Tag: VICTOR

威克多

Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 30L Reviews
Skipping this series would be a mistake. However, after testing it, I didn’t feel a strong desire to update. These are all classic models from the Blue Factory that are familiar to most. Just the popularity of the original MX80 alone is enough to carry half the positive reputation of Victory’s offensive rackets among enthusiasts.
It would be irresponsible to give a quick review of a product geared toward professional performance before fully adapting to it. However, you also know about my recent intense schedule for reviews. If every racket I test is a hardcore model, the few opportunities I get to test them will be wasted on getting used to them, which isn’t efficient.
Starting with the MX30L was a good choice.
Specifications:
Weight: 3U G6, with grip, total weight in use: 94.9g, balance point: 294mm, shaft thickness: 7.0mm, shaft length: 220mm, stiffness: moderate.
Frame: octagonal aerodynamic frame, grooves at 9-3 points, 80-hole string bed, string tension recommendation: 26-28 lbs, strung at 25-27 lbs with Karakal 66F.
Many of the rackets in Victory’s lineup with “3” in their model number use blue elements, like the HX30/300 and Jetspeed 3, and the X30 is no exception, though it has a more elegant feel. The light blue decals really highlight the whiteness of the frame, and the selective covering of the frame reveals the carbon fiber texture underneath, giving the racket a more layered and alluring look.
Covering part of it is more enticing than leaving it fully exposed, right? The frame also features silver elements, enhancing the shine of the X30. Although the specs suggest this racket is more geared toward women, its aesthetic appeal is universal.
Besides the iconic octagonal aerodynamic design, the material used to construct the frame appears to be woven carbon fiber, likely chosen to balance swing speed with torsional resistance. Additionally, the frame’s string holes feature the wave design from the Brave Sword series, enhancing the string bed’s rebound. With the paint and finish added to the frame, this meticulously crafted design is certainly valuable, though the sharp aerodynamic edges might make the paint more prone to damage. Speaking of which, I really wish the Blue Factory’s art department would teach the B Factory how to make their rackets look this good…
Before testing it, I expected the X30 to be a user-friendly, “easy-going” racket, and after holding it for a bit, I could feel its approachable side. Indeed, despite its 3U specs, its balance point and swing weight are both low, and the shaft’s static stiffness is moderate. The racket swings fast, with a sharp sound slicing through the air.
However, when I actually used it, I found the X30 still required some getting used to, and my hopes of quickly taking it into a match were dashed. Its easy-going feel wasn’t as obvious as I expected. Although the shaft isn’t very stiff, the 80-hole string bed requires more effort to drive, and the frame’s high rigidity means the contact time between the strings and the shuttle is short when not generating enough power—before you’ve fully hit the shuttle, it has already bounced off. That said, the sweet spot is large, the shots are clean, and the feedback is rich after each hit.
Taking a bit of time to adapt is definitely worth it. Once you get used to the MX30L’s quirks, you’ll find it’s like a girlfriend who has her own ideas but is also willing to grow with you. The frame’s stability is excellent, and the feedback when using borrowed power is outstanding, making clears highly controllable and relatively easy. Drives can be hit with decent speed and accuracy, and lifts are easy to execute. Overall, its performance in long rallies is excellent, leading me to believe it’s well-suited for playing a control game.
But that doesn’t mean it’s not aggressive. The MX30L still has two weapons—speed and power.
After all this time, I’ve become less picky about racket specifications and have seen plenty of different models. However, this 3U racket still left a strong impression on me regarding speed. The octagonal aerodynamic frame’s wind resistance reduction is excellent, and combined with its relatively light head, it’s perfectly suitable for doubles play when speed is critical. Moreover, the 220mm long shaft prevents excessive shaft flex in fast exchanges, making it reliable for mid-court drives, with quick, stable responses.
Additionally, the X30 isn’t weak in backcourt smashes either. The stability of the shots combined with the shaft’s baseline explosiveness means that, during smash opportunities, it can still deliver powerful attacks scoring around 8 to 9 out of 10. Even if one smash doesn’t finish the point, the second and third shots can follow through seamlessly, maintaining pressure. Despite the shaft having a somewhat wooden feel, reminiscent of older thicker-shaft models, the sensation of energy loss during smashes isn’t noticeable.
After testing it, I was reminded of the Bonny 2013L, which shares similarities with the X30, such as the octagonal aerodynamic frame, woven material, and long shaft. However, the 2013L had better elasticity, though its flexibility caused energy loss during smashes. In contrast, the MX30L has a more rigid feel but better energy conversion efficiency.
And yes, the MX30L is truly beautiful.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 260 Reviews
A racket that ends up stuck in your hands without being able to sell it usually has a few prominent attributes: it’s either in poor condition, lacks recognition, or is a low-end model. These kinds of rackets, no matter how cheaply you buy them, tend to end up being a bad deal.
However, the urge to play is not something easily overcome, and many times, just finding one visually appealing is enough reason to buy it. That’s exactly what happened with this mid-to-low-end MX series racket.
Later, I seriously thought about it, and it seems that several rackets with “60” at the end in the mid-tier lineup were probably designed by downgrading the MX-60.
Specifications:
Weight: 3U G5, without grip, total weight in use: 89.25g, balance point: 300mm, shaft thickness: 7.2mm, shaft length: 216mm, stiffness: medium to slightly soft.
Frame: octagonal aerodynamic frame, 80-hole string bed, grooves at 9-3 points.
