Tag: YONEX

尤尼克斯

Badminton Racket Yonex NANOSPEED 8000 Reviews
Emotionally, I don’t enjoy playing with discontinued or repaired rackets. However, there are always those gems that, despite enduring the ravages of time, still shine brightly and catch my eye.
The 17-year-old NS8000 is one such racket. I encountered it during a casual game with friends, and its restored condition made me appreciate it even more.
Specifications:
- Weight: 3UG5, without grip tape, single-layer overgrip
- Total Weight: Unknown
- Shaft Length: 210mm
- Stiffness: Officially rated as extra stiff, but slightly less in practice
- Frame: Aero box frame with fluid head transitions
- Stringing: 9–3 o’clock grooves, 27-28 lbs tension, strung with Aoshiwei 66 Fire Power
- Warranty: 24 lbs
Given its age, it carries a distinctly old-school aesthetic. The racket head features black wings with silver, yellow, and maroon accents, returning to black at the T-joint. The angular design of the cone cap also reveals its age. Compared to other rackets of the same era, like the NS9900/9000 and various limited-edition or remakes, the NS8000’s finish is much more subdued. My friend’s racket had some repairs at the 3/9 o’clock positions, and you can still see the traces in the paintwork.
Thanks to the restorer’s skills and the fortunate symmetry of the damage, the racket’s balance remained intact, with no noticeable issues when handling it. From today’s perspective, the aerodynamic design is quite conservative. As a speed-oriented doubles racket, the NS8000 only has a basic fluid frame and thin wing design on the head to reduce wind resistance. However, in 2005, materials weren’t as advanced as they are today, so it wasn’t feasible to use less material while maintaining enough strength to enhance swing speed. Despite all the rackets I’ve tried, the NS8000 still feels solid as a balanced 3U racket.
This definitely isn’t an easy racket to wield, and it remains so even today. While the higher weight of 3U or even 2U versions might give shots more momentum, the stiff shaft and relatively head-light balance demand more effort from the player. For advanced players, the NS8000’s performance in clears is decent, but for those with underdeveloped swing techniques, it may feel like they’re exerting effort without achieving enough height or distance. Personally, I find the racket’s elasticity to still be quite sufficient, though the feedback does feel a bit stiff—but not in a way that significantly impacts performance.
In doubles, where speed is crucial, there are two paths to increasing swing speed: reducing wind resistance or lightening the head. The NS8000’s design leans on the latter, which makes it a perfect weapon for flat drives. Shots come off quickly, and the racket is stiff enough to maintain good overall coherence when swinging. Despite being a 3U racket, it feels very nimble, allowing for aggressive play in fast-paced exchanges, where quick wrist movements and good racket positioning can really shine.
However, due to my lack of finesse at the net, I haven’t fully experienced the NS8000’s control potential. In its current setup, it feels a bit average for precise net play. When I can catch the shuttle high at the net, quick taps and pushes suit the racket’s character better than delicate control shots.
Though it’s an old doubles racket from 2005, its attacking power still impresses me. First, the direct feel throughout the test phase made the racket a joy to use, even with the slight stiffness. Second, the excellent torsional resistance ensured that shots were precise, landing where I intended. Third, the shaft’s elasticity still supports powerful smashes, and the aerodynamic design allows for a smooth downward stroke. Finally, its balanced setup allows for seamless play, particularly in situations where I need to take the initiative, pressuring the opponent with rear-court smashes to create scoring opportunities. The NS8000 can even handle front-court duties, holding its own as the front player in doubles.
In defense, the NS8000 benefits from a large face and sweet spot, offering good forgiveness. However, just getting the shuttle back isn’t enough to win a rally. Under continuous attack, the stiff shaft demands quick reactions and effective power generation to escape difficult situations.
While I view the NS8000 through the lens of its era and praise its resurgence after being restored, looking back at my own description, it’s fair to say that it’s essentially a “powered-up” NS9000. After all, times have changed.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex NANOSPEED 9900 Reviews
This ancient “divine weapon” has been praised by many of my senior, experienced badminton friends. Even on BadmintonCN, I often see this 15-year-old racket being mentioned and celebrated by dedicated players.
I, however, don’t hold that kind of sentimental attachment, which puts me in a bit of a dilemma. Material progress is inevitable as part of human development, and entropy always increases. Can this ancient “weapon” still hold its own against the tide of new advancements? I have my doubts.
Specifications:
- Weight: 3U G4, without grip tape
- Total Weight in Use: 89.82g
- Balance Point: 295mm
- Shaft Length: 210mm
- Stiffness: High
- Frame Type: Aero box frame
- Stringing: 76 holes, 9–3 o’clock grooves
- Warranty: 24 lbs
- String: Strung at 24-26 lbs with XB63
Honestly, when it comes to aesthetics, I feel that Yonex’s design capabilities have regressed a bit. At least, the original version of the NS9900 I have is quite good-looking, with a sense of understated luxury. The black base paint, copper-red stickers, and large decorations on the sides of the frame convey a sense of speed without being flashy. The use of advanced materials and technology is showcased subtly, with a perfect balance. I can’t pinpoint why the NS9900 looks good to me, but it simply does. In contrast, newer models like the Arc11 Pro don’t appeal to me visually, and I can easily say why.
Regarding materials, the NS9900 employed fullerene, which was relatively new at the time, aimed at improving racket elasticity.
The NS9900 is a deceptively light 3U racket, feeling very nimble. As one of the kings of speed rackets back in the day, any lighter and it might not have been usable. When the impact of materials on racket performance wasn’t as pronounced, weight distribution played a key role in enhancing the feel. For the NS9900, this distribution makes it very enjoyable to wield. While some players felt it was challenging to generate power, I didn’t find this challenge too noticeable, especially during warm-up clears, where the racket felt normal. Despite the low swing weight, which made borrowing power less obvious, the racket felt comfortable to use, and the large sweet spot made it forgiving—overall, not difficult to get used to.
