Tag: VICTOR

威克多

Badminton Racket Victor JETSPEED S 12FTD Reviews
Specifications: 4UG5, no base grip, total weight in use 87.9g, balance point 312mm, 6.8mm Babolat carbon shaft, 210mm length, medium stiffness, fully aerodynamic frame, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, 76-hole string bed, tension guarantee of 29 lbs, strung with BG80 at 25 lbs.
Sakura Blade! Beautiful! Saying this feels a bit like “AMD, yes!” The racket’s main color is light blue, decorated with a lot of stickers and decals, making it look quite extravagant. The pink base paint at the 4 and 8 o’clock positions of the frame, combined with small flowers, gives off a very girly vibe. It’s truly a “Sakura girl!” I thought I wouldn’t be into this kind of design based on the promo pictures, but once I had it in my hands, I couldn’t put it down. However, the paint is prone to damage, especially the decals or base paint on the aerodynamic sections, which can chip off after hitting the frame. Also, it’s a must to pair this with white grip tape.
But, after using it, I felt like it had a bit of aggressiveness. The head heaviness is quite noticeable, likely above the average for the speed-focused series, and heavier than the JS12 in my memory, though the swing speed is still high. Before using this racket, I had been using the VTFL-CW, which has a pretty poor feel, and when I applied the same power rhythm to the Sakura Blade with its noticeable head heaviness, the awkwardness came — I kept hitting the frame! And this happened right in front of the owner! The combination of head heaviness and high swing speed created a significant mismatch, unlike the JS12F, which is more responsive and quick. Although it’s not hard to drive, the hitting rhythm requires adaptation. This might also explain why it’s rare to see second-hand Sakura Blades, and they are often marked by chips and dents.
Honestly, aside from this, there’s no other entry barrier. The sweet spot is large and forgiving, and the Babolat carbon shaft is elastic enough, so hitting the sweet spot is not a problem, giving a speed boost similar to the Falcon. Moreover, it’s great for borrowing power, and the shaft is not stiff, making swings and strikes comfortable and reliable.
Regarding the aerodynamic treatment of the racket head, it’s not as thin or aggressive as it could be. The thickness is about the same as the JS12TD, which likely contributes to improved stability, making it a choice for many professional players who have used it in international competitions. By the way, even Liu Yang, the player known for his straightforwardness, has used it.
In terms of offensive performance, I prefer the JS12F over the JS12. If we’re only considering power smashes, then the entire JS series has the JS10/Ahmad as the benchmark, with the rest being at least one tier below. But compared to the JS12, the F’s head heaviness gives a more solid feeling during downward shots, and the reduced driving difficulty allows me to apply more pressure in the backcourt of doubles matches without being too cautious about conserving energy.
Similarly, the head heaviness makes the shuttle more likely to be pulled downward during smashes, reducing the chance of a floaty shot. I was surprised by how sharp the placement could be with this speed racket. Also, the lower driving threshold improves the user’s continuity in offensive play, and thanks to the use of TERS resin in the shaft, the recovery speed after deformation is quite good. During continuous downward shots, I didn’t experience any noticeable drag.
However, I found the JS12F a bit less comfortable in flat drives and blocks. The swing speed is fast, but the initial acceleration is slightly delayed, and the response in low-power shots isn’t as crisp and sharp. Due to the overall softer tuning, the string bed has a certain ball-holding feel, which works but isn’t as quick as the JS12 in fast-paced front-court exchanges. Upon closer inspection, its more tempered ball response also shows in downward shots, which might not appeal to players seeking a crisp feel. However, its defense and ability to handle passive situations are much better, thanks to its easy power transfer and drivability.
Additionally, I don’t know if it’s because the previous owner used it less or if it’s just a feature of the racket, but compared to the JS11/12 borrowed from a friend, I personally feel that the JS12F’s shaft doesn’t degrade as quickly during play, and its elasticity lasts longer, giving me more confidence during rallies.
The popularity of the JS12F isn’t just due to its looks. I’ve seen many strong players happily bring it to the court. It’s a great racket with both external and internal qualities, and beneath its approachable exterior, it’s no slouch in doubles play.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket VICTOR JS12II Reviews
Since the release of the first Brave Sword 12, VICTOR has introduced the seventh racket in the speed series with the number 12 in its name. Unlike the more attack-oriented Brave Sword 10 and JetSpeed 10, and the control-focused Brave Sword 11 and JetSpeed 11, the 12-series rackets have always been about balanced speed. The original JetSpeed 12 featured crisp shots, sharp aerodynamic sounds during swings, a well-distributed sweet spot, and a subtle but noticeable head weight, making it nearly perfect for doubles and fast-paced play.
This review focuses on the upgraded and reforged JS12II in 4U, which includes new tech such as the floating handle, a thinner 6.6mm shaft (down from 6.8mm), and an improved molding process. The floating handle enhances feel and reduces vibrations, while the thinner shaft represents an advancement in craftsmanship and addresses durability issues seen in earlier models.
Paintwork & Aesthetics
The JS12II retains a similar design to the first-generation JetSpeed 12, with a white/blue/silver color scheme accented by red/orange decals. Thanks to a matte finish, the racket looks even better in person. Unlike the first-generation JS12, which featured a color-shifting paint, the JS12II only has a reflective decal on the inside of the frame, so players should ensure that stringers use high-tension protection to avoid damaging it.
Specs & Weight Distribution
The original JS12 was slightly heavy, which made the 3U version less ideal for the reviewer. Therefore, the 4U version of both the JS12M and JS12II were chosen. Interestingly, the JS12II feels slightly lighter in the 4U version, in contrast to the first-generation’s heft. For players who prefer balanced attack and defense, the 3U version is recommended. However, for those who opt for the 4U version, wrapping two layers of overgrip and removing the factory grip can add more head weight.
