Tag: Lining

Badminton Racket Lining N90 II vs YONEX AT700 Reviews
Li-Ning, although a newcomer in the badminton world, has shown impressive performance, catching up fast. It boasts a full range of badminton products, sponsors teams like the Chinese national team and several others, and has a group of endorsing players.
YONEX, on the other hand, is an established giant in the field, consistently making solid moves and holding a significant position in the industry. These two major brands have recently been making headlines in the media, drawing plenty of attention.
As a badminton enthusiast, I have used multiple racket brands, with GOSEN and YY being the most frequent choices. I’ve been using YY’s AT700 and 900P for some time, and the power of the AT700 left a lasting impression on me. Recently, I got my hands on the Li-Ning N90II, and here’s a comparison with the YY AT700 for fellow players’ reference.
1. Appearance and Technical Specifications
1. Li-Ning N90II
- Model: AYPE016-1000, MP Force Series, Colors: Red, Gold.
- Dry Racket Weight: 87.9g; Balance Point: 305mm.
- Grip Size: S2; Weight: W3. Shaft Stiffness (Flexibility): Medium.
- String: YY95 (Gray), strung manually, machine-tensioned to 28 lbs (mains 27, crosses 29) with YY’s 4-point method. This was the first stringing for this racket.
- Grip: YY102 (Yellow), after removing the plastic wrap but keeping the original grip, the total weight is approximately 96.5g, with a balance point of 304mm.
- Dimensions: Grip length (including cone section): 200mm.
  Shaft Diameter: At the cone: 7.16mm; at the mid-section: 7.2mm; 5cm above the T-joint: 7.18mm.
  Frame Dimensions:
- At the T-joint: Width: 11.56mm.
- At the 3 o’clock position: Width: 11.5mm, Thickness: 6.5mm.
- At the 12 o’clock position: Width: 11.14mm, Thickness: 6.68mm.
- Technology:
1. Inner cone control.
2. High composite density damping system.
3. Multi-point composite carbon fiber reinforcement.
4. Wing constant system.
5. Frame mechanics optimization system.
6. Aerodynamic frame section system.
7. Superconducting nanotechnology.
8. Ultra-fine high-strength biomimetic shaft.
9. Elastic torsional recovery.
10. Frame compression structure.
The official website lists Lin Dan as the player using this racket. Compared to the first generation N90, the second generation adds the inner cone control technology, while the other technologies remain the same.
2. YONEX AT700 (New Version)
- Model: YY AT series, Color: Bright Red.
- Dry Racket Weight: Approximately 89.1g; Balance Point: 306mm.
- Grip Size: G4; Weight: 3U. Shaft Stiffness (Flexibility): Stiffer.
- String: YY95 (Gray), strung manually, machine-tensioned to 28 lbs (mains 27, crosses 29). This was the second stringing, the first time was at 26 lbs.
- Grip: YY102 (White), after removing the plastic wrap but keeping the original grip, the total weight is approximately 97.6g, with a balance point of 306mm.
- Dimensions: Grip length (including cone section): over 200mm.
  Shaft Diameter: At the cone: 7.13mm; at the mid-section: 7.26mm; 5cm above the T-joint: 7.16mm.
  Frame Dimensions:
- At the T-joint: Width: 11.38mm.
- At the 3 o’clock position: Width: 11.58mm, Thickness: 6.6mm.
- At the 12 o’clock position: Width: 11.38mm, Thickness: 6.32mm.
- Technology:
1. Titanium Armor System.
2. Square Head Shape.
3. Built-in T-Joint.
4. Nickel-Titanium Alloy.
5. Low Air Resistance Cone Cap.
6. Ultra-high Elastic Carbon Fiber.
7. Film Titanium Armor.
2. Experience
Clear Shots
Both rackets make it easy to hit clear shots, but the AT700 feels slightly more effortless. Despite the similar weight and balance point after applying the same string and grip, the AT700’s head-heaviness is more noticeable when hitting clears. When swinging both rackets, the AT700 feels heavier on the wrist compared to the N90II. According to records from EWEI Sports Forum, the swing weight (SW) of the JP version of the AT700 is around 90 kg/cm². Although I couldn’t find the SW value for the N90II, my personal feeling is that it’s lighter than the AT700.
Drive Shots
Both rackets can easily produce accurate drive shots, but there is a slight difference in feel due to the N90II’s shaft being softer than that of the AT700. The N90II seems more balanced, while the AT700 feels faster.
Flat Drives and Blocks
The N90II is quick to swing and can easily change the racket face to hit the desired direction, whereas the AT700 is slightly slower in this regard. However, the AT700 shows exceptional power in flat exchanges when hitting the shuttle.
Net Shots
Both rackets perform well in net kills and intercepting at the net, feeling very light and agile. When actively playing tight net shots or cross net shots, the N90II provides slightly better touch and control compared to the AT700.
Drop Shots
The N90II performs tight and controlled drop shots close to the net, offering a good sense of control, while the AT700 falls a bit short in this area.
Smashes
In terms of smashes, the AT700 clearly outperforms the N90II. The power transmission is seamless, delivering a solid feel with minimal energy loss. Smashes are sharp, which could be due to the stiffer shaft and titanium armor technology of the AT700. On the other hand, while the N90II’s head and shaft offer good consistency, there’s a slight delay in power delivery when smashing. This lag is something I’ve also noticed when using GOSEN’s Platinum Limited Edition and the AT900P during smashes.
3. Summary
The N90II’s craftsmanship is highly detailed, with excellent paint quality. The combination of red, gold, and white offers a balanced color scheme, exuding a certain elegance. There are no visible flaws in the appearance, and it comes with a bag that can hold three rackets, which is practical for casual play. It even includes a small bag of spare grommets, showcasing thoughtful packaging. After some use, I haven’t noticed any paint chipping or cracks, though further inspection is needed for any minor bumps. For such a short time, Li-Ning’s racket design and build quality have reached an impressive level, worthy of praise.
The AT700 also has a unique appearance with its red, black, and gray color scheme, which is quite attractive and well-coordinated. Among YY rackets, this one stands out for its beautiful paintwork. However, after some minor clashes during doubles play, the paint seems slightly more fragile, with a few small areas showing signs of chipping. The AT700 has gone through four different batches (including a limited edition, as detailed in related forums), and this new version appears to be the final one, as it no longer appears in YY’s catalog for this year.