Even though the racket was famously stiff back then, by today’s standards—where many have encountered even stiffer rackets—it’s not as daunting.
However, just because a racket is easy to use doesn’t mean it’s easy to master. After adapting to its swing speed and stiffness, the lack of head weight leads to a lighter feeling when applying downward pressure, which takes time to adjust to. Although the 3U version, with its stiff shaft, doesn’t feel too light in the rear court, there can be a lack of confidence during smashes. First, the shots may lack weight, and while concentrated effort can produce powerful, penetrating shots, I often find myself wishing it was a more demanding racket. Secondly, once the string tension drops, the racket’s large sweet spot exacerbates the “trampoline effect,” reducing the responsiveness and power of the string bed significantly.
That said, the NS9900’s shaft still holds its own even today, with decent power transmission efficiency and the “resilience” often mentioned by senior players.
When compared to today’s speed rackets, the NS9900 doesn’t feel much different in terms of its tuning. It has a relatively short, stiff shaft and low swing weight, making it very fast and maneuverable in mid- and front-court exchanges. It excels in quick drives and blocks, where you can adjust the power and angle on the fly. Playing fast against fast works well, and a soft touch can disrupt your opponent’s rhythm effectively.
I particularly enjoy using the NS9900 for defending smashes. Whether lifting to the backcourt or countering with a cross-court drive, it feels precise. Unfortunately, after a few rallies, opponents stop smashing at me.
Additionally, the NS9900 performs well at the net, making it excellent for intercepting and cutting off returns. In this sense, it aligns with how many describe today’s ultra-light rackets as “windshield wipers.” However, given its price and specs, calling it a “luxury wiper” might be more appropriate.
The racket can also handle delicate net shots, such as drops or cross-court net shots. Even without a heavy head, the large face helps ensure a good return quality by making it easier to connect with the shuttle.
Finally, regarding handling under pressure, my personal experience has been quite positive. Its light weight, fast swing speed, and large sweet spot make it forgiving. Initially, I had concerns about its elasticity when dealing with backhand lifts or defensive shots, but with more use, I was able to hit quality returns. Thanks to its speed, it rarely puts me in overly passive situations. That said, this isn’t a racket where you can just casually flick a backhand and send the shuttle deep into the opponent’s court—the power you generate still determines its performance ceiling.
The honest truth is, while the NS9900 had a great feel back in the day, it doesn’t have a clear performance advantage over today’s rackets. I don’t doubt that some players may still prefer its unique feel and perform well with it, but there are plenty of equally excellent rackets in this category today. If you like it, use it—no need for too many reasons.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex CARBONEX 8000N Reviews
As soon as I see the Carbonex series, it feels like paying homage to an ancestor. This series is one of the oldest in the Green Factory’s history, and for that matter, in the entire badminton manufacturing world—it was around before I was even born. However, according to a friend, the series has continued to produce mid-to-low-end models, and indeed, the official YY website still lists some of the rackets in this series. The models still in production retain clear signs of their era—like the oval head frame.
So, thanks to my friend for lending me a racket, it’s time to take a trip back in time.
Specifications:
- Weight: 3U G5, without grip tape
- Total Weight in Use: 95.0g
- Balance Point: 286mm
- Shaft Length: 205mm
- Flexibility: Low
- Frame Type: Box-shaped
- Stringing: 72 holes, 9–3 o’clock grooves
- Warranty: 20 lbs
- String: Strung at 25–27 lbs with Babolat iFeel 70
The 8000N, produced in Taiwan, has a classic look with a red, white, and black color scheme, a design echoed in many other rackets. Even though it’s an oval head, the racket face is large, which instantly reminds me of the Kason TSF86ti. The frame is quite thick, giving a solid and sturdy appearance, so despite the 20-lb warranty limit, I still strung it at 25–27 lbs.
The racket has a moderate weight and is balanced, making it a reliable choice for doubles play. The shaft is not very stiff, but it’s relatively thick, and its elasticity is vastly different from the performance you’d feel in most high-end Yonex rackets. The feel is much more dependent on the characteristics of the string.
The string has good elasticity and explosiveness, making the 8000N feel comfortable and responsive when hitting. You can rely on the string to generate a good amount of deformation and power. However, the oversized head somewhat detracts from the concentrated power typically felt in oval frames. It’s easy to use, but it lacks distinctiveness.
The 3U version has consistent shot direction without much drift, offering good control for clears and rallies. The lower power threshold makes it comfortable for control shots, but in drives, it lacks some speed at the tail end. The racket’s downward pressure is noticeable, but as mentioned earlier, it depends more on the string bed’s performance to maintain the power in smashes. This racket seems designed to help players feel the process of generating power and executing shots smoothly, rather than achieving instant knockout power.
While the balanced specs make it comfortable to use, and there are no significant flaws in feedback, it falls short when it comes to fast-paced exchanges.
Shots tend to feel soft, and the shuttle lingers on the string bed for a noticeable time. The shaft lacks snap, making shots feel slightly sticky. Additionally, the 3U box frame only delivers adequate swing speed, but not enough sharpness. During fast exchanges, it’s easy to struggle when trying to block or drive. Defensive shots, such as returning smashes or handling heavy attacks, feel average, and when attempting to counterattack with cross-court returns, there’s a tendency to lose power, causing shots to fall short.
On the plus side, the racket performs well when using backhand drives and shots, making it comfortable when covering for a teammate’s gaps.
Overall, there isn’t much more to say about this racket—it would probably receive a score in the low 60s in an equipment review. It’s usable, but not particularly outstanding—price unknown.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Lining N90 II vs YONEX AT700 Reviews
Li-Ning, although a newcomer in the badminton world, has shown impressive performance, catching up fast. It boasts a full range of badminton products, sponsors teams like the Chinese national team and several others, and has a group of endorsing players.
YONEX, on the other hand, is an established giant in the field, consistently making solid moves and holding a significant position in the industry. These two major brands have recently been making headlines in the media, drawing plenty of attention.
