[Review and Experience] YONEX NR Dynamic Action

This is a racquet that was used along with the last installment of bowlite, and the good and the bad tend to come from comparisons. One thing’s for sure, although I got this used for its value, I’ve always been impressed with the NR series, even the NRSP which I couldn’t get right, so it was interesting to see how the lower-end models, other than the NRD1, fared.
And the summary after the trial is also in line with my judgment, the NR series is quite good.

Parameters: 4UG5, bottomed, total weight in used condition 91.99g, balance point 293mm, center bar length 213mm, medium-low stiffness, boxed racket frame, 76-hole string bed, 9-3 point string groove, 24lb warranty, threaded 24lbs training string.
Pink in color, 80 points bottom, I’d say. Examining its details, the head of the racket to points 4 and 8 is covered in a conspicuous bright red color, with a section of black and gold transitioning before picking up the pink primed tee and center bar, and then transitioning to the black cone cover. The look is sweet even without any stickers, and immediately reminds me of ripe strawberries, or strawberry-flavored snacks such as Rakuten Beardies and strawberry-flavored Planet Cups.

Also highly recognizable is the special shape of the cone cap, which has a deep fish mouth and a ring around the edge that may be used for shock absorption or to strengthen the bond, reminding me of the NS6600, which was once a bow. nanoscience now.

Not to mention, this gain will be more obvious than the nanoscience, under the premise of the racket line is not so pull crotch, the DA’s strike feedback is obviously much clearer than the lite, the middle of the pole can produce a sense of drive in the high long ball, and the racket face is also large enough sweet spot, back to some of the long line of the ball out of the hand more feeling and more confident.

This frame can not be said to break the wind, but the original ZSP can not be said to be much wind, let’s just use it, as a 4U specification of the entry racket, its swing speed or coherent sense of power is not so outstanding, many times in the center of the forecourt initiated by the draw file can form a hold but can not take advantage of the often still have to be a soft block in the middle to break the game. However, the racquet is also more obedient, in the passive getaway performance is also quite good, short power feel is better to find, and there is no bad temperament, will let me have a sense of use.

And its kill performance is also in the middle of the class, backcourt heavy power hitting feeling is not much but there is, the rebound performance of the center stick is improved than the lite, so the feel of the downward pressure when the hands can provide more confidence. While neither is a great offensive performer, it’s nice to be able to hit consistency and blitz. The racquet also has a little bit of torsional strength, and the pointing in the downswing is still relatively clear, so the occasional diagonal shot can be as effective as you’d expect.

It would be a bit of a sham to write too much about a low-end racquet, and the current length is quite appropriate. I was a bit surprised to learn that the DA is available in some supermarkets, as is the lite, which makes it a bit more of a high end product.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

      Leave a reply

      Badminton Pro Guide: News, Players, Gear, and Expert Reviews
      Logo
      Register New Account
      Compare items
      • Total (0)
      Compare
      0
      Shopping cart