Tag: YONEX

尤尼克斯

Badminton Racket Yonex ArcSaber 6FL Reviews
The first update of 2024 goes to an unremarkable mid-range racket from the Green Factory.
The ArcSaber series is quite interesting—not only has it had a long lifespan, but it continues to be updated, with many people still willing to buy it today. Although the high-end models get the most attention, after trying the ArcSaber 1000 and realizing that the boundary between mid-range and high-end rackets is becoming increasingly blurred, I’m more inclined to keep testing some mid-range models I haven’t tried yet.
Specifications: 4UG5, bottom cap removed, total weight in use is 86.19g, balance point at 312mm, shaft length of 215mm, low stiffness, box frame, 76-hole string bed, 9–3 o’clock grommets, 24 lbs tension warranty, strung at 25–26 lbs with Gaoshen Steel Armor 5 strings.
Seeing the “FL” suffix, my first thought was that this is more of a women’s racket, even though its full name is Feather Light, meaning lightweight. From its appearance, it does carry some feminine elements, like pink stickers and a white base coat. This isn’t a stereotype; even though the racket’s decorative details aren’t rich, it still looks harmonious overall. However, the Isometric logo placed at the 1 o’clock position on the racket head triggers my OCD a bit.
The racket is a 4U model, and after removing the bottom cap, the head heaviness is quite noticeable. Still, before the actual measurement, I didn’t expect the balance point to be over 310mm. The empty swings feel a bit weighted but reasonable, fitting the identity of an FL model, giving it a sense of agility. It’s worth mentioning that despite being made in Taiwan, the frame still retains the use of nano air springs, which preserves the essence of the ArcSaber series.
This is a typical “sugar water” racket—not heavy but very easy to generate power, and the shaft is indeed soft, making it easy to produce flex. After flexing, the shaft’s rebound feels about 80% as good as the ArcSaber 7, and the sweet spot feedback is almost identical. In terms of difficulty, there’s virtually none, and the sweet spot is incredibly large, with a very high forgiveness rate.
When trying to hit longer shots with the ArcSaber 6FL, it felt quite normal—no issues with weak shots or lacking control. With some adaptation, it’s possible to control the shuttle’s placement well during clears and drives. Due to the prolonged contact between the string bed and shuttle, there’s a “solid hit” feedback when striking, though the shuttle speed itself isn’t particularly high, and the explosiveness is average. However, since there are no real drawbacks, it’s effortless to use even when fatigued, allowing for relaxed shot execution without any burden.
The racket retains the signature shuttle hold of the ArcSaber series, with the string bed wrapping around the shuttle very noticeably. This adds more adjustment flexibility when playing net shots and drops, boosting confidence in shot execution.
The head heaviness of the 6FL provides excellent downward pressure, while its easy-to-generate power and lightweight build give it decent continuity. Even though the quality of the smashes may not be strong enough to finish a rally with one shot from the mid-back court, the continuous output, ensuring each shot travels downward, can still be an effective scoring strategy. This isn’t just due to the quick setup and fast swing speed, but also because of the low physical exertion, which allows for consistent power output.
Handling backhand shots with the 6FL is particularly impressive. When in a passive position, such as when rotating to defend against a smash or return drive, where the space to generate power is severely limited, the result is often poor-quality shots or incomplete escapes. However, the ease with which this racket can be driven makes up for this situation—whether it’s soft blocks for transition or power returns to the backcourt, it feels very handy.
At first, I thought that flat exchanges or fast-paced rallies might be a weakness of the 6FL, but in practice, it didn’t make me feel uncomfortable in doubles. While the shots tend to be sticky, this is consistent with the overall tuning of the racket. Despite not having the direct, crisp feel of a quick, power-assisted crosscourt shot, the racket’s more conservative and steady performance in passive or prolonged rallies helps avoid mistakes or being put at a disadvantage.
Personally, I feel that the 6FL doesn’t stand out in any particular aspect, but it also doesn’t have any major weaknesses. I believe that if its aesthetics were emphasized more, it could take a good share of the Duora 6 market today.
I almost missed out on this racket at first, not realizing that the ArcSaber 6 and the ArcSaber 6FL are two entirely different models. The latter has a much better feel than the former. However, this was my conclusion before I became familiar with the racket market.
To be honest, the ArcSaber 7 is quite outdated now, and its performance no longer meets modern standards. Even low-end rackets with decent materials can deliver a similar experience. Therefore, it’s no surprise that a Taiwanese-made, older ArcSaber 6FL can receive a satisfying evaluation when compared to it.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex ArcSaber 1000 tour Reviews
In the review of the Black Cut, it was mentioned that its introduction suggested that the Green Factory might be adopting a new strategy for the production and marketing of mid-range rackets, aiming to compete in the mid-to-low-end market. At that time, I thought this was an operation led by the Taiwanese factory.
However, a friend lent me this racket, and I discovered that a similar approach existed a decade ago, but it was led by Sunrising Japan, which had more influence than Taiwan YY at the time.
Moreover, it’s not lacking in prestige—it’s clearly marked “Made in Japan” on the bottom cap, which satisfies the social needs of many young players.
Specifications: 4UG5, bottom cap removed, total weight in use is 86.9g, balance point at 305mm, shaft length of 205mm, medium to high stiffness, fluid box frame, 72-hole string bed, 9–3 o’clock grommets, 28 lbs tension warranty, strung at 25–27 lbs with Steel Armor 5.
Despite its all-black appearance, I quite like the matte dark color scheme. The ArcSaber 1000T has a restrained style that doesn’t leave a deep impression at first glance. However, the gradual transition from the deep blue color on the racket head to burgundy is smooth, and the symmetrical distribution satisfies my OCD, making it look very harmonious. People often criticize the ArcSaber series for not being able to handle high tension, but this mid-range racket can withstand up to 28 lbs—satisfied now?
