Tag: VICTOR

威克多

Badminton Shoes Victor ACNYT Reviews
Today, we bring you a comprehensive review of the A-CNYT basketball shoes from the esteemed “Vitality of Tigers” series. Officially available in three stunning colorways – Flame Red, Fluorescent White, and Mysterious Black – each hue is adorned with touches of gold, silver, ink blue, and iridescent accents, elevating their visual appeal. Crafted with meticulous care and utilizing premium materials, these shoes offer remarkable value for their price tag hovering around four hundred yuan (discounted from the original five hundred). For this review, we’ve chosen the Flame Red variant, a vibrant shade symbolizing prosperity and vitality for the new year.
The A-CNYT boasts a shoe upper crafted from durable PU synthetic leather fused with double-layered breathable mesh fabric. A broad expanse of abrasion-resistant TPU film overlays the mesh, reinforcing the shoe’s support and containment while enhancing durability. The primary Flame Red hue is complemented by watercolor-inspired “Tiger” characters and faces gracing the toe and heel, exuding an air of regal grace. The silver PU accents on the midfoot catch the light from various angles, adding a dazzling touch to the overall design.
The outsole is crafted from VSR rubber featuring intricate tread patterns, ensuring optimal grip and durability. Matching the fiery passion of the upper, the sole is also bathed in a radiant red hue. A glimpse through the sole’s hollowed-out sections reveals the integrated nylon stability plate and shock-absorbing energy pad, attesting to its solid construction.
The interior of the shoe upper is lined with ample PU synthetic leather, its thickness reassuring and its smooth, resilient texture effective in mitigating wear and tear during lateral movements. The leather’s undulating patterns add both practicality and aesthetic appeal, a testament to the design’s attention to detail.
Ample ventilation holes dot the shoe’s sides, maintaining the shoe’s structural integrity while ensuring optimal airflow and moisture wicking, particularly beneficial for players prone to sweating. The thick padding around the ankle offers robust support and protection. Underfoot, the full-length ENERGYMAX 3.0 cushioning, coupled with elastic EVA material, delivers exceptional shock absorption and comfort. The LS-S mark signifies the inclusion of a lateral stability system, complemented by the expansive nylon stability plate, reinforcing lateral rigidity and stability.
In terms of weight, our 43-sized test unit clocks in at a featherweight 341 grams, mirroring the lightweight characteristics of the A-series, ensuring fatigue-free gameplay even during extended sessions.
Here’s a breakdown of our on-court performance experience, benchmarked against the S82 for comparison:
1. Fit & Containment: The A-CNYT fits snugly and comfortably, with natural foot-to-shoe contact. Movement is seamless, with excellent foot lockdown. The similarities in PU synthetic leather and mesh usage between the A-CNYT and S82 translate to comparable containment levels, resulting in an overall outstanding fit.
2. Traction: With a tread design mirroring the S82, the A-CNYT grips the court confidently, enabling fluid movements across various footwork patterns. Its traction prowess is on par with the S82.
3. Cushioning: Noticeable shock absorption and quick rebound characterize the A-CNYT’s sole, enhancing stride continuity. Though lacking the TPU reinforcement found in the S82, its lateral stability during side-to-side movements remains impressive. At 72kg, I observed no significant difference in cushioning performance between the two.
4. Torsional Rigidity: During high-intensity maneuvers, the A-CNYT’s nylon stability plate demonstrates satisfactory anti-torsion capabilities, albeit slightly inferior to the carbon fiber plate in the S82.
5. Durability: The thick PU coating and abrasion-resistant TPU film covering the shoe’s vital areas resist wear exceptionally well, outperforming the S82 in terms of overall durability, evidenced by minimal wear marks even after several games.
6. Ventilation: Although the TPU overlay on the mesh reduces ventilation compared to the S82, the A-CNYT still provides ample breathability, catering to players’ cooling needs effectively.
In conclusion, the A-CNYT from the “Vitality of Tigers” series seamlessly blends aesthetics and performance, empowering players to excel on the court. Its unbeatable price point, coupled with its remarkable design and capabilities, renders it an exceptionally high-value option.
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes Victor VG11 Reviews
The VG-11 by Victor showcases a seamless, dual-layer breathable mesh design with a subtle interplay of light blue and pure white hues. Despite its minimalist and refreshing aesthetic, VG-11 leaves no room for compromise in technological materials. Its upper abandons traditional sandwich mesh for a combination of double-layer mesh reinforced with hot-melt TPU, resulting in a cleaner and more sophisticated look.
Weighing in at 333g for a size 41 (265mm), the VG-11 falls within the category of lightweight shoes under 350g.
As the flagship model featuring built-in midsole technology, the magic lies within (with a bit of elbow grease, extraction is seamless, eliminating concerns about the stability of the midsole adhesion to the sole).
With the built-in midsole accounting for nearly one-fifth of the shoe’s total weight (70g out of 333g), it’s evident that no expense has been spared in material selection.
Arch Support and Control Design:
The VG-11 is designed to mimic the curvature of the human foot’s tripod arch system, with a raised mid-arch that provides both comfort and support, ensuring excellent start-up speed and stability. The inner arch employs a solid structure for added reinforcement, preventing collapse and reducing fatigue, while offering tighter support.
On-Foot Experience:
Sizing for the VG-11 aligns with Victor’s traditional badminton shoe sizes. Marked with a U-last of 2.5, 3E, the shoe’s toe area features hot-melt TPU, resulting in a more compact fit compared to Victor’s typical U-last shoes, akin to the snugness of V-last shoes. This makes it an ideal choice for those with Roman-shaped feet like mine.
