Tag: Lining

Badminton Racket Lining AERONAUT 9000C Reviews
As a flagship model from Li-Ning’s mid-generation lineup, it stands out not only for its impressive offensive capabilities within the Wind Storm 9000 series but also for accompanying Zheng Siwei through his remarkable journey. Its popularity and reputation align well with my initial understanding of the racket.
Despite its significant presence and stable price, which has prevented me from completing my trial of it, I have hesitated to borrow it from friends due to its cost and potential inconvenience.
Specifications: 3UG6, without base towel grip, total weight in use 93.86g, balance point 310mm, shaft length 210mm, moderate stiffness, box frame, 72-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string groove, warranty up to 32 lbs, strung with 26-28 lbs BS720.
The racket’s visual style is striking, with its color selection—deep blue, azure, and crimson—evoking a strong sense of national style. It reminds me of the carefully restored glaze on ancient artifacts, offering high recognition. Some players have mentioned that this design resembles the style of the AT900T from the past but with a brighter touch, which is indeed outside my area of expertise. However, due to its distinctive look, the racket has unfortunately become a frequent target for counterfeiting.
Although it is well-known that this is a 3U offensive-oriented racket, my initial experience with it did not cause much pressure. Undoubtedly, it has a slightly higher swing weight than the 9000, but overall, it still falls within the balanced racket category. If it were reduced to a 4U specification with its current weight distribution, it would not differ significantly from the Tactic 6000 in terms of empty racket feel.
The shaft is not very stiff, and its quality is similar to its counterparts. It offers a clear feel of using leverage when handling active shots and makes it easy to drive and experience the deformation of the 9000C shaft. The feedback from the shot is also similar to the 9000, perhaps even a bit more forgiving, making it quite user-friendly. The current box frame also shows good torsional resistance and performs well in directional control, with good performance in trying to keep long shots within the small corner grid.
It is said that wind tunnel technology improves swing speed. While previous experiments by Pang Hu have controlled variables, I need not investigate whether the wind tunnel or the box frame with the same projected area is better. At least in doubles play, with the racket in my hands in a mid-to-high state on that day, flat drives and blocks can still create a fast-paced exchange. Although the increased swing weight affects its agility, the longer grip effectively avoids excessive torque.
However, the feel of this racket is not as typical or aggressive. Unlike the current trend of “touch and go,” the 9000C has a more noticeable holding feel. But this is not an excuse; after all, Zheng Siwei has moved from the 9000C to the Double-Edged 10LT and now to the Bow 11P, and with the rumored preference for BG65 strings, it is clear that the racket’s characteristics are mainly to match the user’s preferences rather than specific scenarios.
On the offensive side, the 9000C feels somewhat “conventional.” The racket delivers energy to the shuttlecock through both gravity and elasticity, with little difference in proportions. As one of the best-performing mid-shaft rackets from Li-Ning at the time, its performance now seems slightly outdated. Whether by design or not, among the 9000 series, the Wind Blade is indeed significantly more aggressive than the Wind Storm, providing more confidence in execution.
The 9000C does have a slightly higher pressing feel compared to the 9000. The deformation of the shaft during a powerful smash is not as pronounced as in the 9000, providing more resistance and a feeling of the whip-like motion of the racket head. With harder strings, it should produce a shot power that closely reflects the input force. It is not as difficult to smash with, and both the pressing and power feel reach a certain level of aggressiveness. However, to create absolute threats, it still largely depends on the user and maintaining continuity.
Although it is a C-suffix product, I have not seen any players around me who immediately experienced the heavy-hitting or continuous pressing characteristics after switching to the 9000C. The essence of the 9000C in the market remains a fairly conventional, balanced racket with some offensive features. After using the 4 and 9 versions of the Wind Storm, I personally do not find the 9000C to have extraordinary qualities. Moreover, its series-specific holding feel gives me more confidence in net play and rear court flicks and pushes, leading to a slightly better impression in controlling the rhythm of play.
Based on this understanding, after using all four siblings of the Wind Storm 9000 series, I will probably miss the days spent with the 9000 more.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining AERONAUT 9000 Series Reviews
Introduction
The “Windstorm” series can also be understood as “wind tunnel.” The frame design of the Windstorm series rackets is an improvement upon the fluid box-type frame, which has been proven over many years in the market. The lower part of the frame is slightly thickened to enhance shot stability, while four air ducts have been added to reduce wind resistance during swings. The principle behind these ducts is similar to the spoilers on race cars and airplanes, guiding airflow behind the fast-moving object to reduce negative pressure at the rear, thus decreasing resistance and enhancing aerodynamic stability.
In simple terms, the Windstorm series frame is an upgraded version of the classic box frame, providing excellent shot stability.
This release of the Windstorm 9000 series includes three models. The Windstorm 9000, focusing on all-round performance, is endorsed by Shi Yuqi, a rising star in China’s men’s singles team. The Windstorm 9000C (Combat) emphasizes offense and is endorsed by mixed doubles specialist Zheng Siwei. The Windstorm 9000D (Drive) focuses on speed and is endorsed by Li Junhui, one half of the “Twin Towers” doubles team. Shi Yuqi is known for his stable and comprehensive playing style. Zheng Siwei’s powerful and fast-paced smashes and drop shots from the backcourt often catch opponents off guard. As a doubles player, Li Junhui demands high flexibility and speed in drives and blocks, and the release of the Windstorm 9000D should allow him to retire his flashy pink racket.
Design
Li-Ning’s racket designs are well known for their durability and appearance, far exceeding the industry average. However, this time, Li-Ning doesn’t just win in terms of aesthetics; the relationship between the design and the racket’s characteristics is equally important.
The Windstorm 9000 features a color scheme of champagne gold and ivory white, with a subdued and restrained overall style. This design complements the all-around performance of the racket and also aligns with Shi Yuqi’s calm demeanor on the court. The Windstorm 9000C, on the other hand, sports a striking combination of deep blue, sky blue, and crimson, giving it a visually impactful look that matches Zheng Siwei’s aggressive and energetic playing style. The Windstorm 9000D predominantly uses fluorescent yellow with accents of green, giving it a flashy and bold appearance—perfectly suited for Li Junhui!
Specifications
The Windstorm 9000 has an unstrung weight of 86g with a balance point of 305mm. The Windstorm 9000C weighs 88g with a balance point of 298mm, while the Windstorm 9000D weighs 84g and has a balance point of 314mm. All models use the thinner S1 handle.
Experience
In hand, the Windstorm 9000 feels slightly lighter than the Windstorm 9000C. Both rackets have similar shaft stiffness, but the Windstorm 9000C has a firmer feel and is noticeably heavier overall. The Windstorm 9000D is completely different, feeling much lighter due to its head-heavy balance. The shaft’s flex during smashes is more pronounced, somewhat similar to the pink Energy 70i, but there are still significant differences in terms of stability, swing speed, and overall weight.
AERONAUT 9000
The Windstorm 900 is a racket with excellent shot direction control. It feels neither as heavy and stable as the Windstorm 8000 nor as crisp and agile as the Windstorm 7000. Instead, the Windstorm 900 feels like a blend of the two, or somewhere in between. The frame stiffness is medium, slightly leaning towards stiff, and the hitting sensation is crisp without being overly rigid. Among Li-Ning rackets, the last model that gave me such a comfortable hitting experience was the Windblade 900. Compared to the Windblade 900, the Windstorm 900 offers better shot stability, although the Windblade 900 still surpasses it in swing speed and precision attacks.