As a badminton enthusiast, I have used multiple racket brands, with GOSEN and YY being the most frequent choices. I’ve been using YY’s AT700 and 900P for some time, and the power of the AT700 left a lasting impression on me. Recently, I got my hands on the Li-Ning N90II, and here’s a comparison with the YY AT700 for fellow players’ reference.
1. Appearance and Technical Specifications
1. Li-Ning N90II
- Model: AYPE016-1000, MP Force Series, Colors: Red, Gold.
- Dry Racket Weight: 87.9g; Balance Point: 305mm.
- Grip Size: S2; Weight: W3. Shaft Stiffness (Flexibility): Medium.
- String: YY95 (Gray), strung manually, machine-tensioned to 28 lbs (mains 27, crosses 29) with YY’s 4-point method. This was the first stringing for this racket.
- Grip: YY102 (Yellow), after removing the plastic wrap but keeping the original grip, the total weight is approximately 96.5g, with a balance point of 304mm.
- Dimensions: Grip length (including cone section): 200mm.
  Shaft Diameter: At the cone: 7.16mm; at the mid-section: 7.2mm; 5cm above the T-joint: 7.18mm.
  Frame Dimensions:
- At the T-joint: Width: 11.56mm.
- At the 3 o’clock position: Width: 11.5mm, Thickness: 6.5mm.
- At the 12 o’clock position: Width: 11.14mm, Thickness: 6.68mm.
- Technology:
1. Inner cone control.
2. High composite density damping system.
3. Multi-point composite carbon fiber reinforcement.
4. Wing constant system.
5. Frame mechanics optimization system.
6. Aerodynamic frame section system.
7. Superconducting nanotechnology.
8. Ultra-fine high-strength biomimetic shaft.
9. Elastic torsional recovery.
10. Frame compression structure.
The official website lists Lin Dan as the player using this racket. Compared to the first generation N90, the second generation adds the inner cone control technology, while the other technologies remain the same.
2. YONEX AT700 (New Version)
- Model: YY AT series, Color: Bright Red.
- Dry Racket Weight: Approximately 89.1g; Balance Point: 306mm.
- Grip Size: G4; Weight: 3U. Shaft Stiffness (Flexibility): Stiffer.
- String: YY95 (Gray), strung manually, machine-tensioned to 28 lbs (mains 27, crosses 29). This was the second stringing, the first time was at 26 lbs.
- Grip: YY102 (White), after removing the plastic wrap but keeping the original grip, the total weight is approximately 97.6g, with a balance point of 306mm.
- Dimensions: Grip length (including cone section): over 200mm.
  Shaft Diameter: At the cone: 7.13mm; at the mid-section: 7.26mm; 5cm above the T-joint: 7.16mm.
  Frame Dimensions:
- At the T-joint: Width: 11.38mm.
- At the 3 o’clock position: Width: 11.58mm, Thickness: 6.6mm.
- At the 12 o’clock position: Width: 11.38mm, Thickness: 6.32mm.
- Technology:
1. Titanium Armor System.
2. Square Head Shape.
3. Built-in T-Joint.
4. Nickel-Titanium Alloy.
5. Low Air Resistance Cone Cap.
6. Ultra-high Elastic Carbon Fiber.
7. Film Titanium Armor.
2. Experience
Clear Shots
Both rackets make it easy to hit clear shots, but the AT700 feels slightly more effortless. Despite the similar weight and balance point after applying the same string and grip, the AT700’s head-heaviness is more noticeable when hitting clears. When swinging both rackets, the AT700 feels heavier on the wrist compared to the N90II. According to records from EWEI Sports Forum, the swing weight (SW) of the JP version of the AT700 is around 90 kg/cm². Although I couldn’t find the SW value for the N90II, my personal feeling is that it’s lighter than the AT700.
Drive Shots
Both rackets can easily produce accurate drive shots, but there is a slight difference in feel due to the N90II’s shaft being softer than that of the AT700. The N90II seems more balanced, while the AT700 feels faster.
Flat Drives and Blocks
The N90II is quick to swing and can easily change the racket face to hit the desired direction, whereas the AT700 is slightly slower in this regard. However, the AT700 shows exceptional power in flat exchanges when hitting the shuttle.
Net Shots
Both rackets perform well in net kills and intercepting at the net, feeling very light and agile. When actively playing tight net shots or cross net shots, the N90II provides slightly better touch and control compared to the AT700.
Drop Shots
The N90II performs tight and controlled drop shots close to the net, offering a good sense of control, while the AT700 falls a bit short in this area.
Smashes
In terms of smashes, the AT700 clearly outperforms the N90II. The power transmission is seamless, delivering a solid feel with minimal energy loss. Smashes are sharp, which could be due to the stiffer shaft and titanium armor technology of the AT700. On the other hand, while the N90II’s head and shaft offer good consistency, there’s a slight delay in power delivery when smashing. This lag is something I’ve also noticed when using GOSEN’s Platinum Limited Edition and the AT900P during smashes.
3. Summary
The N90II’s craftsmanship is highly detailed, with excellent paint quality. The combination of red, gold, and white offers a balanced color scheme, exuding a certain elegance. There are no visible flaws in the appearance, and it comes with a bag that can hold three rackets, which is practical for casual play. It even includes a small bag of spare grommets, showcasing thoughtful packaging. After some use, I haven’t noticed any paint chipping or cracks, though further inspection is needed for any minor bumps. For such a short time, Li-Ning’s racket design and build quality have reached an impressive level, worthy of praise.
The AT700 also has a unique appearance with its red, black, and gray color scheme, which is quite attractive and well-coordinated. Among YY rackets, this one stands out for its beautiful paintwork. However, after some minor clashes during doubles play, the paint seems slightly more fragile, with a few small areas showing signs of chipping. The AT700 has gone through four different batches (including a limited edition, as detailed in related forums), and this new version appears to be the final one, as it no longer appears in YY’s catalog for this year.