Upon first wear, the VG-11 feels snug, likely due to the TPU reinforcement. While the shoe’s flexibility might not be as smooth as traditional sandwich mesh, it doesn’t hinder quick starts. The lightweight and breathable design ensures comfort and a cool feeling right out of the box.
One standout feature, noticeably distinct from other shoes, is the VG-11’s impeccable mid-arch support, making it especially friendly to players with low or flat arches.
If you find the built-in midsole slippery or not fitting your foot contours perfectly, Victor thoughtfully includes a pair of lightweight EVA insoles. By inserting these insoles and aligning them with the midsole before placing them in the shoe, you can achieve a perfect fit and significantly enhance grip. However, even without the insoles, the slip resistance is sufficient.
Performance Feedback:
As demonstrated in my unboxing video, the VG-11’s built-in midsole features 13 hollow diamonds arranged in five rows, enhancing its torsional rigidity. In actual play, the VG-11 exhibits high levels of torsional stability during normal bending and lateral support. Adding a carbon plate would undoubtedly be the icing on the cake.
Direct Ground Feedback:
Despite its seemingly thick midsole, the VG-11’s actual thickness measures 2cm at the heel’s outermost point and 1.5cm at the forefoot (outer edge 3.5cm, inner 2cm). This results in a direct and responsive forefoot feedback, providing an intense court feel and quick, powerful starts. The NEO DUPLEX structural framework elevates the VG-11’s shock absorption capabilities, preventing excessive vibration to the toes during heavy impacts.
Heel Rebound:
Retaining Victor’s signature dual-density midsole technology, the VG-11’s heel features a maximum height of 5cm with an actual thickness of 2.5cm (1cm thicker than the forefoot). The lightweight and elastic EVA acts as structural support, while the ENERGY MAX V cushioning system forms a dual-density shock absorption architecture. Upon landing, the VG-11 exhibits similar cushioning qualities to Victor’s P-series shoes, with a soft yet stable heel buffer that maintains posture stability, preventing postural shifts. Its performance is on par with the esteemed P9500. I can’t help but speculate that with its modular design, future advancements like supercritical nitrogen filling or E-TPU foam might also find their way into the VG-11.
A Note on Lateral Stability:
One area where the VG-11 could improve is in lateral stability. Incorporating either traditional “side claws” or the LSS lateral stability support system would significantly enhance its performance during lateral movements.
Selection Guidelines:
As my third experience with shoes featuring built-in midsole technology, the VG-11 showcases notable advancements in overall weight, craftsmanship, and aesthetics within the VG series. Its minimalist yet fashionable design caters to players who appreciate clean, sleek aesthetics. The mid-arch support stands out as a design highlight, while the intriguing inner workings make the VG-11 anything but ordinary. With its ample performance capabilities and fresh, innovative features, the VG-11’s modular design eliminates concerns about midsole material degradation, allowing for convenient midsole replacement.
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes VICTOR A930 Reviews
After much anticipation, the Victor-A930, equipped with e-tpu technology, has finally arrived, offering unparalleled cushioning comfort and protection while embracing the latest jacquard fabric. Its overall weight has been reduced to an impressive “S”-class benchmark, with a single shoe (size 41, 265mm) weighing a mere 320g.
Renowned for its consistency and innovation, Victor has once again exceeded expectations with the A930, solidifying its position as a top recommendation among e-tpu-powered shoes.
— Aesthetic Appreciation
As part of the comprehensive “A” series, the A930 visibly carries the lineage of its predecessor, the A922, with a sleek and elongated shoe body.
— Detailed Specifications
Taking the single left shoe (size 41, 265mm) as an example, the A930 tips the scales at an astonishing 320g, matching the weight of speed-focused models like the S82 and shaving off approximately 20g compared to the P9200II. This lightweight design is truly remarkable.
The fiery scarlet hue dominates the shoe, with a touch of solemn black at the heel, providing a reassuring foundation for explosive takeoffs. The vibrant color scheme coupled with jacquard technology elevates the shoe’s technological aura the moment you slip it on.
— On-Court Performance
From the first step, the A930 exudes the same stability that Victor is known for. The jacquard fabric facilitates smoother flexing, making the shoe feel almost like a second skin. The 2.5 standard width 3E V-shaped last ensures a compact yet comfortable fit, with additional padding on the tongue enhancing comfort for those with wider feet like mine.
However, those with slimmer ankles may find the shoe’s wide opening less snug, suggesting that the A930 caters better to players with more ankle “meat.”
— Forefoot Initiation
The A930, as a versatile shoe, performs similarly to the A950 and A960 in terms of initial burst. While not quite as nimble as speed-oriented S-series models, the A930’s slightly higher overall center of gravity due to its enhanced cushioning doesn’t hinder its responsiveness. With the wave-patterned non-slip insole, the A930 delivers a solid and decisive start. For those seeking ultimate court feel and lightning-fast cuts, the S-series might be a better fit.
— Heel Cushioning
The A930 marks Victor’s third shoe to feature E-TPU technology, alongside the P9200 and P9310. This innovative material, crafted from polyurethane particles, boasts exceptional rebound and shape recovery, outperforming traditional EVA. The heel cushioning feels like squeezing a soft marshmallow, with the featherweight elastic midsole providing just the right amount of restraint to prevent excessive bounce.