The balance between forgiveness and power feedback determines both shot direction control and racket handling. Rackets with a high degree of forgiveness, like the Windstorm 8000, often have a softer hitting feel. However, because of this softness, the power feedback may not be as direct. In actual use, this can lead to situations where applying 4.8 or 5.2 force yields almost the same results, which greatly reduces error rates but limits players seeking precise control. Conversely, rackets with very clear power feedback tend to have low forgiveness, offering precision at the cost of higher error rates.
The Windstorm 900 strikes an excellent balance between forgiveness and power feedback, providing a comfortable control experience.
One drawback is the 210mm long handle, resulting in a shorter shaft compared to the Windstorm 8000. Rackets with long handles and short shafts generally offer stiffer feedback and faster response, but they perform worse in terms of power transmission during smashes compared to long-shaft, short-handle rackets (those who have used the Windblade 900B/N904 will understand). Therefore, in terms of power smashes, the Windstorm 8000 still holds the advantage. Fortunately, the Windstorm 900’s medium shaft stiffness ensures that, while it’s not a completely easy-to-use racket, it doesn’t require too much time to get accustomed to.
Control is the biggest feature of the Windstorm 900. As an all-rounder racket, the Windstorm 900 also performs well in midcourt rallies and backcourt attacks. In particular, its performance in midcourt flat drives is exceptional, though not as nimble as the Windstorm 7000. The Windstorm 7000 offers faster and more direct flat drives, while the Windstorm 900 feels more comfortable to use. In backcourt attacks, the Windstorm 900 lacks the heavy downward pressure of the Windstorm 8000 and doesn’t have that same explosive power. However, due to its lighter overall weight and higher stiffness compared to the Windstorm 8000, the Windstorm 900 excels in fast-paced attacks.
Based on the Windstorm 9000, Li-Ning has fine-tuned the weight distribution and stiffness parameters to create the attack-focused Windstorm 9000C and the drive-focused Windstorm 9000D.
AERONAUT 9000C
The Windstorm 9000C has a feel very similar to the Windstorm 9000, but with an overall heavier weight, offering a more stable smash, though it can be a bit demanding in defense. The Windstorm 9000D, however, differs significantly from the 9000, with more weight focused in the racket head and a lower overall weight, making it noticeably easier and more flexible to swing, with greater shaft deformation during play.
Apart from the increase in overall weight, the Windstorm 9000C also has a stiffer racket face compared to the 9000. This results in the 9000C sacrificing some comfort for enhanced offense, akin to a vehicle’s “sport mode”—seeking more intensity at the cost of comfort. When compared to the more attack-oriented Windstorm 8000, the 9000C offers a more direct and firm smashing experience. While the Windstorm 8000 feels like a powerful, charged-up strike, the 9000C’s smash resembles swinging a sharp blade. Fans of Bao’s powerful, charged smashes may prefer the 8000, but those who enjoy the fast-paced smashes and slices of Zheng Siwei would find the 9000C a great option.
AERONAUT 9000D
The differences between the Windstorm 9000D and the Windstorm 9000 remind me of the comparison between the N7i and N7. Both models reduce overall weight and increase balance point compared to the originals. The Windstorm 9000D is an easy-to-use racket, being head-heavy yet light overall, with significant shaft flexibility, making it easy to generate power. In doubles play, the 9000D excels in agility during drives and defense. While it may lack the quickness of the Windstorm 7000, it offers more comfort. This reflects Li-Ning’s interpretation of “Drive”—not simply speed, but agile maneuverability, which, in my opinion, refers to nimbleness. Therefore, models ending in “D” tend to have a lower entry barrier.
The Windstorm 9000D also has a stiffer racket face than the 9000. Coupled with its greater flexibility, the 9000D sacrifices some control. When compared to the speed-focused WindBlade 900, the 9000D’s head-heavy design allows for better leveraged smashes, though it lacks the comfortable wrapping feel of the racket face. Personally, I find the WindBlade 900 more comfortable, while the 9000D might be better suited for players with less strength or those who like the Windstorm 7000i but want a softer shaft, or players who enjoy the N7i but find it too light.
Choosing a Racket
The Windstorm 9000 perfectly embodies the core control attributes of the Windstorm series, while the 9000D and 9000C build on this with performance tweaks. The 9000C is closer to the 9000, but with a higher overall weight, making it suitable for powerful, offense-oriented players. The 9000D, on the other hand, is quite different from the 9000, resembling more a softer-shafted Windstorm 7000i with a length of 675mm, or a heavier version of the N7i with a box frame. It is ideal for doubles players or those with less strength.
String Pairing
All three rackets were strung with Li-Ning No.1 string at 26 lbs on the mains and 28 lbs on the crosses. Based on my experience, both the 9000C and 9000D have stiffer racket faces than the 9000, so pairing them with softer strings can enhance the wrapping feel on the shuttle. Given the wear on strings during offensive play, Li-Ning No.7 strings might be a good choice for the 9000C. Meanwhile, the 9000D, which emphasizes drives and doubles play, pairs well with the crisp-sounding Li-Ning No.1 string. For the all-around Windstorm 9000, the equally versatile Li-Ning No.5 string is a viable option.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Shoes Lining SONIC BOOM 4.0 Reviews
Since the launch of the “Sonic Boom” 2nd generation, followed by the 3rd, these two shoe models have been my go-to shoes for badminton matches. I’ve worn the Sonic Boom 2 for 86 matches, including amateur tournaments, traveling with my gear, and squeezing in games whenever possible. The Sonic Boom 3 has also logged 38 matches. (To ensure the accuracy and authenticity of my feedback, I meticulously keep records of each use and the details of my badminton sessions.)
I particularly favor shoes that offer excellent wrapping and stability, even though there are often minor issues that need to be adapted to and resolved during the initial stages of use.
When a shoe leaves a positive impression, it naturally catches my attention for further exploration. As soon as the Sonic Boom 2020, or the 4th generation, was released, I made sure to get my hands on it. With the reopening of badminton halls recently, I’ve been overjoyed to have matches again and the opportunity to test out my new shoes.
In recent years, Li-Ning’s shoe designs have undergone significant changes, embracing innovation, avant-garde styles, and high aesthetics. New designs and technologies such as knitted uppers, sock-like fit, translucent outsoles, and Li-Ning Cloud technology have been adopted in badminton shoes, garnering both praise and some criticism. However, upon closer inspection, this trend is evident across all brands, as they all strive for evolution rather than stagnation.
It’s undeniable that today’s badminton shoes are increasingly visually appealing, offering a wide range of color options for picky players. The Sonic Boom 2020 comes in four colorways for men and three for women, with one color (white) being a unisex option, aptly called the “couple’s colorway.”