Floating Handle Advantage
Made from fatigue-resistant nano nylon, the floating handle is superior to traditional wooden handles in terms of durability and protection from sweat. For players in humid environments, this is a great feature. Previously, the reviewer had to use heat-shrink sleeves and wax candles to protect wooden handles from sweat, but the floating handle eliminates these concerns.
Additionally, the floating handle offers better control, reducing stress at the shaft-handle joint. Players will notice the increased flexibility of the shaft, which provides better leverage and control during play.
String and Grip Recommendations
The reviewer suggests using hard or crisp strings, such as VBS66nano or VBS68. For 4U versions, tensions should be kept ≤29lbs, but no lower than 24lbs to maintain the racket’s speed performance. GR233 and GR262 grips are personal favorites, and towel grip users may find the ultra-thin GR334 ideal.
Comparing JS12II with Brave Sword 12
While it may be unfair to compare the JS12II with the Brave Sword 12, as they were released a decade apart, the JS12II clearly benefits from modern advancements. The Brave Sword 12 had some issues, such as poor paint adhesion and quality control. With the JS12II, paint chips from shuttle impacts are now avoided, and quality has improved significantly.
Comparing JS12II with JetSpeed 12M
The JS12M, with its color-shifting blue paint and vibrant decals, is visually more striking than the JS12II. However, in terms of material and build quality, the JS12II is superior, featuring a thinner 6.6mm shaft, which is more advanced than the 6.8mm shaft in the JS12M.
Performance and Conclusion
Compared to the first-generation JetSpeed 12, the JS12II offers a more balanced and flexible feel, particularly with the 4U version excelling in defense and quick exchanges. The shaft’s elasticity, along with the floating handle, makes the JS12II easier to control, allowing players to break free from passive situations more effectively. However, for players who prioritize smashing in doubles, the JS12M or the 3U JS12II may be better options, as the 4U JS12II leans more towards speed and agility.
In conclusion, the JS12II is a versatile and user-friendly racket. Its floating handle provides benefits in both singles and doubles, and it caters to players who prefer a speedier game.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 09 Reviews
Find a few unusual basic-level rackets to try. Pay attention to the wording—basic-level means there’s no other racket in the series with an official price lower than this full carbon fiber model. This distinguishes it from entry-level rackets. I’ve always trusted Victory’s basic models, whether new or old, because I often find interesting elements in them.
Speaking of which, I wonder if any readers remember when I wrote about the TK330. It’s an entry-level racket with a 6.6mm shaft, which plays softly but still feels decent. The Yu 09 attracted me for a similar reason: I just wanted to see how the most basic 6.8mm shaft from the Blue Factory feels.
Specifications: 3UG5, without grip tape, total weight in use 91.05g, balance point 290mm, shaft length 215mm, low stiffness, fluid box frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, string tension warranty of 26lbs, strung at 24lbs with VBS70.
Of course, offering multiple color choices is a way for low-end rackets to boost their product power. When they can’t provide much performance, they should at least meet aesthetic needs. The version I have is red and black, with vibrant red used on the 4-8 o’clock positions of the racket head and the cone. Visually, it provides a basic sense of layering. The model on the shaft uses a bold font typical of the Yu series, and “09” is a more basic code compared to the 0 and 1L. A similar naming pattern is used in the Speed series. I wonder how this racket looks to others. To me, aside from the head, the current color scheme reminds me a lot of the Duora 8XP.
This racket is aimed at amateur beginners, so it naturally can’t have too much head-heaviness. Besides, given the positioning of the Yu series, this should be a balanced racket. The materials used in this 6.8mm shaft are identical to the slightly pricier Yu 0 and Yu 1L models. Or you could say the 1L at least has the advantage of being lighter, but the Yu 0… is it just because of its looks that it differs from the positioning of the Yu 09? I can accept that.
Originally, I thought this level of racket would feel rather dull, but after using it, I found that the increased stiffness of the 09 improved the overall feel of hitting the shuttle. It feels quite different from the soft and dull sensation of the Yu 0 and 1L. The 09 is a bit stiffer than those two, and its reduced diameter gives it a slight improvement in elasticity. When handling close shots, the power release feels much better, and the dampening effect is reduced. The shaft doesn’t feel too soft when hitting, and although its increased stiffness makes it harder to flex, the benefit is a much clearer feel.
As you can see in the image, the strings are a bit off, which might not sit well with perfectionists. However, there’s no need to worry about these small details, as the stringing condition was pretty average during the test. But here’s the question: why wasn’t this better shaft used in the Yu 0 and 1? Could it be a cost issue?
When I first tested the Yu 0 and 1L, I struggled to adapt to the low elasticity when hitting powerful smashes. Not only did it produce a dampening effect, but the feedback wasn’t very clear, and I wasn’t confident in the power of my shots. But the Yu 09 doesn’t have this problem. As a “basic model,” it reminds me of the unattractive 3U-spec ProKennex Bluebird. Although their feel is in two different directions, the performance ceiling is similar. Whether for casual play or low-intensity matches, it’s really sufficient for me.
As for other aspects, such as drives, net play, defense, and handling passive shots, I’m at a loss for words—the racket embodies the balanced style of the Yu series. The performance and experience of this type of racket are likely more influenced by the strings. If I had a fresh 26lb 66N setup, everything would improve. But with the VBS70, which is losing tension, well…
I think it’s worth recommending. For players who are serious about the game, there’s no need to consider other entry-level Yu series rackets—this one can carry you to an intermediate level. Not to mention, I picked up the second-hand unstrung racket for under 100 yuan. Players tired of the 9500 might want to consider this one, which offers a more balanced feel and a slightly better shaft.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 3H Reviews
Recently, the Blue Factory has released many new low-end, mid-range, and sub-high-end models. Unlike the previous wave of rackets that seemed to simply swap in a floating handle on existing models, many of the new models this time don’t seem to have prototypes in the current lineup.