— Torsion Resistance & Anti-Rollover
The A930 incorporates the LS-S lateral claw system for enhanced lateral stability, complemented by a supportive TPU fused with the outer midsole layer and a carbon fiber bridge. The inclusion of a shoelace keeper and tongue strap ensures a secure fit, minimizing the risk of lace dragging during intense play.
— Recommendation
The Energy Max 3.0 and e-tpu combination, honed through the P9200II and 9200CC, finds its latest iteration in the A930. While both offer impressive performance, the A930 boasts lighter weight and snappier heel response, whereas the 9200CC excels in heel stability. For players who require ample cushioning upon landing, the A930 is highly recommended.
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes Victor P9600 Reviews
This is my new badminton shoe, Victor P9600. It’s the first wide-toe box and thick-soled badminton shoe in the stability series. Its forefoot thickness has increased by 60%, and the heel thickness by 6%. Coupled with full-sole E-TPU material, it enhances the overall shock absorption and stability. Hello everyone, I’m Little Star, and today we’re going to talk about this new Victor shoe with enhanced cushioning and thickened soles.
Appearance:
At first glance, this shoe appears to be pure white, but in fact, its tongue and inner mesh are light cyan, which has a stronger color texture and is deeply appealing to me. The side PU synthetic leather is cream-colored, while other parts are mainly white.
The three colors are very similar yet not exactly the same, giving the shoe a good overall look from a distance and a rich sense of layers when viewed closely. The silver trim and the passionate red heel make this shoe look stable yet lively. Additionally, the thick sole and the widened silver outsole design on the lateral side of the foot are very noticeable, both ensuring shock absorption and stability.
Weight:
The single 41-size P9600 weighs around 350 grams, similar to my P9200 II that I’ve worn for over a year. Despite the thicker sole, the weight has not increased, likely due to the extensive mesh design of the P9600.
Practical Experience:
1. Comfort: My feet are a bit wide, and I really love this shoe’s wide-toe box design because it’s very comfortable. First, the overall wrap of the shoe is strong, with a high fit between the sole of the foot and the upper. During movement, the sole of the foot is well fixed. The extended tongue and thick padding at the ankle provide an extra layer of protection for the ankle. Additionally, the feeling of the thickened sole is very noticeable, especially the enhanced support in the forefoot compared to previous models.
1. Functionality: Once on, the thick sole feels very solid yet not stiff. During running, the foot is securely wrapped in a comfortable position. The VSR rubber sole provides excellent grip, and the widened forefoot sole offers clear feedback when gripping the ground.
During jumping, thanks to the thickened sole, the shoe provides excellent shock absorption and quick rebound, without any hesitation, ensuring the continuity of movements. Moreover, the combination of the thick sole, high-performance EVA midsole, and carbon fiber plate enhances the shoe’s torsional rigidity, making it capable of handling various situations effortlessly.
1. Durability and Breathability: This shoe has large areas of wear-resistant PU material on the inner side of the upper, and the VSR rubber sole extends upwards to wrap around, so there’s no need to worry about its durability. As for breathability, the double-layer breathable mesh is naturally superior to full PU material.
Additionally, although P9600 is designed with a wide-toe box, it can also be worn by people with slimmer feet. I let a friend with the same shoe size but slimmer feet try it on, and he found it comfortable with good wrap, too. By adjusting the tightness of the laces, this shoe can accommodate different foot shapes to achieve satisfactory comfort.
In conclusion, P9600 is a badminton shoe with impressive looks and comprehensive performance. If you’re looking for a professional shoe with strong wrap and excellent shock absorption, this shoe is worth a try. That’s all for this video. Thank you for your support and encouragement. See you in the next one!
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes VICTOR P9500 Reviews
Introduction
When it comes to VICTOR’s most popular shoes in recent years, P9200 undoubtedly takes the crown. Its rational design and stable performance have kept it in the spotlight for four to five years, a remarkable feat in today’s equipment market. Even products launched during the same period or later have faded from public view, making P9200’s longevity all the more remarkable. In fact, many P9200 owners possess two or more pairs of these shoes.
Legacy of Previous Hits
Flashback five years, VICTOR also had a shoe that enjoyed similar popularity – the P8500. Its heatwave lasted until the retirement of Korean men’s doubles player Lee Yong-dae. Subsequently, VICTOR released the ultra-durable P8500ACE, followed by the comfort-enhanced P8510, which has garnered excellent reviews in the past two years.
Despite the P9210, an iteration of P9200, its failure to retain the eye-catching colored outsole and vibrant color schemes of the original meant it failed to resonate with the masses. In contrast, the newly released P9500 inherits all the strengths of P9200: the colorful outsole, striking color combinations, and exceptional heel wrap. Additionally, P9500 boasts significant improvements in arch support, lateral protection, heel cushioning, and overall comfort, surpassing even P8510 in the latter category.
Safety and Comfort Enhancements
In badminton, preventing ankle rollovers during landing and takeoff is crucial. Traditional methods like adding side claws (Eagle Claw) to the forefoot外侧 may improve safety but compromise comfort. P9500, however, adopts the LS-S technology, akin to a car’s bumper in VICTOR’s marketing language. This innovative design extends the midsole to wrap around the lateral side of the foot, complemented by a high-strength TPU plate to distribute concentrated stress. This solution enhances both lateral support and arch stability, allowing for minimal arch deformation even during flexing.
Impressive Package and Support
The wrapping sensation, lateral support, and comfort of the support areas in P9500 far surpass those of P8510, outclassing P9200 as well. Another highlight is its unique shoe collar design, featuring a bold “magenta + black + white logo” combination that adds a subtle touch of flair to the heel’s inner side.