String tension: 26-28 lbs recommended, strung at 25-27 lbs with BS720.
It seems I have little resistance to magenta-colored rackets, and for the MX260, its appearance is definitely one of its strengths. Within the series, it’s the only racket that uses this pink color scheme, leading me to hastily assume it’s a racket aimed at female players. The white paint is accented with plenty of silver stickers, and combined with the magenta designs, it looks quite elegant, completely changing my perception of the MX series’ typically masculine aesthetic. However, the quality of the paint and stickers is still concerning, and the seller hadn’t taken great care of it, leading to its battered appearance being quite shocking.
Unlike the clearly low-end MX6000, the 260 features a proper 80-hole string bed. Not only that, but the frame uses an outer wave design and includes nanotechnology in its materials, pushing it slightly beyond the entry-level tier and into mid-range territory.
Aside from the stiffness of some models, the MX series as a whole doesn’t produce anything too extreme, whether entry-level or flagship models. The MX-260 feels very gentle to use; in addition to its moderate swing weight, its shaft stiffness feels at least half a grade lower than marked, and the frame’s rigidity doesn’t reach the level of the high-end models that use special woven carbon fiber materials.
This makes the racket easier to handle but noticeably weakens its feedback and stability. However, this aligns with its intended positioning.
Whether warming up with clears or practicing delicate net shots, the racket performs its duties well, and its flexibility is decent. Paired with a stiff string, it can perform well in the frontcourt during flat drives in doubles. For a player with good net sense, this racket could help secure an advantage at the net.
Still, it must be said: this racket isn’t difficult to use. I didn’t expect it to offer great elasticity, and the MX-260 is indeed not impressive. Even within the range of what I find acceptable, it’s on the lower end. In this context, the effect of the nanotechnology on the racket’s overall performance is hardly noticeable.
When generating power in shots, the MX-260 has a clear sense of energy loss, primarily due to the frame. I had previously thought the wave design was intended to enhance the frame’s elasticity and improve shot quality by leveraging the frame’s rebound. However, in this racket, it seems more like the design’s purpose was to allow lower-grade carbon fibers to withstand higher string tensions. The frame’s response is not active, and the shaft isn’t stiff enough, so smashes lose speed, and my confidence and desire for offensive play easily take a hit.
Additionally, the information in the equipment database is somewhat inaccurate, mainly because the racket does indeed exist in a 3U specification. However, I never experienced the advertised “high-rigidity carbon fiber” during my testing. If this is due to performance degradation over time, then in some cases, it actually performs worse than previous low-end MX models.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 60 Reviews
Yes, the Meteor X.
This is the third racket, and now I’ve got an MX60. This racket seems to have a slightly better reputation than the 30L, perhaps because its number is closer to the king, the MX80. Moreover, generally speaking, reaching the number 6 usually signifies the transition to true high-end models.
It’s not easy to impress badminton players in 2023 with a product from 2012
Specifications:
Weight: 3U G5, without grip, total weight in use: 93.0g, balance point: 305mm, shaft thickness: 7.2mm, shaft length: 218mm, stiffness: medium to high.
Frame: octagonal aerodynamic frame, 80-hole string bed, grooves at 9-3 points.
String tension: 28 lbs recommended, strung at 24–26 lbs with BG65Ti.
I have a deep impression of Victor’s yellow rackets, probably due to how striking the color is. On the MX60, I’d describe it unpoetically as “construction vehicle yellow”—or if we use the Colombia 6’s term, “mango yellow”—though to me, it feels more like the HX60. Regardless, the carbon fiber texture beneath the clear coat on the wings of the frame, the bright silver stickers at the paint junctions, and the prominent “X” on the shaft make this niche high-end MX look sharp and stylish.
When I first held it, I had no doubts about its MX series heritage. It feels balanced, with a pronounced sense of stability, regardless of the actual shaft stiffness. Perhaps it’s just intuition, but the sharp “whoosh” sound when swinging the racket is unmistakable.
However, after a few clears on the court, it became evident that the MX60 retains the series’ familiar “wooden” feel—quiet and subtle.
That said, the overall feel remains very good. Despite its muted response, the racket’s stability in initiating shots offers excellent precision. This can be attributed to the denser sweet spot provided by the 80-hole string bed and the stronger torsional resistance of the 7.2mm shaft. The racket doesn’t have a strong drive feel, but it’s not difficult to handle, making it relatively easy to execute beautiful clears.
Is it enjoyable? Compared to the cheap, flexible, and springy rackets of today, it doesn’t aim to please the user. However, this solitary character prompts the player to adopt a more serious attitude toward the MX60, offering the endorphins of self-discipline as a reward.
This is particularly noticeable in smashes; while it doesn’t feel overly head-heavy or elastic, its high energy transmission efficiency pushes you to improve. In powerful smashes, the MX60 doesn’t feel as raw or exhilarating as the MX80, but its consistent output and slightly reduced stiffness provide a longer-lasting sense of assurance in extended rallies, preventing fatigue from setting in too early in a match.
Flat drives are another strong point of the MX60. Besides the well-known stability, its fast swing speed and quick recovery make midcourt duels enjoyable. Although it’s not as agile to the point of being deadly, it’s sufficiently versatile. The ample tolerance of the 80-hole string bed’s sweet spot allows you to confidently rally at high speeds.
When counterattacking smashes or driving to the opponent’s rear court, it shares the MX80’s crisp rebound feel, delivering the shuttle cleanly without unnecessary fuss.