Regarding the shoe’s appearance, the Sonic Boom 2020 features a large, nearly full-surface PU material, front and rear cushioning, a prominent carbon plate, unique tongue structure, and lace-eyelet design. While it may resemble traditional Li-Ning badminton shoes at first glance, there are numerous changes upon closer inspection. Compared to the 3rd generation, the 2020 (4th gen) incorporates Li-Ning Cloud midsole technology, a dual-density rubber outsole (translucent + solid-colored), and an extended PROBAR LOC stability structure in the forefoot and heel, with the outer side being even longer. The accompanying carbon plate has also been lengthened, and its edge is reinforced with TPU support that bridges across. The heel area boasts substantial TPU reinforcement and an elevated ankle cuff, along with a longer tongue, all contributing to enhanced stability and protection.
A crucial aspect worth mentioning is the alteration to the forefoot shape. Although it retains the 3-shoe last, the forefoot’s outer side is slightly tapered inwards, resulting in significantly improved wrapping, eliminating the need for narrow-footed players to wear thicker socks for a snug fit. The insole has also undergone changes, with a more pronounced curvature in the forefoot, a narrowing of approximately 1mm+ in width compared to the 3rd generation, and the addition of soft sponge ridges for enhanced grip. The solid EVA material in the forefoot insole has been thinned out.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Shoes Lining Blade Max On-Court Reviews
Last September, Li-Ning unveiled the Blade Pro, a brand-new comprehensive badminton shoe series that garnered favorable reviews upon its release. I frequently spot fellow players wearing the Blade Pro on the court. A year later, Li-Ning has introduced the all-new Blade Max, an upgraded version of the Blade Pro. So, what kind of on-court performance does the Blade Max deliver?
Firstly, the Blade Pro is a shoe I’m particularly fond of, and I’ve even acquired quite a few pairs – a total of 12, to be exact. What draws me to the Blade Pro? Primarily, it’s the incredibly comfortable upper and the redesigned shoe last, which naturally targets the competition from the green brand’s 65Z. However, in terms of materials, the Blade Pro is ahead of its time, boasting Li-Ning’s flagship cushioning technology, the Bèng (Four Thunder), while the 65Z still relies on outdated EVA cushioning. My friends who’ve worn the Blade Pro also attest to its superior cushioning performance over the 65Z. As the Blade Max, an upgraded version of the Blade Pro after a year, has incorporated feedback from players, it boasts numerous improvements.
Let’s start with the outsole. The Blade Max’s outsole pattern is similar to the Blade Pro’s, featuring hexagonal shapes composed of bar-shaped grooves. However, the Blade Max boasts a denser groove pattern, and the outsole no longer has the fine creases present in new Blade Pro shoes. Additionally, the rubber material has been modified, resulting in better grip performance. This upgrade is a direct response to player feedback. In practical tests, under the same court conditions, the Blade Max indeed offers superior grip compared to the Blade Pro. Nevertheless, both Blade models have slightly higher requirements for the court surface. On dusty or aged courts, their grip performance falls short of the Thunder Pro. In terms of outsole durability, the Blade Max also sees improvements over the Blade Pro.
Moving on to the midsole, the Blade Pro and Max share identical configurations. Both feature Bounse+ in the forefoot, Bèng (Four Thunder) technology in the heel, and a full-length Li-Ning Cloud framework. This technology lineup underscores the excellent cushioning capabilities of the Blade Pro/Max within the comprehensive shoe category. Furthermore, a wraparound TPU framework in the heel ensures stability. A large, irregularly shaped TPU plate and a rigid carbon plate in the midfoot provide exceptional torsion resistance and support. During gameplay, I can clearly feel the ample cushioning of the Blade Pro, supporting all necessary shock absorption for my weight. Its torsion resistance is significantly superior to the 65Z, preventing foot arch strain or soreness. The Blade Pro/Max delivers a powerful push-off feedback, akin to stepping on a shock-absorbing medium. It’s neither sluggish nor overly harsh.
Turning to the upper, the Blade Max’s upper material is stiffer than the Blade Pro’s, enhancing support. The Blade Pro’s upper is very flexible, and players with stronger ankles might accidentally push their feet out. However, the Blade Max addresses this issue with improved upper support, securely locking the foot in the shoe’s chamber without feeling rigid. Personally, I adore the Blade Pro’s sock-like wrapping sensation, which is why I’ve accumulated so many pairs. The Blade Max also upgrades the shoe’s collar, incorporating a woven technology fabric for better support. The flashy TPU at the heel is quite novel, displaying “MAX” and the Li-Ning logo from different angles, adding a stylish touch.
Regarding the insole, the Blade Max’s insole is stiffer than the Blade Pro’s. Some players have reported slipping issues with the Blade Pro’s insole, though I haven’t encountered this. Li-Ning has addressed these concerns with corresponding upgrades to the Blade Max’s insole, which remains firmly in place during practical tests.
In terms of court feel, the Blade Max’s excellent foot-shoe integration allows me to perceive the ground clearly during gameplay. It feels like an extension of my feet, providing a comfortable experience.
In conclusion, Li-Ning has made thoughtful upgrades to the Blade Max based on consumer feedback, which is commendable. Listening to customers and improving products accordingly is always inspiring. For me, aside from the Blade Pro and Max’s limited grip adaptability, I can’t fault them in other aspects. Plus, they’re relatively affordable. For players who aren’t excessively heavy and play on decent courts, the Blade Max is a highly recommended shoe.
September 11, 2024
Badminton Shoes Lining Blast JF01 SE Reviews
Back in March this year, the Fastwind SE made its debut at Li-Ning’s 2022 Autumn/Winter Order Conference in Hangzhou. As a new addition to the Fast Start Series, it captured the curiosity of many badminton enthusiasts with its ambitious goal of being the lightest badminton shoe ever created by Li-Ning. Following the April release and subsequent buzz surrounding the flagship Fastwind PRO, today, we bring you an exclusive first look at the Fastwind SE, another star in the series.
Official Tech Highlights:
Simplicity Meets Uncompromising Technology
The overall design embodies the essence of simplicity, crafting the lightest iteration within Li-Ning’s Fast Start Series. Taking a size 42 as an example, each shoe weighs an impressive 280 grams. Featuring a multi-layered midsole configuration, the heel is equipped with Bèng (Four Thunder) technology for cushioning, while the forefoot incorporates BOUNSE+ for enhanced push-off feedback. The carbon plate in the midfoot, combined with dual TPU, provides stability and anti-torsion support. The segmented upper design ensures a snug fit while maintaining breathability, with a low-stretch, soft, and supple microfiber at the toe for comfortable wrapping.
Design Aesthetics:
Inspired by the Time-Lapse Photography of Nighttime Car Light Trails
The sleek lines of the Fastwind PRO left a lasting impression, exuding speed and technology. The Fastwind SE continues this design language, drawing inspiration from the light trails created by cars moving at high speeds in nighttime time-lapse photography. The designer captured the fleeting sensation of speed and the passage of time as the vehicle’s lights blur and shift, translating it into the streamlined silhouette of the Fastwind Series.
With a similar “family face” to the Fastwind PRO, the side profile boasts a feathered Li-Ning logo that appears lightweight and agile. The tongue and heel wrap adopt a traditional design, differentiating it from the sock-like fit of the PRO model to cater to a wider range of users. The segmented upper design not only reinforces the fit but also ensures breathability.
The Fastwind SE is available in three color options: red-white-blue, black, and white. The color palette of the shoe body and sole complements each other seamlessly. The red-white-blue variant showcased in this unboxing stands out for its vibrant color play, particularly the striking blue-white-red accents on the sole, a detail visible only when lifting your feet on the badminton court.