Superior Heel Cushioning
While P9200’s heel cushioning is decent, it can feel overly firm at times. P9500, equipped with a fourth-generation energy pad and a wedge-shaped midsole, offers notably better heel cushioning, akin to having a built-in air cushion. This provides a plush feeling that overwhelms P9200’s cushioning.
Integration of Key Features
P9500 bears similarities to VICTOR’s all-rounder shoes, effectively blending stability, comfort, and versatility. The numerous vents on the upper not only keep feet cool but also enhance the shoe’s aesthetic appeal, making P9200 and P8510 look relatively dull and stuffy in comparison.
Improved Forefoot Cushioning
P9500 addresses P9200’s major shortcoming by significantly thickening the forefoot, specifically the lateral side. This results in swift starts with reduced soreness after prolonged play, albeit with a slight sensation of heaviness upon landing.
Integration of Latest Technologies
Upon closer inspection, P9500 seems to incorporate the best technologies from VICTOR’s recent shoes. Its outsole pattern is reminiscent of A960, heel cushioning mimics P8510 with added comfort, colorful outsole and overall stability echo P9200, while the high-strength arch design and heel contour are all-new.
Material Advances
The use of microfiber PU leather and a highly resilient PU coating on the forefoot’s medial side not only enhances durability but also outperforms once-popular KPU in terms of wear resistance and flexibility.
Potential Drawback: Color Schemes
The only discernible flaw in P9500 lies in its color schemes. The vibrant magenta and apple green hues, while eye-catching, may not appeal to more subdued individuals. The risk of such bold colors deterring potential customers should not be overlooked, and VICTOR could consider offering more subdued options in the future.
Note on Color Representation
Be mindful that the vivid colors of P9500 may appear distorted in photographs due to lighting conditions. It’s always best to inspect the shoes in person before making a purchase.
This translation seeks to maintain the original review’s tone, content, and structure while adapting it for an English-speaking audience
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes Victor P9210 Reviews
If you ask me what’s the most important equipment for playing badminton, it’s not the racket that ranks first, but a pair of professional badminton shoes. As a sport involving 360-degree foot movement, high-frequency stepping and landing, and intense jumping, badminton puts significant pressure on the ankles and knees. Thus, having a pair of badminton shoes with exceptional support and cushioning is particularly important.
As a loyal fan of V Brand, apart from trying out new rackets, trying new shoes is my second favorite activity. I believe that V Brand shoes are the only ones among the top three brands that excel in durability, performance, and comfort. Their flagship shoes range from 8500 to A920 (ACE) and my beloved S81. I’ve also tried models like P9100 and SH9000ACE. With my S81 about to retire, I got my hands on the newly released P9210 and have worn it for about a month, playing three games per week, each lasting 3-4 hours. Here’s my review to greet you all in advance for the new year.
First Impression
Upper – Soft on the outside, sturdy within
At first glance, over 50% of the P9210’s upper is made of mesh fabric, which is lighter and more breathable than the PU leather used in the previous P9200. It employs a double-layered reinforced mesh that deforms less during lateral stretching, providing stronger foot support during movements.
The outer side of the upper uses hot-melt technology to enhance the strength of the mesh, improving stability and support in areas prone to deformation during lateral movements and sudden stops. Coupled with the mature technology of the mesh fabric, the upper provides ample support despite its lightweight design.
Midsole – Already excellent in cushioning, it shines with rebound
The P9210’s midsole continues the segmented design for the forefoot and heel. The forefoot uses a harder, lightweight EVA material that provides a clear and quick rebound feedback during push-off. The heel employs a softer shock-absorbing EVA material for a softer feel, absorbing excess vibrations and reducing pressure on the ankles and knees.
Upgrades from the P9200 include replacing the EnergyMax3.0 in the heel with the more elastic EnergyMaxV material first introduced in the P9510, enhancing shock absorption during large strides while providing instant rebound.
The NEO DUPLEX heel with a dual-density midsole, which I’ve loved since the A920, is also present in the 9210. It combines ENERGYMAX V with the midsole at a 7-degree angle to balance energy absorption and stability support. It supports leg movements in line with the angle between the leg and the ground and provides shock protection for the outer heel during steps and landings.
Outsole – Every groove serves its purpose optimally
The P9210 retains the outsole pattern of the P9200, differing from the radial element pattern of the P8510 designed for weight reduction. The P9210’s outsole features extensive slip-resistant strips, with through-the-sole zigzag strips on the outer sole and slip-resistant strips on the inner heel, providing slip resistance during lateral movements. The lateral diagonal stripes on the inner sole work in conjunction with the multi-directional circular patterns for optimal grip.
The outsole of the P9210 clearly defines the slip-resistant function for each area, unlike the one-size-fits-all approach of the P8510. The only drawback is that it doesn’t adopt the colorful rubber outsole design of the 9200, which was visually appealing.
Second Assessment
Wrap
Thanks to the knitted fabric upper, the P9210 allows for slight deformation and better puffiness. Coupled with the V-shaped toe box that suits my foot shape, the overall wrap is very comfortable, especially in the forefoot area, where there’s no obvious sense of oppression or friction. However, during lateral movements, the shoe provides stable wrap without large-scale deformation.
Support
Despite the extensive use of mesh fabric, the P9210’s double-layered reinforcement and hot-melt coating technologies prevent severe deformation during lateral movements, sudden stops, and push-offs, providing even support for the feet. The ankle support plate also offers ample support for the ankle area.