Except for the 10M, the Yu series has continued to remain low-profile. However, the new quarter’s Yu F/M series has finally garnered some attention, at least in the promotions. Meanwhile, the Yu 5H has reappeared in the spotlight due to player reviews and retailers clearing their stock. But in an unassuming corner, there’s also a new Yu 3H…
Specifications: 4UG5, with a bottom cap, total weight in use is 90.33g, balance point 295mm, shaft length 210mm, stiffness is medium-high, hexagonal aerodynamic frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, 30 lbs string warranty, strung at 27-29 lbs with VS100.
The Yu 3H has an elegant light gold exterior, and the blue and yellow lines on the wings of the frame transition to a beige design, giving the racket a fresh look. Aside from these painted details, the racket has no other decals, making it appear even cleaner. The original 3F was a very aesthetically pleasing racket targeted at women, while the 3H is much more neutral in comparison. Both 3F and 3H use the same level of carbon fiber, but upon investigation, it was found that the 3H has had changes in the shaft and handle.
I have never been fond of rackets with FRS, as they tend to give poor feedback from the racket face. However, the low string tension of the 3F was also a downside. The 3H is no exception. With moderate swing weight and relatively high swing speed, the power feels good, but the overall hitting sensation is average. When hitting actively, the floating handle does provide decent shock absorption with high-tension strings, but the filtered feedback makes it harder to generate the desire to hit harder.
Additionally, the racket itself is slightly stiff, but the driving sensation is still fairly easy to control. For the entry-level players this racket is aimed at, while it’s not overly forgiving, it also doesn’t pose much of a problem.
In terms of offense, this is a racket that gives me half a sense of relief. Compared to the 3F, the more solid hitting sensation and greater rebound ability elevate the feel during powerful or sharp smashes to a higher level. The shuttle comes off the racket faster, and generating power is equally enjoyable. However, compared to the 5H, the reduced swing weight and downgraded materials create a significant performance gap when driving the shuttle downward. Therefore, the 3H is more of a racket that emphasizes generating downward power through your own effort. As a result, when my stamina declines or I don’t want to play too aggressively, I actually prefer the slightly heavier and bulkier 5H to maintain control and dominance on the court. This is definitely a racket I would use with high-tension strings, and if it weren’t for the VS100 strings, the situation would be even better. But there is still a considerable difference in offensive efficiency and overall feel between the 3H and 5H.
The aspect of the 3H I’m most satisfied with is its excellent continuity. Its flexibility is similar to the 3F, but it has the fastest shuttle response of the three, which gives the 3H an advantage in fast exchanges in the front and mid-court. Additionally, its higher string warranty supports players with mature short power techniques and awareness, allowing for fast drives and blocks that are tight and seamless.
However, the racket’s feel for controlling small shots is relatively weaker compared to the other two. The Yu 5, with its more stable and solid feel, is at a higher level, and the slight ball-holding sensation of the 3F provides a unique advantage in handling deceptive shots and increasing fault tolerance. In comparison, the 3H appears rather average.
When it comes to handling defensive shots, the 3F remains the best. Its lightweight and slightly softer frame allow for easy returns to the backcourt with just the natural elasticity, without needing to exert much power. It also excels at lifting smashes with ease. While the 5H is slightly heavier, it provides stability and adequate shock absorption, instilling confidence when transitioning from defense to offense. The 3H, at this point, sits somewhere in between the two, lacking distinct characteristics.
From the overall performance of the 3H, it stands out with clear differentiation.
What initially attracted me to this racket was its appearance and the significance of the “H” suffix. After using this product, I was quickly reminded of the old HX60H, and the two indeed have some comparability. However, mid-range balance rackets from the Blue Factory often end up relatively unnoticed, with only the Nano 6/7 series becoming a hit in the past 30 years.
Although I quite like this racket, the awkward part is that the 3H, as a core model in the Yu series, has the same low market presence as the overlooked 3F targeted at women. In terms of performance, the 5H, along with the slightly adjusted and reissued 6/7SP, as well as the higher-end Nano 6/7, are significantly better with just a bit more budget. From the channels I’ve checked, you can get a racket that’s a couple of levels higher in both frame and shaft performance, reaching high-end quality, if you just increase the budget slightly. Therefore, the purchasing advice is clear: “Go for the upgrade.”
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X NANO6 Reviews
Badminton players who have used the Nano 6/7 are likely around forty by now. Well, at least I hit the mark myself. The fact that the original versions of these two rackets are still being sold and even have counterfeit versions is quite unbelievable. Although I haven’t used the original Nano 6, there’s no need to go out of my way to find an old mid-range racket just to knock it down, especially since Victor knows to at least give it a new look and rebrand it as the HypernanoX series to sell.
But now, there’s an even better upgraded version.
Specifications: 3UG5, without the base grip, total weight 91.6g in use, balance point 299mm, 6.6mm shaft, length 210mm, medium stiffness, dynamic hexagonal frame, 8–4 o’clock string grooves, 76-hole string bed, warranty for 28 lbs, strung at 26–28 lbs with VBS66N.
With this IP in hand, it’s a waste not to use it. One of the most classic elements of the Nano 6 IP is the rose gold color scheme, and now the Yu Nano 6 has been fine-tuned to make it look even better. When the Nano 6 was released, the iPhone 4 hadn’t even come out yet! Isn’t Victor leading the trend with this move? Compared to the clunky old version, the new Yu series indeed looks and feels much more premium.