Priced more affordably than the Fastwind PRO, the Fastwind SE, according to official data, does not compromise on core technologies. Already available since July, are you ready to make a splurge?
September 10, 2024
Badminton Shoes Lining Invincible Ace Reviews
After his devastating defeat to Kunlavut Vitidsarn at the Tokyo Olympics, Shi Yuqi once again suffered a setback in the semifinals of the Japan Open, losing to Lanier. The once-promising young talent has finally fallen victim to the passage of time.
Shi Yuqi’s journey, fraught with obstacles, mirrors the ups and downs of the Invincible Ace shoes he wears. Since the Invincible Ace debuted in 2020, it has gone through four generations and five colorways, earning a reputation as a cost-effective masterpiece through hard work. From the first generation’s bulkiness and lack of breathability, to the second generation’s tendency for the camouflage-patterned sides to delaminate, and the third generation’s less-than-stellar durability on the white gold sides, Li-Ning has finally combined the best of its predecessors to create a “king of sneakers” – the Yuanyang Invincible Ace.
Compared to the simplicity of the first and third generations and the flamboyance of the second, the fourth-generation Invincible Ace embodies the essence of being elegant yet understated. The TUFF TIP material on the toe cap, while appearing as a plain white from afar, reveals exquisite cloud patterns upon closer inspection (one can’t help but marvel at Li-Ning’s adeptness in striking a chord with fashion enthusiasts). It’s unclear whether these patterns genuinely enhance the durability of the toe cap or if it’s simply the superior material formulation. Nonetheless, the wear resistance of this Yuanyang pair is impressive, showing virtually no signs of wear even after a month of use, unlike other shoes.
In an era where faster technology is all the rage, the first three generations of Invincible Ace often left users feeling a noticeable sluggishness during initial movements before breaking in. Likewise, the Yuanyang’s weight hinted at its premium status as a successor to the Invincible Ace line. However, upon putting them on, I was surprised by how lightweight they felt. This alone earns the Yuanyang the title of the ultimate Invincible Ace, as who wouldn’t want a steed that’s ready to gallop without any warm-up?
Interestingly, the Yuanyang’s sole has reduced TPU support pads, which, considering the thickness of previous Invincible Ace soles, might explain why it achieves faster start-up speeds. This makes it a versatile shoe suitable for all ages.
One gripe, however, is the inconsistency in sizing between Li-Ning’s and another domestic brand’s (let’s call them V-Brand for anonymity) shoe size charts. It would be convenient if domestic brands could standardize their sizing. Therefore, potential buyers should measure their foot length carefully before making a purchase.
When faced with the vast sea of shoes and the dilemma of balancing budget with aesthetics, the Yuanyang Invincible Ace offers a compelling option. Priced just slightly above 400 yuan, it combines eye-catching design with a lightweight feel and a comfortable sole.
In conclusion, why look any further? This is the complete package.
September 10, 2024
Badminton Shoes Lining Saga PRO Reviews
In the steaming arena, agility reigns supreme as players dart across the grid lines, transitioning weight seamlessly, each step a symphony of fluidity. The screeching of soles against plastic flooring, the forceful push forward—all these elements evoke the essence of “Close-to-Ground Flight.” But can this iconic shoe series still deliver such thrilling moments in its 2020 iteration? That’s the question the Close-to-Ground Flight 2020 aims to answer.
Regrettably, amidst the ongoing pandemic, opportunities to hit the court have become scarce. Badminton, once an integral part of my life, now feels distant. The mere act of picking up a racket and slipping on my shoes seems like a distant dream. Yet, I find solace in incorporating badminton elements into my daily life, beyond its exclusive domain on the court. The integration of badminton shoes into my lifestyle marks a promising start.
In this tumultuous year of 2020, the heavily revamped Close-to-Ground Flight captured my attention. Chief among my anticipations was the introduction of the Pebax elastomer-based “beng” midsole in badminton shoes, ushering in a new era of performance materials that transcends the conventional EVA. Additionally, the early design sketches of the Close-to-Ground Flight 2020 intrigued me with their fresh, contemporary aesthetic that aligns with current sneaker trends.
Unboxing Experience
My anticipation translated into delight as I tore open the package. The shoebox itself was a pleasant surprise—crafted from sleek black foam plastic, it exuded a premium feel, a stark contrast to the ubiquitous kraft paper boxes. The box’s execution was impeccable: the lid glided open silently, the carrying handle was thoughtfully positioned, and intricate carvings adorned the interior, showcasing a level of craftsmanship rarely seen in shoe packaging. The stickers on the exterior, however, appeared somewhat rudimentary in comparison, though perhaps overly elaborate detailing would have been overkill.
Upon holding the shoes, it was evident that the Close-to-Ground Flight 2020 had undergone a significant transformation. The craftsmanship was impeccable, with clean glue lines, precise fabric cuts, and even stitching. The shoe abandoned synthetic leather for a more tech-forward thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) film on the upper, lending it an unprecedented texture and promising support. The black TPU film struck me as particularly appealing, both robust and stylish. The white sections, adorned with a pearlescent sheen that shifted hues under different angles, echoed the current trend of iridescent materials. The W-shaped stitching, breathable cutouts, and printed graphics demonstrated a commitment to design detail, a notable shift from previous iterations that focused solely on performance.
The heel’s three-dimensional fabric, reminiscent of neoprene, complemented the internal rigid support, ensuring ample heel stability. The dual loops on the heel, initially mistaken for a locking mechanism, were purely decorative, an element I found somewhat redundant. The sock-like construction, enriched with Lycra fabric, ensured effortless on-and-off, surpassing the ease of Li-Ning’s Fengying series. The ankle’s foam padding offered a plush feel, though the smooth fabric raised concerns about slippage, albeit not at the cost of sock durability.
The outsole retained the signature color-blocked design, complemented by a full-length beng midsole, visible carbon plate, and TPU reinforcements on both sides. This combination constituted a luxurious, top-tier setup in badminton shoes, exuding a sense of security. The familiar sidewalls added an extra layer of reassurance. Material-wise, the shoe left nothing to be desired.
Overall, the Close-to-Ground Flight 2020 introduced numerous innovative design elements, blending freshness with substance while staying true to the series’ essence. However, for me personally, the abundance of design features bordered on overwhelming, as I prefer a more minimalist aesthetic. The intricate components also posed manufacturing challenges, particularly the thin lace loops, which, despite their strength, relied on a potentially unreliable fixation method. Only time will tell if the Close-to-Ground Flight 2020 bucks this trend.
On-Court Performance
Eager to test the waters, I slipped on the shoes. My initial encounter with the beng midsole, perhaps clouded by lofty expectations, did not yield the explosive take-off sensation I anticipated. Instead, it presented a balanced, slightly firm ride, emphasizing stability over outright bounce. The constrained deformation, likely due to the flanking TPU shanks, suggested a focused, efficient energy return rather than flamboyant spectacle.
