[Review Experience] Victor MX-90

Jayce September 6, 2024 6 0

The 2014 MX-90, as a latecomer to the 80, should have been able to be the set piece. But the MX-90’s popularity and recognition differed from the MX-80 by a cliff, and even it couldn’t escape the fate of the rest of the MX line’s high end being overshadowed by the MX-80. But unlike the fate of the 80/90, the MX-90 still has an audience, and some of the older MX series players will just like the MX-90 even more.
It, as the Classic Series proper has the highest numbered capper, is likely to be a more balanced option.

Parameters: 3UG5, de-bottomed, total weight in used condition 89.7g, balance point 295mm, 7.0mm center, length 215mm, stiffness on the high side, eight-sided windbreaker frame, 80-hole string bed, 9-3 point string groove, warranty 28lbs, stringing 25-27lbs KT66F.
Is there any golfer like me, looking at some of the top products of the last era, analyzing their appearance, in fact, will find that they are compared with the current new products will lack some exquisite stickers, color schemes and patterns, but just look particularly powerful, for MX-90 this also applies. The MX-90’s frame and center column have a strength and sturdiness to them that gives you a sense of security, regardless of any imperfections caused by age. The color scheme, with a white primer on the T-head and head and black or varnish on the wings of the frame and cone cover, has a kingly look.

Looking over the information, the MX90 does have a little lower labeled stiffness than the MX-80N, but the head weight is more pronounced. When the series generally existed in the case of playing the feeling of hair wood, at first I thought that the middle rod thick reason, and later thought it was 80 holes innate attributes, and then later found a new end – reinforced laminated carbon fiber, this technology is not the later strong laminated FRS well, although the back of the lower end of the lower end of the Victor part of the production and greatly improve the resistance of those models to high poundage. Although the technology was later put into the middle and low-end products of Victory and greatly improved the performance of those models in terms of high poundage resistance, it also made the racket faces of those products generally become as stale as dead faces, and I didn’t realize that the source was actually here.
It’s worth mentioning that the MX-80 has a 7.2mm center bar, while the MX-90 is 7.0mm.

The difference in frame shape and weighting makes a considerable difference in the feel of the MX-90 and MX-80 in the hands. For one thing, the 90’s windbreak handling is not as sharp, and the frame thickness has been increased, resulting in a swing speed that is not as impressive as the 80’s. Secondly, the off-head-weighted configuration also makes the racquet more heavy-handed and solid. The result is a change in the performance of the stringbed, with the 90 holding the ball slightly better, which makes it friendlier to use for players whose power level is not yet very good. At the same time, the higher swingweight also makes it more comfortable to warm up and take the ball out without having to put extra effort into it, although this can be detrimental to physical exertion in confrontation.

The MX90’s mid-range driver is also different from the MX-80, with a thinner diameter for a more flexible feel, less stiff feedback, and a bit more of a mid-range deformation recovery ejection on the ball. The current MX-90’s ball control ability is therefore better, in addition to a little holding feeling added to the ball out of the moment to become more maneuverable, and the MX-70 similar to the weight of the head also it provides me with a lot of confidence in the stability of the feel of the hand.
The draw has not weakened, and it still has good ball response and clear pointing. However, the higher swing weight requires more durability of the user’s small arm and finger strength, and my small arm was a bit sore after a high-intensity doubles inning.

Judging from its feel feedback, I was looking forward to its offensive performance, and it certainly lived up to the hype. Needless to say, the actual results were high, with its high ceiling having been recognized by both Gideon and Zhou Tiancheng. On heavy kills, its hitting from sound effects to feedback can bring a lot of pleasure to golfers with good power level. In this session, some differences between the 80 and 90 can be more clearly distinguished. The 90 gets a stronger downward pressure due to the higher swing weight, and the drive is correspondingly less difficult, but the higher swing weight also makes its ability to connect on the next shot less brutal than that of the MX80N.

In the end, Victor’s X stands for balanced tuning, and from the earliest supernanoX, to the meteor X, to the hypernano X to the current Harness X, and even all the products in the series with the X suffix have intentionally pulled some of the more aggressively tuned racquets toward the center of the coordinate axis. And it’s the same thing with the MX-90, except that with the pull it looks a little more like an attacking racquet compared to the MX-80.
I was going to say that if I can’t get a good deal on a JJS, then that’s the end of the MX series, but then I thought about it, and the MX80B is odd enough that I’d rather just leave it here.