By the way, even though durability is a significant feature, this review won’t cover its sturdiness, as I didn’t get the chance to test it, and I hope players who have had racket clashes won’t actually use it for revenge matches.
That said, although the 3U DXN6 still follows the Yu series’ balanced tuning strategy inherited from the old Nano, it feels a bit weighty when swung. You can’t expect it to be a speed racket just because it has a low balance point and a rounded frame. It’s not a racket that can accelerate at any moment. Besides that, the frame stability, sweet spot forgiveness, and power absorption are all in line, making it relatively easy to handle.
People often say the old Nano felt wooden, and the main reason for that was the shaft’s lack of elasticity. To address this flaw, Victor seems to have made a significant move by fitting it with a 6.6mm shaft, boldly writing this information on the cone in large black font, as if to say, “Who’s still calling me wooden?” But as for the actual experience…
Thanks to the quirky anti-rebound carbon tube technology, the DXN6 still feels wooden, almost like the HX100. The old Nano is comforted, its spirit lives on… Jokes aside, during the initial use of the new racket, the shaft’s performance was not fully activated. After about half an hour of play, the feedback felt more natural. The racket offers a slightly noticeable ball-holding sensation, feeling a bit soft, which is also a classic feature of the old Nano, but it still retains a solid feeling, making it somewhat enjoyable to use.
After breaking it in, during powerful smashes, you’ll experience a sensation similar to NAMD, where the racket’s hardness slightly increases upon impact. With the string tension at 26–28 lbs, the feedback from the string bed is quite clear, so the smash feeling isn’t vague. The significance of the 6.6mm shaft upgrade becomes evident at this moment. For players with good explosive power, the upper limit of the Yu Nano 6 is quite high, ranking in the upper-mid range of mid-tier rackets, not inferior to those featuring Pyrofil carbon.
However, this also raises the bar for players when using the Yu Nano 6 for downward attacks. It’s not as easy as it looks. While it accommodates the more abrupt burst of power during impact, relying solely on the racket’s weight to leisurely execute a downward offensive shot is much less satisfying. Especially towards the end of a match, using this racket demands a certain level of fitness.
But since it’s equipped with a dynamic hexagonal frame, and the overall thickness of the frame has been significantly reduced—especially with the thickness at the 12 o’clock position close to the speed series—it seems Victor has found a way to improve the flexibility of the Nano 6. Just when I was confidently speeding up in doubles, I regretted it—the performance in fast exchanges is still quite ordinary, not quite what I expected. Perhaps the 4U version might improve this, but the old Nano was never a speed-oriented racket, so I’ll pass.
You may not excel at fast exchanges, but you can control the game effectively. The Yu series’ frame design is indeed geared towards stability, and the Nano 6, with its solid feel, offers excellent stability. The feel at the net is very solid, and the quality of net drops, slices, lifts, and blocks can quickly reach a high level. Although due to the swing weight, I don’t particularly enjoy using it for cross-court shots or deceptive moves, for players with a higher demand for shot precision, the Yu Nano 6’s ability to execute shot commands is on par with high-end rackets. Slow things down a bit, and everything will be great.
The old Nano has almost become a major IP for Victor. After upgrading its materials in the new era, its performance has indeed improved significantly, but so have the skills and patience required to handle it. It’s worth buying, but after purchasing, you’ll need to spend more time playing with it, adapting to it, and gradually appreciating its merits.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 8K Reviews
My first flagship racket was the 3U ZSP in the new color. It was definitely a racket that felt great for young players, offering impressive swing speed and powerful performance.
Recently, I bought a brand-new racket, the 3U Yu 8K, which for some reason reminded me of the ZSP I once owned. Although the feel of these two rackets is not the same, it indicates that the Yu 8K is also a racket that can offer me a new experience.
Of course, it could simply be due to changing tastes after gaining more experience.
Specifications: 3UG5, stripped-down, total weight 95.4g, balance point 304mm, handle length 195mm, 7.0mm Babolat carbon shaft, hard setup, 76-hole string bed, dynamic fluid hexagon frame, 8-4 o’clock string grooves, warranty 29 lbs, string tension 26-28 lbs BN69.
The main color of the racket is a deep Prussian blue, which is quite understated and not particularly striking but looks very stable. The circuit-like lines on the shaft and frame are a major feature of the Yu series. However, for a high-end racket like the Yu 8K, the lack of any flashy elements in its appearance is somewhat disappointing. The neighboring Yu 8S, with its metallic red hue, seems more eye-catching in comparison. This might be why the Yu 8K hasn’t received much attention.
Strictly speaking, the Yu series includes three types of frames: the Yu 7K and below use a guiding hexagonal frame, the high-end series uses a three-in-one dynamic fluid hexagonal frame, and the Yu 9X features a unique twisted frame. The Yu 8K’s frame has a rounded transition in the midsection, and the guiding hexagonal frame has already achieved a good balance of stability and swing speed, while the three-in-one frame further enhances swing speed while maintaining stability. The thickness at the head is almost like that of speed rackets.
Therefore, as a 3U racket with a slightly higher balance point, the Yu 8K initially felt very much like the ZSP: solid feel, slightly head-heavy, good swing speed, hard shaft, and well-matched to my style. In fact, with its thinner frame, the Yu 8K might even offer slightly higher swing speed. Even before trying it, it gave me the feeling of “I want it all.”
However, its impact feel is not related to the crisp or focused feeling. The BN69 is a 0.66mm diameter, high elasticity, medium-hard string. At 26-28 lbs, the Yu 8K surprisingly still provides a certain ball-holding sensation, with a bit of a bow-and-arrow feel. It doesn’t have the soft yet resilient feeling of the bow-and-arrow series but offers a turbo-like kick-in sensation. While I don’t mind this feeling, many other players might prefer the high-speed self-absorbing sensation.