Using this racket means you need to improve yourself to find satisfaction. Although the MX60 is relatively gentle, it doesn’t pander. Its high performance potential becomes its greatest strength, turning even its muted feedback into an asset. Those who shy away from rackets that don’t flatter the user will miss out on the charm of the MX60.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 360 Reviews
Specifications:
Weight: 3U G5, with grip, total weight in use: 91.38g, balance point: 312mm, shaft length: 215mm, stiffness: high.
Frame: octagonal aerodynamic frame, 80-hole string bed, grooves at 9-3 points.
String tension: 28 lbs recommended, strung at 26 lbs with BG80.
The paint quality of the MX series isn’t particularly good; even the MX80 often suffers from chipping, let alone the mid-range and low-end models. The 360 and 260 only differ in color schemes; the three-way joint and T-joint have been changed to a contrasting black, and the magenta at 2, 10, 5, and 7 o’clock has been replaced with orange. The racket now looks more vibrant, with a neutral appearance and striking colors. I don’t dislike this restrained visual style; there’s nothing overly eye-catching about the racket, but it’s pleasant to look at.
This is a thoroughly offensive racket. After removing the grip, the strong head-heavy feel, noticeable self-weight, and high overall stiffness clearly indicate this. It’s quite different from the more gentle 260 in the same range. The 360 provides a powerful feeling of leveraging, allowing you to use a high arc to send the shuttlecock to the opponent’s baseline with just a casual swing of the handle. You need to control the speed and force to avoid sending the shuttlecock out of bounds. The 80-hole string bed is familiar; it’s easy to find the sweet spot despite the higher tension.
While most users might already be familiar with the racket’s feel, its high swing weight and stiffness still demand significant physical ability from the user, comparable to top offensive rackets.
The racket has a raw power feel, with high shuttlecock speed and good penetration. It works well for suppressing opponents’ baseline shots in singles or targeting the opponent’s female partner in mixed doubles. The high lift and smash actions are consistent, making it harder for opponents to predict the shuttlecock’s trajectory after several rallies. Additionally, the MX360’s string bed offers high tolerance, ensuring reliable performance in rear court lifts, using the racket’s head weight to achieve good shuttlecock release. Combined with the octagonal aerodynamic frame’s torsional resistance and directionality, it exhibits high stability in control.
The benefits of nano-resin are finally evident, with the shaft’s elasticity approaching that of high-end rackets. This, combined with the racket’s strong downward pressure, creates explosive offensive power. When fully utilizing the rear court, the MX360 delivers a substantial smashing force with a low trajectory and fierce intensity, without significant power loss, putting substantial pressure on opponents.
However, the racket’s continuity is quite poor. The high swing weight and long stroke time can be advantageous in rear court doubles, but once the rhythm is set, it becomes ineffective. Flat drives are particularly laborious, and in the mid-front court, if entangled by the opponent, it only remains to “block.” An assertive high lift is a good escape strategy, including in continuous defensive smashes. Even with this strategy, the high power demands during emergencies make the MX360’s performance in passive situations feel somewhat inadequate.
When unable to reach high points at the net, softer blocks and returns become more effective for net play. Fortunately, the 360 has a solid and steady feel, which doesn’t hinder these actions.
Positioned as a mid-range racket, the MX360 reminds me of the Colombia series, with similar pricing. Although MX360 is still far from the quality of the Colombia 6, which remains the king in this category, it’s not easy for a mid-range racket to stand out. Despite its straightforward approach, the MX360 has left a strong impression.
September 13, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 2012 LONDON Reviews
I initially thought the METEOR X series only had the JJS player version left, but a friend suddenly asked me if I had tried the Olympic commemorative edition.
What? I checked the equipment library and indeed found this racket, which reminded me of the unfortunate situation of the hx800ltd.
Specifications:
Weight: 3U G5, with grip, total weight in use: 95.4g, balance point: 293mm, shaft length: 215mm, stiffness: high.
Frame: octagonal aerodynamic frame, 80-hole string bed, grooves at 9-3 points.
String tension: 28 lbs recommended, strung at 25-27 lbs with High-Tech Steel Armor 5.
It’s very British; you can see that the Blue Factory has incorporated as many elements of the British flag as possible into the commemorative edition, including adjustments in color and lines. The full paint job is also a rarity. But is it visually appealing? I still think the standard models look more imposing. Besides, aren’t the water blue of the 30, mango yellow of the 60, and metallic silver of the 70 more striking than plain white?
When I first held it, it felt very familiar, almost like I had used it recently. Checking the stiffness and head-heavy feel, wow, it’s quite similar to the MX90. Could it be a re-skinned version? But there are differences; the London edition has a 7.2mm shaft, unlike the 7.0mm of the MX90. Also, the London edition was released two years before the MX90, so it would be more accurate to say that the MX90 is a re-skinned version of the London edition.
So, is it a product based on the MX80 with a MX90 tuning? Hey, it does feel that way. The slightly higher swing weight and better driving shaft stiffness are spot on. If we really need to get into details, the racket’s stiffness is between the 80 and 90, but the current High-Tech Steel Armor 5 is indeed stiffer than the KT66F, so focusing on small details might be unnecessary.