Cushioning
As a P-series shoe, the P9210’s midsole is noticeably thicker after getting used to the thinner midsoles of A-series and S-series shoes. The soft and shock-absorbing heel provides a sinking and wrapping feeling when standing still. During gameplay, it demonstrates not only excellent shock absorption but also remarkable rebound after impact absorption. Whether during lunges or landings after jumps, you can feel the heel sinking into the sole, being wrapped, absorbing shock, and then rebounding.
Starting Ability
Poor starting ability has always been a common issue with stability-focused shoes like the P-series, as the added weight for improved stability and cushioning inevitably affects agility. However, the P9210 has made significant improvements in this aspect compared to other P-series shoes. The lightweight mesh upper reduces starting burden, while the angled midsole design and more elastic EnergyMaxV material provide a more fitting and powerful push-off feedback. Although it can’t match the swift starting of shoes like the S81/S80, for a stability-focused shoe, being average in speed is already the best performance.
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes Victor A950LTD Reviews
Recommending shoes has always been a “technical job” that requires ample wearing experience and a heartfelt approach tailored to different suitable groups of people.
Generally speaking, for badminton players who don’t overly demand heavy weight support or strong shock absorption, I personally believe that Victor’s shoes have a very low trial-and-error rate. The overall impression of Victor’s shoes for me is one word: “Stable”!
However, if you have certain requirements for shock absorption or feel that the traditional EVA feel has become boring, then the 9200 II equipped with E-TUP can be considered a top-tier newcomer among Victor’s recent shoes with good reviews and few negative comments. Although its appearance may not be as striking as the first generation, its performance is truly impressive!
But today, we’re talking about the A950LTD, a speed-oriented shoe that targets those with a moderate budget but high demands for aesthetics, falling into the mid-to-slightly-above-mid-tier category.
Strengths – Appearance
The A950LTD features a pure white color scheme as its main attraction, with the shoe tongue, laces, and inner lining adorned in a dynamic and festive Ferrari red. The gold-embossed model logo elevates the overall class of the shoe, making it a personal favorite of mine compared to others.
Thoughtful Shoe Last Design
Each pair of Victor badminton shoes clearly indicates the shoe last width with the letter “E,” and the shoe last taper with U/V. The larger the prefix number, the wider the shoe last. U indicates a rounder toe box, while V represents a more compact and snug fit with enhanced wrapping.
The A950LTD offers a similar on-foot feel to the A960 but with a more spacious shoe chamber distribution. Those with wider forefeet are advised to choose the 950WACE, the 4E wide-last version. The synthetic leather upper bends smoothly, making the transition period for new shoes negligible.
Its slender design makes the shoe appear more streamlined and less bulky when worn. The asymmetric upper design enhances the shoe’s fit to the foot, but those with high insteps should choose carefully.
Weight
The A950LTD weighs 310.5g per shoe in size 265mm. Both shoes’ weights fall below my personal threshold for lightweight shoes (≤350g per shoe in size 265mm), so the A950LTD meets the lightweight standard.
Outsole Pattern Design
The outsole pattern design continues the prototype pattern of the A960, paired with solid-color non-slip rubber, ensuring excellent grip performance.
LS-S Anti-Rollover Design
With a low center of gravity, the shoe excels in anti-skid ability. The midsole ingeniously incorporates high-strength TPU in an “embedded” form, while the LS-S lateral stability system, Victor’s signature technology, provides robust support and protection during high-speed lateral movements in badminton, effectively preventing side slips and ensuring safety.
ENERGYMAX3.0 + NEO DUPLEX Dual-Density Midsole
The heel cushioning feels soft, and the overall shock absorption is superior to the P9200, which focuses more on protection. The drop-cushioning rebound performance is outstanding. With a similar dual-density wedge midsole design (featuring Feather Elastic EVA + ENERGYMAX3.0), its cushioning performance is close to that of the A960, offering a light and springy feel with stable support without feeling soft. The shock absorption is impeccable and suitable for players of all weights.
Breathability
Due to the A950LTD’s predominantly synthetic design, its shoe surface extensibility and durability are indeed higher than the P9500 and on par with the P9200. However, the shoe’s breathability is noticeably inferior to the P9500. In hot summer months, I recommend having a pair of Victor’s speed-oriented S82 shoes as a backup.
Durability
Compared to the P9500, the A950LTD’s overall wear resistance is indeed better, on par with the P8510 and P9200. The V-Durable+ anti-abrasion patch enhances both the shoe’s stability and the durability of the toe cap. After wearing for a month, the wear is almost undetectable, except that the white shoe surface is not very dirt-resistant.
Conclusion
With its outstanding appearance, multiple width and color options, and reasonable pricing (below three figures, with discounts bringing it to the 400-500 price range), the A950LTD boasts impressive practical performance, winning the favor of many consumers. The fresh and vibrant LTD version is captivating like a splash of color. The asymmetric upper design enhances the shoe’s fit to the foot but requires careful consideration for those with high insteps. Additionally, with its low center of gravity enhancing flexibility, attention should also be paid to ankle protection.
Although positioned as an all-rounder, the A950LTD is no less speedy than certain competitors and excels in shock absorption and aesthetics. I believe the upcoming Star Wars Dark Vader colorway will create another wave of enthusiasm.