I strung the N90II at 28 lbs for the first time, slightly below the recommended tension. This was similar to my experience with GOSEN rackets, where I don’t exceed the recommended tension, but it reaches the desired tension on the first stringing. With YY rackets, I also tend to stay below 25 lbs to avoid voiding the warranty. The frequent reports of frame sinking make me a bit concerned. After stringing both rackets at 28 lbs, there was minimal frame deformation in either racket, with both showing similar deformation levels: approximately 3mm horizontally and 2mm vertically.
In conclusion, there’s a significant difference between these two rackets. The N90II is easier to handle, while the AT700 requires more explosive power.
Each racket, whether used for the first time or by different players, provides a unique experience. Every racket has its own personality, and perhaps that’s the charm of top-tier rackets. It’s also part of the beauty of badminton, as the ever-changing sensations of playing can become quite mesmerizing and addictive.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex NANORAY D1 Reviews
The reason why this lower-end racket can be considered worthwhile is mainly due to the fact that it can be obtained for free. Although many might find it less enjoyable to play with compared to a low-end black racket, this NR series lower-end model caught my eye not only because of its appearance but also because, after some research, it seems that YY has invested some marketing and manufacturing effort into this racket. After all, it’s still available in many physical stores, and it appears that the mainland factory is still producing its successor model, the NR8. Moreover, this racket is available in various colors.
Additionally, many players have messaged me asking about the performance of specific models. If you are interested in a racket’s performance, I recommend searching for reviews and discussions in the equipment section of forums, and checking the ratings in equipment databases. As I play casually and do not have access to equipment, it is unlikely I can provide reviews for various popular models without being provided the gear. Therefore, it’s a matter of chance.
Specifications: 3UG5, without cap, fully equipped balance point 298mm, 210mm long shaft, soft adjustment, fluid box-shaped frame, 22lbs unknown string, 24-pound warranty.
The appearance is quite nice. The sakura pink with white to gray gradient gives it a youthful feel. The text on the shaft follows the NR series style, and the racket looks clean and straightforward due to minimal use of technology. However, if any enthusiastic readers could educate me on the signature technologies of the NR series, I’d appreciate it.
As an NR series racket, the D1’s empty swing doesn’t match its speed. The 3U balance is head-heavy, and in hand, it neither feels light nor delivers the sharp speed of a wind-breaking frame. Nevertheless, it feels solid. The slight head-heaviness provides a sense of weight, unlike the plastic feel of some low-end black rackets and some similarly priced Victor and Kason models. Perhaps this is related to the hot-blowing tube technology? If so, the racket should have decent hardness. I’ve seen players with considerable power using this racket in doubles without any damage to it.
The string doesn’t have identifiable markings, and according to a player’s report, this racket was bought with strings in a physical store, probably some type of training string. The feel is around 22 pounds and hasn’t been changed for 3 years, making it quite soft. The shaft is also soft, though slightly firmer than the softest levels of Victor and Kason. During warm-ups and high clear shots, it provides excellent feedback and some feel of shaft elasticity. Unfortunately, due to the poor string, the remaining elasticity is minimal, resulting in a relatively weak performance.
The sweet spot of this racket is quite good, with a large, regular area that is easy to adapt to, embodying the NR series’ characteristics. The box-shaped frame also offers good torsional resistance, with a reasonable directional accuracy. Even with the current string state, it can perform well at the net and handle soft shots effectively. Unfortunately, during mixed doubles, I had few chances to play at the net, so I couldn’t fully assess its error tolerance for small net shots. However, I believe that with new, medium-hard control strings, this racket could be a good entry-level option for net play.
Of course, in mixed doubles, especially when paired with less experienced partners, even if the string condition is not ideal, I had to play the heavy hitter role. The quality of heavy smashes is indeed lacking, with the 24-pound warranty and the soft, less elastic shaft limiting its offensive capabilities. Interestingly, the smashing feel of this racket is smooth, and to me, it feels more comfortable than the previous AX99 Tour LCW, without any unpleasant wooden or vibrating feedback. It’s good for smashing and consistent, and as a 3U racket, hitting 5–6 consecutive smashes doesn’t leave me struggling, providing a bit of the NR900’s shadow.
Flat drives are average, with the long, soft shaft recovering slowly, and the string not producing enough power. In doubles, especially when only I am handling flat drives without my partner’s help, it can be quite challenging. It’s not about wrist strain or slow swing speed, but simply because of the lack of power, including many passive returns hitting the net. It deserves better strings.
The combination of low-end YY, physical store, and pre-strung features in this racket was quite surprising. As an old-model training racket from YY, aside from the shaft quality, the NRD1 provides normal handling and lacks major issues, with a gentle character. While it may not be outstanding, the fact that there is a competitive Yonex product at this price point was unexpected.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex NANORAY ISP Reviews
Originally, I intended to write about other rackets first, as I’ve recently used several others and have fresh impressions of them. However, upon reflection, I realized I still have 5–7 reviews to finish for borrowed rackets, so I must complete those first.
Unfortunately, as a sugar-coated version of the ZSP, the ISP didn’t leave a deep impression on me during the trial period due to its performance and handling. It’s no surprise that I had to put in some effort while organizing this piece. It’s not the racket’s fault; it’s just that I’ve experienced more extreme versions and have developed a taste for the best.
Specifications: 3UG5, without cap, total weight in use 92.6g, balance point 296mm, shaft length 220mm, medium-hard adjustment, fluid box-shaped small frame, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, warranty 24 pounds, stringing 25–27lbs XB63.
Clearly, this is a youth version of the ZSP, with its appearance and name strongly confirming this view. The ISP, like the old ZSP, uses a red and black color scheme. Except for differences in technological applications and frame pattern details, it’s hard to distinguish the two from a distance. Of course, the missing details make the ISP less impressive and a bit cheaper-looking compared to the ZSP.