I’m still not used to seeing a 72-hole string bed on an ArcSaber, but the racket face performs just fine, with a large sweet spot and a noticeable shuttle hold. Aside from the string pattern, the frame has been adjusted as well, with a thinner, more rounded aerodynamic frame on the 1000T. This is undoubtedly a faster-swinging ArcSaber, which enhances its user-friendliness—so no more complaints about it being too difficult to handle.
In terms of materials, I believe the cutbacks are more evident in the shaft, as there’s no difference in the frame’s technology compared to higher-end models. During warm-ups, the 1000T felt well-balanced and easy to get along with, although its elasticity was still a bit lacking compared to premium models like the ArcSaber 7 or ArcSaber IS.
However, this didn’t affect its performance. I tested this racket while recovering from a cold, with my body not yet fully recovered, and its ample flexibility helped me regain control on the court.
Although the softer shaft and strong shuttle hold can be a hindrance in fast-paced rallies, the short shaft and lower head weight make the racket more agile, compensating for its shortcomings. Whether it was defending against continuous smashes from below or executing backhand drives, it felt very responsive and showcased its strong transition capabilities in passive situations.
However, the racket’s torsion resistance was a bit lacking, resulting in less solid feedback on long shots and making it difficult to control the shuttle’s placement accurately. It often failed to hit my desired target, falling short of expectations.
The racket’s weakness in downward attacks didn’t bother me too much, as its short shaft and high explosive power still added some shine to its performance. It’s clear that the 1000T isn’t suitable for heavy, powerful attacks, as it likely wouldn’t be able to handle them. During full-power smashes, there’s a noticeable disconnect in power transmission. However, by lowering my expectations and focusing on continuity, I found that the racket could still deliver decent downward pressure during quick flicks, making it much easier to use than expected.
This is a racket that relaxes you mentally, though you’ll need some understanding from your teammates. I’m used to hitting high, powerful downward shots, but during this test, my teammate teased me all evening about my soft hits.
Overall, this racket serves as a great example of a well-executed mid-range product. Among the Green Factory’s mid-range models that I’ve tried, it stands out for its performance and value. It brings out the signature characteristics of the series and emphasizes the tuning focus, meeting my expectations for a mid-range Green Factory racket. It’s definitely worth recommending to those looking for a good deal.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex ArcSaber 9FL Reviews
I am unlikely to actively collect this kind of racket. The reasons are as follows: first, its price remains high; second, the paint quality is relatively low; third, the racket isn’t durable; and fourth, counterfeit products are rampant. For equipment with such a high usage cost, its positioning as a female racket is a key factor that piques my interest.
After using it, I feel that the modern Green Factory has maintained the same original intention as when they released their female rackets in the past.
Specifications: 3UG4, bottom cap removed, total weight in use is 95.5g, balance point at 292mm, shaft length of 220mm, medium to low stiffness, box frame, 76-hole string bed, 9–3 o’clock grommets, 25 lbs tension warranty, strung at 24–26 lbs with KT66F strings.
First, let me clarify that the ArcSaber 9 and 9FL are two different products, and the 9FL has both old and new color versions. The new color version even comes in a 4U specification, giving counterfeit markets more opportunities.
Of course, the racket is indeed very visually appealing. The pink on the frame and shaft establishes its image, while the transition from white on the frame to a starry black at the T-joint adds depth and dimension to the 9FL. The cone cap is quite distinctive, featuring a Yonex crystal emblem in addition to the usual specification markings, giving it high recognizability.
This is a racket that, from the first touch, clearly shows it belongs to the ArcSaber series. The organic combination of shuttle hold and elasticity in its feedback, along with the balanced tuning as indicated by its specifications, gives the ArcSaber 9FL a “rich, mellow” feel. Of course, in my view, the 3U version’s swing weight isn’t exactly light, and its swing speed isn’t as fast as I would like, but it provides significant leverage during the swing. In terms of stiffness, it’s softer than its siblings like the ArcSaber 7, 8, and 11, with the shaft’s flex making clears easier, thanks to the large shaft deformation. The 3U version is quite easy to use apart from its swing speed. Even my teammate, who typically struggles, could rally with me near the baseline during warm-ups with this high-end flexible racket.
I’m not sure if some players still hold the stereotype that rackets designed for women lack power, but the ArcSaber 9FL firmly challenges that notion. Among the series, its downward pressure is in no way inferior, and the ample elasticity ensures it avoids a sense of power loss, even after being softened. In repeated downward attacks, the 9FL showcases a very distinct characteristic: shuttle hold. During powerful smashes, you can feel the shuttle sticking to the string bed, clearly sensing the deformation of both the string bed and the shaft. The shot response may not be fast, but the longer power transmission time gives the user a solid feel, and the end result doesn’t lack power or speed.
More importantly, the racket doesn’t require you to have exceptional stamina or advanced power skills to execute a strong smash. Its flexibility allows for great endurance and continuity during exchanges.
When I mention “shuttle hold,” you could also describe it as “stickiness.” I personally dislike its performance in fast-paced doubles matches. On the one hand, the 9FL’s swing speed isn’t fast; on the other hand, during rapid strokes, the shaft tends to flex, and by the time it rebounds, the shuttle has already left the string bed, meaning you can’t generate additional power. As a result, its feel in drives and blocks is less aligned with my preferences compared to other balanced rackets.
A similar issue arises during net play and return pushes. After intercepting the shuttle at the net, the response isn’t decisive enough, failing to compress the opponent’s reaction time, sometimes allowing them to escape even after gaining control of the net.
However, the 9FL’s solid feel gives it exceptional confidence in delicate net shots. During flicks and drops, the interaction between the player and racket is strong, sometimes resulting in effortless net shots during practice. In doubles, if paired with a reliable heavy hitter, this could lead to an easy kill. Even if I’m pushed to the backcourt by the opponent, a well-timed drop to the net can often regain the initiative.
