoosh” sound when you exert power, even though it’s a 3U racket—this speed is off the charts. Additionally, the current version’s balance point is set reasonably, without an excessive head-heavy feel. The racket feels well-balanced in hand, which is very friendly for a racket equivalent to a five-star model in Kawasaki’s product grading system.

    Although the shaft’s stiffness is moderate, it feels somewhat resilient during play, and the power delivery is very smooth. The C60 fullerene in the shaft always makes me want to exert more force. It’s really easy to drive, giving me no trouble during warm-up clears. The sweet spot is consistent and forgiving, power delivery is comfortable, and the feedback from the shuttle is normal. However, the Lightning II shouldn’t be considered a “syrupy” racket, although I don’t quite know how to explain this contradiction—it doesn’t feel overly indulgent, but it’s very handy to use.

    Oh, I really like how the Lightning II performs in fast exchanges. Although the shaft is slightly longer and prone to deformation, the crisp and clean response after hitting the shuttle still allows me to keep up with the pace of the game with this 3U racket. This isn’t just due to continuity and speed, but also the stability brought by the 3U’s own “weight.” Sometimes, even if I can’t react in time, a forehand block can still hold the situation—it’s fantastic.

    Not only can the Lightning II maintain a fast pace during exchanges, but it also makes it easier to take the high ground at the net. It performs crisply and cleanly in all aspects, whether it’s pressing, pushing, slicing, or dropping after taking the high ground. At least in this area, I believe this new Kawasaki model is no less than high-end models from major brands and aligns well with its name.

    Although the balance point isn’t high, the reduction in shaft diameter has improved the racket’s explosiveness, making the Lightning II’s downward shots even more impressive. I wonder if any players feel the same as I do—Kawasaki shafts have a distinct “Kawasaki feel,” somewhat like elastic rubber. When I first encountered this texture with the Viper, I found it tough to handle, but after adapting, I realized its high energy conversion rate when exerting power. There’s no need to aim for a heavy smash; just maintaining focused downward shots during high-speed movement and rotation throughout the court can yield great results. The key is that the upgraded 6.8mm shaft hasn’t sacrificed the racket’s torsional resistance, allowing for precise or brute-force attacks.

    The most comfortable rhythm is the seamless transition between a frontcourt block from your partner and a backcourt smash or drop during high-speed rallies across the court. This is not only a new rhythm capability established in the fast-paced battles supported by the Lightning II but also a result of its clear shock absorption. The quality of its response to downward shots depends entirely on your defensive positioning. If the opponent smashes hard, you can counter to both corners, forcing them into a continuous drain in an amateur match; if the smash is weak, a soft block to the net followed by a net rush can turn the tables; if the smash is off-target, a quick cross-court shot can likely win the point outright.

    This new product has just been released, and I’ve been testing it for about a week. If any brand tries to borrow the concept of Demon Slayer in the future, then at least when it comes to Thunder Breathing, my expectations for potential named products will be greatly raised thanks to the existence of the Lightning 8900 II.

  • Badminton Racket Kawasaki F10 Reviews

    Badminton Racket Kawasaki F10 Reviews

    You can copy or borrow ideas, but for brands with their own production lines, even if other brands target them, the key parameters, materials, and channels are still in their hands, so at most, only the appearance or fonts might be copied.

    However, among brands with their own production lines, copying each other is quite a mean behavior. As a bystander, of course, I’m just here to enjoy the show.

    Kawasaki’s new Thunder F10, you’ve really outdone yourself.

    Specifications: 4U G5, with grip, total weight in use 95.1g, balance point 299mm, shaft length 213mm, medium to high stiffness, box frame, 76-hole string bed, 8-4 point string grooves, warranty up to 30lbs, string tension 26-28lbs BS710. As for the appearance, it’s matte carbon black with an ultra-thin shaft and golden fonts at the 4 and 8 o’clock positions. What else can I say? Just look at it; the paint quality is decent. But aside from the potential controversy over the appearance, I want to share a story I heard. Apparently, Kawasaki was the first to propose the name “Thunder” for this series, with the F8 being the first model. The English name was “Thunderbolt,” which wasn’t the same thing. However, we all know Kawasaki’s brand isn’t strong enough to compete with the big names. The Chinese name of this series was later taken by another factory, and it really took off… Does this have a bit of an “NTR” vibe? If that’s the case, then the storyline where “you do it first, I’ll do it back” doesn’t seem that bad, does it?

    Man, as soon as I picked up this F10, it ignited my desire to attack, even before I started playing. Kawasaki released another offensive racket this season, the Spider-Man 8100 Pro, and the head heaviness of the Thunder F10 is on par with it. I believe its swing weight in the 4U category is among the top, but still within my acceptable range. On the day of the trial, I didn’t have time to adjust to the F10 and just went straight into a match with it.

    To be fair, this isn’t a strange or unfriendly racket. Besides the slightly high swing weight, its good power transfer, large sweet spot, and top-tier elasticity within its specifications make it suitable for players with some strength to drive it. The direct feedback when hitting the shuttle also makes the F10 very satisfying to use; it’s a racket that you’ll want to continue using. Don’t just assume that “this racket doesn’t seem agile enough for fast exchanges or blocking”; it’s not designed for that, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t excellent.