The 7.0mm shaft not only represents the thickest diameter in its series but also has a notable official hardness. Therefore, while you can feel the ball-holding sensation, it doesn’t feel mushy; you can feel the hardness, but it’s not wooden. For small actions like net shots, flicks, and drops, the racket leans towards ball-holding, while for larger actions like smashes, clears, and drives, it leans towards explosiveness.
I’ve rarely written such a lengthy, subjective, sensory, and non-standard description. If I were to really describe the Yu 8K, it would be similar to many excellent rackets I’ve encountered: it offers a significant feel of borrowed power, whether for high clears, flat clears, or smashes; the T-head box structure ensures the racket’s stability, clear directional control, and excellent torsional resistance; it might be challenging for flat drives due to its heavier weight, and its slightly delayed response from the preparation to the swing can make it risky for net play; the sweet spot is easy to find, but hitting outside the sweet spot significantly affects the quality, with average tolerance; the shaft’s explosiveness is outstanding, and the frame can handle high tension, resulting in high-quality smashes with a sharp, pleasant sound; the heavy weight and hard setup are not recommended for beginners. The 4U version might be more generally liked, but I prefer the extremely stable 3U version for personal improvement.
Does that cover it?
Even though it was a regular purchase, the Yu 8K gives me a sense of an unexpected encounter. Its comprehensive nature makes me occasionally overlook its excellent performance. As a balanced, slightly attacking racket, its feedback doesn’t quite match some other mid-range rackets, and its response speed in doubles isn’t exceptionally quick. However, using it on the court gives a sense of stability, and its excellent shock absorption reduces the load. All-around, it may not always be appealing.
Even now, my description of the Yu 8K feels like the saying “The way that can be told is not the eternal way.” No matter how I describe it, I can’t fully capture its essence. Its strengths are not immediately obvious or captivating. Its solid and stable nature often makes me forget the racket’s presence until I’m reminded by a powerful smash that the equipment I’m using is not to be underestimated.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 7K Reviews
If we are to talk about the youngest family within the current lineup, it would undoubtedly be the Yu series. Rumor has it that it is the successor to the HypernanoX series, maintaining the same “all-around” characteristics while incorporating numerous new technologies and a more refined product positioning. Although I previously tested the DX1L, as an entry-level racket it only featured a power hexagonal frame and didn’t provide much insight into the series’ performance.
Today’s review is of the Yu series’ first true product: the Yu 7K. As mentioned earlier, the Yu series has a more mature product positioning, and the 7K is clearly focused on control and attack.
Specifications: 4UG5, full-weight 88.8g, balance point 302mm, 6.8mm Babolat carbon shaft, length 210mm, slightly stiff, power hexagonal frame, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, strung at 26lbs with VBS68.
Appearance: The racket is quite understated with a deep gray base and orange stripe stickers. While it is visually appealing, it also gives off a cheap impression, which is surprising for a high-end racket. Additionally, the paint quality is not satisfactory, especially at the top of the frame where the paint has chipped and become uneven after a year of use. The frame design is worth mentioning; it has a traditional box frame at the T-joint, transitioning to a sharp frame at the top, somewhat similar to the HX900’s all-in-one frame but with a more natural transition. The wings are not of the Speed series’ sword structure, which should provide the 7K with a more stable hitting experience.
Handling: The head-heavy feel is noticeable, but the 4U weight and the head’s aerodynamic design make for effective swing speed, making it suitable for doubles. The racket feels responsive and maintains a strong overall integrity with minimal deformation.
In terms of high-clear shots, the 76-hole string bed makes the sweet spot very easy to find, with clear feedback and good power feel. Despite the stiffer shaft, the racket’s head-heavy nature still allows for good leverage. The dynamic-hex frame type effectively reduces wind resistance, contributing to the racket’s stable shot performance and precise hitting.
Performance: If the user has good explosive power, they will likely appreciate the Yu 7K’s response during smashes and drives. The racket is overall quite stiff, with a certain learning curve, and may feel somewhat wooden for less powerful players. The Pyrofil in the shaft and the “K” suffix indicate that this is a serious contender. The combination of internal rotation power and the shaft’s explosiveness yields strong, fast shots. The pronounced head-heavy feel also aids in smashes and net play.
However, there are some downsides, particularly its flexibility. The high balance point results in some drawbacks in maneuverability, especially during fast drives and when retrieving shots from behind. The stiffness of the shaft can challenge shot execution and may cause issues with low arcs or interceptions on defensive shots.
Control: As an all-around racket, control is crucial. Although I am not particularly skilled at fine handling, I found that the clear and stable feel allowed for quick adjustment in net play and correction of errors. The large string bed and sweet spot also provide ample forgiveness for backcourt smashes and lifts. However, compared to rackets known for control and balance like the Bow or Dual Blade 7, the Yu 7K’s straightforward shot delivery doesn’t offer the same confidence in small ball control. For me, quick pushes and unexpected high clears are more effective with the Yu 7K in creating passive situations for opponents.