I still view the ArcSaber 9FL primarily as a singles racket. After discovering its control advantages, I became more confident in utilizing its directional and control capabilities, allowing me to gradually build an advantage by fully utilizing court space. Although it’s an old racket, it still excels in control and attack.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex ArcSaber 7 Reviews
Although it’s an old model, based on the racket’s condition, it could be from the 2018 reissue. Considering that the original ArcSaber 7 was launched in 2007, judging by the font on the bottom cap, it’s likely one of the earliest batches. The ArcSaber 7 I tested this time has a pure white paint job, which is rarer compared to the yellow-silver version.
Generally, I don’t actively test discontinued old rackets, but I was really curious why the Green Factory’s last new release last year was the Pro version of this racket.
Specifications: 3UG4, bottom cap removed, total weight in use is 94.0g, balance point at 295mm, shaft length of 210mm, medium stiffness, fluid box frame, 76-hole string bed, 9–3 o’clock grommets, 23 lbs tension warranty, strung at 24–26 lbs with XB63 strings.
Does anyone think it resembles the white ArcSaber 10? In my view, the silver-yellow version, with its color blocks on the frame’s wings, is more recognizable, while the current all-white design—though it hides some flaws—lacks a bit of impact. The frame has a symmetrical design, with C.S. Cap technology applied at the 2, 4, 8, and 10 o’clock positions. The decals, due to the similar color scheme, remind me of the Astrox 66. The shaft is silver-gray with minimal design elements. However, the paint quality unmistakably reflects the Green Factory’s craftsmanship—those in the know will understand…
They say the ArcSaber series is a balanced racket. When I used the ArcSaber 11, I felt it had a slightly head-heavy feel, while the ArcSaber 7’s balance might very well be the benchmark for “balanced.” The swing weight isn’t high, but it’s not exactly light either, with a solid grip feel that isn’t too hollow. The swing speed isn’t outstanding, but the rounded frame reminds me of the NS8000, which also reduces wind resistance, making the ArcSaber 7 well-suited for doubles play, offering a decent amount of agility. The handle is quite thick, and the reduced gap in my palm after gripping the racket is a bit uncomfortable for me, but the ArcSaber 7’s comfortable feel mitigates this issue. The shaft is indeed thick, likely a result of material limitations at the time.
During warm-ups, my first issue to address was getting used to the feel of clears with the ArcSaber 7, as I occasionally hit the shuttle out of bounds. To be honest, the ArcSaber 7’s elasticity was impressive when it was released, and even now it performs like an excellent mid-range flexible racket. But the number of shots that went out made me question whether my post-illness condition was affecting my touch. The Green Factory’s tuning of the shaft and swing weight make the ArcSaber 7 a racket with a highly noticeable power-assist feel. The shaft’s flex is easy to activate, contrary to the “stiff” tuning preferences of the time. Setting weight aside, the ArcSaber 7 is incredibly beginner-friendly, and during testing, I found myself instinctively adding extra power—XB63’s elasticity only added fuel to the fire.
However, XB63 may have slightly suppressed the ArcSaber series’ signature “hold” feel. Although the contact time between the string bed and shuttle is still relatively long, during drives and blocks, the racket no longer feels sluggish. Additionally, the slightly lighter head compared to the ArcSaber 11 improves its agility. While it may not give you an advantage in fast-paced exchanges, it at least prevents you from falling behind.
The key feature is the racket’s exceptionally large sweet spot. Unlike the massive sweet spot on the Nanoray Glanz, the ArcSaber 7’s sweet spot still packs some explosiveness, likely thanks to the C.S. Cap technology. Its tolerance for mishits is quite high. Even if you’re unfamiliar with its quirks, mishits during aggressive shots are rare, and the racket remains forgiving and stable.
This makes the racket particularly reliable in defensive situations. Whether you’re lifting a smash back to the rear court or handling tricky shots in the backhand or overhead positions, the ArcSaber 7 offers solid tools to respond effectively. The longer power stroke makes difficult situations seem more manageable, allowing you to escape without much effort. The ArcSaber 7’s low entry barrier makes it extremely user-friendly. Some YouTubers describe it as “desireless,” but that’s exactly what makes it so enjoyable to play with, perfectly matching my current physical condition.
However, as a racket once used by Hendra Setiawan and Marc Zwiebler, its offensive capabilities should be on par, right? Here’s where things get a bit awkward. The ArcSaber 7 certainly has a soft, easy feel, making it easier to hit powerful shots. Compared to its younger sibling, the ArcSaber 11, it may lack a bit of downward pressure, but this can be improved by adjusting your shot timing. While the feel is nice, the racket’s smash potential isn’t exactly top-tier—it lacks that overwhelming, heavy hitting power. Instead, it relies more on continuity to turn small advantages into a winning position. I wanted to unleash its maximum potential with stronger shots, but concerns like “the ArcSaber might collapse,” “it’s someone else’s old racket,” and “it’s strung with thin strings over the tension limit” quickly squashed my plans. That’s where the awkwardness lies—both the racket and I can’t afford to push too hard.
The ArcSaber 7 leaves an impression of being “without weaknesses.” I’m not sure about its current market value, but if you can get one for around $60, I actually think it’s a better choice than the ArcSaber 11 for beginners who are drawn to the “YY” brand, have limited budgets, and aren’t too sensitive to value for money. While it may not be a racket you’ll use for a long time, if I owned it, I wouldn’t mind keeping the ArcSaber 7 in my bag for use during slumps.
It’s a fun and interesting old-school racket. After 15 years, it’s not too surprising that Yonex released a new high-end version based on it, given that professional players surely understand their competitive needs. But I have to admit, its “lack of weaknesses” also leads to a “lack of character.” Upon reflection after the test, I realized it heavily relies on the XB63 string’s performance. To me, it still feels like an old man whose bones are ready to fall apart at any moment…
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex ArcSaber Z Reviews
The last racket from the Green Factory I managed to complete was, unexpectedly, their very first “Z.” Quite a coincidence, right?