Weighing in at 357.2g (left) and 354.6g (right) for my size 42.5, the beng midsole’s thickness was well-compensated for, resulting in commendable weight management. As a 70kg individual, I found the heel’s compression range to be narrower than expected, hinting at a broader weight compatibility. The reportedly adjusted last shape finally allowed me, with my narrow 3E feet, to experience the comprehensive embrace of Li-Ning’s sock-fit badminton shoes. Surprisingly, the forefoot felt snug, eliminating the customary void above my toes.
Notably, the thin lace loops allowed for fine-tuning of the forefoot fit, enhancing the secure wrap when the first two lace loops were tightened, particularly with thicker socks. Initial concerns about heel slippage proved unfounded; the shoe adhered flawlessly, offering high comfort levels. Nitpicking, the relatively thin tongue, despite its pressure-relieving foam strip, could exert pressure on the instep with round, thick laces; swapping to flat laces might alleviate this.
Regrettably, due to the pandemic’s resurgence, the Close-to-Ground Flight 2020 accompanied me on only two court sessions. Nonetheless, the beng midsole’s energy output became more evident during play, offering a sustained, responsive rebound. Despite its non-explosive initial feel, the shoe excelled in quick starts and offered ample protection for lower limb joints, thanks to its thicker forefoot. Cushioning was impeccable; despite the heel’s limited static compression, landings felt buttery smooth, dispersing impact effortlessly. The shoe’s lavish midsole configuration left little room for criticism, blending agility with stability. Pebax’s superiority in elasticity, even surpassing Boost in certain aspects, particularly in colder temperatures, promises further delights during winter play.
Grip and traction are staples of the Close-to-Ground Flight series. The segmented outsole, adorned with grip strips, promises versatility across various surfaces. Unfortunately, limited testing on slightly dusty wooden floors showcased the shoe’s prowess. The revamped tread pattern, deeper and more spaced, enhanced dirt dispersion and durability, a trait I eagerly anticipate testing further. Anti-rollover performance was exemplary, with the upturned outsole sides and TPU reinforcements stabilizing lateral pressures. The new TPU film upper’s exceptional containment further mitigated sideways slides, though at the cost of some breathability; even with ample ventilation holes, the post-game odor reminded me of TPU’s Achilles’ heel.
The heel lockdown, an area of emphasis for me, was commendable. Many badminton shoes prioritize flexibility over ankle support, leaving narrow-heeled individuals like me yearning for a snug fit. The Close-to-Ground Flight 2020’s upturned heel and sock-fit design cradled my foot like a custom orthotic, fostering a sense of comfort and security. I couldn’t help but wish that the decorative heel loop was functional, adding the ultimate touch of luxury.
Despite the brief encounter, the Close-to-Ground Flight 2020 left a lasting impression. I eagerly await the pandemic’s end to fully explore this new-generation badminton shoe’s pinnacle performance. Moreover, I hope to see more such diverse design languages in the badminton shoe industry, as monotony and sameness should not define this vibrant sport.
September 10, 2024
Badminton Shoes Lining DF01 PRO Reviews
Unveiling the Sharp Edge: A First Look at Li-Ning Blade PRO (DF-01 PRO) Badminton Shoes
After the stunning debut of the Zhanji 8000 left many badminton enthusiasts yearning for more, our midweek unboxing series strikes again, fulfilling the pent-up anticipation with no room for disappointment. Presenting to you the newly announced companion of the Zhanji 8000 from Li-Ning Badminton – the Blade PRO.
The dao, renowned for its combat prowess among ancient Chinese weapons, aligns perfectly with the Blade PRO’s design philosophy, which revolves around a return to the essence of badminton – prioritizing comfort and balanced performance for real-world matches.
Official Tech Highlights:
Li-Ning boasts that the Blade PRO has been meticulously crafted with badminton at its core, redefining the benchmarks for fit, comfort, containment, and professionalism in badminton shoes.
- Revolutionary Sole Technology: Introducing a new sole with a front-mounted BOUNSE+ tech for instantaneous push-off response.
- Cushioned Landing: Equipped with Li-Ning’s proprietary bèng (Four Thunderbolts) technology in the heel, minimizing the impact of powerful smashes and jumps.
- Stability Reinforced: A carbon plate fused with TPU support in the midfoot ensures robust anti-torsion stability.
- Flexible Upper: Crafted from a low-stretch microfiber leather, the upper delivers a supple fit and enhanced flexibility during movement.
- Secure Heel Lock: TPU encasement around the heel adds an extra layer of stability.
Aesthetic Design:
A palette of vibrant colorways, each imbued with its own narrative, invites you to choose your battlefield attire.
- Duel Colorway: Inspired by Fu Haifeng’s iconic white-red combo and the hues of Indonesian and Singaporean flags, catering to international players’ style.
- Rabbit Year Edition: Drawing inspiration from the beloved White Rabbit Creamy Candy, symbolizing the unwavering passion for badminton.
- Aurora Colorway: Capturing the serene beauty of midnight snowcapped mountains and the aurora borealis, offering a soothing blue backdrop for a breathtaking visual experience.
- Snow Camouflage: Continuing the popularity of its predecessor, this black-and-white iteration creates a mesmerizing, dreamlike ambiance.
- Cherry Blossom: Embracing romance and freshness, the pastel pink finish exudes a playful and energetic vibe.
Notably, all colorways except Duel feature an “EG2.5” standard width, tailored to better fit Asian foot shapes, while Duel sports an “EG3.0” wide fit.
Upon first glance, the striking “Blade” typography on the tongue, sharp and angular, immediately resonates with the shoe’s moniker and essence. Particularly noteworthy is the Rabbit Year Edition, adorned with a stylized version of the “Mao” (rabbit) character in seal script on the tongue.
September 9, 2024
How to Choose Badminton Shuttles
1. Material Selection The material of a badminton shuttle directly affects its flight performance and durability. Common shuttle materials include goose feathers, duck feathers, and nylon:
- Goose Feather Shuttles: Offer the best flight performance but are more expensive. Ideal for those seeking a premium flight experience and have a higher budget.
- Duck Feather Shuttles: Provide good value for money and are suitable for most players. The flight stability of different types of duck feathers (e.g., single-sided, hunchback, small square, medium square, large square feathers) increases progressively.
- Nylon Shuttles: Suitable for varied indoor and outdoor environments and known for their durability.
2. Weight Selection The standard weight of a shuttle is between 4.74g and 5.50g. Different weights are suited for different players and match settings:
- Beginners or players with less strength may choose lighter shuttles for better control and technique development.
- Advanced players or those with more strength may prefer heavier shuttles for greater control and power.
3. Speed Selection Shuttle speed refers to how fast the shuttle flies, which is influenced by the player’s skill level, playing environment, and climate:
- In cooler, more humid conditions, shuttles tend to fly slower, so faster shuttles are recommended.
- In warmer, drier conditions, slower shuttles are suitable.
- Beginners can opt for medium-speed shuttles to gradually adapt to various playing conditions.
4. Durability Durability is a key measure of a shuttle’s quality. A good shuttle should maintain its flight performance and feel after multiple hits. You can evaluate durability by observing its appearance, feather arrangement, and elasticity.
5. Brand and Price Well-known brands like YONEX, VICTOR, and Lining are known for their quality and after-sales support but tend to be more expensive. Beginners can start with cost-effective brands, while advanced players may prefer high-end options. Price should align with your budget, but avoid compromising on quality for a lower price.