There was a time when the Yu 7K was available at a very low price, making it quite appealing. The subsequent price increase has led to a sales decline, which may be due to consumer expectations not aligning with the new price. The paint job is mediocre, but the performance is good, with a certain usage threshold. The 7K has similarities to the HX800, HX900, and HX900X. If the Yu series aims for an all-around performance, the 7K is indeed balanced, with slightly less emphasis on speed but stronger in attack. For players accustomed to softer rackets and looking to advance to a more versatile racket, especially those confident in their attacking abilities, the Yu 7K is worth trying. At its current price point, it offers some advantages over similarly positioned products from the major brands.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X R Reviews
Striking while the iron is hot, let’s continue with another racket named “R,” which is currently available at a significant discount. The marketing and subsequent market performance of this racket feel very familiar to me. First, I recently compared the TK-R and Yu-R using the same strings on the same day, which allowed for a rigorous comparison. Second, it’s not surprising to see a brand suddenly release an outlier model that doesn’t fit the series naming conventions and then encounter poor reception.
However, considering the recent decline in curiosity-driven content quality and readership, I’ll give a straightforward conclusion: If the retailer can offer it for just over 400, that would be a good deal. It’s worth picking up if the opportunity arises.
Specifications: 5UG6, unstrung weight 89.61g, balance point 287mm, 6.6mm shaft, length 210mm, moderate stiffness, power hexagonal frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, warranty 27 pounds, strung with 26-28lbs BS710.
I have already mentioned my criticisms of the Yu-R in the previous review, so I won’t repeat them here. The sparse color-changing stickers on the frame seem rather half-hearted. However, the black base paint has a strong visual convergence effect, making the racket appear very slim, especially with the 6.6mm shaft that looks fragile but is actually quite sleek and highlights the rainbow-colored R logo.
There’s not much to describe about the appearance, but the configuration and positioning are quite interesting. Priced at 1080, it just enters the high-end category. Material-wise, it lacks the TR reinforcement found in the higher-end Yu 7K, which results in precise craftsmanship. Additionally, like the TK-R, this racket is only available in 4U/5U specifications, positioning it as a “quasi-high-end” product.
This racket was among the early adopters of the suspended handle, and though it was not the transparent cone cap version, it represents an early adoption of Yu 9X technology. Whether this will become a quality issue like the Jinx is still uncertain.
The initial feel of the racket is satisfactory, with minimal difficulty and easy adaptation. It’s a pleasant high-end product. I have always been fond of the high-end frames in the Yu series for their high tolerance, swing speed, and stability, even though the series is relatively niche. The sweet spot provides a light and responsive feel, making it easier to find the rhythm in net play and flat drives, with the ability to deform the shaft with power. The racket’s elasticity is top-notch, and the feedback is relatively direct, with the suspended handle providing good shock absorption and clear feedback.
When pushed to its limits, I found the Yu-R to be almost like a lighter, softer version of the Yu 7K, even responding more crisply than the Yu 8S. The absence of TR carbon affects the face’s elasticity and resilience, but the shaft’s explosiveness, sweet spot positioning, and ball feel are comparable to the 7K. When I tested the 7K, I considered it a strongly offensive Yu racket, while the 5U R is a speed-oriented Yu racket.
The racket performs smoothly at the front court, with effortless net play and strong agility, similar to an extension of your arm. The 210mm shaft length enhances confidence in the front-to-mid court flat drives, providing a sensation of speed and continuity. It significantly improves performance in passive situations, eliminating concerns about handling wide angles or insufficient elasticity for high-quality returns.
Similarly, although part of the Yu series, its offensive performance can be compared to the less common HX AIR. While the 5U racket lacks the heavy feel for powerful smashes needed by less experienced players, its shaft elasticity allows for quick speeds on smashes and flat drives, producing a sharp cracking sound. Speedy shots and quick returns are its characteristics, and after meeting these requirements, I am willing to sacrifice precision and control for the advantage of swift, continuous attacks that overwhelm opponents. The 6.6mm short shaft is reliable and crucial to the racket’s offensive performance.
So, why isn’t it selling well or receiving good reviews? I immediately think of the situation with the Yu 7K, where both were similarly priced at their lowest and the 7K was a genuine high-end racket with better specs. Both rackets’ actual experiences were more influenced by weight distribution, offering good value for money. With the 7K nearly sold out, the Yu-R has become the “victim” of the situation.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor Drive X 5H Reviews
Many players may have noticed that the brand Victory has many classic mid-range rackets in the 8xx price range. Apart from the high-end material-distributed Columbia, models like Little Falcon, Little Devil Slayer, and Speed 50 have become outstanding representatives of mid-range rackets. When in doubt, choosing among these three can provide a good experience.
However, have you ever heard of a “Mid-Range Four Legends” version that includes a Yu series racket?
Specifications: 3UG5, unstrung weight 88.1g, balance point 305mm, 7.0mm Pyrofil carbon shaft, length 210mm, moderate to stiff stiffness, 76-hole aerodynamic hexagonal frame, 8—4 o’clock string grooves, warranty 34 pounds, strung with 26-28lbs NBG95.
The actual visual effect of the Yu 5H is not fully captured in pictures. The paint used is mixed with a large amount of glitter, giving the racket a very blingbling effect, and the actual color of the paint is somewhat darker than what is shown in promotional images. I find this paint job somewhat controversial; its distinctive appearance is both a benefit and a drawback as it may not align with everyone’s aesthetic preferences. As for paint durability, the previous user reported minor blemishes at the 2 o’clock position on the racket head after about a month of use, which may still be unsatisfactory. Moreover, if significant paint chipping occurs, the exposed carbon fiber color may become quite glaring. Also, the black color in the images is not pure black but a brownish shade similar to traditional Chinese medicine decoctions.
The 3U weight is quite imposing, and the reason the previous owner sold the racket aligns with some reviews on platforms like Xianyu and Zhongyu: it’s heavy and hard to handle. After testing various 3U rackets, I found that the weight distribution of the Yu 5H is quite balanced, and the overall weight is not high, making the swing load feel minimal. This initial impression conflicts with the reviews. The hexagonal frame, used in the previous Yu 1L/3F models, still maintains a balance between low wind resistance and high stability. During shuttle juggling practice, apart from a somewhat muted hitting sound compared to other rackets, there were no other unusual sensations. The difficulty reported by many players may stem from the shaft. I haven’t seen any non-collision damage cases on rackets with the Strong Stack System.