Who would understand what I’m saying? Nowadays, the Nanoflare Z has smashed records with shuttle speeds over 500 km/h, and the Z-Speed even reached 493 km/h. My ArcSaber Z also broke records with speeds over 400 km/h back in the day, so who’s underestimating whom?
In terms of influence, many top players have used this antique racket. As for its market value, it still holds strong in the second-hand market. To complete my collection, Solomon, I’ve returned.
Specifications: 3UG4, bottom cap removed, total weight of 91.9g in use, balance point at 305mm, shaft length of 220mm, medium to high stiffness, small box-shaped frame, 76-hole string bed, 9–3 o’clock grommets, 24 lbs tension warranty, strung at 24–26 lbs with KT66F strings.
I must say, the ArcSaber series’ design aesthetics match my taste quite well. Aside from the classic red ArcSaber 10 and the pink ArcSaber 9FL, the coffee brown ArcSaber 8 and the red-and-white ArcSaber 11 are still admired by many. As for the ArcSaber Z, it’s unmistakably banana yellow. Although the public didn’t fully embrace asymmetrical designs until the Astrox series, the ArcSaber Z was already playing with that concept. It’s very unique—like a chocolate-covered banana dipped in a bit of strawberry syrup.
Compared to the ArcSaber 11, the frame of the ArcSaber Z is notably thinner, giving the racket head a slightly flat top. In contrast, the Z-Speed’s frame looks rounder and more balanced. Back then, the technology comparison for the original Z-Speed on Yonex’s website showed that its sweet spot area was compared to the ArcSaber Z. Based on official measurements, the ArcSaber Z’s sweet spot is more egg-shaped—narrow at the top and wide at the bottom. This is the flavor of old-school rackets, which those big-name players may not appreciate.
I was initially hesitant seeing the 3U, but it felt very balanced once in hand, especially with the bottom cap removed. Doesn’t this weight distribution resemble a slew of 4U attack-oriented rackets? Even the specs are almost identical. Moreover, the shaft isn’t too stiff, and with its 220mm length, it’s hard for it not to flex during normal swings, making it very easy to control. The small frame also helps reduce wind resistance, allowing for smooth power generation during swings.
Interestingly, the overall feel of the ArcSaber Z still retains that characteristic “ArcSaber” hold sensation, rather than having the crisp and bouncy feel of a small frame. This almost led me to label the ArcSaber Z as another “syrupy” racket. The ArcSaber IS I used previously gave a similar impression—it felt easy and intuitive to use. Seeing the red frame, I instantly knew the passcode: 2887.
The ArcSaber Z’s torsion resistance isn’t bad, either. Its precision is still impressive by today’s standards, and it offers excellent shuttle speed. It’s perfect for slowing the pace and hitting more clears, and you can even hit fast and accurate clears that land precisely within the boundaries. This aligns well with the ArcSaber series’ focus on precision control—the accuracy is as sharp as slicing through with a blade.
Now, let’s talk about smashing. The ArcSaber Z provides a great power delivery feel and maintains an elasticity that can still compete today. It’s comfortable to use, and even without using full power techniques, it delivers shots that leave few weaknesses. And when the perfect power opportunity arises, hitting the sweet spot with full force rewards you with an audible cue, as well as a sense of heaviness in your shot. The angles are sharp, the speed is fast, and the shot is threatening. “Shall we summon Genesis?”
Though it has its aggressive side, I find the ArcSaber Z especially comfortable when hitting controlled, mid-court pressure shots or soft pushes. It excels at setting up the second shot for a point. I used to think that softer shafts wouldn’t allow me to hit precise shots, but the ArcSaber Z has turned that belief on its head… Could I be a man who makes the impossible possible?
When in an offensive state, the low tolerance of the small frame isn’t much of a problem, but when it comes to defense or drives, the frequency of mishits and frame contact reminds me of Freya sneaking out of someone’s room late at night and getting Thor beaten up.
The ArcSaber Z doesn’t fare well in doubles either. Whenever I try to link up drives, I find myself hampered by the delay in resetting after the previous shot. Have you ever seen how the Archangel shakes for a few frames after being hit? The shaft is too long and lacks enough stiffness, so its recovery speed after flexing isn’t quick enough. Alas, the soul bound by gravity…
What does the small frame bring to the ArcSaber series? Of course, a stronger slingshot effect. It’s a very fun racket to play with, subtly matching my abilities and aesthetics. Using it was somewhat surprising.
Looks like there will be another SEED sequel next year.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Racket Yonex ArcSaber 10 Reviews
I once misjudged this racket. Without proper knowledge at the time, I used a counterfeit and even thought it performed well, praising it enthusiastically. I confess that my skills were not refined.
During the National Day holiday, thanks to a fellow player’s influence, I reconnected with this racket, feeling as if I had fulfilled a long-standing wish. But overall, it was a process of disillusionment.
It was not only about demystifying this classic old racket, but also about demystifying myself for others.
Specifications: 3UG4, bottom cap removed, shaft length of 210mm, medium stiffness, box-shaped frame, 76-hole string bed, 9–3 o’clock grommets, 24 lbs tension warranty, strung at 22–24 lbs with BG80 strings.
I believe there’s no need to describe the appearance anymore. Who hasn’t seen this racket? The entire frame is painted bright red, with black and white transitions on the wings, and c.s. nano cups at the 3–9 o’clock positions, one of the sources of the ArcSaber series’ hold feeling. Of course, this racket is old, and its paint quality was not great to begin with, so it naturally has quite a few imperfections. After inspecting the grommets, it seems the owner never strung it at high tensions, as there are no signs of collapse after being strung for a long time.
I’ve done my homework on this racket. It’s indeed a very balanced setup—3U but very well-balanced. There’s a certain flexibility when swinging, and the head feels lighter compared to the ArcSaber 11 and 9, while the stiffness is less than the ArcSaber 8. The racket face is large, and the frame is soft, requiring little effort to generate power. When hitting the sweet spot, the feedback is soft, but the power and speed of the shot are good, allowing you to feel the shaft’s elasticity.
