Jayce
I was thinking of recommending the AURASPEED 50 racquet on the 11th of February, but I was only able to get in touch with it (through a private message from a friend) and I was mainly impressed by the amazing price.
Double eleven activities 400 out of the head, and even when there is a discount 400 within the price can be fixed really make me a little skeptical, for fear that is gf goods. In line with the attitude of responsible experience to share it or their first experience and then give you ball friends to do a share.
Parameters
Appearance and paint those do not whole false, 400 racket, recognizable there, after playing on the court really someone asked me small yellow this is again took what magic weapon? Hey, hey, hey, hey!
Directly to see the parameters, 4ug5 specifications under the ARS-50 empty racket balance point of 295mm, empty racket 81g swing weight of 85 or so, swing speed light and flexible.
AURASPEED 50 has a familiar feeling when you initially get your hands on it, mainly due to the fact that its grip is too close to that of the 70f, which is also in the AURASPEED series. The slim Kenshiguchi frame and the hardness of the middle shaft and frame, and the technological markings, well, it’s almost too similar.
Although AURASPEED 50 is very comfortable to hit for the first time, mainly because AURASPEED 50’s elastic soft center stick rebound feedback is relatively soft, and the balance point is relatively moderate but unexpectedly good borrowing power, but don’t say that sometimes we talk about AURASPEED’s high-end racket is always to engage in some technological superposition of buffs, and this AURASPEED 50 doesn’t have the outburst of BAYLOR Carbon and Wes Whiplash gained in the center stick really doesn’t have that flavor, and there is always a sense that although it is elastic enough, it lacks that crispness compared to the newest also fast-bouncing racket such as the Supersonic. There will always be a although enough to play, but compared to the victory of the high-end racket such as the latest is also a fast pop-up racket supersonic, it lacks that crisp and clear, always feel that the center stick deformation, although not big, but the speed is slower, and coherent out of the ball’s pointing is not as accurate as the victory of the high-end racket.
However, AURASPEED 50 also has its own unique advantage – light and fast, tough and elastic, a few high-intensity confrontation with the men’s doubles process, using AURASPEED 50 can be said to be a seamless transition. AURASPEED 50’s overall characteristics of light and fast in the middle of the forecourt in the blocking of the beat fast, in the defense of the articulation of the response more relaxed, especially in the backhand to catch the kill rebound slash quite obvious feeling.
AURASPEED 50’s attacking ability is also limited when you want to hit some well-prepared heavy kills and jump kills, which is slightly inferior to JS122’s top touch racket, but it is still more than enough to match BS12 in all aspects.
I know what you’re concerned about. Benchmarking the other two major brands, right?
Here on the standard of the most popular CALIBAR 500
1. the most concerned about the cost-effective, must be into the middle-end racket players are also rushed to the cost-effective to go, otherwise used to look at the flea or directly on the high end of the CALIBAR500 current market price should be discounted at least in the 550 or so, AURASPEED 600 price is more expensive, and here AURASPEED 50 good to find a good look at the 400 within the next take no problem at all.
2. comprehensive performance, performance on the general characteristics of AURASPEED 50 in the speed than CALIBAR500 faster than the stability of the ball due to the structure of the frame are wind-breaking, I feel quite, are not part of the ability to hit the point or manipulation of the precise type of racket, hard to compare the high and low, if AURASPEED will be slightly stable so a little bit of a drop, so usually AURASPEED 500 playing singles is not a problem! In fact.
3. the appearance of the paint, the appearance is actually as most of the main factors in the choice of racket, otherwise there will not be so many players will like Li-Ning’s Storm WS72. I have to admit that the red factory paint is really good, but also worth the price, the AURASPEED 50 and CALIBAR500 with the frame of the same frame of a comparison will also immediately AURASPEED 50 than down, after all, the price is also there.
4. The degree of heat, compared to the fire of the widely praised CALIBAR500 AURASPEED 50 can be said to be unheard of, not I saw someone private letter recommended to me, I really can not think of AURASPEED series there is a 50 such a model. But relative to us consumers may still be a good thing, fewer fakes and will not have too much of a premium component, after all, now the three major manufacturers of high-end rackets have been rolled to an incredible degree, I believe that soon will also reach out to the mid-range series.
Summarize
Personally, I think AURASPEED 50 is a speedy doubles racquet with good overall performance, but I don’t recommend it for singles, it’s not accurate enough and too bouncy. The main competitive advantage is the price. To be honest, I felt that this racquet is the same as the AURASPEED 70f at the end of the game. Thinking about it, it’s possible that the original 70f as AURASPEED’s first women’s racket on the market, the market feedback is actually not hot, the feel of the high-end racket pricing in the middle of the road is not much of a feature, mainly the color is not bright enough, but also a little bit of a curiosity to play to change into AURASPEED 50 paint may be on fire, if it is really the case that I think, the middle of the pricing plus AURASPEED 70f high-end hit feeling, that is not really fragrant?
Some people may ask if there is another speedy racket, the Bright Sword 12, for the same price, but I can tell you that the BS12 is the best. I can tell you that AURASPEED 50 can crush BS12 in all aspects, and I recommend VBS-66N or VBS-63 for stringing.