For players with good power and technique, it is easy to drive. Even if you can’t feel the shaft deformation, the racket’s inertia and string bed power are enough to hit high-clear shots with a good arc when making proper high-clear movements, as long as you hit the sweet spot. The feedback still carries that slightly rigid MX series feel. Is it wooden? I would have definitely said yes before, but since the perception of “wooden” varies among players, it’s a matter of personal opinion. I still enjoy the stimulation from this hitting feel.
Players who haven’t mastered their power technique should avoid forcing themselves to use it, as there is a risk of injury.
I first assessed its various shot effects. The high-clear shots are good, net play has a solid feel, and net flicks are stable. The flat drives are also effective, but the higher swing weight makes the racket feel clumsy in fast-paced rallies. It’s harder to maintain fluidity in shots and get adequate small power windows, making it difficult to handle passive shots. This really feels very much like the MX90.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 7600 Reviews
I suddenly realized that there’s not much to say about low-end old rackets—they’re not readily available anyway. So, I might as well reveal everything during the All England Championship.
Strike while the iron is hot; let’s try the low-end MX models, and this one with the highest serial number is the MX7600. From the first two digits, 76 seems closer to 80, but it’s not named 8000, which is quite puzzling. Since it’s an old model, it’s hard to find more information from other sources, so let’s consider it as an ordinary entry-level racket.
Specifications:
Weight: 3U G5, with grip, total weight in use: 93.13g, balance point: 288mm, shaft length: 215mm, stiffness: low.
Frame: octagonal aerodynamic frame, 72-hole string bed, grooves at 9-3 points.
String tension: 24 lbs recommended, strung at 23-24 lbs with NS660Ti.
The racket has its own style in appearance, not following the high-end model’s patterns. It’s rare for a higher-end low-end model to have a unique paint job. The symmetrical paint scheme, with rich color layers from silver gray, fluorescent green, white, navy blue, and back to white, along with an unpolished metal-like finish, makes it visually striking. The racket is almost at the mid-range threshold, evidenced by the nano tec below the T-joint. However, the unchanged 7.2mm shaft remains the same.
The feel of the racket in hand is surprisingly light, with a very low balance point. For beginners, it might be hard to tell if the 3U designation was changed to 4U. It can directly be used as a speed racket. The 72-hole string bed characteristics have been discussed in previous reviews, so I won’t repeat it. The racket is very user-friendly, with low swing weight, high swing speed, and a relatively soft shaft, making it easy to drive the shuttle. Many times, you can even achieve shaft deformation with just a gentle swing. The power feel is good, allowing easy access to a high hitting point and better accuracy on the sweet spot.
However, the softness of the shaft significantly affects its attacking power and consistency.
In practical use, the MX7600 shows its friendly side, quickly demonstrating its potential without a break-in period. In doubles play, it feels like hitting the gas pedal on an A0-level electric vehicle at high speed. The racket’s swing speed and agility quickly reveal their advantages, offering more room for play in doubles.
The quick preparation allows for direct smashes from the front, and the racket forms a frame quickly after each shot. However, due to the string state and shaft stiffness, the response speed isn’t fast enough, making it less effective in drives and blocks. This can be improved with better strings.
In the mid-court, the MX7600 seems to be more flexible and offers more options than just net play. It handles low or difficult shots with acceptable feel for flicks, cuts, and net returns. Perhaps the racket’s solid feel is just average, but its flexible design makes it convenient for performing fancy moves.
Moreover, for handling passive shots or receiving smashes, if the strings were more elastic, it would perform better. I believe its softness and lightness are advantageous in such situations.
Using the MX7600, it’s quite easy to help teammates gain opportunities for rear-court smashes. However, when it comes to taking on offensive responsibilities in the rear-court, the MX7600 feels too gentle. Despite the good power feel and easy access to high points, both sudden short power and powerful rotation will result in noticeable deceleration. Excluding string issues, the 7.2mm shaft is indeed inadequate and should be firmer. Consequently, while it can produce ideal smashes, it’s unlikely to deliver powerful and fast attacking shots. Fans of heavy smashes might want to avoid this racket. If there’s only consistency without threat, implementing various tactics becomes difficult, and sometimes a simple high clear might be better.
However, from the perspective of a beginner’s racket, there are no issues.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 7000 Reviews
This should be a low-end MX model that stands out among shorter players.
However, based on my inference from the MX260 review, the MX7000 is likely also a soft model. This is supported by information from the Zhongyu Equipment Library. The stiffness decreases from MX6000 to MX7000, similar to the change from MX80 to MX90. Additionally, low-end rackets rarely feature an 80-hole string bed. It’s not about the cost of adding more holes but rather that an 80-hole string bed requires higher demands on the frame’s structure and materials, making it better to use a 72-hole design.
Specifications:
Weight: 4U G5, no grip, total weight when in use: 85.30g, balance point: 313mm, 7.2mm shaft, shaft length: 220mm, stiffness: low.
Frame: octagonal aerodynamic frame, 72-hole string bed, grooves at 9-3 points.
String tension: 24 lbs recommended, strung at 24 lbs with Li Ning N9.
The color scheme is similar to the NR750 I mentioned earlier but is actually traced back to the blue, silver, and gray of the MX70. The two-tone gray and four-tone blue give the racket a centralized visual effect. The amount of stickers is considerable, the shaft is relatively plain, and there are no striking technological applications. It has the typical appearance style of a low-end racket. Compared to the previous Yu 09 I used, it’s much better, but the MX6000’s black base still makes me prefer it.