However, learning about the technology and downgrades in the ISP helped me reevaluate the ZSP. The visible differences are mainly two and are concentrated in the frame. First, the three horizontal line tubes in the ISP are positioned closer to the center of the frame compared to the ZSP, resulting in a slightly lower density in the upper third of the sweet spot, though the sweet spot area may be larger. Second, the SBZ in the middle of the frame does not use EX-HMG material. The role of SBZ, according to the official website, is to narrow the frame and create a bending point to utilize the elasticity after the frame folds during impact. This second point is particularly eye-opening, as I realized the ZSP/ISP frame indeed has an inward curve at the 9 and 3 o’clock positions.
When I first used the ISP, I had not tried the old-colored ZSP, so I immediately noticed that the new-colored ZSP felt like a relatively light and balanced racket. With a low balance point, its swing speed meets the standard for a speed racket, offering good agility while maintaining a solid feel. During warm-up, I also felt that the ISP had better affinity. As a small-frame racket, it doesn’t require much power, due to its softer adjustment. This softness applies not only to the shaft but also to the frame, as evidenced by the material and warranty poundage. A friend who strings rackets warned me not to use too high tension on this racket, as the ISP frame is relatively soft and high tension poses a greater risk.
Thus, the ISP is currently the most user-friendly small-frame racket I’ve experienced from Y brand, with the lowest barrier to use. For players who have learned the correct swinging technique, handling active shots with the ISP is quite straightforward.
In my view, the reduced barrier also lessens the small-frame racket’s responsive feel. The softer adjustment leads to an unexpected lack of power during aggressive smashes. Despite the good elasticity of the shaft and high string bed tension, the feedback isn’t as excellent as the ZSP/DZS/ZF2. The impact feels somewhat dull, as if an extra layer of gauze is added during power transfer, lacking the clarity of top-tier rackets. This reduces my confidence in powerful and precise shots during doubles backcourt play.
However, as a good product of the NR series, the 3U ISP still delivers excellent consistent offensive performance due to its high swing speed and low swing weight.
Generally, enhanced handling improves control at the net, but the ISP doesn’t have an advantage over the ZSP in rear court or net shots. Compared to the significant drop in tolerance due to the smaller frame, adjustments to the string bed’s sweet spot size only alleviate secondary issues.
About a year ago, this racket was priced at 499. At this price, it’s a cost-effective choice for a mid-range racket with a good shaft, flagship characteristics, and user-friendly handling. Initially less popular, it gained traction due to early reviews, and recently, it’s seen a price increase of around 100 due to the big three’s pricing strategies. At this point, it’s worth reconsidering.
For me, the current ISP doesn’t deliver the excitement as some small-frame rackets from certain second-tier brands or the ZSP, making it hard to excite me further.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex NANORAY 10 Reviews
I still remember when I first started playing badminton, my family gave me this RapiD 10. At that time, I had no real concept of badminton rackets; I just heard people say this brand was good and treasured it like a gem. However, as time passed and I used more and better rackets, this one was quietly abandoned in a corner. Fortunately, thanks to its protection, the racket is still in pristine condition, and it’s time to revisit that “initial sharpness.”
As usual, let’s start with the equipment parameters:
4UG4, length 675mm, shaft length 210mm
After removing the cap and three layers of film, weight is about 90g, balance point around 307mm
Wind-breaking frame, 72-hole string bed, warranty 24 pounds
String 23lbs Yonex AB, handle grip soft and large
The racket I have is the blue version. The paint gives an overall fresh and detailed look, with a nice blue and white color transition on the frame, and the symmetrical pattern design is quite pleasing. The paint seems durable, as the racket has not lost any paint despite being in use for so long.
The racket has a low swing weight, with no noticeable head heaviness, but its swing speed is quite good, meeting the standard for a speed racket.
The sweet spot is evident, with the ISO frame providing a large sweet spot. The racket performs well in handling net shots with agility, and its performance in flat drives is quite consistent. This allowed me to handle net shots effectively during the match.
However, given the racket’s positioning, the shaft feels relatively soft, and the smash lacks power, leading to a feeling of inefficacy. Returning shots also requires some power to get the shuttlecock back to the rear court. Perhaps it would perform well in doubles as a “net front sweeper”? The high-quality string somewhat compensates for the racket’s shortcomings.
For passive shots, the racket’s performance is acceptable, but it still feels somewhat weak. There is some directional control on high lifts, but it often suffers from positioning issues, requiring a certain level of power to use effectively.
Overall, this “re-experience” was quite good.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex NANORAY Dynamic Action Reviews
This is a racket used alongside the previous generation Bow Lite, and its merits and flaws are often determined through comparison. To be honest, although I bought this second-hand racket primarily for its appearance, the NR series has consistently impressed me. Even the NRSP, which wasn’t very suited to me, left a strong impression, so it’s worth exploring other lower-end models besides the former NRD1.
The summary after trying it out confirms my assessment: the NR series is indeed quite good.
Specifications: 4UG5, with cap, total weight in use 91.99g, balance point 293mm, shaft length 213mm, medium-low stiffness, box-shaped frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, warranty 24 pounds, stringing 24lbs training string.
The color is pink, with a base of 80 points. The details include bright red coverage from the 4 and 8 o’clock positions of the frame, transitioning through black and gold to pink base paint for the three-way joint and shaft, and finally transitioning to a black cone cap. The appearance is very attractive even without stickers, immediately reminding me of ripe strawberries or strawberry-flavored snacks like Lotte bear biscuits or strawberry-flavored planet cups.
Another highly recognizable feature is the cone cap’s unique shape, designed with a deep fish-mouth and a ring on the edge, possibly for shock absorption or to enhance bonding, reminiscent of the NS6600. Like the previous Bow Lite, the structure of this racket doesn’t use premium materials but includes some signature technology, such as the now-common nanoscience.
The benefit of this technology is more noticeable than the nano-cushion, with the DA providing clearer feedback compared to the Lite, and the shaft can generate a driving force in high-clear shots. The large racket face and sweet spot offer good control for long shots, providing a more confident feel.