I strung the N90II at 28 lbs for the first time, slightly below the recommended tension. This was similar to my experience with GOSEN rackets, where I don’t exceed the recommended tension, but it reaches the desired tension on the first stringing. With YY rackets, I also tend to stay below 25 lbs to avoid voiding the warranty. The frequent reports of frame sinking make me a bit concerned. After stringing both rackets at 28 lbs, there was minimal frame deformation in either racket, with both showing similar deformation levels: approximately 3mm horizontally and 2mm vertically.
In conclusion, there’s a significant difference between these two rackets. The N90II is easier to handle, while the AT700 requires more explosive power.
Each racket, whether used for the first time or by different players, provides a unique experience. Every racket has its own personality, and perhaps that’s the charm of top-tier rackets. It’s also part of the beauty of badminton, as the ever-changing sensations of playing can become quite mesmerizing and addictive.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining WindStorm 700 Reviews
The WS series continues to sell well among all badminton racket categories from the Red Factory, firmly occupying the mid-range market. This indicates that lightweight and user-friendly rackets, when paired with good design, meet the needs of the majority of amateur players.
Several years ago, I found the WS72 difficult to get used to, but the top male player in our unit used the same series’ WS700 to execute a series of impressive moves, which inspired me to reconsider.
Parameters: 5UG6, with bottom, total weight 89.76g in used condition, balance point 299mm, shaft length 220mm, low hardness, fluid box-shaped frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string groove, warranty 30 pounds, string tension 24lbs BG66U.
The previous user was a director, so I felt somewhat embarrassed to take photos of his racket, but I used it with some hesitation. To put it simply, the WS700 gave me the same initial impression as many players: it immediately reminded me of the Feng Dong 9000. Both rackets share a similar design aesthetic, with elegant beige-white and a small amount of gold lines. The use of water decals is minimal, making it less eye-catching compared to other products, especially when compared to the youthful colors of the 72/74. However, this simple appearance is also quite appealing.
In its unstrung state, the WS700’s balance point does not exceed 300. Upon using it directly, its feel is more like a 4U balanced racket. It has a slight head-heavy feel, a high swing speed, and with its low hardness shaft, the racket’s action is very smooth and easy to handle. This racket allows any beginner to hit accurate high clears without difficulty.
From the cone cap style, this racket seems to bridge the gap between the early and mid-generation Li Ning products. It is said to be the predecessor of the Li Ning ultra-light racket series or WS series. The entire frame feels both soft and elastic, comparable to the TP101 but with a significantly lighter initial setup. It’s evident that the WS700’s load capacity is not high, which is why the previous user chose it as his main racket later in life and even bought three of them for his bag.
Age may bring irreversible power decline to users, but if the player’s fundamentals are strong, the skillful and delicate handling will only improve with experience. The WS700’s lightweight design and high maneuverability allow for a wide range of shot options after reaching the net. Whether it’s deceptive drops, quick pushes, or sudden low-angle flicks, the WS700 combines quick response and strong handling, making it highly effective at the net. While it may not be ideal for every player, the additional 7g weight compared to the WS72 and the added feel of the string bed provide more stability for controlling small and long shots.
Many advancing players link the overall hardness of a racket with its attacking performance, but they are not directly related. In terms of powerful smashes, the WS700 cannot offer extremely solid feedback. Users typically leave some leeway when smashing from the backcourt, focusing on creating a more coherent and dense attack. Although I initially found the racket’s power to be weak, its forgiving nature allows for prolonged and consistent power generation, helping maintain a longer period of control and making scoring more comfortable.
Furthermore, the WS700 withstands stretching well. Its agility gives an advantage in mid-court drives. Although its response speed is not exceptionally quick, it is smooth and continuous. When following up after a net block, the racket can reach higher points, quickly establishing an advantage at the net and providing opportunities for teammates. In handling defensive shots, the racket’s soft, responsive, and relatively lightweight characteristics are effective. The backhand low-position shots are comfortable, and a simple push can reach the opponent’s backcourt baseline.
I consider this ultra-light racket to be a well-balanced model with comprehensive performance and not overly light. It reminds me of the significant change from the previous N903, reflecting not only the evolving needs of a mid-level advancing player but also the reasonable design aspects of the WS series.
I am not sure if the WS700 has been discontinued, but compared to the more expensive and less inflated 72/74, the WS700, with its older pedigree, theoretically has a price advantage. It could be an excellent choice for those interested in trying a 5U racket or seeking a softer, more forgiving option.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining N50II S-type Reviews
Parameters: 3UG5, no bottom, total weight 91.68g in used condition, balance point 302mm, shaft length 220mm, medium hardness, box-shaped frame, 72-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string groove, warranty 30 pounds, string tension 26-28lbs BS720.
The main color choices for Li Ning at that time were silver, gold, and red. When the N553 was released, the visual effect was indeed impressive, though that’s another story. The racket features a silver-gray paired with navy blue on the wings, and the shaft is a black background with the racket model and technology, including a transition to blue at the cone cap—an overall standard presentation. However, the black string grooves on the outer wings of the frame and various technology markings inside the frame enhance the visual appeal from a side angle, effectively improving the user’s experience.
Players who previously used the N502S were top-tier, including Wang Lin, Bao Ge, and Yu Yang, which secured a solid price for this racket in the second-hand market. Additionally, as a Fire series product emphasizing attacking ability, it has the ‘S’ suffix denoting speed, indicating it is more suitable for doubles play.
However, upon actual use, it turns out that’s not entirely the case. The racket’s swing weight is quite noticeable, and the frame’s air resistance is high, resulting in a slower swing speed. With its long middle shaft and medium hardness, the N502S might not produce continuity in my hands.
Apart from being somewhat heavy, there are no other difficult aspects to adapt to. It can easily generate power in high clear shots. However, the old Li Ning’s elasticity is rather average, with a low feedback between the racket and the shuttle. The racket feels somewhat wooden, and my sensitivity to the shaft’s bending is somewhat lacking.
The style of rackets tested on the same day was varied, and switching to the N502S required more adaptation time, especially in terms of power generation and hitting point judgment. Initially, the racket’s long drawing time and slow swing speed were quite uncomfortable. After consulting with the racket owner, who described it as light and fast, I realized what was happening. It turned out to be a tool for power players. After acknowledging this shortcoming and adjusting my mindset, I adapted to it while playing mixed doubles.