    I still remember the feel of the Thunder 80, and the F10 is definitely not its follower—they feel different. The former was very balanced for an offensive racket, while the latter has the classic feel of a true offensive racket. The natural torsional resistance of the box frame gives the F10 excellent directional control. It’s not just about downward smashes; even push shots, drives, and other controlled shots can be delivered with the precise trajectory I want, sending the shuttle to my intended spot. Additionally, thanks to the weight of the racket head and the elasticity of the shaft, the F10’s shots feel explosive—powerful, fast, and with great sound. This racket is definitely more aggressive than the Thunder 80.

    The racket’s control at the net is also outstanding. I prefer using a slightly head-heavy racket for net play or slicing; it helps me stabilize my touch, and after hitting high in the backcourt, a normal swing can bring the shuttle to the opponent’s net and land it just over. Even when dealing with an opponent’s heavy smash in a hurry, a well-timed soft shot to the net can turn the situation around.

    When it comes to offensive performance, I believe this is the most “explosive” Kawasaki racket I’ve used this year. The energy burst from this ultra-thin shaft slightly exceeded my expectations. When focusing my power, the F10 delivers a solid performance with high power transmission efficiency. Although the significant head weight can help users, even those with less power, generate solid, flawless smashes, adding force recklessly makes the attack much more intimidating. This intimidation comes from a combination of sound, speed, and hitting feedback—all top-tier experiences. It’s not one of those clunky rackets that sacrifices continuity for a single heavy smash; the shaft’s quick recovery ensures uninterrupted output in the backcourt during the trial. It’s worth mentioning that although the stiffness is slightly high, there’s still a resilience during heavy smashes.

    On the other hand, the racket’s performance in defensive situations really tests the player’s skill.

    From the start, I suspected it wouldn’t be suitable for fast exchanges or blocking, and the actual experience confirmed this. In doubles, during rotations in the front court, I had to step back half a step more than usual to avoid being caught by the opponent’s fast drives. Simply put, the Thunder F10 might expose its sluggishness in quick transitions between forehand and backhand, as well as in continuous racket swings. But if I were to rank it, the F10’s crisp shots and quick shaft recovery keep it from being the worst in close combat—at least it’s better than the Spider-Man racket. Additionally, its segmented fishtail cone cap leaves room for the thumb’s role during backhand grip.

    It’s clear that this 4.5-star racket is more suited for advanced players. The F10 fits well in positions where the 88D can adapt, offering a thrilling offensive experience. However, I think the timing of releasing this high-quality new model, directly competing with the Spider-Man series, might not have been the wisest decision.

  • Badminton Racket Kawasaki Aurora 7 Reviews

    Badminton Racket Kawasaki Aurora 7 Reviews

    Christmas has just passed, it is expected that everyone should have received Christmas gifts, by the way, to give you a chat about this author recently acquired ultralight racket, Kawasaki Aurora 7. may be able to as a New Year’s gift among the range of considerations.


     


     


    This racket I also have a week or so into the hands of the overall experience of this racket has a general understanding of the hands-on experience, the racket adopts the ultra-lightweight 5UG6 specification design, the use of 30T carbon fibre, there are four kinds of colours, respectively, for the Aurora White Blue Aurora Pink Aurora Green Aurora Purple, all belong to the more gentle white-based colours, the laser shooting bag attached to the racket, the light will be changed into a variety of colours, the back to the court! Very bright, I this is the aurora pink, balance point 302, do not go to the bottom of the line on the hand glue weight of 88g, the maximum racket to withstand the poundage of 30 pounds, the author on the 80 line, 28 pounds.


     


     


    As a two or so into the hands of the racket, Kawasaki Aurora 7 really give it to what it should give, 30T carbon fibre with the racket at this price is really conscience, the elasticity of the middle lever better with the help of the force, you can let the novice or the power of small ball players easily long balls in place, I just got the racket played a single, there is an unexpected sense of crunchy pop, the backcourt of the kill shot is really faster swing speed, point kill chopping and hanging! This type of ball pointing is also good, passive backhand, there is a certain power base under the premise, but also easily to the backcourt without too much effort, the only backcourt attack threat may be a little bit worse, this point is almost all the speed of the attack racket disadvantage, but for the novice there is a good degree of inclusiveness, the weight of the 5U in the hands of the light, doubles practical use of the net in front of the flat pumping fast blocking is also indeed very brittle and elastic, the net release may be the result of the racket, the net is also very brittle and elastic, the net is very brittle and elastic. The net release may be too light racket still need to get used to, give out the ball very quickly, the middle half of the court to lift the racket to seal the net can also be a step ahead, as an ultra-light attack racket, while taking into account the speed, this point allows you to no matter in singles or doubles to use it, it can be easy to manage.


     


    As a good value, the price of two rackets, it really can not pick what fault, send your loved ones to send friends are a good choice, if you are a beginner just contact badminton, then this Aurora 7 can also be included in the scope of one, with this experience, but also let the author is very much looking forward to Kawasaki’s subsequent experience of the use of other products, friends interested in the follow-up of the racket series of products can be a point of concern, will be continued! Experience will also continue, to be continued…