While the frame isn’t particularly wind-breaking, and the ZSP wasn’t known for its wind-breaking abilities either, it’s usable. As a 4U entry-level racket, its swing speed and overall sharpness aren’t exceptional. Often, the aggressive shots initiated from mid to front court can lead to a stalemate without gaining an advantage, often requiring soft blocks to break through. However, the racket is responsive and performs well in passive situations, with a good feel for short, powerful shots and no undesirable characteristics, making it feel usable.
Its smash performance is also average for its class. Though there aren’t many powerful backcourt shots, the shaft’s rebound is better than the Lite, providing more confidence during smashes. While it doesn’t have outstanding offensive performance, it is capable of producing consistent and aggressive shots. Additionally, the racket has some anti-torque advantages, with clear directionality during downward shots and occasional effective diagonal slices.
For a lower-end racket, this amount of description is appropriate. An unexpected fact is that the DA, like the Lite, is available in some supermarkets, which makes it easy to distinguish between them.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex NANORAY 700PR Reviews
The NR series high-end pioneer, NR700. To be more precise, it was the RP version, which was released earlier than the FX version. Generally speaking, the first high-end model in a series often has some issues, mainly due to the market’s gradual acceptance of new technologies and concepts, as well as the manufacturer’s understanding of new product concepts. The RP model of this racket did not receive high recognition.
However, with the advent of the Aerotus, the era of NR700 will only improve.
Specifications: 3UG5, no cap, total weight in use 86.5g, balance point 304mm, shaft length 214mm, medium stiffness, wind-breaking frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 o’clock string grooves, warranty 25 pounds, stringing 24-25lbs BS720.
Compared to the later NR750, 800, 900, or even the ZSP, the RP looks relatively ordinary. The outside of the frame is a black-brown color similar to traditional Chinese medicine decoction, with the inside primarily in antique bronze color, with some bright yellow stickers added. The visual experience is quite flat and lacks layering. The new racket has less satisfactory paint strength, and the stickers are easily scratched, resulting in an unimpressive visual experience.
This 2011 racket has a very typical speed racket feel, with low swing weight and high wind-breaking efficiency, producing a sharp sound when power is applied briefly. The frame is narrow, and the racket face is relatively large, but the sweet spot is also quite large, making it easy to find the hitting point, and the power feel is clear. The material includes the latest fullerene at that time, with a shaft elasticity comparable to the NR750, so it still holds up well today. The racket is moderately difficult to handle, with a clear driving feel, and the low swing weight means less physical exhaustion during prolonged use. The only concern is whether this racket, which emphasizes active power, will cause a decline in shot quality when energy and stamina decrease.
From professional players who have used the RP, both singles and doubles players are included. The male players with aggressive play styles and the female players with strong net play do not seem to show any particular tendency of the racket. This is consistent because, although it is named a speed racket in the NR series, the NR700 RP actually feels more like a high-speed balanced racket.
The racket face has a holding sensation similar to the NR750, with more stable performance in controlling small balls. The touch for net play is lighter, which made me initially feel uncertain, but the actual return quality is quite controllable.
For long-distance pushing, lifting, and flat attacking shots, there is still a certain sense of distrust after the shot. It’s not that the NR700 RP performs poorly, but there’s a persistent illusion of shots going off-target. In reality, it still delivers good speed, and for players who prefer a light touch, more adaptation might be needed.
However, from the perspective of continuity, there is much to discuss. In terms of head heaviness, the NR700 is slightly higher than the NR750, so short power shots can benefit from the head’s inertia to make the ball more forceful. While the 750 is purely about continuity and speed, the 700 adds a bit of power to the shot, making the confrontations more intense.
When it comes to offensive play, I have to admit that the NR700 still holds back a bit on explosiveness. Subjectively, the feel is a bit light, as the balance point is only 290mm. However, the shaft and racket face’s elasticity help transfer energy to the racket head as long as possible during smashes, resulting in a fast shot speed, although it is still prone to being returned. It’s not excellent, but this performance is surprising given its build.
Compared to the NR750, the stability is not as good, but it still has many qualities suitable for confrontational play even today.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex NANORAY 900 Reviews
The old brother naturally has the confidence of an old brother; these three characters each convey its weight.
“Old” refers to being born earlier. As a speed racket that took over the ns series banner, the current nr series is clearly nearing its twilight, and it has long been discontinued. “Big” signifies the achievements forged through reputation, sales, and on-court performance. It is not only a landmark in many aspects but also remains the choice of high-level players who still stick to this model, with 3 nr900 rackets in their bag, 2U. “Brother” represents the authority of the series’ status. A model with a 9 prefix in the numbering is bound to be placed in the ultimate flagship category by the three major brands, even the newbie ZSP must address it as its predecessor.
Parameters: 3UG5, stripped, total weight 90.0g in use, balance point 298mm, middle shaft length 205mm, stiff, 9-3 o’clock groove, fluid box-type frame with 4-8 o’clock thin wing wind-breaking treatment, warranty 24 pounds, stringing 26-28lbs xb63.
Gray-black, calm, understated but with character, displaying a charm of restraint and relaxation. On every modified point of the frame, it generously applies reflective stickers and a fresh green robust design. With a bit of patience to adjust the angle, these seemingly plain stickers burst forth with brilliance akin to gemstone-grade zircon. Elegant, very elegant.
This is a unique frame, transitioning from the pure box-type at the T-head with 4 and 8 o’clock wind-breaking treatment to the pure box-type two wings, then the head is a thin-wing fluid wind-breaking frame. Not only the shape but also the thickness varies, as if every part of the design has been meticulously tuned. Compared to many current aggressive all-wind-breaking doubles rackets, its consideration for performance optimization makes my spine tingle with excitement. Unfortunately, the paint strength is not very good and is prone to flaws.