After removing the grip, the head-heavy feel of the racket is quite noticeable. The high balance point makes the swing weight slightly excessive for a 4U racket. Handling active shots at the handle position is not problematic, and the head-heavy feel allows you to generate noticeable shaft deformation and shot power when swinging the head. It’s a racket capable of producing powerful shots, but it does require a significant amount of physical exertion. After about 30 high clears, I started to feel soreness.
Therefore, I’ll directly address the racket’s attacking capabilities. Honestly, the MX7000’s smashing feel is outstanding among entry-level products. It delivers a robust and powerful hit, and with better strings, achieving a powerful smash is not too difficult.
However, its sacrificed consistency and endurance are quite noticeable, especially the former. The MX80 balances both drives and smashes well, whereas the MX7000, being two levels lower, uses high swing weight to achieve shot power, which affects the follow-up shots. Long preparation time, prolonged deceleration after swinging, and higher loads on the forearm and wrist make it uncomfortable in drives and blocks, and these shortcomings are amplified by the subpar strings. In the mid-court and front-court, its down-smashing becomes more coherent with improved swing speed.
The racket’s head and sweet spot areas are moderate, and the 72-hole string bed provides a stronger hold compared to the 80-hole version. Thus, the MX7000 offers better control over small shots and a good margin of error for rear-court lifts.
In passive situations, it relies more on personal skill. It’s not that the MX7000 needs exceptional power techniques; the shaft is actually quite friendly. The high swing weight remains a challenging aspect. In fast-paced rallies where you are stretched from side to side, you need core stability to handle both forehand diagonal drives and backhand clears. Relying only on your upper arm won’t suffice.
This racket has a head-heavy feel similar to the MX70, and it’s an older entry-level model with its own strengths and characteristics.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 90 Reviews
In 2014, the MX-90, as the successor to the MX-80, should have become the ultimate masterpiece. However, the MX-90’s popularity and recognition are vastly different from the MX-80’s, and even it couldn’t escape the fate of being overshadowed by the MX-80 like other high-end models in the MX series. However, unlike the other high-end models outside the MX80/90, the MX-90 still has a certain audience, and some of the older MX series players tend to prefer the MX-90.
As the highest-numbered model in this classic series, it may be a more balanced option.
Specifications:
Weight: 3U G5, no grip, total weight when in use: 89.7g, balance point: 295mm, 7.0mm shaft, shaft length: 215mm, stiffness: high.
Frame: octagonal aerodynamic frame, 80-hole string bed, grooves at 9-3 points.
String tension: 28 lbs recommended, strung at 25-27 lbs with KT66F.
Does anyone else, like me, look at some of the top products from the previous era and analyze their appearance, only to find that they lack some of the exquisite stickers, colors, and patterns compared to the new models? But they have a particular sense of power, and the MX-90 is no exception. Setting aside the imperfections due to age, the frame and shaft of the MX-90 have a thickness that exudes strength, providing a great sense of security. The color scheme uses a white base on the T-joint and head, with black or clear lacquer on the frame wings and cone, giving it a regal feel.
Looking through some data, the MX-90’s marked stiffness is indeed slightly lower than the MX-80N, but the head-heavy feel is more pronounced. Back then, this series was known for its solid feel, which I initially thought was due to the thick shaft. Then, I thought it was the inherent property of the 80-hole string bed. Later, I discovered a new clue—enhanced woven carbon fiber. This technology, which later became the reinforced multi-layer structure (FRS), was subsequently applied to some of Victor’s mid- to low-end models, greatly improving their high-tension durability. However, it also made those models’ faces feel more rigid, and to my surprise, this was the origin.
It’s worth noting that the MX-80’s shaft is 7.2mm, while the MX-90’s is 7.0mm.
The differences in frame shape and weight distribution result in a significantly different feel between the MX-90 and MX-80. First, the aerodynamic treatment on the MX-90 is not as sharp, and the frame thickness has increased, which reduces its swing speed compared to the MX-80. Secondly, the head-heavy setup makes the racket feel more solid and substantial. This brings about changes in the string bed performance, with the MX-90 having a stronger hold on the shuttle, making it more user-friendly for players who aren’t yet proficient in power generation. Additionally, the higher swing weight makes hitting long clears during warm-up smoother, as you can send the shuttle flying with ease, though this may negatively affect stamina during intense matches.
The shaft performance of the MX-90 also differs from that of the MX-80. With a thinner diameter, the shaft is more elastic, reducing the stiffness feedback and adding a bit of shaft recovery elasticity to the shots. The MX-90’s control ability has thus improved, with the added hold time providing more maneuverability during shots. Moreover, the head-heavy feel, similar to the MX-70, gave me confidence in the racket’s stability.
The feel in drives and blocks hasn’t weakened, as the MX-90 still offers excellent shot responsiveness and precise direction. However, the higher swing weight places greater demands on the user’s forearm and finger strength endurance. After a high-intensity doubles match, I noticed a bit of soreness in my forearm.
Judging from its feedback, I was very eager to test its attacking performance, and it didn’t disappoint. The actual effect needs no elaboration—its high potential was once affirmed by players like Gideon and Chou Tien-Chen. During powerful smashes, the racket provides an immensely satisfying experience for players with good power. In this area, the differences between the MX-80 and MX-90 become clearer. The MX-90, with its higher swing weight, offers a more intense downward pressure while reducing the difficulty of generating power, but its higher swing weight also makes follow-up shots less fluid compared to the domineering MX-80N.