Many might appreciate the N502S for its performance in attacks. It is a racket that feels capable of delivering powerful smashes due to its swing weight. For players with substantial strength, simply using it to smash is enough to trouble opponents. However, the N502S feels a bit rough, even compared to the later N903, largely because the power comes more from the racket’s kinetic energy rather than its elastic potential. Additionally, while the sweet spot is large, it lacks focus.
Moreover, can every player ensure they are positioned early and fully exerting force while using it? Because of the longer preparation time for power, moving quickly to the hitting point is essential, and failure to do so may result in poor shot quality.
Even after adapting, I still struggle with the feel of the racket’s short, quick shots. It lacks flexibility, and the short power feedback is unsatisfactory. I hoped that after hitting the sweet spot, the racket head would quickly return the shuttle, but the N502S’s face feels sticky, and the shaft’s recovery speed is slow. In fast-paced exchanges, I quickly found myself at a disadvantage, often only managing to block the shuttle.
If I must highlight a point of praise, it’s that the N502S provides very stable shot output. Whether in long shots or small ones, the feel is solid. Sometimes, when not in position for a backcourt shot or transitioning from the net, the quality of control is still good, with fewer vulnerabilities. Additionally, in active situations, I find it challenging to adapt to the racket’s feedback for powerful smashes. This racket seems to excel in exploiting opponents’ weaknesses, as a few times I saw the shuttle drop straight into the court while opponents could only watch.
Unless there is a different tuning for player versions, I’m puzzled as to why it is used in fast-paced games. Its heaviness, large and slow drawing action, and inadequate shock absorption mean each shot has a significant interval, and the racket takes time to recover from deformation. If you are slightly forward in position, it becomes very difficult to deal with opponents’ smashes effectively. If struck at the armpit or other weak positions, it is even more likely to lose points.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining Flame N50 I Reviews
Introduction Statement: Evaluations have a lot of subjective elements, and differing opinions can exist, but let’s avoid arguments!
Racket History: Starting with history, this classic old racket is the first-generation product released after Li-Ning sponsored the national team in 2009. The endorser was Fu Haifeng, known for his powerful shots. Those familiar with Bao Ge know that he preferred rackets with a relatively soft shaft and a certain weight in the head. Such rackets have a high swing weight and powerful shots. (This review discusses the retail version of the endorsed racket, not the CP version.)
Li-Ning’s first-generation rackets were generally comparable to those used by players before. The N501 clearly targeted the Yonex ArcSaber 10. The specific feel will be discussed later, so it won’t be elaborated on here.
Besides Bao Ge, national team players like Jin Boss, Huang Yaqiong, and Chen Qingchen also used the N501 for a period. If the national team hadn’t changed sponsors, the N501 might have accompanied Chen Qingchen at the Tokyo Olympics.
Even Lin Dan briefly put down his N90 I and used the N50 I (source screenshot from Bilibili). The racket’s suitability for aggressive play is self-evident.
It’s worth mentioning that Bao Ge won the World Championship in 2009 using this racket. You can search for the video if interested.
Appearance: The red, white, and gray color scheme immediately brings to mind the red ArcSaber 10. The overall look of the racket is quite aesthetically pleasing, with a subdued dark red base color that becomes increasingly attractive and refined with use. Li-Ning’s attention to paint details and quality was outstanding. Back then, racket colors were not as bright or bold as today, so while the N501 might not be stunning now, it remains elegant and understated, like a fine tea that still has flavor when it cools.
Feel: After removing the base and stringing, the overall weight is 92g, with a balance point at 305mm. It’s not an extreme power racket, but with the high balance point, it’s still quite powerful.
The swing weight is very heavy and solid, making it feel like a “meteor hammer.” Is it powerful? I think it’s sufficiently so, though Lin Dan and Lee Chong Wei might not agree. As always, preferences vary, and there’s no need to be overly critical!
The shaft of the N50 I is softer compared to the ArcSaber 10 but has similar resilience (referring to the flex feel when squeezed). It has a similar hitting feel to the ArcSaber 10 (not very elastic but suitable for powerful shots). Li-Ning’s first-generation rackets had distinct and user-friendly shafts. Today, they may not be considered stiff, but those who like them (like me) find them very satisfying. The feel is solid and reminiscent of archery with a curved bow. For those who don’t like it, the feedback might be wooden or soft. Overall, the first-generation shaft is relatively elastic.
Regarding overall weight, as a balanced racket, I believe the weight doesn’t significantly affect the feel; it’s more about the balance point. Therefore, I won’t stir up any debate about 3U vs. 4U. Ultimately, practice and strength are more important than worrying about weight.
The frame design is a large frame, almost identical to the ArcSaber 10, featuring a box frame with a fluid frame design in the middle. The main advantage is maintaining the box frame’s power while ensuring some degree of hand speed for defense and front-court play. Of course, the actual effect depends on individual ability, as the racket’s technology cannot compensate for 90% of players’ abilities.
Horizontal Comparison: The comparison with the ArcSaber 10 has been briefly covered. Here, the focus is on comparing Bao Ge’s other racket—the Kason F9.
Having used many rackets, I find Bao Ge’s rackets quite unique, especially since he endorses balanced rackets, which is a contrast that adds a touch of surprise!
The F9 has several similarities with the N50 I:
1. Similar paint color, both featuring a dark red base.
2. Both have a soft, resilient shaft.
3. Both feature a large frame, suitable for all-around play.
Differences include:
1. The F9 has a special wind-breaking frame design with “Energy Axe” technology, offering faster swing speed than the N50.
2. Different price points and awards.
3. Different brands (Kason is cheaper but has more counterfeit issues).
September 11, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining WOODS N90 III Reviews
One of my colleagues in the office, who has a lot of experience, used to try out all the top rackets used by national team players during their time with the Red Factory. He often complained to me about various issues with the series, especially regarding the shaft.
I haven’t experienced it myself, so I can only agree based on word-of-mouth, though it hasn’t stopped several colleagues in my office from buying this model. It seems to have a pretty large user base.
This is a powerful racket, but it’s not the successor to the N902; it actually inherits from the N80, so don’t get confused.