From the moment I picked it up, I was impressed by its firm and crisp feel, unlike Victory’s 76-hole string bed paired with NBG95. Initially, the stiffness of the shaft doesn’t match the actual settings, somewhat similar to the HX800LTD. However, after some use, as the initial tension of the NBG95 settles, the racket becomes more flexible, resulting in a more neutral overall stiffness for both the shaft and frame.
The elasticity of the racket is quite impressive. During warm-up, clearing shots felt smooth, with a good balance of ball feel, speed, and angle. For advanced players, the Yu 5H is quite easy to handle. However, its neutral feel means that the feedback can be somewhat ambiguous. For players with strong power who can deform the shaft, the racket feels like playing on a sponge, while for those without sufficient upper body strength, it might feel overly jarring. Although it is a mid-range model, its current settings are somewhat high, similar to the Columbia series, which targets typical head-heavy attacking players. The Yu 5H, marketed as a balanced racket, might lead some buyers to feel disappointed.
Whether it will become easier to use after breaking in, like the Speed 10, remains to be seen with long-term use by others. Currently, its firm state provides a good experience in offense. The Yu 5H is not a heavy-hitting racket; its performance relies on elasticity, requiring focused power from the user. When this requirement is met, the ball speed is impressive, with explosive performance exceeding my expectations for its swing weight, and the sound is quite sharp. As a mid-range racket, the Yu 5H’s smashing performance might be on par with its elder brother, the Yu 7K, and its lower balance point also enhances its continuity. The strong core and hexagonal frame provide excellent torsional resistance, ensuring stable shot control under various power levels, resulting in excellent performance in quick kills.
Although it performs well offensively, the 305mm balance point seems somewhat lacking in terms of sharp and shallow drop shots, with less downward pressure compared to the Yu 7K.
For players who have already purchased the Yu 5H but find it too heavy for doubles, adjusting the grip point slightly to have the thumb rest against the cone cap can reveal its strength in flat drives. With quick response and agile swings, if the finger joints can effectively generate power, it proves to be highly useful in fast-paced mid-court exchanges, with strong shots even with the 95 string. Although the balanced nature of the Yu series is often associated with creating opportunities through precise net play, I personally prefer its direct and straightforward approach. Techniques like net drops are not difficult with the Yu 5H, but its straightforward shot style makes me often forgo these options.
Of course, when repositioned to the mid-to-back court due to lifts or drives, the large sweet spot and high tolerance of the Yu 5H make actions like intercepting and slicing easier to perform.
In fact, I didn’t do enough research before acquiring this racket, and was surprised to see the Pyrofil on the shaft after receiving it, even checking the equipment library for confirmation. Overall, I really like the Yu 5H; it uses quality materials and performs well. However, its moderate stiffness means it has the characteristic drawbacks of Victory’s balanced rackets, which may not meet the expectations of the mid-range market, resulting in a rather low profile in the market.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X DF 09 Reviews
Do you remember the Yu 09 that I wrote about before? It’s understandable if you don’t, as such a basic entry-level racket rarely interests anyone and hardly sells, with its circulation being close to zero. The reason I mention it is that the Yu series is a successor to the HX series, but the HX series models were generally quite obscure.
I’ve already reviewed the more advanced HX series models, so it’s time to try out this “featureless” entry-level model. Its “fast food” simplicity fits my needs at the time.
Specifications: 4UG5, with a base, total weight 89.90g in use, balance point 292mm, 7.0mm shaft, length 215mm, medium-low hardness, diamond-cut wind frame, 72-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, warranty 23 pounds, strung with 24lbs BG6.
Surprisingly, this basic entry-level racket comes in only one color. Nevertheless, for a low-priced product, its appearance is quite good. The lake blue paint with an asymmetric frame design, and the dark-colored split at the 2 and 8 o’clock positions, give the 09 a distinctive look and a clean, fresh appearance. The racket has no advanced technology, and the use of water decals is minimal, providing a simple visual experience, cleaner and more straightforward than the summer models.
When the HX09 came out, it didn’t have the advantages of the Yu 09, and could only use a 7.0mm shaft, so its elasticity is limited. This allows for a clearer experience of its smooth swing and power feel through the low swing weight and high swing speed. It encourages users to focus on short, powerful strokes and offers a comfortable hitting feel. Although officially marked as the lowest hardness, it still has a bit of “resistance” subjectively.
The swing speed of this racket is genuinely high. Combined with its low power difficulty, it offers excellent continuity, with great feel for mid-court and net play, almost effortless. It seems lighter than the Yu 09 and better aligns with my aesthetic preferences.
Although the frame doesn’t withstand high tension well, it’s better than using FRS, which makes an already uncomfortable low-end racket even more sluggish. I quite like the feedback from the HX09. While it can’t finish off opponents with a single hit, enjoying its power and compression is quite nice, somewhat like the Wave Power 9001. Moreover, the shaft isn’t as lacking as expected. When I decide to powerfully smash, it provides decent ball speed without losing balance, allowing for some sudden shots. It somewhat resembles the overlooked HX30.
Additionally, the racket excels in one area that’s guaranteed for products in its class: its low power requirement for passive shots makes it very suitable for transitional shots. Speaking of which, why has the classic diamond-cut wind frame become so rarely used?