Because of this characteristic, I quite enjoy using it with my lifelong mixed doubles partner during matches. When she repeatedly delivers unwise shots to our opponents, I can reduce the feeling of struggle and even manage to extend the rallies by one or two shots.
Honestly, it reminds me of Taufik Hidayat’s backhand showcase. The backhand with the ArcSaber 10 is indeed very comfortable. Even when the opponent hits a clear over my head, I have more ability to return it. Sometimes, it’s perfect for a laid-back game when I don’t need to exert much effort. I fully understand why there was never a 4U version of this racket—the current tuning is already very well-balanced.
In addition to being easy to handle, the racket unexpectedly provided me with a smooth power release during downward strokes, and the power output remained linear within a certain range of my explosiveness. I enjoy the satisfaction it offers when performing heavy smashes.
Of course, with the racket’s light swing weight, I can occasionally execute drop shots, but I always feel that the shots don’t come out as sharp as I’d like.
I also appreciate the agility the ArcSaber 10 brings in doubles. While its shots may not be the crispiest, I can still return one or two fast-paced shots after quickly raising the racket. That’s more than enough for me.
Another advantage I found is that this racket’s soft frame isn’t too picky about the condition of the strings. I’m sure the tension on my current strings has dropped significantly, but it hasn’t affected my performance, making it a solid choice for home use.
This was Yonex’s first high-scoring answer to an all-around racket, truly excelling in all aspects. However, while it can still serve as a relic of the past or be used in casual games when your fitness declines, it’s clearly no longer suitable for serious competitive play today. Many have said that being balanced equates to having no distinct characteristics, and this racket is the originator of that concept.
It’s a great racket, and it’s lasted a long time, but it’s also something that can be demystified. After all these years since my initial misjudgment, I can finally put it to rest today.
September 12, 2024
Badminton Shoes YONEX SHB65ZMen Reviews
Yonex, the venerable brand that has embraced the fresh series like 01, 02, and 03, hasn’t forgotten its loyal fans who still cherish the memories of the iconic 98MX. The 65 series seems to be Yonex’s evergreen offering, with the “65” prefix intact since the introduction of the 65CF in 2009. Only the subsequent letters have changed, along with a design language that remains consistent, reminiscent of the black-and-white simplicity of the 98MX era.
As someone who relishes trying new things, I was surprised to find myself owning quite a few pairs of 65 shoes upon opening the 65Z box. From the earliest 65CF to 65FT, 65, and now 65Z, I’ve only missed out on the 65X and the narrow 65SF. Arranged on the floor, they form a testament to my 65 fandom, perhaps influenced more subconsciously by the 98MX than I realized. The 65Z still embodies the essence of the 65 lineage—smooth white leather, black heels—a timeless aesthetic that’s persisted since 2009.
Visually, the 65Z doesn’t deviate much from the established 65 design. It sports a soft yet durable single-piece synthetic leather upper with additional reinforcement in the toe area for wear resistance. The shoe is generously lined with low-rebound foam, extending to the tongue and ankle for unparalleled foot contouring and comfort. Coupled with Yonex’s signature hexagonal outsole, every element feels familiar yet refined.
Yet, the shoe isn’t stagnant. With evolving functional demands and technological advancements, the 65Z integrates modern touches. Enhanced wireless stitching on the upper and TPU reinforcement to mitigate creasing during flexion ensure a smoother wear experience. The most notable upgrade lies in the midsole, which now houses the next-generation Power Cushion+, highlighted by a vibrant yellow hue and a transparent window revealing its pillow-like structure. This tech-forward showcase, though not uncommon in other sports brands, marks a fresh attempt for Yonex, allowing wearers to proudly demonstrate the advancements to fellow players.
Upon initial wear, the 65Z’s thicker inner lining provides a more pronounced sense of encasement. It’s a comforting pressure that demands proper lace adjustment to fully unlock its 360-degree wraparound hug. This enhanced fit imparts a sense of security, akin to being cocooned, positioning the 65 series to distinguish itself amidst the lightweight offerings of the 02 and Aerus lines.
The 65Z maintains a firm forefoot, delivering a distinct push-off feedback ideal for quick starts. Given my light-footed gameplay on well-maintained courts, I didn’t discern a dramatic improvement from the upgraded Power Cushion+ in the heel, but it performed flawlessly, mirroring the excellence of the 03zm. Notably, stability has seen a marked enhancement compared to older models like the 65FT, offering a blend of stability, swiftness, and flexibility akin to a reinforced 01ltd.
In adverse conditions (dusty or wet courts), the 65Z remains unfazed, testament to Yonex’s steadfast commitment to the hexagonal outsole design. In summary, the 65Z caters to those who prefer a snug, substantial fit, offering a versatile and comprehensive badminton shoe experience. While the initial firmness may take some getting used to, it’s a minor adjustment for a shoe that’s otherwise impeccable. Personally, I lean towards lighter shoes, making the Aerus a more suitable choice for me. However, for those struggling with choice or unsure of their preferences amidst Yonex’s vast array of badminton shoes, the 65Z serves as an excellent starting point, given its impressive lineage and versatility.
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes YONEX SHB 88DEX Reviews
Review of YONEX SHB-88D Badminton Shoes: Effortless Adjustability and Optimal Tension
When it comes to BOA lacing technology, many are already familiar with it. Back in the summer of 2014, the SHB-SC10W introduced this cutting-edge feature, but unfortunately, it was only available in a 4E (wide width) JP version, limiting its market reach. Compared to the POWER CUSHION INFINITY released in 2019, which boasted a dual BOA system, the SC10W remained relatively unknown. However, the 88D not only stands out with its striking design but also offers a significant price advantage over previous BOA-equipped shoes, making this innovative and convenient technology accessible to a wider range of badminton enthusiasts.