Specifications: 3UG5, stripped of its base, total weight in used condition 96.2g, balance point 310mm, shaft length 220mm, medium to high stiffness, wind-breaking frame, 76-hole string bed, 8-4 o’clock string groove, warranty 30 lbs, strung at 25-27 lbs with AB string.
Among the old Li-Ning rackets, this model is highly recognizable and very attractive, which is likely why many players are willing to buy it. The pure white base paint extends to the inside of the wind-breaking frame as well. The shaft is very robust, and the frame is similarly sturdy, giving it a powerful appearance, with several Dan symbols and cross marks on the frame that make the 903 look like a fully armored knight. The frame has many familiar technological markers that were continued in later Wind Blade series.
Firstly, the head-heavy feel of the racket is very pronounced. With this high swing-speed frame type, it’s challenging for me to control the rhythm during initial adjustment stages, and I often hit the frame in active shots. However, the sweet spot is quite large. The feedback from hitting feels very much like the Wind Blade series, somewhat similar to the Jian Jian and Sharp Peak models I’ve been using recently, with a wooden and bouncy feel.
The continuity in mid-court and front-court play is significantly affected. Although the 903 delivers powerful shots and can easily create openings in the opponent’s returns, it becomes frustrating when you can’t reach high points after following up.
Old Li-Ning rackets with such thick shafts may not have the best elasticity by today’s standards, but they offer exceptional anti-twist performance. The racket has good directional control and a large hitting area, making it highly responsive and precise. I find it hard to resist the urge to use the 903 for powerful smashes—not just soft presses, point attacks, or broader offensive plays, but for full-body power smashes. The 903 has a strong hammer-like feel; it’s like a child finding a handy stick by the roadside and wanting to swing it. The strong down-force sensation makes the hitting moment feel electrifying, and the shot quality matches this intense power, making the shuttle feel like a cannonball.
Despite its solid feel and excellent net control, it’s quite difficult for receiving smashes. In doubles, you need to stand further back compared to using other rackets to achieve better defensive performance due to the extended pre-swing caused by the racket’s weight.
The racket naturally encourages more power usage in all types of shots—flat drives, clears, defensive responses, and smashes. It tends to make players exert more force. To be honest, its difficulty in use is more dependent on the user’s physical fitness. I suddenly remember that the owners of the 903 in my office are all quite robust.
So, if the N80 is the big brother of the Wind Blade series, then the N903 is definitely the second brother. Considering it’s an upgraded version of the Wind Blade 500, those who like the powerful performance and have a fondness for Lin Dan’s endorsed products might want to give it a try.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining WOODS N90 II Reviews
My trial experience: Generally speaking:
1. I rarely play with Li-Ning rackets;
2. I rarely play with discontinued models;
3. I don’t play with repaired rackets;
4. I don’t use knock-offs. This time, the racket hit all four points.
It was a coincidence. Near the end of the year, I had sold most of my rackets, and because I forgot to bring my current racket back to my workplace after visiting home, the only racket left in my dorm was the Viper, while the other backups were still unused. When I got back, the string broke on the first game, so I had to shamelessly borrow a racket from an old friend. To avoid damaging it, I chose the most beat-up one.
Upon closer inspection, I realized it was an old friend that looked familiar, though I had never used it.
Specifications: 3US2, total weight and balance point unknown, soft shaft, pure box frame, strung at 25 lbs with BG66U.
At this point, I really can’t describe the appearance. Originally, the racket’s paint job was the classic “tomato and scrambled eggs” (red and yellow), but this battle-worn version looks like the eggs were burned. The racket is scorched black around the 4 and 10 o’clock positions. I’m not sure if it was just painted black or if this is a poorly done repair, but it feels bumpy. The racket is heavily battle-damaged, and the paint looks like it went through a Van Fleet-level bombardment. There’s no smooth spot left on the entire racket. When it was in perfect condition, the color scheme gave me the impression of a wealthy family’s traditionally decorated Chinese-style living room, but it’s definitely not my cup of tea.
With a 3U box frame, swing speed isn’t something to expect, but it doesn’t feel overly head-heavy, so overall, it’s still a balanced racket, and it wasn’t difficult to handle. After a few clears, I was even a bit confused—was this really an old flagship model from Li-Ning? It was so easy to drive! The ease of use comes from the relatively soft shaft and the string bed, which wraps around the shuttle well, providing a soft hitting experience with low difficulty in returning shots. During a few test clears, I could clearly feel the power transfer and effortless returns. Is this the ArcSaber? But it’s even easier to handle than the Arc 11—a “sugar water” racket? WTF?
If it were just soft, I wouldn’t be so surprised. The key is that the elasticity of the N90 II is also excellent. The balanced nature of the racket allowed me to seize opportunities to press down even in less proactive situations during doubles play. Even when my preparations for smashes were insufficient, the quality of the shots remained high—good speed, good placement. When I hit with force, I could feel the string bed and shaft bending, a sensation similar to the Arc series. The stored elastic potential energy transmitted to the shuttle created a strong sense of power. This was all while using a battle-damaged, possibly repaired N90 II. I wonder how much easier it would be to play with a fully intact one.
I’m confident that it also performs well with net shots, as the strong hold on the shuttle allows for more adjustments when making returns. However, the weakness of the softer shaft became apparent during fast exchanges in drives. Each swing of my forearm seemed to bring out the shaft’s flexibility, particularly during rapid mid-court rallies. There was a lack of consistency between my wrist and racket face, increasing the chances of off-target shots and making it easier for my opponent to press me. With just one game with the N90 II, I wasn’t inclined to do fine-tuned plays. I focused on pressing down when possible, driving when I could, and lifting to get out of trouble when needed. Defense and backhand shots were more manageable thanks to the soft, bouncy setup—just exert power, and that’s it. Playing this way didn’t feel burdensome at all.
The experience was very limited, and I probably only scratched 70% of its full potential. But the impact was definitely strong. To be honest, even if someone gave me an N90 II in this condition, it wouldn’t have stirred any interest in me to try it. If I hadn’t been completely out of usable rackets, I probably wouldn’t have had the chance to test it.