6. Practical Testing If possible, test the shuttle in a real game to evaluate its flight and feel. This helps you make a more informed decision on whether the shuttle meets your specific needs.
September 7, 2024
Three Points for the Racket, Seven Points for the Strings! Do You Really Know How to Choose Badminton Strings?
Have you ever bought a racket similar to a friend’s, only to find it doesn’t feel right? Or chosen a racket with seemingly perfect specs, but it felt off once strung? Have you found that a 30-pound string tension sometimes feels less comfortable than a 24-pound one? If so, you might be blaming the racket when it’s actually the strings that are at fault.
Many beginners spend a lot of time choosing attractive badminton shoes and a good racket but often overlook a basic consumable: the badminton strings. The different models, materials, gauge, and characteristics of badminton strings, as well as whether they come in reel or individual packs, and the tension used, all significantly impact the actual feel of the racket.
The saying “Three points for the racket, seven points for the strings” holds true because your choice of strings can affect your performance. Have you chosen the right strings for your badminton?
1.Three-Layer Structure
Most badminton strings feature a multi-core single-layer wrap structure with three layers: the core, the outer wrap, and the coating. Different models of strings use different weaving structures, and these three layers provide different functions: the core’s strength and nylon filament diameter affect elasticity and durability, the middle wrap influences control, elasticity, and durability, and the outer coating affects grip, anti-slip, and sound. In simple terms, the core affects the feel, the wrap affects durability, and the coating affects grip.
String Craftsmanship: Typically, fine nylon filaments are used for the core, and thicker nylon filaments are used for the wrap, tightly woven with some resin materials. Some strings may have an additional layer of special fibers between the core and wrap, such as YONEX BG80’s Vectran.
Advanced Technologies and Craftsmanship:
- Hydro Titanium Coating: This composite titanium coating enhances clarity of feel and durability.
- Multifilament Construction: Ultra-fine gauge provides comfort and durability.
- Nano Technology: Uneven coating allows high-strength nylon fibers to fill every cross-section, providing superior rebound and control while maintaining a firm feel.
- Ultimax Coating: Enhances the sharpness of the impact sound, like YONEX BG66U.
The craftsmanship of the string affects its performance: the wrap, core, weaving, and coating all play crucial roles. Generally, thin strings offer high elasticity and loud sound, while thick strings are more durable. It’s challenging to achieve absolute balance between the two.
2.Five Key Performance Attributes
Different brands of badminton strings come with various manufacturing processes, types, and targeted performance attributes for different users. Despite these variations, all badminton strings share five fundamental performance characteristics: durability, control, elasticity, shock absorption, and sound. These attributes are often depicted on the packaging in radar charts or bar graphs to help players understand the string’s performance more intuitively.
Durability: Refers to the lifespan of the string, i.e., how resistant it is to fraying or breaking. Generally, you can gauge durability based on the string’s gauge—the thicker the string, the more durable it is. Conversely, thinner strings tend to be less durable. In practice, observe the string’s fraying or breaking tendencies based on your frequency and intensity of play. Sometimes, strings might break without much fraying, or fraying may occur without immediate breakage.
Common reasons for string breakage include:
- Normal wear and tear
- High impact from the player’s force
- Thin gauge string prone to breakage under heavy strikes
- High frequency and intensity of play causing significant wear
- Excessive string tension causing tight string bed
- Incorrect hitting point on the racket frame
- Cold weather
- Improper stringing method or outdated stringing machine
- Poor racket storage conditions accelerating string aging
- Worn protective tubing
Control: Refers to the string’s ability to offer precise control over the shuttlecock. The control of the string is influenced by the outer wrap and coating. For example, YONEX’s NBG99 features a special nylon woven outer layer, with a high-strength nylon multifilament core, and a textured surface for better friction and control over the shuttlecock.
Elasticity: Good elasticity allows the shuttlecock to travel farther and with less effort but may make control more difficult. The elasticity of a string is affected by both its inherent properties and the string tension. Higher tension results in a tighter string bed, leading to less deformation and better control, while lower tension provides more deformation, offering better elasticity and power. Generally, beginners with less foundational strength might benefit more from lower tension.
Shock Absorption: Refers to the string’s ability to reduce vibrations felt in the hand upon impact. Strings with better shock absorption, often finer gauge strings, help minimize vibrations and reduce the risk of hand injuries from excessive vibrations.
Sound: This is the sound produced when the string hits the shuttlecock. Stringers often use the sound of the racket when tapping the string bed to check if the string is properly tensioned. In actual play, strings with the same tension but different models, or the same model with different tensions, can produce varying sounds. Generally, finer gauge strings produce a brighter sound, while specially coated thicker strings can also offer a pleasant sound.
3.Recommended Models
Durable + Balanced Type: YONEX BG65/NBG95, Li-Ning No. 5/7, Victor VBS69NANO/VBS70/VBS70POWER
- BG65: Often recommended by stringers when unsure about which string to choose. BG65 is one of the top-selling and well-recognized strings on the market. Suitable for all players, including beginners and those who use high tension.
- NBG95: Features a nano-coating that provides a soft hitting feel and comfortable play. With a gauge of 0.69mm, it performs similarly to BG65 but offers improved elasticity and feel, making it a well-rounded choice for most players.
- Li-Ning No. 5: Offers a balanced performance with slightly less elasticity compared to the No. 1 but better durability. Compared to No. 7, it has less bounce but is more durable and offers a moderate feel.
- Li-Ning No. 7: Focuses on durability with a soft feel, similar to YONEX BG65. Suitable for those who prioritize durability.
- N69: A balanced string combining the strengths of Li-Ning No. 1 and No. 5, offering better durability than No. 1 and more elasticity than No. 5. Provides a good feel and tension retention.
- VBS69NANO: An upgrade to VBS70 with better elasticity and control, resembling YONEX NBG95 in overall performance.
- VBS70: Known for its high durability with a bundle of long fibers as the core, providing excellent durability and a loud hitting sound. Suitable for beginners and regular practice.
High Elasticity + Sound Type: YONEX BG80/80P/66U/98/AS/AB, Li-Ning No. 1/N65/N68, Victor VBS63/66NANO
- BG80: Incorporates Vectran fibers for a hard-hitting feel and strong power. Popular among many professional players for its excellent performance.
- BG80P: An improved version of BG80 with enhanced durability and clearer hitting feedback. Ideal for aggressive players with high tension setups.
- BG66U: Features Ultimax technology for a pleasant hitting sound and high elasticity. Despite its excellent elasticity, its thin gauge makes it prone to breakage, suitable for players with accurate hitting and moderate power.
- BGAS: Extremely thin with a 0.61mm gauge, offering bright hitting sound and high elasticity. However, it has lower durability, best for intermediate to advanced players seeking excellent feel and reduced effort.
- BGAB: A dual-gauge string (0.67mm for vertical and 0.61mm for horizontal). Provides excellent elasticity and control but has lower durability. Suitable for players who prioritize high bounce and control over durability.
- Li-Ning No. 1: The finest string before the N series, known for its high rebound and crisp sound. Offers effortless hitting and speed but has poor tension retention and durability.
- N65: An upgraded version of Li-Ning No. 1 with improved tension retention and stability. Provides a crisp feel and good explosive power.