Design Overview
The SHB-88DEX (hereinafter referred to as 88D) features a pure white base with a 45-degree angled splice at the heel, incorporating indigo blue inner sponge padding. Coupled with the BOA lace cover wrapping the sides of the shoe, the white-blue color contrast with fiery red accents exudes a futuristic Gundam-like aesthetic.
Removing the traditional lace design, the 88D boasts a more streamlined and fashionable look. Its on-foot appearance is nearly flawless, making it undoubtedly one of the most visually appealing YONEX badminton shoes I’ve worn.
Introduction to BOA Lacing Technology
Working Principle
The BOA Boot Lacing SystemTM comprises three main components: the BOA lace reel, steel boot lace, and extended lace guide channel. Similarly, the BOA Shoe Lacing SystemTM consists of a Steel Shoe LaceTM, BOA lace reel, and elongated lace guide.
On-Foot Experience
The 42-size 88D, with a length of 270mm, weighs 310.2g per shoe. The first thing you notice when slipping on the 88D is its “lightweight and snug fit.” The BOA lacing system not only eliminates the hassle of tying laces but also turns the process into an enjoyable experience. You might find yourself tempted to turn the dial a few extra times, but if you overdo it, simply pulling the dial outwards instantly releases the tension.
For those unfamiliar with the BOA system, YONEX thoughtfully includes a user manual in the shoebox (featuring the original BOA-equipped SC10W JP on the cover).
Designed with Asian foot shapes in mind, the 88D offers a well-proportioned interior space, with a snug but not cramped forefoot area. Compared to the 65Z, which I’ve worn before, the 88D’s interior space allocation is very similar, but thanks to the BOA system, there’s more room for the instep, making it easier for those with high arches to wear comfortably with mid-calf socks. This enhances its versatility compared to the 65Z.
Combined with the BOA lacing system, the 88D’s thoughtful interior space design creates an unparalleled sense of oneness with the shoe.
The seamless, one-piece synthetic leather upper not only looks premium but also maintains the flexibility of traditional leather shoes. The absence of stitching seams eliminates friction on the toes during movement, allowing for smooth and powerful starts and lunges right from the first wear. However, compared to modern fused materials, synthetic leather tends to show more visible creases with frequent use, affecting aesthetics.
The 88D continues to utilize YONEX’s signature Power Cushion technology in the midsole. This effectively absorbs impact during landings, minimizing deformation while providing optimal support for quick starts.
A visible window showcasing the Power Cushion is also present at the heel of the outsole.
Upon closer inspection, it becomes evident that the 88D shares remarkable similarities with the 65Z in terms of midsole technology, outsole material, and even weight. However, subtle adjustments have been made to the forefoot feedback. When starting with the 88D, the forefoot response is more comfortable, sacrificing some of the lightning-fast agility of the 65Z for enhanced cushioning and protection. This makes the 88D a more well-rounded option.
In terms of breathability, the 88D excels with its generously vented toe area, which is superior to the 65Z’s mere perforations.
The slightly extended and angled upper design also significantly improves the shoe’s stability, complemented by the sock-like, highly contoured fit, making it adept at preventing lateral rollovers.
Conclusion
Comfortable, snug, and equipped with cutting-edge BOA lacing technology, the 88D, as a secondary top-tier shoe, offers an affordable price point and a sleek yet stylish design that is bound to ignite a trend among badminton enthusiasts.
Before stepping onto the court in the 88D, crouch down, turn the dial, and let the satisfying “click-click” sounds draw the attention of everyone on the bench. Now, it’s time to showcase your skills and steal the spotlight.
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes YONEX CFZ3 Reviews
After nearly three years, we finally welcome the star of the show – the YONEX COMFORT Z3 (CFZ3) badminton shoes, which were recently launched in July.
Official Tech Highlights: Classic Heritage Meets Innovative Technology
The COMFORT Z3 features an optimized “Asymmetrical Upper” and “Integrated Tongue Design” for a soft and snug fit. By minimizing material overlap and maximizing seamless areas, the upper achieves a supple and enveloping sensation.
Equipped with Power Cushion+: This innovative cushioning technology incorporates high-rebound special resin within the Power Cushion, arranged in a grid pattern with strategically spaced and depth-optimized + grooves. This maintains the shoe’s lightweight nature while enhancing shock absorption and rebound properties.
Moreover, the midsole boasts YONEX’s lightest-ever midsole material, “Feather Light X Ultra-Light Midsole Cushioning Material X,” for the upper layer. The lower layer utilizes “Feather Bounce Foam,” a new material that combines lightweight cushioning with high propulsion, offering both featherweight comfort and exceptional rebound. Additionally, the midfoot incorporates the “3D Power Graphite Drive,” featuring an outward-protruding 3D shape that inhibits twisting, enhances stability, and boosts propulsion.
The 3D shape on the lateral side of the shoe improves rigidity against outward torsion, further enhancing stability. The redesigned graphite shape and fiber layering angles achieve a harmonious blend of flexibility and rebound, amplifying propulsion.
Radial Paddle Outsole: The CFZ3’s sole employs a novel “Radial Paddle Outsole” design that promotes pattern deformation, significantly improving grip in vertical, lateral, and oblique directions.
Design Aesthetics: Cool Black Meets Vibrant Fluorescent Green
The CFZ3 carries on the design language of the CFZ2, retaining the “Asymmetrical Upper,” “Integrated Tongue Design,” and signature wavy stripes on the sides. The “POWER CUSHION” logo, previously placed on the heel, has been relocated to the sides for a more prominent and eye-catching look.
The CFZ3 showcased in this unboxing is in black, but unlike the classic retro vibe of the CFZ2’s black-red combo released in winter, this black iteration is accentuated with fluorescent green and subtle orange touches. This masterful color scheme by the designers perfectly balances the boldness of green with the sobriety of black, creating a visually striking, cool, and energetic appearance. Could this be the charm of a summer release?