A limited-time experience, not a long review, with more emotional than rational analysis. After the game, I felt like I’d been slapped (in a good way) by the product power of old Li-Ning products.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining HC1200 Reviews
Here comes another entry-level racket from the “Red Factory.” Unlike previous models, the HC series lacks any distinctive “features.” It doesn’t have the ultra-lightweight tuning of the WS series, nor does it offer the quick-attack feel of the low-end Wind Blade series. The Thunder series, also with a box frame, has gained quite a bit of hype this year. So, with the same budget, what attraction does the HC series still have for beginners?
Specifications: 4UG6, with grip tape, total weight in use 97.44g, balance point 288mm, shaft length 215mm, low stiffness, box frame, 72-hole stringing pattern, 9–3 point grommet positioning, tension warranty of 30 lbs, strung at 25 lbs with durable strings.
In line with the “Red Factory’s” consistent strengths, the HC1200 stands out in terms of appearance among entry-level rackets. Besides the reliable paint quality, its design is also well done. The blue base color is complemented by appropriate decals, with a youthful decoration style and vibrant colors. Although the frame lacks any technological markings, it doesn’t skimp on decorative details.
A solid driving feel is crucial for this type of product, and the HC1200 delivers. Unlike the 1800 I tried earlier, this 3U model feels more substantial in hand. Although the total weight seems a bit exaggerated, once you hold it, there’s nothing to fear. It’s well-balanced, with moderate swing weight. On top of that, the softer shaft makes it very easy to hit clears after getting the rhythm of your swing, making warm-up shots feel effortless.
Of course, if it had more elasticity, that would be even better, but without it, it leaves some market space for second-tier and independent brands.
The 72-hole string bed provides a stable sweet spot, and the frame is quite steady. The shot feel isn’t too floaty, but the HC1200 struggles a bit with long-range shot control. After all, improving torsional resistance requires better materials, and with basic materials in a box frame, you can easily push it to its limits.
Some users of the HC1200 may be looking to try a few attacking smashes, and it can indeed provide a basic level of downward pressure. Thanks to the low threshold for shaft deformation, even players with less strength or improper technique can generate some energy through the shaft’s elasticity. Even slightly advanced players will notice that it easily absorbs power, so while it’s suitable for beginners, it won’t accompany them for too long as they improve.
On the defensive side, it’s quite easy to handle. In terms of both maneuverability and driveability, the HC1200 offers a good response when under attack. Its ability to absorb power makes it effective for soft blocks, often turning defense into offense. Handling backhand defensive shots is also relatively easy, and I believe it would perform even better with more elastic strings, allowing for a more noticeable defensive struggle.
The racket feels agile during flat exchanges, and the shots are stable. However, because the overall tuning is too soft, the response is delayed, lacking crispness. This makes it less effective against faster shots.
Despite the serious homogenization, I still think this is a good template. Besides the lack of high-end materials, I’m surprised to find that the HC1200 doesn’t really have any significant flaws. It’s balanced and user-friendly. With Li-Ning’s brand power, it’s a strong choice for an entry-level racket. I previously thought this was Blue Factory’s stronghold, but it turns out the Red Factory also has some exemplary models for beginners.
As for Green Factory’s entry-level models, well… better to just move on.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining HC1800 Reviews
Li-Ning’s series is aimed at beginner players. In fact, I’ve heard of HC’s entry-level models priced below 200 yuan, specifically the HC1900. I remember seeing a few kids from my partner’s family playing with an HC1900, and to this day, I still regret not taking that racket away from them.
“Why didn’t I just take the kid’s racket?”
Recently, I managed to get an HC1800 at a low price, so I can finally explore the true nature of this series.
Specifications: 3UG5, without grip tape, total weight in use 89.8g, balance point 305mm, shaft length 220mm, medium stiffness, box frame, 9–3 point grommet positioning, 72-hole stringing pattern, tension warranty of 26 lbs, strung at 25 lbs with VBS70 strings.
One significant advantage that the “Red Factory” has over other first- and second-tier brands is the effort they put into improving the paint quality of mid- and low-end products. The version I have is black and gold. Despite some scuffs left by the previous owner, the racket still looks quite appealing when in good condition. The subtle gradient of gold on the racket head, though simple, adds a layered feel to the design, while the dark color gives it a more premium appearance. With a few more decorative touches, I believe I could easily claim this as a mid-range racket before using it.
Additionally, Li-Ning rackets are indeed quite sturdy, as is the case with the HC1900 that was mishandled but still durable. This HC1800 has withstood many bumps and remains solid.
I used this racket around the same time as the previous two models, and during the racket-switching process, I quickly noticed that the HC1800 has the strongest head-heavy feel. The overall weight is not much different, but this indicates its more attack-oriented positioning.
The slight increase in weight ensures a solid feel without adding too much burden. In terms of clears, its hitting feel is better compared to the previous two models. This can be attributed not only to the ideal state of the VBS70 strings but also to the head-heavy feel providing easy follow-through, the moderately tuned long shaft, and the large sweet spot on the string bed. Even with the added weight, it remains an easy-to-handle product.
The shaft feels slightly stiff but not too soft, giving it a decent sense of quality.
I can say the HC1800 behaves well in all aspects, making it a balanced product. Stability is my first impression. Especially during wide, high clears or soft, controlled smashes, it offers better direction and shot feel compared to the previous two models, providing a sense of reliability. When the shuttle doesn’t land as expected, the HC1800 responds with subtle adjustments.
Also, due to its more pronounced head heaviness, the HC1800 doesn’t disappoint in attack. Though it doesn’t offer high elasticity, during fast swings against incoming shots, the high balance point ensures a strong downward feel when hitting. You can feel the shuttle being driven down during a swing, and in the same class, it doesn’t have a noticeable loss of power. With better strings, I believe more advanced players could land two or three powerful, hammer-like shots.
However, the usual caveat applies: this racket’s setup isn’t suited for fast-paced exchanges. In doubles, it lacks agility, whether it’s intercepting at the net, flat drives in the mid-court, or handling fast-paced defense and smashes from both sides. The longer shaft and greater wind resistance reduce the racket’s maneuverability. Moreover, since it’s inherently head-heavy, the higher the intensity, the more likely the arm and wrist joints will tire.
Still, it’s a pretty decent racket, one that can be used for a long time and isn’t just for fun. While there’s a brand premium, the HC1800’s price is still reasonable.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining Windstorm72 Reviews
It’s unusual for such a popular racket to have no reviews. This is clearly a phenomenal product. Although the concept of ultra-light rackets existed before this one, with the ArcSaber FB proving that ultra-light and high-quality could coexist, it was the WS72 that really brought ultra-light rackets into the spotlight, sparking widespread discussion on racket weight.