Ultimately, Victor’s “X” represents a balanced design. From the earliest SupernanoX, to MeteorX, to HypernanoX, and now to ThrusterX, and even among all the X-suffix products in the series, they have intentionally pulled some of the more aggressive rackets toward the middle of the spectrum. The same applies to the MX-90. Compared to the MX-80, after this adjustment, it feels slightly more like an attacking racket.
I originally wanted to say that if I couldn’t get a good deal on the JJS, then the MX series would end here for me. But after reconsidering, I realized the MX80B is quite quirky as well, so let’s hold off on that for now.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 70 Reviews
Why doesn’t anyone use it? Why doesn’t anyone use it? Why doesn’t anyone use it?
It’s been a long time since I’ve felt this frustrated, but I really don’t understand the situation with this racket. In terms of strength, it’s no worse than the MX80, and in terms of fame, even Vietnam’s top player Nguyễn Tiến Minh has used it. As for its value for money… well, I’m not familiar with its pricing.
The MX70 doesn’t even have detailed reviews in the badminton equipment database, despite the MX80’s brilliance. It’s not as if the MX70 should be so overlooked, especially when even the MX30L gets more attention!
Specifications:
Weight: 3U G5, no grip, total weight when in use 94.5g, balance point 302mm, shaft thickness 7.2mm, shaft length 215mm, stiffness: high.
Frame: octagonal aerodynamic frame, 80-hole string bed, grooves at 9-3 points.
String tension: 28–30 lbs recommended, strung at 28–29 lbs with BG66U.
This is a silver sword… oops, I mean, this is a sharp, silver racket exuding a sense of purity and strength. Although the sample I have shows some wear with stickers peeling and paint chipping in multiple places, it’s clearly been through some tough battles, as seen from the handle and grommet condition. However, upon close inspection, there’s no damage to the carbon fiber frame. The thick frame and shaft give the MX70 a rugged, veteran look. The design carries on the high-end style of the peak series, with visually rich layers.
Speaking of which, this racket has a substantial feel. I’ve been testing it alongside the notoriously heavy 4U TK 75C (stay tuned for that review). Despite the slight weight advantage, the MX70’s heft is noticeably felt in the hand, with a very straightforward head-heavy feel. Oddly, though, its balance point and the feeling during swings don’t align with the perceived weight—it swings quite smoothly, perhaps because it’s set up more as a balanced racket, with a degree of flexibility.
With high string tension and the pairing with BG66U, I immediately felt the “right” connection during the first few long rallies of warm-up. The shaft is not particularly long, and the stiffness is slightly lower than the MX80N, but with a bit of power, you can feel the shaft flex. I wouldn’t say this racket is easy to handle; the stiffness and vibration alone will deter many. However, its core appeal, much like the solid feel of the thick shaft, is its stubborn yet captivating nature, making me enjoy using it.
Power overwhelms technique, and that’s the case with rackets too. Compared to today’s rackets that boast flexible 6.6-6.0mm shafts to create explosiveness, the MX70 reminds me more of the classic VT series from Yonex. It doesn’t offer that “boing-boing” elasticity, but with a stiffer frame, a harder shaft, and a higher balance point, it transmits energy with minimal loss when you fully engage your strength.
Indeed, the direct and raw power in smashes is where you need to handle it carefully. On one hand, the head-heavy balance and strong anti-torsion frame give excellent stability and confidence in smashes, drop shots, and drives. On the other hand, the stiffness and energy-draining setup mean players lacking strength or endurance will struggle by the end of a match. No wonder only the most relentless players use it.
Compared to the MX80N, the slight decrease in stiffness and the increased balance point provide more leverage, making it lean slightly towards a control-oriented playstyle, emphasizing long rallies and strategic maneuvering. As always, the 80-hole string bed delivers great feel, enhancing the solid sensation in net play like pushes, cuts, and drops. Since opponents still fear its power during attacking strokes, the stability of lifts also becomes a key advantage, making deceptive shots and net flicks feel threatening.
However, I tested it primarily in doubles, which presented some unique challenges. First off, I definitely wouldn’t recommend using the MX70 with beginners.
As I initially noticed, this racket is indeed not fast, but it still offers decent agility in quick exchanges. Due to the stiff shaft and string bed, shot response is very quick, allowing you to hit with force and control. The shaft requires almost no time to recover after flexing, making drives and flat shots remarkably stable.
When defending against smashes, the MX70 also excels in repelling powerful shots back to the baseline with ease. But because of the higher swing weight, it becomes more taxing when handling some defensive shots or when reaching for backhand shots, making them harder to execute cleanly. Moreover, the racket’s overall high load during play means it’s physically demanding to use for extended periods. After three hours of testing, my forearm muscles began to ache shortly after leaving the court.
Essentially, the MX70 feels like an adjusted version of the MX80, with a heavier head and a slightly more flexible shaft, making it easier to generate power when smashing. The adjustments give it a slightly steadier feeling in both attack and control, but it’s still incredibly satisfying to use. I’d recommend any fans of the MX80 to give the MX70 a try if they get the chance.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor METEOR X 80N Reviews
Previously, I had never touched the MX series from Victor, and there were several reasons why I didn’t actively explore it. First, it has a legendary reputation, especially the MX80, which remains a favorite among many advanced and serious badminton players. Even many prominent equipment bloggers still use it as their main racket. Second, there are numerous versions, and the subtle parameter adjustments between them can be overwhelming. I’ve lost count of how many times the MX80 has been re-released, with variations in new colors and “little wing” versions. Third, the original or first batch models still maintain a high price, and the premium pricing for high-end models in this series was steep to begin with. Let’s not even mention the player version JJS. Fourth, this is indeed a very old and classic series, and I tend to prioritize discontinued products less.