For those seeking a more versatile look, a stylish and easy-to-pair white variant is also available.
On a summer evening, nothing beats a game of badminton, sweat dripping, and the anticipation of meeting these shoes on the court.
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes YONEX ELSZ3 Reviews
A fusion of the ultra-light breathability and the comfortable wrap-around experience of the 65 series, coupled with the comprehensive performance of the CFZ series, the ELSZ3 boasts an integrated outsole that extends laterally into the shoe body, emphasizing unparalleled stability and rigidity! Who else can claim the same?
Today, I’m excited to introduce to you the most formidable performance shoe of the year from Yonex – the Elsz3!
First, let’s dive into the specs. The Elsz3, in size 42 (270mm length), weighs a mere 351g per shoe. It’s equipped with the Power Cushion+ shock-absorbing technology, a Power Graphite connection plate in the midsole bridge, and a one-piece connected midsole and outsole. The lateral side features rigid TPU reinforcement to prevent lateral rolls, similar to its predecessor, the Elsz.
—Wear Experience
Upon slipping on the Elsz3, the arch support seamlessly extends to the outer edge of the forefoot, delivering a noticeable stiffness initially. I, as a flat-footed individual, found this rigidity slightly jarring at first, but it’s understandable given the design.
When it comes to comfort, Yonex never disappoints. The shoe’s last offers impeccable wrap-around and snug fit, which is expected of a flagship model. Any deviation from this would be unacceptable.
Ventilation-wise, even in scorching heat, the large-area integrated sandwich breathable fabric, along with the ventilation grilles in the midsole bridge, keeps the Elsz3 remarkably cool. The reinforced lateral shell, while enhancing durability and protection, also contributes to the shoe’s breathability and stretchability.
—Performance on the Court
The Elsz3 is no slouch in terms of speed, rivaling the 65 series. Although its cushioning differs from the soft and bouncy foam materials, the Power Cushion+ is more than adequate for lightweight players like me. Combined with the exceptional lateral stability provided by the outsole and lateral shell, the shoe instills a reassuring sense of stability underfoot. In a word, it’s “stable.” Heavy-weight players I’ve consulted also attest to the shoe’s high shock-absorbing capacity, ensuring a stable and responsive rebound regardless of body weight.
Worth mentioning is the shoe’s impressive breathability. The cross-shaped paddle-like tread pattern significantly enhances the outsole’s wear resistance but should be avoided in wet conditions as it compromises grip.
—Drawbacks
If I had to nitpick, the Elsz3’s aesthetics might deter some aesthetes like myself from an instant purchase, despite its outstanding performance. However, once on the court, the experience speaks for itself.
In terms of grip, the cross-shaped paddle outsole is more susceptible to sweat and water stains compared to traditional honeycomb patterns. Through multiple tests, I found it performs better on wooden floors than traditional sports flooring, indicating a slight venue preference.
Lastly, the standard insole doesn’t quite match the premium feel of a flagship shoe. Upgrading to a top-tier insole from a different brand could significantly enhance the experience.
—Conclusion
Incorporating the best of Yonex’s various series, the ELSZ3 stands as a highly commendable successor to the CFZ3 and a must-have for anyone seeking a versatile and high-performing shoe. Unlike the 65 series, its higher shock-absorbing capacity also caters to heavy-weight players.
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes YONEX AERUS Z Reviews
Embodying the quintessential spirit of Japanese otaku culture, YONEX seems to harbor a special affinity for the letter “Z,” which, in my interpretation, stands as the intersection of termination and initiation, where “zero” merges with the symbolic conclusion represented by “Z.”
The Lightest Badminton Shoes in History
Renowned for pushing the boundaries of lightweight badminton shoes, YONEX has once again outdone itself with the AERUS Z. Officially touted as the lightest badminton shoe ever crafted by YONEX, the men’s version weighs a mere 250 grams (for size 260mm), a feat that perfectly aligns with the essence of “Z.” The 42-size (270mm) pair I tested weighed 269.9g, validating the manufacturer’s claims and confirming its status as the lightest badminton shoe I’ve ever laid hands on. Even without wearing them, the sheer lightness is palpable, akin to wearing nothing at all.
Aesthetic Appeal: Gradient Hues and Seamless Design
The AERUS Z sports a gradient design that gracefully transitions from a deep ocean blue at the heel to a refreshing mint green across the shoe’s body. The seamless, integrated shoe construction merges seamlessly with the mint-colored midsole and outsole, elevating the overall premium feel. The abundance of breathable holes, intricately integrated with the shoe’s fibrous texture, adds a touch of ingenuity to the design. The AERUS Z exudes a sleek, slender silhouette from every angle, embodying the essence of lightweight design.
Seamless Comfort and Enhanced Durability
The seamless upper is crafted from a durable yet lightweight material, complemented by an extensive use of perforation for superior breathability. The two materials are fused using vacuum pressing, ensuring minimal deformation while preserving the material’s inherent flexibility. This design not only eliminates friction points between the toes and the shoe, significantly enhancing comfort but also promotes durability.
Superior Wrap and Unparalleled Comfort
Despite its featherweight nature, the AERUS Z maintains ample cushioning in the heel, upholding YONEX’s high standards for wrap and comfort. With a width of 2.5 and a noticeable improvement in fit over the A3 model, the AERUS Z provides a snug, yet spacious fit, ideal for various foot shapes. Both visually and physically, the AERUS Z exudes a heightened sense of sophistication compared to its predecessors.
Agility and Responsiveness: The Ultimate in Quick Starts
Its feather-light weight and seamless flexibility allow the AERUS Z to excel in high-speed movements like quick stops and lunges. When pushing off the toes, the transmission of power from the legs to the forefoot is instantaneous and palpable, making it a dream for players seeking agility and responsiveness. Unlike the direct, hard, and fast feel of the 65Z, the AERUS Z offers a more fluid, ribbon-like glide across the foot, akin to being wrapped in invisible wings.