Honestly, I don’t feel very confident about this review. First, I wasn’t in good condition on the test day, and the performance didn’t align with my expectations. Second, I’m not the target audience for this racket, so my review might be out of place. Therefore, please take it with a grain of salt, and I welcome differing opinions.
Specifications: Unstrung weight of 72g, balance point of 310mm (with no grip removed, stringed, and cushioned with an overgrip), total weight of 82.6g. T-shaped, box-frame transition with a fluid box-shaped head, full groove frame, strung at 25 lbs with Li-Ning No. 1 string.
The appearance is worth mentioning—definitely one of the factors driving its sales. It comes in two different color schemes, both using contrasting colors. The one I have is a purple-red-blue-green indigo transition with a strong, youthful layering effect (I’m certainly not saying my previous racket looked bad). Clearly, this is a product aimed at the younger badminton crowd, the kind of racket you might dismiss for being too flashy but become curious about when you see others using it so strikingly.
At first, it feels very light in the hand, but when swinging, it’s a different story. It feels even clumsier than some 4U rackets like the 9001, not what you’d expect from an ultra-light racket. Judging by the specs, even without removing the base grip, the balance point still reaches 310mm after adding the cushion and overgrip. It’s even more extreme than the Kason K600 I once owned.
When hitting clears on court, it finally starts to feel like an ultra-light racket—you need to exert more force. That day, I wasn’t in great physical condition, so my clears were weak. In its natural state, this racket couldn’t get the shuttle from my rear court to the opponent’s doubles service line without some sharp, short bursts of force—adding to my frustration. This issue also showed up when making defensive lifts at the net. If the lift wasn’t high enough, it got intercepted, or if not placed properly, it got smashed. I could only make decent quick drives to the waistline. The most nightmarish situation was saving from the backhand corner, where my inadequate technique meant the shuttle would barely reach midcourt, setting up the opponent for an easy smash.
As a male player who often plays doubles, this racket’s offensive capabilities are lacking. At this tension:
1. The smashes were neither fast nor powerful enough, resulting in my smashes from midcourt being easily returned when facing opponents of a certain skill level. After a few attempts, I lost confidence.
2. The shaft’s elasticity is mediocre. When hitting with power, the racket feels both shaky and stiff, possibly also due to the Li-Ning No. 1 string.
3. There’s a delay in drive shots, giving it a somewhat meteor hammer-like feel. While it can handle one or two shots, after a while, it gets overwhelmed. However, its downward pressure is quite good, and its stability is decent. The larger frame performs well on some backcourt drop shots and in overhead/backhand slices, offering a reliable means of maintaining pressure. The problem is that this doesn’t translate into winning points, and using it frequently makes it easy for opponents to catch on to your strategy.
I remember reviewing the K600 and calling it an ultra-light racket capable of delivering at least one powerful smash. So why doesn’t the head-heavier WS72 perform the same? My amateur theory is:
1. The K600 has a narrower head, which increases the tension of the sweet spot at the same tension.
2. The K600’s full box-frame provides more stability and firmness.
3. The shaft and head-heavy tuning allows for faster recovery after deformation.
Perhaps the WS72 performs better at the net, but when I play mixed doubles, I rarely get to play in the frontcourt.
Since this racket has created such a buzz and even sparked a wave of counterfeit versions, we need to discuss factors beyond just the racket itself—just like how discussions about Evangelion can’t stop at the animation and character designs without at least joking about Hideaki Anno being short on cash.
This is indeed a successful product. Its fresh design, clear target audience (young players, beginners, those who care about aesthetics, non-competitive use, and influencers-driven marketing) have driven its popularity. Despite its obvious markup (it’s significantly more expensive than similar rackets like the K600), it hasn’t hindered its hot sales. It’s decent for casual games, but if you go head-to-head with intermediate players, it’s basically asking for trouble. Despite its price being in the range of mainstream mid-to-high-end rackets, the WS72 still feels like a toy and is not recommended for anyone looking to improve their badminton skills (unless you’re catering to someone who insists on having it).
This racket is addictive, but we also need to acknowledge its positive impact on the sport of badminton. It’s not a bad thing for a racket to spark interest in badminton. The more enthusiasts there are, the better it is for all groups within the sport. However, it doesn’t change the fact that this racket has lowered my opinion of Li-Ning.
That said, I realize my judgment may have been influenced by the current anti-Li-Ning sentiment on the forums. To eliminate bias, if any female player interested in testing and reviewing it—especially for mixed doubles—wants to borrow it, feel free to message me privately. I’m happy to lend it for free, no liability. Maybe it will perform differently from a different perspective as a “frontcourt wiper.”
These are just my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the true performance of the product.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining Turbo Charging 01D Reviews
This racket was acquired through a trade, and it incorporates many elements that I haven’t encountered before. Firstly, it’s the first D-suffix product from the Red Factory that I’ve tried. Secondly, it’s my first experience with the lower-end Energy series. Finally, it’s also the lowest-cost racket I’ve obtained recently. It indeed brought me a rather fresh experience.
Specifications: 3UG5, no base grip, total weight in use is 91.30g, balance point is 308mm, overall length is 670mm, shaft length is 215mm, hardness is relatively high, Energy wind-breaking frame, 72-hole string bed, 10-2 o’clock string bed, warranty for up to 30 lbs, strung at 25-27 lbs with BG80 strings.
This racket immediately reminded me of the striking Energy 80 in terms of aesthetics—they both feature bright red paint. It’s surprising that the highest and lowest models in the series share the same style. This vibrant design brings a very energetic visual experience. Furthermore, the level of detail is quite consistent with the Wind Blade 001, without cutting corners despite being a lower-end product, something that my previously satisfying Wind Blade 300 series couldn’t offer.
Even though both have the energy-reversing wind-breaking frame, there are still obvious structural differences. The most noticeable change is at the 3-9 o’clock positions, where what was originally an internal-external transition area has been replaced with a longer box-style structure. This instantly reminded me of the Green Factory’s Black Slash model I’ve used recently. It seems that wind-breaking frames are difficult to construct, and with cost limitations, the only way to ensure sufficient frame stability was to increase the box frame structure.