Some players may have noticed that I recently updated my review of the MX30L, and I think now is a good time to delve into the recast version of the MX80.
Specifications:
4U G5, with an overgrip, the total weight in playing condition is 94.9g, balance point is 286mm, 7.2mm stiff shaft, 210mm length, tuned for stiffness, octagonal aerodynamic frame, 80-hole string bed, 9-3 point grommets, string tension recommendation of 26-28 lbs, strung with 25-27 lbs Karakal 66F.
The MX80N is positioned as a racket for powerful players, and its platinum paint job immediately appeals to me, carrying a majestic and regal aura. After getting it in hand and examining it closely, I couldn’t help but make a meme-worthy face, thinking, “Nice!” From the shaft extending to the racket head, a large amount of gradient coloring has been applied. The base color transitions from a golden sheen to pure white, with the frame shifting to a transparent lacquer finish. Additionally, at the 2, 10, 4, and 8 o’clock positions, Victor deliberately exposes carbon fiber textures, bordered by a strip of purple, making the racket look both domineering and incredibly detailed. It’s a masterpiece that’s hard to put down.
This is definitely not a racket that gives you an instant feel right out of the box—there’s almost no “sweetness” to it. During my test session, my feel was quite off, and after warming up in an attempt to get my touch back and doing some rallies with my opponent, I quickly gave up. It’s stiff—very stiff. Even by today’s standards, it doesn’t feel any softer than the top-tier stiff rackets like the Jetspeed 10. As one of the older Victor rackets with the hardest cone caps, and with the difficulty of driving the 80-hole string bed (not easier than a small 76-hole frame), players who are new to this type of racket might feel like they’re hitting with a steel plate when they string it at their usual tension.
Yet, this is also an incredibly enticing racket because its shots are explosively powerful. In its current specification, the MX80N is actually a balanced racket, and its 286mm balance point gives it excellent power transfer. The 210mm stiff shaft presents high resistance when swinging, but also provides extremely direct feedback upon contact. Surprisingly, its handling of clears is smooth and effortless, and paired with the aerodynamic benefits of the octagonal frame, swinging feels almost frictionless, with a clear sense of power transfer. In terms of triggering that surge of adrenaline, the MX80N excels.
After a few warm-up games, I finally gained enough confidence to use the MX80N in actual play. And after just one game, the MX80N completely captivated me with its performance in high-intensity situations. Violent, exhilarating, and energy-draining—if I were to describe the sensation, it would be like an unrestrained, reckless pursuit of exhilaration, focusing solely on the pleasure of each shot.
The racket feels violent due to its raw power. Smashing from the rear court feels incredibly rewarding—it delivers both sound and impact with every strike, and MX80N never lets down its user if they put in the effort. What’s even more remarkable is that this isn’t a head-heavy racket, which is why some veteran players refer to it as Victor’s “wrist-breaking weapon.” It reminded me of Jung Jae Sung’s relentless bombardment from the backcourt.
It’s exhilarating because the MX80N combines high swing speed with agility. I originally thought only the Brave Sword frame could produce that air-piercing sound, but the MX series delivers something similar. The racket’s balance point is indeed low, and combined with its uniformly stiff build, the crispness of each shot is jaw-dropping, providing an exceptional experience in drives and blocks, as if it never loses in speed or fluidity. From a rear-court smash to a mid-court follow-up, the sensation is immensely satisfying.
As for the energy drain, it’s self-explanatory. The high power threshold and relatively weak shock absorption make the MX80N a demanding racket to use. The 80-hole string bed and ultra-stiff shaft become weapons when you’re on the offensive, but during defensive play, it’s a struggle. Players without the right technique can easily be forced into returning mid-court shots after a heavy push to their backhand. However, its defensive capabilities, especially when receiving smashes, benefit from the clear feedback of each shot, allowing for fast counters with a quick flick or block, often forcing opponents into a defensive posture.
For a racket with such a high skill ceiling, pairing it with stiff strings and combining the MX80’s stiff shaft, the shot accuracy is superb. Whether it’s clears, drives, or drops, the shuttle lands exactly where you expect it to, much like the traditional box-shaped frames of the Thruster series.
The MX series is positioned as an all-round attacking line, and the “N” suffix mostly represents new colorways. The 4U weight and moderate balance point give the MX80N a solid feel, without any hint of hollowness. In terms of feedback, the racket does feel a bit “wooden,” which seems to be a feature of this series or the 80-hole frame. Although this is only my second time trying the MX series, I’ve learned a lot about the octagonal frame and 80-hole string bed from other brands, and it’s a fantastic combination of stability, torsional resistance, and low wind resistance. I’m not sure if the new colorway has improved the manufacturing process, but I didn’t experience the rumored “wooden” feel as much with the MX80N—certainly less than the same-era TK models or the MX30L. By comparison, modern carbon shafts just feel more bouncy.
I have an overwhelming affection for it.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Victor MX80 Reviews
In recent years, Victor has launched many excellent rackets: the Thruster series, Black Gold Thruster, 100X, among others, all of which have gained immense popularity worldwide. Indeed, as technology advances, rackets have become better and better. Yet, there are still legendary rackets that, despite the passage of time and rigorous testing by countless players, remain unparalleled, standing tall amidst a world of cutting-edge equipment.