On initial contact, its middle shaft is fine enough to make someone unfamiliar with it think it is a current racket. Apart from the body, the weight configuration is also quite different. I didn’t even wrap a cushioning film, and generally, balancing a racket like this would require a balance point of around 305mm, but after testing, it was less than 300. Despite being 3U and as the middle shaft denotes “head light,” the feel in hand is neither heavy nor light, with a comfortable and smooth handling. Thus, I completely understand why the 2U version of this racket is favored by advanced players.
From my experience with the ns8000, even though such rackets were made stiffer back then, in the current environment of stiff rackets, the stiffest models from that era would likely hear a lot of “Big Brother, times have changed.” During the adaptation process, its stiffness, even with a 205mm middle shaft, still retains driving difficulty, but the regular sweet spot and smooth swing speed make it easier for advanced players to adapt quickly. The feel feedback is good, but the elasticity level is somewhat lacking. This setting means more situations require active power handling. I was even overpowered by a girl using a Tian Fu 77, although there was also a health issue on my part.
NR900 is renowned as a flat smash king, so it naturally needs to be tested for its reputation in fast-paced confrontations. It lives up to its name by being both stable and fast. On the basis of stability, it achieves sufficient speed. In addition to stability, it also offers high tolerance. Stability results from the high-performance carbon combined with most box-type frames; speed results from the low drag frame and low swing weight. The tolerance is what impressed me the most. Compared to the higher loss rate of the ZSP with a smaller frame during net play and the discomfort when pressed at low positions, NR900 scores back with a regular frame size. If it were only that, I wouldn’t be so amazed, but the NR900 still managed to produce quality returns even during mishits in various flat smash block phases. The most incredible thing was that I clearly felt several times when the frame was hit but still managed to keep the rhythm going—this was truly a first for me. No quirks; it covers it all.
The requirement for active power in smashes is evident, but this racket is very comfortable to handle once you gain the initiative. Because of the low swing weight, you can directly hit semi-chances without worrying about the small arm load, and usually, if the accuracy is good, the racket’s directional performance is also decent, showing rare anti-twist ability in speed rackets. At the same time, it doesn’t have the extremely short ball contact time of small frames, providing good control for power, spin, and precise shots, such as backcourt drop shots and front net push shots. Many techniques work well; however, in strong attacks, it still lacks a bit of explosive power, especially compared to extreme rackets like ZSP, which leaves a feeling of missing a battering ram. Of course, the racket’s continuity is excellent, and it won’t let scoring opportunities slip away when it’s in a winning position.
Its defensive performance is decent, with flexible and stable shooting characteristics performing above average in receiving smashes and soft blocks. However, when it comes to using power to clear the backcourt, under the overall stiff tuning, it requires the user to have good skills and physical foundation for better results, making it relatively harder to clear properly.
NR900 also features enhanced operability in the backhand area due to its stability, flexibility, and larger frame. When there is not enough time to retreat and handle high shots, it can be surprisingly effective for backhand smashes, with good power feel. Although the backhand smash effect is certainly not as threatening as a forehand, it can still make opponents wary. For players with poor backhand skills, it can at least serve as a teaching tool.
The old brother still has confidence, and I indeed underestimated its energy and dominance. Except for the slightly aged explosive power in strong attacks for a discontinued racket, other aspects are still well-rounded and composed. Its Nanoray glory remains untarnished. After playing a full session without damping film, I found my wrist burdened. Given my already poor knee condition, this was an oversight.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex NANORAY 750 Reviews
The NR series is truly a treasure trove, offering various frame shapes, stiffness levels, and materials, all aimed at interpreting the concept of “speed” from different angles. While the materials and craftsmanship of the time couldn’t deliver peak performance in every aspect, the diverse styles of this series’ high-end models definitely gave players like me who enjoy exploring different rackets a pleasant surprise.
Among them, the NR750 left a lasting impression on me. This is because, on the performance spectrum of the NR series—and even across all rackets—the NR750 is positioned at the very bottom, being the racket with the lowest balance point in history. I think this gimmick alone makes it worth trying.
Specifications:
- 3UG4, bottom cap removed, total weight in use 93.20g, balance point 289mm
- Shaft length 215mm, medium stiffness
- Aero-box frame, 76-hole string bed, 9–3 o’clock grommets, 25 lbs tension warranty, strung at 24–26 lbs with BS720 strings
The racket has both old and new color schemes. More former professional players used the newer colors, but the version I got was the older gemstone blue. Although it’s faded over time, with many scratches on the frame showing the raw carbon fiber, I still appreciate its slender and refreshing original look. The upper part of the frame is an elegant blue-gray, with minimal embellishments covering the 9–3 o’clock positions, then transitioning to the classic white base paint with black line designs. The Nanoray logo is in blue font, with the Nanoray lettering floating near the T-joint against the white background. Although the design is simple, every part of it looks harmonious and well-thought-out, pleasing to the user.
At first glance, the racket doesn’t seem to exude much “speed”—the frame’s aerodynamic qualities aren’t obvious, with no sharp edges or slim areas. It feels similar to the aero-box frames found in the ArcSaber series. However, once you pick it up, you immediately understand why it belongs to the NR series. The head heaviness is almost non-existent; after removing the bottom cap, the balance point of this 3U racket is still under 290mm, which is extremely low. From my experience, only the later Victor Princess 2 comes close, while the old 9001 can’t be compared due to its 4U spec.
Despite its low swing weight, the power transfer when handling shuttle shots is excellent. The NR750 naturally doesn’t have the momentum to send the shuttle deep into the court like head-heavy attack rackets, but I’m more fascinated by the feeling of control it offers. The quick transition from backswing to stroke, combined with its smooth and compact power release, makes it easy to handle, and the shaft’s flex isn’t difficult to manage. During warm-up clears, its charm already began to show.
The secret lies in the NR750’s ability to help the user achieve relatively high contact points. Even when under pressure in the rear court and with footwork not perfectly in place, this racket’s flexibility allows players to easily reach back and escape the situation with an effective shot. In ideal positioning, it provides more chances to take the initiative, enabling you to either push the pace with fast downward shots or vary your shots to disrupt your opponent’s rhythm. It’s highly versatile.