September 9, 2024
How to Choose Badminton Shuttles
1. Material Selection The material of a badminton shuttle directly affects its flight performance and durability. Common shuttle materials include goose feathers, duck feathers, and nylon:
- Goose Feather Shuttles: Offer the best flight performance but are more expensive. Ideal for those seeking a premium flight experience and have a higher budget.
- Duck Feather Shuttles: Provide good value for money and are suitable for most players. The flight stability of different types of duck feathers (e.g., single-sided, hunchback, small square, medium square, large square feathers) increases progressively.
- Nylon Shuttles: Suitable for varied indoor and outdoor environments and known for their durability.
2. Weight Selection The standard weight of a shuttle is between 4.74g and 5.50g. Different weights are suited for different players and match settings:
- Beginners or players with less strength may choose lighter shuttles for better control and technique development.
- Advanced players or those with more strength may prefer heavier shuttles for greater control and power.
3. Speed Selection Shuttle speed refers to how fast the shuttle flies, which is influenced by the player’s skill level, playing environment, and climate:
- In cooler, more humid conditions, shuttles tend to fly slower, so faster shuttles are recommended.
- In warmer, drier conditions, slower shuttles are suitable.
- Beginners can opt for medium-speed shuttles to gradually adapt to various playing conditions.
4. Durability Durability is a key measure of a shuttle’s quality. A good shuttle should maintain its flight performance and feel after multiple hits. You can evaluate durability by observing its appearance, feather arrangement, and elasticity.
5. Brand and Price Well-known brands like YONEX, VICTOR, and Lining are known for their quality and after-sales support but tend to be more expensive. Beginners can start with cost-effective brands, while advanced players may prefer high-end options. Price should align with your budget, but avoid compromising on quality for a lower price.
6. Practical Testing If possible, test the shuttle in a real game to evaluate its flight and feel. This helps you make a more informed decision on whether the shuttle meets your specific needs.
September 7, 2024
Badminton Shoes Victor P9200CC Reviews
First, in terms of color scheme, the 9200CC adopts Tai Tzu-ying’s signature colors: black, white, blue, and orange;
The sole pattern remains consistent with the 9200II, without any changes.
Modification 1: The tongue material is thicker compared to the 9200II, and a tongue stabilizer has been added;
Weight Comparison:
- 9200II, size 41 (265mm) weighs 343.5g per shoe
- 9200CC, size 41 (265mm) weighs 345.5g per shoe
  The additional 2g can be attributed to the thicker tongue sponge material and the added tongue stabilizer design in the 9200CC.
Modification 2: The breathable grille has been replaced with breathable holes/sandwich mesh;
Changes to the toe area
Changes to the inside of the shoe body
Changes to the outside of the shoe body for breathability

These modifications undoubtedly aim to enhance the shoe’s upper flexibility and overall strength, which Xiao Huang finds quite satisfactory.
The shoe last width is 2.5, and the 3E design remains unchanged, fitting well with people like Xiao Huang who have Greek-style feet.
September 7, 2024
Badminton Shoes Victor S82 II Reviews
Last year at the end of the year, I already wrote a review of the new colorway of the S82 generation. The S82 generation gave me an overall pretty good impression, with its lightweight, excellent wrap, and cushioning performance, all meeting my requirements. Shortly after, I learned that the S82 II version was coming out. To be honest, when I saw the spy photos of the S82 II, its more appealing design already piqued my interest. Over the following months, I eagerly anticipated its arrival
Arrival and First Impression:
Finally, in this hopeful spring, I received it. I remember that day I was still sleeping late when the deliveryman called to urge me to pick up the package. Realizing it was the much-anticipated S82 II, I, a nearly 30-year-old man, excitedly ran all the way to the post office like a child. I then rushed straight to the badminton court, and when I opened the outer packaging and lifted the shoebox, my lips couldn’t help but curl up, almost reaching my eyes. My first impression? Impressive! Very impressive!! Damn impressive!!! Victor’s designers finally got their aesthetics right. This is what beauty is! Beauty is justice! Beauty is right! I chose the bright white with a small silver trim, a refreshing colorway that I believe suits most people’s tastes. Additionally, the white with small orange trim colorway of the S82 II is also quite attractive, and I plan to buy another pair in that color. However, the bright blue upper colorway doesn’t appeal to me.
Appearance and Materials:
The bright white with small silver trim S82 II I chose has a clean and fresh main tone of bright white, complemented by touches of silver, making it less monotonous. The outsole’s main color is cyan, with a black carbon plate and an orange TPU piece next to it, adding a youthful and lively touch to the overall color scheme. Unlike the first generation, the material distribution of the S82 II’s upper is more reasonable. The upper features a large area of lightweight and breathable jacquard mesh cloth, while some specific areas prone to distortion during movement are reinforced with appropriate amounts of PU synthetic leather, ensuring support performance. It’s worth mentioning that the S82 II looks even better in person than in the product catalog or official images.
Weight:
I wear a size 39.5, and the weight of a single shoe is 288.5g, 1.2g lighter than the first-generation S82 I reviewed last time. So, from a weight perspective, this slight difference is negligible, and the second generation can be said to maintain the standard of the first generation.
Fit and Comfort:
Putting the shoes on, I was immediately impressed by their fit. The last shape of the S82 II is the same as that of the first generation, which I find to be standard. My feet are of a standard shape, and the internal space feels extremely comfortable and reasonable, with accurate sizing, eliminating concerns about being too large or too small. I must praise a significant advantage of the S82 series: its exceptional internal space. Many shoes I’ve worn in the past either had excellent wrap but cramped my toes or were comfortable for my toes but lacked wrap. The S82, both generations, perfectly addresses this issue. When worn normally, there’s just the right amount of space for my toes to move, without any oppressive feeling on my instep, yet it doesn’t feel loose during actual play. I emphasized this excellent feature in my review of the first-generation S82, and I’m delighted to see it retained in the second generation.