While I don’t mind the slight increase in wind resistance caused by the compromised wind-breaking frame, the swing weight of this racket does indeed further reduce swing speed. The 01D feels noticeably less agile than the N72 with the same specifications. As the swing weight increases, so does the ease of generating power, and with a larger racket face, the tolerance level is effectively guaranteed.
The racket’s elasticity is limited, but Li Ning’s signature “wooden” feedback successfully mitigates the loss of power caused by poor elasticity, resulting in a slightly stiffer real feel and a challenging driving experience. For players with some foundation, the 01D still provides a solid shot feel, allowing them to generate decent power. Sometimes, even hitting simple clears can yield good pressure.
As for offense or downward pressure, the 01D surprisingly meets my expectations. With the current string setup, the smash feel is normal, the shot speed is guaranteed, and it can even handle bursts of power without worrying about the shuttle not dropping. If I had to point out a shortcoming, it would be that the racket face lacks precise directionality, likely due to its limited torsional resistance.
However, this racket is not well-suited for fast-paced exchanges. Despite having a wind-breaking frame, the racket face has a bit of holding sensation, and the higher swing weight limits flexibility, which reduces continuity in flat drives and blocks. On the contrary, the feel of soft touches and gentle drops is quite solid. For a wind-breaking frame racket, it performs better in net play, which is acceptable.
There are also some shortcomings in defense. The most obvious is the lack of clear direction when returning smashes, making it difficult to control the shot’s direction when trying to clear to the backcourt under pressure. Shots can easily go off-target or out of bounds. However, handling passive backhand shots poses no difficulty. I believe it’s more appropriate to view this as an offense-oriented singles racket.
Lately, I’ve also been playing with several of the Red Factory’s entry-level models. Although I’ve mentioned similar points before, it’s worth repeating. Compared to newer generation products, the mid-generation Li Ning mid- to low-end models seem to have more character and better cost-performance ratios, which differs from the Green Factory.
Of course, the Red Factory’s products from that era often have that “wooden” feedback during shots. While it’s not necessarily unpleasant, after playing with it for a while, one may start to grow tired of it.
September 11, 2024
Badminton racket Lining Turbo Charging 80 Reviews
The energy reversal frame, as a design tested on various international courts, has proven its merits and has been applied across both the initial N7 generation and the mid-generation Energy series. It seems there’s not much untapped potential left. If I remember correctly, the Energy 80 is currently the latest product in Li Ning’s Energy series, and I’m curious how they’ve managed to fine-tune this mature platform into an excellent piece of equipment.
Specifications: 4UG5, weight of the bare racket is 82g, balance point is 308mm, shaft length is 210mm, medium stiffness leaning towards stiff, full wind-breaking frame, 10-2 o’clock string grooves, warranty for up to 32 lbs, strung at 25-26 lbs with VBS66N strings.
Compared to the Energy 75C, which was brought into the spotlight by Loh Kean Yew for some time, the Energy 80 endorsed by Zhang Nan has always had a more stable market reaction, until the release of the Fengying 800. After watching the unboxing review by a senior reviewer, he highly praised the quality control of this model, and combining that with Li Ning’s reputation for excellent craftsmanship, I trust that the Energy 80 is reliable in terms of quality as a product.
The Energy 80 only comes in one color and one specification. The entire racket is a very bright red—so bright it appears golden. This alone is likely to attract many players, such as the owner of this racket. In fact, Li Ning has continued to use their youthful design language across the entire Energy series, and even with such a vibrant color, the details stand out upon closer inspection. Although I’ve previously used the N72, this is the first time I’ve deliberately examined the wind-breaking frame design in this series: starting from the T-joint, the lower triangle wind-breaking frame extends outwards, naturally forming an inward trapezoidal wind-breaking frame at the racket head, giving it a distinctive look. The frame is thicker compared to speed series products from the Green and Blue brands, likely designed for better torsion resistance and frame rigidity.
I was quite surprised when I first handled the Energy 80, given that it’s one of the flagship models in the series—it’s unexpectedly friendly. It still retains the fast swing speed, large sweet spot, high tolerance, and smooth driving feel of the N72. Of course, after some retuning, the shaft feels stiffer, but the higher balance point makes the ease of use when hitting the ball even more noticeable. Surprisingly, the increased swing weight doesn’t negatively impact swing speed as much as expected. This tuning makes it very reliable when dealing with passive situations in the backhand and overhead areas.
I’ve previously seen comments criticizing the usability of this racket, but I didn’t expect the Energy 80 to be so easy to handle—it’s a piece of equipment that players with a bit of a foundation can use comfortably. Moreover, the drift present in the N72 has been significantly improved in the Energy 80, with a noticeably stronger and more stable downward pressure.
Not only is the downward pressure improved, but the shaft’s performance is also visibly enhanced, and with the higher swing weight, the Energy 80’s power smashes exceeded my expectations again. Although the driving feel is good, during more focused bursts of power, the shaft’s deformation suddenly feels stiffer, aiding in the release of explosive power. This greatly suppresses the unloading sensation compared to the N72. I even felt that this was somewhat reminiscent of the same shaft used in the Fengdong 9000. The ball speed performance during power smashes with the Energy 80 is quite impressive, and it’s clear that opponents find it difficult to defend against. The racket’s shot style isn’t particularly crisp, since the frame is larger and the horizontal string tension decays more noticeably, creating a slight holding sensation when the strings are fully activated. This is similar to the N72, and players who prefer a crisp and springy feel might not find it as appealing.
However, the increased holding sensation and enlarged sweet spot provide an advantage in net control. I feel that I can directly apply the same judgment used for the N72—not only does it excel at net intercepts and spins, but it also gives great confidence and forgiveness in backcourt cuts and drops, making it easy to adapt to the feeling of cutting around the shuttlecock.
In fast-paced offense-defense exchanges, the racket might not feel as nimble during defense or flat drives due to its head-heavy nature, but the shaft’s recovery speed has improved a lot compared to older Li Ning models. After each shot, the racket doesn’t feel wobbly when transitioning into a ready position. While it may not immediately turn the tide when under pressure, once the tempo picks up, the Energy 80 holds its own even in intense exchanges. Furthermore, its stability and directional accuracy, based on its excellent torsion resistance, give it a slight edge.