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 90 Reviews
It’s evident that there is a difference between outstanding items and those that are more subtle. In badminton gear, good products often compete not only across different brands but also within the same brand due to variations in cost-effectiveness and marketing. Even if a product is excellent, it may still face stiff competition. This is what I’m referring to with the HypernanoX90, the final piece in the somewhat obscure Super Nano series.
Parameters: 3UG5, stripped base, current weight 89.8g, balance point 320mm, 7.0mm shaft, 205mm length, stiff, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock grommet slots, diamond-cut wind frame, warranty 27lbs, string tension 25-27lbs, XB65.
The most striking color on the HX90 is fluorescent green. The frame features a mix of black, purple, and green with a layered, asymmetric design. The frame’s thickness isn’t exceptional, but the large frame area stands out. The paintwork is well done, with a commendable matte finish.
The HX series is known for its balanced rackets, but like the HX80, the HX90’s high stiffness and balance point make it feel stable and solid. A 3U version with a balance point of 320mm feels quite hefty during initial handling and even more so during early play. Previously, the HX80 was available in 4U, but the HX90’s remaining stock is all 3U, which presents a challenge.
The racket excels in power when leveraging the shot, but with highly elastic strings, it’s easy to overshoot. It also has a “long forehand” feel, requiring some adaptation to the swing rhythm.
The shaft uses reverse carbon technology, and thankfully, the HX90’s performance leans more towards the direct feel of the HX80 rather than a dull response. Additionally, whether due to the EM fibers or the strings, the HX90’s string bed offers a good amount of elasticity. It provides excellent initial speed in short, powerful shots and doesn’t cause erratic shots during delicate play. This balance of qualities reminds me of the HX900X.
Thus, with a strong core filling, the control is very good. The large head and sweet spot ensure a high margin for error, while the high stiffness and anti-twist capability provide precision. The heavier spec ensures stable feel, making it easy to perform quality shots like lifts, cuts, hooks, spins, and drops. The racket also demonstrates impressive power among those with reverse carbon shafts. Although the Nano 6 was also a balanced offensive racket, the HX90’s harder feel enhances the joy of attacking from the backcourt. It performs well in competitive play, providing powerful smashes.
However, the drawbacks are also apparent—slow and heavy. The diamond-cut wind frame only slightly reduces wind resistance, and even with advanced designs like the Speed Frame, the head-heavy feel of the HX90 leads to a primarily heavy handling experience, affecting quick defensive moves. The racket’s inflexibility can make fast-paced actions and net play more difficult.
The HX90 can indeed be classified as a traditional offensive racket. The 4U version would be a better choice, though even this requires a high level of skill and technique. Despite its advantages, the HX90’s performance might not stand out compared to other models, which could explain its lack of popularity in the market. Overall, it justifies its price and positioning but has a higher usage threshold. Its good elasticity requires substantial personal strength to drive it effectively, making it a near-high-end racket. With many competing models and no particularly striking features, its market performance is understandable.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor HYPERNANO X 990 Reviews
It must be admitted that it is, first and foremost, a “collapsed king.” When I received it, it was still strung, and upon inspection, I found that the condition of the racket head was not ideal. However, after removing the strings, the situation wasn’t too severe, so I reluctantly accepted it. Upon further inspection, it turned out that all six holes in the racket head were problematic. If you decide to use this racket, make sure to find a responsible stringer with good skills, ideally someone who will adjust the angle of the protective tube for each stringing. For this review, the racket head was fitted with the lightest six-grommet system possible, which may have affected its performance. After replacing the grommets, it was found that the stringer didn’t rotate the protective tubes for the 2 o’clock and 10 o’clock directions, so I had to rely on their judgment.
With Wang Shixian as the spokesperson, the HX series flagship racket, designed and crafted by Victory in Taiwan, has a commendable reputation. However, it has received a score of 7.9 and mostly 4-star reviews. Strangely, the reviews include contradictory comments such as “head-heavy, stiff and hard shaft, slow swing speed” and “light head, soft middle shaft, easy to handle, faster swing speed,” which seem to describe the same racket.
A friend who has played with the entire HX series gave a negative evaluation of this racket, leading me to wonder what the HX990 is like.
Parameters: 3UG5, with bottom coating and shrink film, total weight 99.2g, balance point 300mm, 6.8mm Flash Shaft (M30J + M46J), 210mm shaft length, stiff, racket length 675mm, diamond-cut wind frame, 9-3 o’clock grommet slots, warranty 31lbs, string tension 25-27lbs, VBS66N.
The striking red base with white and black stripes and gold accents makes it hard not to notice this racket. The aggressive color scheme has a “hatred-provoking” effect, making one eager to pick it up.
After stringing, there is a noticeable head-heavy feel, which doesn’t quite align with the expected balanced design. After trying the HX900, I felt that a 3U would be better, but it seems I made a miscalculation with the HX990, especially for continuous doubles play.
Before changing the strings, I tried it with the original Li Ning No. 5 strings. The high-clearance shots were fine, and the head-heavy feel was just right for me, offering good power and a feeling of elasticity in the shaft. The diamond-cut wind frame provided a smooth swing experience, and the overall feel was on par with Victory’s flagship rackets. The response was clear with good directional accuracy and appropriate shot speed. However, there was a noticeable “sticky” feel on the string bed, making the feedback less crisp. This might be due to the large frame or shaft adjustments, showing a difference in understanding or handling of the Hypernano series between the Nanjing and Taiwan factories. The HX990 and HX900 are two distinct types of rackets.
Many of the national women’s singles players seem to prefer rackets with a “blurry” hitting feel, such as the Thruster 77. While the HX990 has a high upper limit, its feel is somewhat reserved and unremarkable. It excels in stability, control, and precision but lacks excitement. Its easily damaged nature also explains its lesser popularity.
September 13, 2024