- N68: Comparable to YONEX BG80P but with a harder feel. Offers better durability while maintaining elasticity and excellent feedback on powerful shots. Suitable for fast attackers.
- VBS63: Features a 0.63mm gauge with high-strength multifilament core, providing a clear hitting sound and excellent rebound. Offers increased durability compared to other thin strings. Suitable for players focused on precision.
- VBS66NANO: Compared to YONEX BG66U, it has slightly less rebound and sound but better tension retention. Nano technology enhances control and feel, providing good ball speed.
4.How to Cut the Strings
Reasons for Cutting Strings: Cutting strings typically occurs due to the following reasons: broken strings, frayed strings, loss of tension affecting feel, severe string movement, or aging due to prolonged storage.
The tension of a racket string generally remains stable for about a week. After this period, the tension will gradually decrease. Frequent play causes the tension to drop faster, and idle rackets also experience tension loss over time.
Method for Cutting Strings:
1. Cross-Cutting Method
  - Step 1: Locate the center of the intersecting horizontal and vertical strings and cut the strings in a sequential order according to their position.
  - Step 2: Identify the four points corresponding to the center of the racket face and the top, bottom, left, and right of the frame. Cut the horizontal strings at points 2 and 4, and the vertical strings at points 3 and 5.
  - Step 3: Continue cutting from the center outwards in a cross pattern until all the strings are cut.
When dealing with broken strings, cut them according to the cross-cutting principle (cut horizontal strings if vertical strings are broken and vice versa) to maintain the balance of tension in the racket. For rackets strung above 24 pounds, cut the broken strings immediately to prevent deformation and potential damage due to prolonged tension imbalance.
September 7, 2024
The badminton sport is booming, so how should you choose rackets and equipment? Here’s everything you need to know all at once.
Badminton is a sport loved by many. From casually buying rackets and finding an outdoor space to play, to learning the correct grip or developing a passion for the sport, people start choosing suitable rackets and learning about racket parameters, not just limited to weight, but also balance points, shaft stiffness, and more. They begin recognizing professional badminton players, watching various matches, and learning techniques through videos. During this process, it becomes clear that besides the racket, many essential pieces of equipment are needed. This article mainly discusses knowledge related to badminton, excluding shuttlecocks.
Characteristics of Badminton
Badminton is a widely popular sport with diverse levels of play, offering physical exercise, competition, and opportunities to make friends.
1.Why is it said to be widely popular?
Badminton is suitable for a broad range of people—men and women, young and old, tall and short, heavy and light, everyone can play. The minimum equipment requirements are low; even a racket costing just a few dozen yuan is sufficient. The minimum court requirements are also low, whether it’s a professional indoor court with wooden floors, an open square, or a small space in your neighborhood. It can be played anytime, anywhere, by anyone.
2.Why is there a wide range of skill levels?
Simply returning the shuttlecock counts as playing badminton. Whether it’s basic rallying or performing smashes and drop shots, even competing in tournaments, it’s all considered badminton. Playing in the park is called badminton, and playing at the Olympics, like Lin Dan, is also badminton.
3.Why does it provide physical exercise?
Badminton involves a lot of physical effort, especially in singles where each shot must be chased down. Doubles might be slightly easier since you can rely on a partner. The sport is full of quick stops, starts, forward and backward movement, direction changes, jumps, lunges, and smashes, constantly consuming energy. It’s a combination of aerobic and anaerobic exercise. At the same skill level, matches often turn into a test of endurance and willpower, not just technique. That’s why badminton is considered one of the most physically demanding racket sports.
4.Why does it offer a sense of competition?
Badminton is a net-based sport where players compete to hit shots that their opponent can’t return, aiming to score and win.
5.Why does it help build social connections?
People who enjoy sports tend to be outgoing, and sharing a common passion for badminton creates opportunities for bonding and conversation.
Badminton Racket
When it comes to choosing a badminton racket, there are numerous factors to consider, such as weight, handle thickness, balance point, shaft stiffness, and frame type, all based on personal preference. My personal experience in buying rackets is that they should be light—if there’s a 5U option, I won’t go for a 4U, and I avoid 3U altogether.
The most important factor when selecting a racket is your budget. Spend within your means, and if your budget doesn’t allow for a high-end racket, avoid buying so-called premium replicas, high-quality knockoffs, or second-hand rackets that you can’t verify. You might end up spending money on something whose value is unclear. There are many excellent beginner-friendly rackets available. In the past, I used to recommend the Li-Ning WS72, but it’s no longer as appealing. Now, I recommend models like the “Balanced Blade” or “Little Hammer,” which are affordable and highly functional, much better than spending on overpriced options.
Badminton Shoes
A racket allows you to engage in the sport, but shoes are the most critical piece of equipment. While how others choose to play is their decision, as a responsible person, I can’t help but recommend wearing proper badminton shoes if I see someone without them. If someone asks for my recommendation, I always suggest buying the best shoes they can afford.
Choosing badminton shoes is a process of finding what works best for you. A good pair of shoes should provide support, cushioning, torsion resistance, grip, durability, and breathability, all tailored to the individual. For most amateur players, cushioning and torsion resistance are the primary concerns. Speed is less important, while preventing injuries is crucial.
One tip is to invest in specialized insoles, replacing the standard ones. Don’t rely on the original insoles being great—try buying a pair of replacement insoles and see how they feel. However, be mindful of changes in balance when using them for the first time.
Badminton Clothing
The primary function of badminton clothing is to wick away sweat and moisture during play, typically through quick-dry materials like polyester and spandex. If you’re unsure about what to buy, you can’t go wrong with official tournament apparel. This not only saves you from decision fatigue but also lets you support your favorite players, making it a win on multiple fronts. Other factors to consider include comfort and features like odor resistance. For casual players, where intensity isn’t too high, it’s more economical to buy clothes on sale or regular quick-dry shirts. Bringing extra shirts to change frequently can also keep sweat from being an issue.
Badminton Socks
Many people overlook the importance of socks and think any pair will do, but that’s a mistake. Badminton socks, also known as towel socks, are different from regular ones. They’re often thickened in certain areas to provide better cushioning, reduce friction, and improve grip, which helps protect your feet during rapid starts and stops. There are plenty of brands to choose from, such as Yonex, Li-Ning, and Victor, or even some lesser-known ones.
Sweatbands
Sweatbands are among the most frequently replaced items in badminton, yet they are often neglected. It’s not just beginners—even seasoned players who’ve been at it for years sometimes don’t bother replacing them. I’ve seen players whose sweatbands have turned black, smell bad, or even start shedding powder, yet they keep using them.
Sweatbands are purchased separately and wrapped around the racket handle to improve grip and help you generate power. Popular types include ribbed grips, towel grips, and thin grips (PU sweatbands). A good sweatband will help you grip the racket better and apply more power. While Yonex grips can be expensive, other brands like Pro’s Pro offer more affordable options with good quality.
Strings
Strings are the soul of a badminton racket. Different strings offer different benefits—some have high elasticity, some sound great, and others are highly durable. The string tension also affects the feel of the shot. It’s important to note that strings wear out and can break, especially if hit improperly or during cold, dry winter weather.