Performance in Actual Combat:
Wrap: The wrap of the S82 II maintains the standard of the first generation, especially around the ankles, where the material is just right, neither too thick nor too thin. During actual play, the wrap is flawless, with no instability even during sharp starts or changes of direction.
Upper Support: This aspect deserves special mention, as it’s often overlooked in reviews. Upper support is closely related to the leather material used. For example, the p9200 series features a large and thick leather upper, providing stable support and relieving pressure on the instep and arch during prolonged play. However, this comes at the cost of breathability and significantly increases the shoe’s weight. In terms of upper support, the S82 II is noticeably improved over the first generation. It uses the latest jacquard mesh cloth, which, compared to the double-layer breathable mesh of the first generation, feels more supportive. Additionally, the S82 II has leather reinforcement at crucial bending points, making the upper support of the first generation pale in comparison.
Torsional Rigidity: When it comes to torsional rigidity, many people immediately think of carbon plates or twisting the shoe like a rope. However, testing torsional rigidity requires actual play. Simply twisting the shoe cannot accurately determine its performance. Good torsional rigidity should provide sufficient support and protection within the deformation space of the sole during movement. The S82 II fully meets my requirements in this regard, remaining stable throughout several singles matches.
Outsole Cushioning: The outsole of the S82 II is significantly better than that of the first generation. Thanks to the ENERGYMAX V energy pad at the forefoot and heel, every push feels like stepping on clouds. However, the outsole of badminton shoes cannot be too soft, as it would compromise torsional rigidity and increase the risk of injury during intense play. The thickness and hardness of the S82 II’s outsole are just right, balancing between lightness, stability, and cushioning. Although not ultra-light, the S82 II excels in other areas often lacking in speed-oriented shoes: its sole is neither too hard nor too soft but quite bouncy. Its overall outsole performance ranks among the top three of all the shoes I’ve worn.
Grip: In recent years, some new shoe models from major brands have suffered from poor grip, leading to slipping. Grip is an essential aspect of my testing, and the S82 II performs just as well as the first generation, providing ample security during large strides and second starts.
Durability: Durability requires time to test. The S82 II’s toe cap is reinforced with a wear-resistant TPU film. After multiple singles matches, there are no noticeable wear marks despite friction from dragging. Moreover, dust sticks to the TPU film easily but can be wiped off effortlessly, which is more reliable than using leather directly on the toe cap, which can peel and attract dust that’s difficult to remove.
Suitable for: I believe the S82 II’s last shape suits most foot shapes and weights, making it less picky about foot types. It’s also suitable for players of various styles, from aggressive attackers to controlled players who rely on lifting and dropping shots, saving energy.
Conclusion: Compared to the first generation, the S82 II retains its strengths while optimizing areas for improvement. Positioned as a speed-oriented shoe, it strikes a balance between lightness and stability. In my opinion, the S82 II is faster when you need it to be and stable when you need stability. Whether you consider it a speed-oriented or a versatile, stable shoe, it’s hard to find fault. Personally, the S82 II excels in both appearance and performance, making it one of the most satisfying shoes I’ve worn in recent years.
Additional Thoughts on the White with Orange Trim Sock-Fit Version:
After wearing the white with silver trim version for a night, I immediately ordered the sock-fit version. Here are a few differences between the two colorways: At the same size, the sock-fit version feels more spacious inside, almost like it’s half a size larger. I find the wrap of the white with silver trim version superior. Additionally, the cushioning inside the toe cap of the sock-fit version is thinner, making the toes less comfortable compared to the white with silver trim version. These differences may be due to individual variation, but based on my experience, I recommend the white with silver trim version. Feel free to consider this when choosing your colorway.
September 7, 2024
How to Choose Badminton Equipment
The Paris Olympics have concluded, and the Chinese team achieved impressive results in badminton with 2 golds and 3 silvers. The excitement for the sport continues to be fueled beyond the hot Olympic courts.
However, recent months have seen a noticeable rise in badminton prices. Since the beginning of summer, many leading badminton brands have announced price increases, with some brands raising prices by 14-15 RMB per tube, marking a 20%-30% increase compared to last year. Some online users have humorously remarked that badminton has become a “financial product.”
Since early July, brands like Yonex, DHS, Lining, Li-Ning, Victor, and others have begun a new round of price hikes. Currently, the prices of major domestic badminton brands are generally 20%-30% higher than last year, with some models increasing by over 60%. The main reason for these frequent price adjustments is the surge in raw material costs. The key material for shuttlecocks, which is duck and goose feathers, has seen a decrease in supply due to reduced breeding volumes, leading to a tight supply of raw materials.
For badminton enthusiasts, who view shuttlecocks as consumables, choosing cost-effective options is crucial.
1. How to Choose Shuttlecocks
First, check the distribution of feathers. The feathers should be evenly arranged and not misaligned. Generally, the whiteness of the shuttlecock is not an absolute indicator of quality, as it does not affect the flight or durability of the shuttlecock.
Next, inspect for insect damage and holes. Insect-damaged feathers can break easily upon impact. Also, check the evenness of the glue. High-quality shuttlecocks pay attention to the uniformity of both the line glue (glue on the feathers’ base) and the base glue (glue where the feathers connect to the cork).