Overall, as someone not deeply familiar with the Energy series, after testing the Energy 80, I found many of the N72’s advantages carried over. In addition, the adjustments to the balance point and shaft have made incremental (rather than revolutionary) improvements, resulting in a well-rounded speed attack racket. It manages to maintain a balance between singles and doubles suitability while keeping the difficulty level in check, but make no mistake, this “sweet racket” has a very high ceiling.
September 11, 2024
Badminton racket Lining N7II Natsir Review
Green and blue seem to be the popular colors in the racquet world this year. Whether it’s tennis racquets or badminton racquets, shades of blue and green are common. Li Ning’s N7II super-light new color joins this trend, with a brand-new color scheme launched as a signature racquet for newly signed Olympic champion Natsir. I still remember the last generation of the N7II super-light with its bright pink that lit up the court. For men, using it required a bit of courage and fashionable matching, but now, there’s no need to worry about the color being too bold to handle.
The matte black main color is paired with grass green and bright white. The N7II Super-light Natsir continues the design language of the previous generation while adopting a more neutral color scheme. Li Ning’s paint quality remains excellent, with a fine paint finish rarely seen in badminton racquets – the paint is evenly applied, thick, glossy, and has a ceramic-like texture. This paint technique not only looks great but feels outstanding, cool to the touch like jade, showing that Li Ning’s polishing skill is top-notch. The thick paint layer also provides excellent defense against small bumps and scrapes.
As for the design of the racquet, it’s best to illustrate with pictures. Li Ning has put a lot of thought into the details, including adding reflective particles to the matte black base, which sparkle like stars in the vast universe when under light. The real product doesn’t disappoint and is even more dazzling than in photos.
On-Court Experience:
Li Ning N7II Natsir (AYPM212-1)
W1S1 76-hole energy-consolidating frame
Head size: Large+
Weight (with grip tape/base film/strings): 90.71g (frame alone 79.80g)
Balance point: 304mm, 4mm head-heavy (304mm-300mm) with excellent balance
Handle length: 200mm
Swing weight: 81
Strings: Li Ning No. 5, SZ double knot, 27 lbs
Stiffness: Frame – moderately soft, Shaft – soft, Hitting stiffness – moderate
Vibration: Low
The initial feel of the N7II Natsir is somewhat different from the data I measured. It didn’t feel as light as I expected, probably due to its head-heavy balance, which makes it feel weighty when held. If you’re used to using W2 (4U) offensive racquets, switching to the W1 (5U) N7II won’t be a problem. It swings quite smoothly, and the swing weight isn’t high. In my opinion, the N7II Natsir is relatively easy to handle, but those who regularly use W3 (3U) or even W4 (2U) racquets might find it a bit unusual at first.
I’m not sure if it’s due to changes in my physical condition (since it’s been almost a year since I last tested the N7II Light) or if Li Ning has made slight adjustments to the racquet’s specs, but I felt that the hitting stiffness of the N7II Natsir has increased, making the feedback crisper and clearer. However, it still tests your fundamentals when it comes to backcourt clears. This is a characteristic of super-light racquets: if your power isn’t great, the low inertia and low swing weight make it difficult to “borrow force,” and the quality of your clears will gradually decrease, possibly even falling short of the mark. But if you have a solid foundation, a super-light racquet can be very efficient, allowing you to easily find the optimal hitting point and produce consistent clears with a short swing. So, if you’re just looking to use a light racquet to hit the shuttle farther, it’s better to focus on improving your fundamentals.
While backcourt clears rely on technique, the N7II Natsir can immediately enhance your performance in drives and blocks. It is nimble and light, with a well-designed frame that allows for quick swings, giving you a natural advantage in front-court play. The shaft may be soft, but its quick recovery means that if your forearm strength is good, the racquet acts like a slingshot, quickly storing energy during deformation and then releasing it upon recovery, resulting in more powerful shots. The downside is that you must time your shots accurately; otherwise, if you miss the sweet spot, the shot may feel soft. In situations where you’re on the defensive in front of the net, the large and flexible head of the N7II Natsir gives you more margin for error, and sometimes, that little bit of forgiveness can be the difference between scoring or missing an opportunity.
Using the lightweight N7II Natsir for offense should also change the minds of those who doubt the power of super-light racquets. The feel of its smashes is solid, though it doesn’t deliver the heavy, hammer-like power of a much heavier racquet, nor the stability of a massive axe. It feels more like wielding a handy sword – stabbing and retracting quickly, ready for the next strike. In other words, it has decent power with excellent continuity. You can strike decisively, but if that’s not enough, you can immediately prepare for the next shot. This makes it particularly suitable for players with strong, explosive power who can take advantage of short bursts of force, saving energy and improving offensive efficiency.
In terms of small, controlled shots, I think the N7II Natsir performs well on net shots. The large head allows you to handle unexpected shuttles with ease, and pairing it with higher string tension will increase the consistency of the sweet spot, compensating for the variation in power across different areas of the large head. For players with good touch, controlling a lightweight racquet is also more intuitive. As for drop shots, I personally don’t like using too light a racquet, as the touch is too weak and hard to control. Since it’s already energy-saving for offensive play, I tend to opt for more aggressive smashes or sharp-angled drop shots, where more force is applied, and the feedback is much clearer. For small shots, stronger players might find it harder to adapt.
Conclusion:
Super-light racquets have further subdivided the playing styles of amateur players. For players who like frequent offense, have strong explosive power but relatively lower stamina, racquets like the Li Ning N7II Natsir are an excellent choice. It’s more suitable for doubles, whether you’re attacking from the front court or consistently jumping and attacking from the back court. For singles play, it lacks some stability over longer shot trajectories and can be hard to keep pace with. For players with good physical fitness and confidence in their strength, the N7II Super-light Natsir is better as a backup racquet, fully utilizing its energy-saving characteristics to maintain performance as stamina wanes. If you want to improve long shots like clears, I recommend using high-elastic strings with a thin gauge. If you’re looking to enhance offensive power and feel, opt for strings with a harder hitting sensation to increase the sharpness of smashes. Of course, what’s most attractive is that this under-80g racquet has a tension rating of up to 32 lbs, which should reassure advanced players who want to try a super-light racquet but are concerned about its ability to handle their usual string tension.
September 11, 2024