The higher the tension, the less elastic the string is, allowing for more precise control of the shuttle. However, this requires more power from the player. Finding the right tension is a personal process. While recommendations are helpful, it’s best to experiment with different tensions yourself. Badminton is a long journey—start with an initial tension, adjust when the strings break, and after a few tries, you’ll find the tension that works best for you.
September 7, 2024
How to Choose a Badminton Racket and String Tension for Beginners!
1. About String Tension
Choosing the right string tension is best determined through trial and error. For beginners, the general recommendations are:
- For women: 22-24 lbs
- For men: 23-24 lbs
Of course, string tension is subjective and can vary for each individual. It depends on your physical tolerance, skill level, and personal feel. Higher tension provides better control of the shuttlecock but less elasticity, while lower tension offers more elasticity and is less taxing but provides less control.
Consider adjusting the tension in the following situations:
1. Decrease Tension: If you find the racket face too stiff, and you feel you can’t generate enough power, especially when handling defensive shots, and you experience significant vibration, you may need to lower the tension. This will increase the racket’s elasticity and improve its forgiveness.
2. Increase Tension: If you feel the shuttlecock is sticking to the strings, the speed of your shots is slower than the effort you’re putting in, and you find control lacking, you may want to raise the tension.
2. About Racket Selection
Material of the Racket:
The best choice is a racket with both the shaft and frame made of carbon fiber, often referred to as a full carbon fiber racket. In 2024, avoid aluminum or aluminum-carbon alloy rackets. While they might seem inexpensive, they are often considered disposable; you might not even restring them because they can’t handle higher tensions. Nowadays, full carbon fiber rackets are very affordable and are the recommended choice.
Racket Weight:
For beginners, the material is less of a concern as long as it’s full carbon fiber. The weight of the racket is a more critical factor.U denotes the weight of the racket. Common classifications are 2U, 3U, 4U, 5U, 6U, etc.
The larger the number in front of U, the lighter the racket.
This weight value is easy to remember. For every U, the racket is lighter by 5 grams from 100 grams:
- 2U means it is 10 grams lighter than 100 grams. So, the weight of 2U is 100-10 = 90 grams, with an actual range of 90~94 grams.
- 3U = 100 – 3*5 = 85 grams, with an actual range of 85~89 grams.
- 4U = 100 – 4*5 = 80 grams, with an actual range of 80~84 grams.
If both 3U and 4U rackets can achieve the same swing speed, and 3U does not make you tired, then choose the 3U racket. If you find 3U too heavy and tiring, then opt for 4U or lighter rackets.
Most players use 3U and 4U rackets. The main difference between them is the weight. There is no absolute answer to which is better; the most important thing is finding a weight that suits you. For beginners, if unsure, choose 4U as it is more versatile for newcomers.
3.About Racket Brands:
For entry-level rackets, you don’t need to be overly concerned with the brand. As long as it’s from a reputable manufacturer of badminton rackets, it will be suitable. Brands like Yonex, Victor, Li-Ning, Kawasaki, Kason, Xwind, Babolat, and others are all good choices. You can consider brand reputation, reviews, and cost-performance ratio as references.
4.About Racket Appearance:
The design of rackets has become increasingly beautiful and trendy, incorporating various cultural elements. Preferences for appearance are subjective. Whether a racket looks good or not is up to you; if you like it, that’s what matters.
Of course, there are many other parameters not covered here, such as the racket’s balance point and shaft stiffness. However, the above simple and clear introduction should be sufficient to help you avoid common pitfalls. The key is how the racket feels in your hand, as the parameters are fixed but the playability is crucial. Next, I’ll recommend some high-value-for-money rackets suitable for beginners.
① Kawasaki Ice Cream
The two color options, Sea Salt Blue and Taro Purple, are visually appealing and attractive to many female players.
With a 5U weight and a box-shaped frame structure, the racket is lightweight and flexible, offering quick speed while also providing excellent torsional stability. This enhances the precision of control. The racket uses high-strength, high-modulus Mitsubishi carbon fiber, with good shaft elasticity and moderate hardness, making it easy to drive. Even beginners can easily achieve the desired shaft deformation. The ultra-light design also reduces wrist strain.
As an entry-level racket, the Kawasaki Ice Cream meets the criteria of good power, low price, and high appearance. It is very suitable for double matches and continuous attacking play.
② Victor Hammer
The Victor Hammer (TK-HMR) and the Mini Hammer (TK-HMRL) are also very popular entry-level offensive rackets.
The Hammer comes in 4U and 5U specifications, with the 4U model capable of handling up to 32 lbs and the 5U model up to 31 lbs.
The Mini Hammer comes in 5U and 6U specifications, with the 5U model capable of handling up to 28 lbs and the 6U model up to 27 lbs.
Both the Hammer and Mini Hammer use a shaft material consisting of carbon fiber + resin + 7.0 SHAFT. The shaft of both models is relatively soft, with the Mini Hammer having an even softer shaft. Therefore, players with less power or female players are recommended to choose the 6U Mini Hammer, while those with more power should consider the regular Hammer. As an entry-level offensive racket, whether for beginners or players with some experience, this racket is an excellent choice with a high cost-performance ratio.
③ Lining Little Cannon
The Thunder 80 is incredibly popular, with its availability being scarce. The Thunder 50 is a mid-range offensive champion and has been extremely popular. However, many students still have a strong preference for entry-level offensive rackets. Despite budget constraints, the pursuit of aesthetics, feel, and offensive capability remains important. Hence, the Thunder Little Cannon was created.
The Thunder Little Cannon is currently the only entry-level racket endorsed by world champion Chen Long.
In terms of appearance, it is more attractive than the Victor 9500 and Victor Hammer. This 4U Little Cannon can handle up to 32 lbs. It has a slight weight and a head-heavy feel, with a soft and elastic shaft, making it an entry-level racket primarily for back-court offense. It is comparable to the Victor Hammer.
The racket comes in 4U, 5U, and 6U specifications. If you need a single-player back-court offensive racket and are aiming for ultimate offense, the 4U model is suitable. For continuous smashing, the 5U is recommended, while the 6U is ideal for front-court play. As an entry-level racket endorsed by world champion Chen Long, it is highly recommended.
④ Kawasaki Galaxy
With a weight of 4U and a balance point of 287mm, the distribution of balance and weight is designed for whippy action. Made from high-modulus Taimo dense nano carbon and featuring a 6.8mm uniformly elastic slim shaft, the middle shaft offers excellent elasticity, making it easier to generate power. It excels in net play for short balls, drops, slices, and pushes, and maintains an advantage in fast-paced flat drives. The low balance point emphasizes agility and control, while the box-shaped frame with wind-breaking design ensures stability during shots and maintains a high swing speed. The racket is very easy to handle, making it a true gem for casual play.
It provides smooth and continuous net play, handles small balls effectively, and, while the 287mm balance point is not ideal for aggressive back-court attacks, it is well-suited for sharp smashes, point attacks, or net kills. It is recommended for players who enjoy doubles, quick attacks, and predominantly play at the front and middle courts.
This concludes the recommendations for entry-level rackets under 300 yuan, including information on string tension. When choosing an entry-level racket, focus on the weight, and consider aesthetics and brand preferences. These types of rackets are all very easy to handle.
In summary, do any of these entry-level rackets catch your eye?
September 6, 2024