Moreover, whether dealing with backhand, underhand shots, or defending against continuous smashes, the NR750 performed exceptionally well for its time. While the ZSP, the top of the series, suffered from low tolerance due to its small frame, and the NR900 with its high stiffness posed challenges for less skilled players when handling defensive shots, the NR750 truly shined.
Of course, some might worry that the racket sacrifices downward attack capability, but that’s not the case. As mentioned earlier, the NR750’s ability to secure higher contact points makes it easier to hit steep shots. If your power and accuracy are on point, you won’t notice much difference in your smashes. The racket also has excellent shot direction control, and even in rushed shots, it won’t twist or falter, maintaining stable performance. Apart from slight differences in shuttle hold feel due to string tension, the NR750 has some similarities with the ArcSaber series. The only minor drawback is that the power behind heavy smashes might not fully meet the user’s explosive potential. The shaft has a slight flex, so while the shuttle comes off fast, the feel isn’t as solid when defending smashes, and it’s easy for the shuttle to bounce up. The placement might also not be as sharp as with other offensive rackets. However, the NR750 excels in consistency, allowing for smooth, continuous shots, especially in long exchanges.
This continuous, fluid feel, combined with the super head-light design, is truly unique to the NR750.
The NR750 is also known as the “King of Drives,” and in doubles, I definitely experienced the power of its flexibility, stability, and short, sharp strokes in fast exchanges. With such low swing weight, it’s possible to defend shots aimed at awkward areas like the right shoulder, chest, or armpit, as long as your reaction time is quick enough. Additionally, when opponents attempt to vary their shots with wide angles, the NR750’s ability to take the shuttle early often allows you to intercept the shuttle before it reaches a distance that would require a difficult pivot. However, purely from a drive perspective, many newer rackets with lower swing weights and better elasticity now offer even better performance in this regard, such as the NR9001, which serves as a more affordable alternative.
Despite this minor drawback, it’s a small issue. Overall, the NR750 is a highly enjoyable and versatile former high-end racket that performs well in both singles and doubles. I can even recall Hu Yun’s remarkable backhand drive against Kento Momota. While it may not have the highest performance ceiling, it’s definitely fun to use and easy to play with, and I’m baffled by its relatively low popularity.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex ArcSaber 8DX Reviews
There are many consensus points about the ArcSaber series, such as its low entry barrier, shuttle hold feel, and its tendency to collapse under stress. The characteristic shuttle hold is due to the soft frame, which also causes the carbon fiber to fatigue easily, leading to poor creep resistance. Even the ArcSaber 11, reissued just a year ago, still has a 24 lbs warranty, showing that the stiffness has not improved much.
However, in my opinion, the ArcSaber 8 stands out simply because of its “high” 27 lbs tension warranty.
Specifications:
- 3UG5, bottom cap removed, total weight in use 92.7g, balance point 300mm
- 7.2mm shaft diameter, 210mm long, stiff tuning
- 76-hole string bed, 9–3 o’clock grommets, 27 lbs tension warranty, strung at 25–27 lbs with XB63 strings
It seems that among the high-end models of the Duora and ArcSaber series, the 8 has relatively better high tension durability. In terms of appearance, the design of the ArcSaber 8 is consistent with the models of that period. The frame has a simple silver-white base coat, transitioning to black around the 4 and 8 o’clock positions, which continues along the entire shaft. However, the font on the shaft made me think of toffee or coffee. The application of C.S. nanotubes is clearly marked on the frame’s sides, and other than that, it has a clean and simple look.
As always, it has a large racket head and a big sweet spot, but the ArcSaber 8 feels a bit more head-heavy than the ArcSaber 7, giving it a slight offensive edge. Also, when paired with the XB63 strings, the series’ characteristic shuttle hold is slightly reduced, and both the frame and shaft feel stiffer, resulting in quicker shot response. The racket’s power transfer remains excellent, and after just one or two rallies, it’s easy to get a feel for its shot rhythm and power output, with a clear sense of directionality.
Of course, the 3U ArcSaber 8’s swing weight is still very manageable, and this faster response speed would be greatly appreciated by advanced players with a bit more power and technique. In drives and blocks, it performs remarkably well. As a racket once used by Koo Kien Keat, it gave me a similar fast-paced experience to the NS8000 that I tried for the first time last year. I had no issues using the ArcSaber 8 for doubles.
Today, if I were to praise this racket’s elasticity, it would be unreliable. Even its successor, the ArcSaber 11, has a more flexible shaft. Although they both feature Nano Science technology, advancements in technology never stop evolving. However, the ArcSaber 8 has excellent stability, and as long as your technique is in form, the shot quality it delivers is impressively consistent, with a very clear feel.
One significant advantage of its high tension durability is that it allows for higher string tensions, further enhancing its strength in shot control. With its unique characteristics, the ArcSaber 8 excels at tight net play. Some people claim it’s the king of offense in the ArcSaber series, which I’m not sure about, but it certainly has no problem creating offensive opportunities.
Sometimes, it must be acknowledged that when power is sufficient, durability under high tension becomes an offensive asset. When striking with force, you can feel the string bed flex more, and the shuttle stays on the strings longer, allowing for more efficient energy transfer. The ArcSaber 8’s offensive feel is not as “sugar water” as other models—you can’t expect a slow, light downward shot to have much quality. Instead, by focusing power into a heavy smash, you can truly feel its stiffness, stability, and potential. Even after 13 years, it still meets the offensive needs of modern players. Moreover, it keeps up with continuous play.
The backhand power is also great, and aside from the stiff tuning, there’s no other difficulty to overcome. The racket also offers higher tolerance in drop shots, and the consistency in high clears and smashes is greatly improved.
I’ve run out of words. Aside from the generational gap in materials affecting the racket’s elasticity, in every other aspect, it feels like I’ve been testing a very modern stiff and balanced racket.
September 12, 2024