Without a doubt, the MX80 is such an ancient artifact from Victor. Its ultra-stiff shaft and octagonal sword frame destined it for greatness. This racket, used by Korea’s men’s doubles player Jung Jae Sung during the 2012 London Olympics, carved a path through fierce competition. Though they lost to Denmark in the semifinals, the racket’s brilliance remained untarnished by the defeat. Hearing the news of Jung Jae Sung’s passing in 2018 evoked a mixture of emotions, yet the image of his heroic figure at the Olympics still lingers in my mind.
In addition to men’s doubles, Korea’s top men’s singles player, Son Wan Ho, also wielded this racket during the 2012 Olympics. Although his journey ended at the hands of Denmark’s Peter Gade, the legacy of the MX80 continues.
With nostalgia and admiration for its strength, I decided to get one.
Strung with 28 lbs of yellow BG65 strings, the unique paint job was immediately to my liking. The carbon weave base, in a dark black tone, exudes a sense of depth and high-tech precision that is rarely seen on today’s rackets. Laser-etched gold, silver, and red blocks adorn the frame, shining brilliantly without appearing gaudy. Inside the frame, a large golden “X” sparkles, emitting an enchanting glow. The overall design resembles a bright star in the galaxy, commanding attention with its radiant allure.
Now, let’s talk about how it feels to play with.
It’s the best racket I’ve ever used—no exceptions (sorry, NF800P, you can retire now).
This is an ancient artifact that demands an incredibly high level of skill to unlock its full potential. A blazing star needs the intensity of the sun to truly shine. The 2011 model only comes in 2U and 3U. Upon first use, it feels slightly head-heavy, but the 3U weight feels as light as a 5U. How stiff is the shaft? Slightly stiffer than the Z-Speed, and noticeably stiffer than the 100ZZ. This is exactly why I wanted it (laughs).
After a few swings on the court, I immediately realized this racket was no joke. The extreme stiffness of the shaft requires significant effort to generate power, and the 7.2mm shaft lacks much elasticity—it gives back exactly what you put in. However, thanks to the shaft’s balance between stiffness and flexibility, the feedback is excellent, making the racket feel incredibly responsive. This also means that the racket has virtually no upper limit. But the entry barrier is high; it demands a lot from the player in terms of technique and physical ability.
While it’s positioned as a balanced racket, the MX80 is far from an ordinary balanced racket. The 28 lbs BG65 strings have just the right elasticity, and the slightly head-heavy balance helps generate power. The racket feels solid, making clears and drop shots effortless, with sharp and precise placement. In this aspect, I saw the traits of a balanced racket. The unique frame design reduces swing weight and increases swing speed, resulting in crisp, clean shots. The ultra-stiff shaft also provides excellent drive capability; a powerful cross-court drive can often catch opponents off guard, showcasing Victor’s expertise in speed rackets. To my surprise, its attacking performance was also remarkable. Quick smashes sliced through the air like lightning, and heavy smashes landed with the force of a meteor. Here, I saw the potential of a powerhouse attacking racket, comparable to the Thruster series or the 100ZZ. These multiple advantages, combined with its addictive feel, make it a joy to play with—the more you use it, the more invigorated you feel, without ever tiring.
Despite being such an amazing racket, encompassing all the strengths of different types, it never got to showcase its full potential at the Olympics. A real pity.
Years have passed, yet the MX80 continues to exude its charm, battling against the new generation of rackets while upholding the honor of its predecessors. This racket excels in both singles and doubles, truly deserving the title of ancient artifact and king of versatility. I hold it in great reverence, even though I only managed to get it from a second-hand market.
In the end,
What is the cost of becoming a legend?
Perhaps, that’s the MX80.
Finally, I hope the Chinese national badminton team will live up to expectations, fight hard, sweat, and bring home the championship!
September 12, 2024
VICTOR Partners with French Badminton Federation as Official Partner for 2025-2030
VICTOR and the French Badminton Federation have announced a six-year partnership, with VICTOR becoming the official partner of the French Badminton Federation and the French national badminton team in 2025. Starting in 2027, VICTOR will also sponsor the Super 750-level French Open, collaborating with the French Badminton Federation to create a high-level badminton platform.
VICTOR Becomes Official Partner of the French Badminton Federation for 2025-2030
Regarding the new partnership with VICTOR, Yohan Penel, President of the French Badminton Federation, stated, “We are thrilled to embark on this new and comprehensive partnership with VICTOR. We deeply appreciate VICTOR’s trust in French badminton. We share a common vision for the development of the sport, and I believe this will be a new chapter for both sides!”
VICTOR Chairman Chen Shuyuan also traveled to Paris last month to finalize the agreement and expressed his enthusiasm for the collaboration. “We are honored to become the official partner of the French Badminton Federation. With the growing popularity of badminton in Europe and the continued improvement of French badminton, we look forward to working closely with the French Badminton Federation to advance the development of European badminton.”
VICTOR Chairman Chen Shuyuan (left) and French Badminton Federation President Yohan Penel at the signing ceremony
As one of Europe’s strong teams, the French national badminton team will wear VICTOR-designed uniforms in team competitions, making its debut at the European Mixed Team Championships next February. From 2027 to 2030, the French Open will be sponsored by VICTOR and the company will serve as the official equipment partner, marking a new chapter in the tournament’s history.
September 12, 2024