Speed is another crucial factor. Reputable manufacturers have standards for shuttlecock speed, typically marked on the top cover of the tube as 76, 77, 78, 79, or 1, 2, 3, 4. A lower number indicates slower speed, while a higher number indicates faster speed.
Generally, for high temperatures, high humidity, or high altitudes in summer, choose lighter shuttlecocks. In winter, with lower temperatures, dry climates, or lower altitudes, opt for heavier shuttlecocks.
2. Shuttlecock Maintenance
Many badminton enthusiasts choose to “steam” their shuttlecocks, a widely accepted method to improve durability. In particularly dry areas, feathers can become dry and brittle. Dry feathers are more prone to breakage upon impact due to their lack of resilience. Steaming can increase the moisture content of the shuttlecock, reducing breakage due to dryness. Steamed shuttlecocks have softer feathers that are less likely to split or break, with the effect being more pronounced in dry climates or colder winters.
September 7, 2024
Badminton Shoes VICTOR P9200III Reviews
Since its launch, the P9200 has undergone numerous color variations, maintaining a consistently high market sales figure and enduring the test of actual play. Even today, it remains a timeless classic. However, technology advances, and past glories eventually fade. The P9200II then arrived, ushering in a technological revolution in the shoe industry with its E-TPU technology. If you’ve yet to experience the intimate protection offered by the 9200 legacy on the court, today’s 9200 returns with “Built-in Midsole Technology, Reinvented”!
Built-in Midsole: The Modular Shoe Concept
Talking about built-in midsole shoes, do you, like me, feel a sense of familiarity mixed with unfamiliarity? Indeed, since the debut of the VG-10 leisure shoe and its subsequent iterations like the VG-1 worn by Indonesian doubles legend Hendra Setiawan, this technology has waxed and waned in popularity, never truly taking off.
The modular shoe design concept of built-in midsoles feels like a novel approach, but consumers seem skeptical. Nevertheless, it persists, even in international tournaments and amateur gyms, where I rarely see players wearing shoes with built-in midsoles from Victor. With the introduction of the 9200III, this technology has evolved through multiple generations.
Inner Power Parameters
From VG-11 to P9200III, spanning 2016-2023, we’ve seen advancements from feather-light EVA, lightweight EVA, high-elasticity EVA, and anti-slip materials to today’s E-TPU, supercritical nitrogen-infused foaming, and hyper EVA. The built-in midsole’s modularity, fit, and solidity are the hallmarks of the P9200III.
The reviewed shoe is a size 41, with an inner length of 265mm and a weight of 336.4g. The magic lies within, as the built-in midsole seamlessly integrates with the outsole, ensuring a sturdy connection. Removing the midsole reveals a weight of 61.3g, significantly lighter than the 80g VG-1 midsole I previously tested, thanks to the lighter hyper EVA technology.
Wearing Experience
Unlike traditional shoes, the P9200III with its built-in midsole offers a more compact and rigid interior. Despite a labeled width of 2.5 (3E), the forefoot feels spacious, and the smooth midsole provides less friction and adhesion than traditional wave-patterned insoles.
Victor thoughtfully includes a suede insole with double-sided adhesive to enhance friction, along with an instruction manual. This significantly improves the wearing experience.
Despite the futuristic built-in midsole concept and super-fiber upper, the overall feel is surprisingly traditional, with a rigid and straightforward on-and-off sensation. It’s a solid all-around shoe for intense play.
Key Wearing Sensations:
1. The unique wedge-shaped built-in midsole offers notable arch support from three directions, effectively alleviating arch fatigue and preventing plantar fasciitis.
2. Contrary to the soft and bouncy feel of traditional shoes, the P9200III’s rebound is firm and substantial, with a clear ground feel without being overly hard. The dense, colloidal-like “stability” may initially concern some about its landing response.
Lateral Support
Unlike the VG-10, the P9200III has a lower design center, facilitating lateral movements. Coupled with the embedded L-shaped lateral stability structure and outward-extending outsole edges, it ensures stability during wide movements.
While not as steady as the “Eagle Claw” lateral support of the P8500 II, the embedded L-shaped system in the P9200III is reassuring.
Quick and Responsive Start
The noticeable heel-to-toe drop in the P9200III creates a natural forward lean, enhancing the shoe’s overall responsiveness. The rigid midsole structure and solid ground feedback contribute to swift starts. However, the forward lean may be uncomfortable for certain foot shapes like Greek feet (long middle toes).
Modular Design Concept
Advanced concepts require sophisticated technology. From VG-1 to P9200III, Victor has gradually introduced E-TPU, supercritical nitrogen-infused foaming, and hyper EVA, marking significant progress in under three years.
Advantages of Modular Design:
1. Flexibility and adaptability to different needs and preferences.
2. Easy replacement of the midsole as it wears out.
Disadvantages:
1. A noticeably different wearing sensation from traditional shoes, requiring time to adjust. Even after experiencing Victor’s built-in midsole shoes like the VG-1, switching back can still feel odd.
Recommendation Summary
The P9200III, fusing the “built-in midsole” technology with Victor’s flagship IP, represents a balance between tradition and innovation. While modular design still has much room for improvement, particularly in incorporating E-TPU or supercritical technologies, the P9200III boasts impressive shock absorption, making it suitable for heavier players. It also delivers impressive start-up speed. Despite the novel wearing sensation that may take some getting used to, its overall performance in actual play highly recommends it for all players to try.
September 7, 2024