Power Boost and Enhanced Rebound
Equipped with the upgraded POWER CUSHION+ in the heel, the AERUS Z surpasses expectations in shock absorption and rebound. The visible POWER CUSHION windows evoke a sense of resilience, while the actual experience is nothing short of astonishing – swift starts coupled with a smooth, comfortable impact recovery. For lightweight players prioritizing quick starts, the AERUS Z is an unparalleled choice.
Protection and Stability: Where Lightweight Meets Durability
While comfort, speed, and breathability are the AERUS Z’s core design pillars, protection and stability are equally crucial for a professional badminton shoe. The 3D Dynamic Carbon Sheet (3D DCS) integrated into the shoe’s lateral sides, reminiscent of the pioneering F1 model from 2013, ensures stability without compromising on weight. The elimination of rigid TPU in the midfoot is a strategic move that minimizes weight without significantly affecting torsional rigidity, a testament to YONEX’s engineering prowess.
The extended forefoot design enhances the shoe’s resistance to lateral rollover, while the improved wrap further solidifies its stability. The AERUS Z addresses the durability concerns of previous ultra-lightweight models by reinforcing the forefoot’s inner side with heat-fused abrasion-resistant material. The solid rubber outsole retains the durability standards set by previous YONEX ultra-lightweight series.
Aesthetically Pleasing and Performance-Oriented
Available in vibrant mint blue and bright yellow for men and mint blue and soft pink for women, the AERUS Z breaks the mold of conventional, staid-looking badminton shoes, appealing to consumers seeking both style and substance. Its outstanding on-court performance backs up its striking aesthetics, making it a worthy successor to the esteemed “Z” lineage.
In conclusion, the AERUS Z, with its modern design, premium aesthetics, and unparalleled lightweight experience, truly embodies the essence of the “Z” designation, offering a significant upgrade over the SHBA3 in terms of weight reduction, lateral stability, and wrap comfort.
September 9, 2024
Badminton Shoes YONEX INFINITY 2 Reviews
Experience the ultimate combination of a snug, secure fit and effortless on-off convenience with the innovative BOA lacing technology that revolutionizes shoe-wearing, making one-handed shoe-donning a reality!
When it comes to BOA lacing technology, many are already familiar with its pioneering application in the SHB-SC10W back in the summer of 2014. However, its limited availability in the 4E (W-width) JP version hindered widespread adoption. Compared to the double-BOA-equipped POWER CUSHION INFINITY that debuted in 2019, it remained relatively obscure. Fast forward to the more affordable 88D, which introduced the convenience of this lacing technology to a wider audience. Now, three years later, the POWER CUSHION INFINITY 2 re-emerges with a more streamlined and modern aesthetic, surpassing its predecessor in every way.
Key Features of the BOA Lacing System:
1. Pressure-Point Elimination: Thanks to its elongated lace guides and precise closure, the BOA system distributes force evenly, eliminating pressure points common with traditional laces. The satisfying “click” sound as you turn the dial is a bonus stress reliever.
2. Instant Adjustability: Wearers can fine-tune the tightness to their perfect fit instantly, a capability unattainable with conventional laces. The 88D model, for instance, offers millimeter-level precision.
3. Ease of Operation: Simply press, twist, pull, and you’re done. Rotate the dial to tighten, pull it up to loosen. The entire process takes no longer than three seconds.
4. Origins in High-Performance Gear: Originating in cycling shoes and snowboard boots, the BOA system prioritizes safety and convenience, infusing tech into everyday use.
Aesthetic Appeal:
The POWER CUSHION INFINITY 2 boasts a sleek, futuristic design in either a striking metallic dark red or a deep, mysterious matte black, exuding a strong technological vibe and underscoring its premium positioning.
On-Foot Experience:
Weighing just 303.4g per shoe in size 42 (270mm), the first thing you’ll notice about the POWER CUSHION INFINITY 2 is its sheer comfort. The BOA system not only simplifies shoe-tying but also turns it into a stress-relieving, enjoyable experience. The crisp sound of the dial’s rotation is sure to draw envious glances from your peers on the sidelines.
The shoe’s sleek silhouette challenges the stereotype of bulky, unwieldy badminton shoes. Despite being a first-time wearer, bending the shoe feels smooth, though the seamless, fused upper inevitably reveals creases upon flexing.
With a 2.5 width last, the forefoot accommodates comfortably while maintaining a snug fit. The integrated tongue enhances compatibility, fitting both high and low insteps seamlessly.
Lightning-Fast Start:
As a top-tier all-rounder, the POWER CUSHION INFINITY 2 rivals even speed-focused models like the SHB-65Z3 in terms of launch responsiveness. The direct feedback from the forefoot sole and crisp, instant acceleration are truly impressive.
The signature hexagonal honeycomb outsole ensures excellent grip and durability, while the large, contoured 3D carbon fiber plate enhances midfoot stability, surpassing that of the 65Z3.
Powered by YONEX’s signature Power Cushion+ technology, the midsole cushions impact upon landing while maintaining a rigid structure for optimal push-off support. However, the relatively firm forefoot may not be ideal for heavier players.
Areas for Improvement:
While the seamless fused upper enhances comfort, it compromises durability. Applying protective tape can help prevent abrasion from dragging. Additionally, the creasing that occurs with frequent bending is inevitable.
Despite its lightning-fast start, the POWER CUSHION INFINITY 2’s landing cushioning may disappoint heavier players, making it less than ideal for this demographic within its premium segment. Those seeking more cushioning may find the CFZ3 a better match.
In Conclusion:
The POWER CUSHION INFINITY 2 offers a comfortable fit, secure lockdown, and breathtaking speed, complemented by excellent breathability and lightweight construction. While it may not be the ultimate choice for heavier players, it shines as a top-tier option for those who prioritize speed and agility.
September 9, 2024